london blue wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Just curious - for the pro/anti hampson as a forward crowds...
if hampson were played forward in 2012...
- what would people consider to be a pass mark?
- what would it take for people consider it to be a successful move?
The blues making it to and winning a prelim
Synbad wrote:
so far he has PROVEN nothing except he has POTENTIAL.
throwing him around in alien positions is hardly going to help him.
he is best suited to a mobile leaping ruckman and not a forward.
i think its better to allow him to learn his craft on what he is suited to and not what we want him to be.
isnt a case of working with what we have and backing it? our fwd structure and success could come from a number of sources
Yes, and funnily enough the best of them ended up Thornton after Waite went down. Did everything I wanted from a support KP forward and everything a KP forward should do. If not, the next step is to try Casboult, who showed so much in the VFL finals the way he smashed packs and took contested marks. showed st least he was well and truly ready to be at least tried. At least they're KP players. Bugger this ruckman as KP forward stuff.
If you do try one Kruezer is a way better option than Hammer ever would be as he at least has some idea given he played there quite a bit in the u18s. Then you'd play him at CHF where he can use his mobility alot more rather than be stifled in the goalsquare. But we did try that a couple of years ago and gave it away after a couple of practiced matches. We worked out he was a much better ruckman and one average forward at the time. If he couldn't do it then Hammer has no hope. Maybe a couple more years experience might help so that might be worth a try again but not often ruckman make KP forwards given they're alot different roles. And we know he is alot be in the ruck. We have other options than to waste our best big man there.