moshe25 wrote:
AFAIC, Hamil did what Barassi, Diesel, Wells, Spalding, and a few others before him, and Juddy, Ablett, and a few others after him did. He split for the cash.
The players and administrators all got over it. Good ordinary player who most of us would've said bled for the club (in fact most would've ironically said he bled for the jumper). Played with the Spirit of Carlton when he was here.
Shame on us that we became a rabble and allowed shit like that to happen in the early part of this century!!!! It should be happening the other way round (a la Judd).
PS, if we're up in arms about a shot-to-pieces, rough'n'tumble short-ass CHF who couldn't kick, imagine how WCE fans feel every time Juddy has another "3 votes - Cee-Judd" game for us!!!!
This is a good post because it reflects the reality (although I have a higher opinion of Hamill as a player I suspect). He was offered more money and had a run-in with Big Jack over it. Possibly the two things combined were enough whereas one or the other may not have been. Most of the supporters of the day loved Big Jack because the cap cheating hadn't been discovered yet.
Hamill was a great player for us next to Whitnall and would have been a great player at StK next to a Reiwoldt in full flight. In the team we have now with it's forward defensive mindset, he would have been an outright star paying the Walker role of medium forward. IMO he was just a bit short for CHF but he could certainly take a contested mark and split packs better than anyone we have up front today.
Lets not forget, Jezza walked away from the club and went to StK over a difference of opinion with the board. Nobody gets into him over it. He just backed the wrong person and had to leave or swallow his pride. Of course not many people like the taste of humble pie so he took the easier option.
Things happen in footy. Players come and go. In another time Hamill may well have stayed. If he says he's a Carlton man, that's good enough for me.