Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 6:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 128 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18628
Location: threeohfivethree
Synbad wrote:
First tall I'd be looking at moving on is Waite


Oy!

That's my barrow you're pushing!

It's the Whitnall scenario all over again. Better to get something decent while we can than end up stuck with a player who can't make it onto the park.

We totally lucked out with Fev in getting Henderson and Lucas and Fev was a pariah.

I'd happily swap Waite for another Henderson alone. An additional 200 game key position player? Yes please.

And for those who don't think Waite would command that sort of a return then what makes him so worth keeping?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1354
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
I would try Watson as a forward......

His long kicking from his left side could be a real asset......


This could work provided he gets himself up on his fitness. His left peg is a weapon ... suitable for long distance shooting and placing short balls inside 50 (a real weakness for us).

He isn't the answer though for our most glaring weakness up forward and that is someone that can stand under the ball and mark close to goals. in finals football you are always going to have the long bomb and this is where we fall short. The Eagles on the other hand have this type of forward in abundance. They have players with size BUT also a presence.

How many Carlton players have a presence. Go back to our last premiership team and you will see whay I mean by having players with a presence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10573
dadadadada - I'm going to stalk you and keep agreeing with you, if you keep saying that. :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:09 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:24 am
Posts: 336
Lets look at the options.

How many spots are available now?

Laidler Jamison Yarran

Duigan Henderson Scotland

Simpson Gibbs XXXX

Robinson Waite Garlett

Walker xxxx Betts

Warnock, Judd, Murphy

Kruezer, Carazzo, X, X

So there you have it, there aren't too many postions available.

We need an up and coming full forward capable of pressing, therefore sorry Fev, alternative is a CHF and Waite moves to FF.

Lucas could develop into being a wingman he has an elite kick, needs to get harder and fitter. While we wait for him, Armfield has the spot.

Russell needs to force Scotland from the team and get his spot back. Scotland had a great season, but is over 30.

Bench needs another big bodied midfielder. Kruezer is capable of Rucking and pushing forward, but isnt a KPP, so get over it.

So who is off

Houlihan
Austin
Kerr
Levi - just doesnt work hard enough, so he has wasted 3 years of our time.

Maybe look to trade, Setanta, Thornton and McLean while we can, GC or GWS need ready made players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:20 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24634
Location: Kaloyasena
Need to get rid of the ball butcherer in that lot as well. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:07 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Bloody hell is there any chance of us giving Watson a least one full preseason before we run the line through him? Unbelievable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:15 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
dadadadada wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
I would try Watson as a forward......

His long kicking from his left side could be a real asset......


This could work provided he gets himself up on his fitness. His left peg is a weapon ... suitable for long distance shooting and placing short balls inside 50 (a real weakness for us).

He isn't the answer though for our most glaring weakness up forward and that is someone that can stand under the ball and mark close to goals. in finals football you are always going to have the long bomb and this is where we fall short. The Eagles on the other hand have this type of forward in abundance. They have players with size BUT also a presence.

How many Carlton players have a presence. Go back to our last premiership team and you will see whay I mean by having players with a presence.

Quentin Lynch has about as much presence as Leigh Brown, Koschitzke and Hawkins. Just a big dumb footballer who can mark and kick it a mile. These four have less presence than Paul Chapman. Hurley and Brown have IT. Kreuzer has presence.

Why wouldn't we throw Henderson forward?

Henderson's courage, clean marking and reading of the play has been impressive. The brave mark Henderson took against St Kilda could easily have been Lachie streaming forward and marking going back with the flight. Great mark where he didn't take his eyes off the ball to beat Riewoldt at his own game.

I don't see why Watson won't improve his intensity once he gets fitter and stronger. And starts to believe he's an AFL player. Mackenzie and Schofield weren't great against Henderson last year, yet have improved out of sight this year. The former towelled up Cloke last week.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
ThePsychologist wrote:
We have Watson, McCarthy, Mitchell, Casboult who are just kids. They need time.

The issue we have is we are ready now!

I am confident in a fit Jamo and Henderson to hold down FB and CHB.

Warnock and Kruezer are our Ruckman for the next 5 plus years.

Thornton is very handy but we need that power forward.

Names for consideration are McKernan, Dawes, Tippett, M.Brown or J.White but there isnt a lot of quality around either.


Don't forget Bower.
A lot of people seem to lost the love for this guy, but I reckon if he gets his body right he's in Jamo's league.
That happens I'm sure Hendo wouldn't mind going back to forward line and the pieces all fall into place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
grrofunger wrote:
i fear we picked watson on one quality alone - his kick out of defence


I'd add decision making - I've seen him do this well under pressure.
I wouldn't worry about the physical stuff - a couple of pre-seasons will sort that out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:21 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10573
BigKev wrote:
Don't forget Bower.
A lot of people seem to lost the love for this guy, but I reckon if he gets his body right he's in Jamo's league.
That happens I'm sure Hendo wouldn't mind going back to forward line and the pieces all fall into place.


:clap: :donk: :thumbsup: .....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Get serious -here -an asssassination of a young kid who has played 3 games -2 against the best side in the competition - did you ever see Michael Sexton in the first few years of his career - was very ordinary -became a AA CHB -give the kid a go Watson needs time and support not denigration

Right wing left wing -no affiliation putting the boots into a young guy is a disgrace and is why some of us take a sabbatical from this site in the pre-season -


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:57 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
Synbad wrote:
Blue Beatle wrote:
keogh wrote:
You cant win flags unless you have big marking forwards and backs

Lets hope that Mitchell and Watson develop quickly



forget them - on what i have seen (admitedley only on ABC games), levi is the man - hits the contest hard - one grab marks, something that watson lacks. no urgency in his game from what i've seen of him.

watson will struggle to play seventy games.
can't contested mark ,can't run can't bend down and hates body contact.
I'd rather mark Austin. watto just does not have the physical attributes to play the modern game.
give me Jack daring or issac smith anyday.

and th at has nothing to do with improvement. watson can't change his body to become afl athletic.


A recruiter from another Melbourne based club made it clear that there wasn't much love from other clubs for Watson pre-draft because Watson had no idea/interest in defending and lacked the necessary mobility. The recruiter also founded it amusing that it was very obvious that Carlton were going to recruit Watson with their first rounder anyway (primarily because he was big and could kick)!!

Let's hope he develops otherwise that will be two consecutive first rounders we would have wasted!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:05 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
grrofunger wrote:
i just havent seen any other outstanding qualities

Reads the incoming ball well; reasonably quick in a straight line. Has shown a propensity to develop his 1-on-1 work and fitness.

He's not some uncoachable lump; he's a developing player.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:11 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
You don't just 'move on' good players who are also sons of Carlton players.

Waite deserves to play out his days at Carlton. He has had a bit of bad luck with injuries and sometimes thinks he is his father and gets suspended but that didn't happen this year. He is one of the few players on the list who can dominate a game with his pace and marking.

If we were to 'move him on', we would not be furthering the cause of the club to get #17 in any way. The likelihood of getting a better player than he is for the assault on 2012-3 is minimal.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Sombrero wrote:
You don't just 'move on' good players who are also sons of Carlton players.

Waite deserves to play out his days at Carlton. He has had a bit of bad luck with injuries and sometimes thinks he is his father and gets suspended but that didn't happen this year. He is one of the few players on the list who can dominate a game with his pace and marking.

If we were to 'move him on', we would not be furthering the cause of the club to get #17 in any way. The likelihood of getting a better player than he is for the assault on 2012-3 is minimal.


waite is a footballer like everyone else.
if we got what we need for him you have to look at it like we did kennedy who is twice the player and much younger.
waite has given us very little and is now coming to an end of his career.
why would we not put ourselves in a better position by trading him?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:22 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
jimmae wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
i just havent seen any other outstanding qualities

Reads the incoming ball well; reasonably quick in a straight line. Has shown a propensity to develop his 1-on-1 work and fitness.

He's not some uncoachable lump; he's a developing player.

everyone is a developing player Hartlett was as was Benjamin livingstone and plemming too and everyone else who has appeared on our list.
its about making it.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:08 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
Will the club be bold enough to shop Waite around?

Much to the dismay of many here, the old Carlton regrettfully lacked the balls to cash in on Lance when we had the chance.

It may take some lateral thinking for the Blues to instantly improve on the areas we need to next year - and dangling Vin's boy out there could provide that. The interesting word Ratts used post-match was "consistency" in relation to our talls etc.

Consistency is not a word to be associated with Waite.

As much as I have enjoyed watching Hendo bloom down back it will be very interesting when/if he gets a run up foward. You would like to think he has learned a hell of a lot playing on the game's best forwards this year - and he will take his new-found confidence with him.

Get Bower right and there's another tall defender. But are his injury battles the "consistency" Ratts lamented? Still, I'd love to see him fit AND THE MC BACK HIM IN. He's still young and would be a virtual recruit next year.

Ditto Austin. Show some confidence in the kid, instead of throwing him in the deep end when there is no-one else and then casting him off back to the Bullants.

And just play Tuohy ... don't care where - just play the kid. Lucas too.

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:40 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Please lay off Watson. Did all he was expected to do year 1. What are judging him on 2 games against collingwood? Maybe if he has half of the opportunities Davies or Simon White have had, you would be thinking differently. Be realistic he will take 2 to 3 more years to click.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:45 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Kenny, the thought of shopping Waite around is an awkward one for obvious reasons. But family-ties and loyalty aside, I can't see anything of value being offered for him.

And just a general observation, once again I find myself reading the terms "get his body right", "get more games into him" and "a big preseason" a lot. This seems to be a yearly tradition for us, particularly with our talls. We always seem to assume that the following year will magically make all the angst and inconsistency go away that have dogged us for years, and we'll suddenly have an army of 190cm+ bulletproof supermen to call upon for long periods of the year. This never happens, and we can't expect it to happen again in 2012. We'll have injuries, we'll have inconsistency, we'll have times where our team will be unbalanced. It's how the MC deal with these problems when they occur that will determine how much further we can go in 2012.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:49 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Agreed that Waite has promised sooo much over the years and has given glimpses of what he is capable of, but is going on 28-29 now and is yet to reach that potential. Will he ever put together a full consistant season ? Will he ever stay injury free ?

Think its time we plan for life after Waite and Setanta.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 128 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group