Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 4:25 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
99prelim wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
what would ratts know?

they are ruckmen only according to all the experts here


Agreed grro... Apparently, our keyboard boffins think they've seen enough of Hampson in the forward line to categorically put a line through him as a forward. Some people need to watch Ratt's first 50 games. thank god Parko had faith in him cause they were pretty uninspiring. I'm not saying that Hammer to FF will work but I am saying that its worth giving it a go for a year at least

huge fan of hammer and his mark and kicking.
his leading and running into the right spaces
definitely think he has forward written all over him

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:05 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Synbad wrote:
99prelim wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
what would ratts know?

they are ruckmen only according to all the experts here


Agreed grro... Apparently, our keyboard boffins think they've seen enough of Hampson in the forward line to categorically put a line through him as a forward. Some people need to watch Ratt's first 50 games. thank god Parko had faith in him cause they were pretty uninspiring. I'm not saying that Hammer to FF will work but I am saying that its worth giving it a go for a year at least

huge fan of hammer and his mark and kicking.
his leading and running into the right spaces
definitely think he has forward written all over him



Synbad, if your apocalyptic and doomsday observations over the last few years had a strike rate mildly in the positive, I'd rate your hilarious attempt at sarcasm. As it stands, I'm still comfortable with the experiment of Hammer to FF

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
so far he has PROVEN nothing except he has POTENTIAL.

throwing him around in alien positions is hardly going to help him.
he is best suited to a mobile leaping ruckman and not a forward.
i think its better to allow him to learn his craft on what he is suited to and not what we want him to be.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 8:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Synbad wrote:
so far he has PROVEN nothing except he has POTENTIAL.

throwing him around in alien positions is hardly going to help him.
he is best suited to a mobile leaping ruckman and not a forward.
i think its better to allow him to learn his craft on what he is suited to and not what we want him to be.
this


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:50 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Just curious - for the pro/anti hampson as a forward crowds...

if hampson were played forward in 2012...
- what would people consider to be a pass mark?
- what would it take for people consider it to be a successful move?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:11 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3256
4thchicken wrote:
Just curious - for the pro/anti hampson as a forward crowds...

if hampson were played forward in 2012...
- what would people consider to be a pass mark?
- what would it take for people consider it to be a successful move?


The blues making it to and winning a prelim
Synbad wrote:
so far he has PROVEN nothing except he has POTENTIAL.

throwing him around in alien positions is hardly going to help him.
he is best suited to a mobile leaping ruckman and not a forward.
i think its better to allow him to learn his craft on what he is suited to and not what we want him to be.


isnt a case of working with what we have and backing it? our fwd structure and success could come from a number of sources


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:11 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3256
4thchicken wrote:
Just curious - for the pro/anti hampson as a forward crowds...

if hampson were played forward in 2012...
- what would people consider to be a pass mark?
- what would it take for people consider it to be a successful move?


The blues making it to and winning a prelim
Synbad wrote:
so far he has PROVEN nothing except he has POTENTIAL.

throwing him around in alien positions is hardly going to help him.
he is best suited to a mobile leaping ruckman and not a forward.
i think its better to allow him to learn his craft on what he is suited to and not what we want him to be.


isnt a case of working with what we have and backing it? our fwd structure and success could come from a number of sources


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 9:25 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
4thchicken wrote:
Just curious - for the pro/anti hampson as a forward crowds...

if hampson were played forward in 2012...
- what would people consider to be a pass mark?
- what would it take for people consider it to be a successful move?


A pass mark would Hampson becoming an important component of a successful forward line that regularly kicks winning scores.

I like him as a ruckman but dont mind him as a forward. I dont mind the gamble on potential. Hope he can string games together.

Rare that he doesnt get his hands on the ball in a marking contest. Whether he marks or not we can still use that ability as a weapon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 12:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
How many ruckman have been turned into successful forwards?

P Salmon started more as a forward and became a ruckman, ditto Ottens.


I can't think of too many going the other way.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
If we have better options, no.
If your willing to try something new, yes.
We will see the positives/negatives by mid rounds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:28 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
london blue wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Just curious - for the pro/anti hampson as a forward crowds...

if hampson were played forward in 2012...
- what would people consider to be a pass mark?
- what would it take for people consider it to be a successful move?


The blues making it to and winning a prelim
Synbad wrote:
so far he has PROVEN nothing except he has POTENTIAL.

throwing him around in alien positions is hardly going to help him.
he is best suited to a mobile leaping ruckman and not a forward.
i think its better to allow him to learn his craft on what he is suited to and not what we want him to be.


isnt a case of working with what we have and backing it? our fwd structure and success could come from a number of sources


Yes, and funnily enough the best of them ended up Thornton after Waite went down. Did everything I wanted from a support KP forward and everything a KP forward should do. If not, the next step is to try Casboult, who showed so much in the VFL finals the way he smashed packs and took contested marks. showed st least he was well and truly ready to be at least tried. At least they're KP players. Bugger this ruckman as KP forward stuff.

If you do try one Kruezer is a way better option than Hammer ever would be as he at least has some idea given he played there quite a bit in the u18s. Then you'd play him at CHF where he can use his mobility alot more rather than be stifled in the goalsquare. But we did try that a couple of years ago and gave it away after a couple of practiced matches. We worked out he was a much better ruckman and one average forward at the time. If he couldn't do it then Hammer has no hope. Maybe a couple more years experience might help so that might be worth a try again but not often ruckman make KP forwards given they're alot different roles. And we know he is alot be in the ruck. We have other options than to waste our best big man there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:39 pm
Posts: 1703
Location: Darwin
Synbad wrote:
so far he has PROVEN nothing except he has POTENTIAL.

throwing him around in alien positions is hardly going to help him.
I think its better to allow him to learn his craft on what he is suited to and not what we want him to be.

Yep just like we did for Setanta :razz:

PS Synbad - the minor edit of your post is not to change the meaning but to highlight the parts that I am commenting on.

_________________
“Before you criticise someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticise them, you're a mile a way and you have their shoes."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:00 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
NTBlue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
so far he has PROVEN nothing except he has POTENTIAL.

throwing him around in alien positions is hardly going to help him.
I think its better to allow him to learn his craft on what he is suited to and not what we want him to be.

Yep just like we did for Setanta :razz:

PS Synbad - the minor edit of your post is not to change the meaning but to highlight the parts that I am commenting on.


Setanta's best spot was in the KP. He pinch-hit in the ruck. Same as it would be in reverse with a ruckman pinch-hitting forward. Both results are a the same, fill a hole but not much else. At least the forward can ruck around the ground in the ruck with freedom and take a few marks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:54 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
Wasnt Hampson a soccer player so who is to say he is either a ruckman or a forward

I thought he was picked as an athelete so therefore we can turn him into anything

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:36 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Hampson Goals : 2011 = 3 Career = 14.

(Just for those still arguing that he's shown great promise a forward).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
He has played mostly as a ruckmen in his 44 games

He has had 35 shots on goal
14 17 and 4 oof

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:38 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3256
Sydney Blue wrote:
Wasnt Hampson a soccer player so who is to say he is either a ruckman or a forward

I thought he was picked as an athelete so therefore we can turn him into anything


+! :thumbsup:

Interesting to see the guys who went on the qatar leg of the trip.....it was all about development and preparing those young and 'fringe' players for the next step


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:42 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:24 am
Posts: 336
Here is my theory.

You need a chamption team not a team of champions. Everyone has a job to do.

Every player should be selected on the basis that on their best day they are in the top 3 in the competition in that position.

On every line you need 2 out of 3 players to be doing better than average, the 3rd player needs to be average. No one can be below par.

So its really simple to select a team

Forward is 2 smalls, 2 mediums, 2 talls
Back is 2 smalls, 2 mediums, 2 talls,
Rucks, 1 genuine ruckman, 1 ruckman able to rest forward
Everyone else is a Utility, some can push forward and others back.

This is the same formula used by every team.

You need at least one elite tall at each end, and one elite ruckman and a one elite midfielder.

You make your own luck and injuries will play a part.

So our team selects itself really.

Laidler Jamison Yarran (Yaz is elite, Jamo is very strong)

Duigan Henderson Scotland (No one elite)

Simpson Gibbs Lucas (Gibbs is elite)

Robinson Waite Garlett (Waite can be elite)

Kruezer Walker Betts (Kruezer is elite)

Warnock, Judd, Murphy (Judd & Murphy elite)

Russell, Bower, Thornton, Carazzo

Emg:
Ellard, Armfield, Joseph


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2011 5:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
Why all the negative about the forward line structure, l heard its better than it ha
s been in last 10years.

Hammer flags


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2011 5:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
4thchicken wrote:
Just curious - for the pro/anti hampson as a forward crowds...

if hampson were played forward in 2012...
- what would people consider to be a pass mark?
- what would it take for people consider it to be a successful move?


2.5-3 goal avg. Would work out to be a 40-50goals.

If your playing a FF position all season thats what we need.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Heavs, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mannequin, Sideshow Mark and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group