Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 2:18 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 290 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
Posts: 2385
aboynamedsue wrote:
One thing I've noticed in the last few years under Ratten is that VFL form only means so much. If the MC want to get a player into the Carlton side, they will do so almost no matter what their VFL form is like. Likewise, certain players star on a weekly basis for the Bullants but don't get picked for the Blues.

If the MC want to get a Bower, Curnow, Hammer, Hoops, JR, Lucas, McLean, Setanta or White into the side for Round 24, as long as that player gets through Saturday's VFL game without injury, and their attitude (including how they follow their line coach's instructions in the VFL and how they are at training during the week) is OK, they will be selected.

It's obviously a different story if the player is unfit and/or exceptionally low on confidence, but the MC - rightly or wrongly - seem to place less value on VFL form than the structural needs of the team (long-term or short-term) and the attributes of a player to perform a specific role against a particular opposition side.

So what I'm saying is that even though we have a Bullants game between now and Round 24, I wouldn't place too much weight on who is and who isn't named in the best players after that game. I'd say the MC already have a very good idea about who they will pick. They clearly don't get carried away with VFL form...

It was interesting to hear Robinson on 360 last night state that he "knew as fact that some Carlton 'people' were upset McLean was not in the team against the Hawks" Interesting to know who these 'people' were and what the ramifications for McLean after this week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:21 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:30 am
Posts: 475
Location: Glenelg
I saw that too. It seems as though we have some disagreements at MC level.....

Unless Robbo is FOS.

_________________
"He was found guilty in June 2008 of assault with intent to cause bodily harm, an offence which carries a maximum penalty of 20 years jail."
And people are making his return to footy somewhat of a fairytale?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:22 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
Posts: 2385
Adelaide Blue wrote:
I saw that too. It seems as though we have some disagreements at MC level.....

Unless Robbo is FOS.


Though it was Robinson who stated it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:22 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:30 am
Posts: 475
Location: Glenelg
it was. I changed my post as soon as i wrote it.

LOL :donk:

_________________
"He was found guilty in June 2008 of assault with intent to cause bodily harm, an offence which carries a maximum penalty of 20 years jail."
And people are making his return to footy somewhat of a fairytale?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
I reserve the right to change my prediction, but at this stage (ie. 10 days before the game and with a VFL match still to be played)...

Duigan Jamo Laidler
Yarran Hendo JR
Simmo Judd Scotland
Carrazzo T-Bird Robbo
Garlett Setanta Tex

Kreuzer Gibbs Murphy

Inter: AJ, Curnow, Hammer
Sub: Betts

In - Curnow, Hammer, JR, Setanta
Out - Armfield, Davies, Ellard, Warnock

4 changes is more than what's ideal. The players being dropped are unlucky but it might serve to keep them 'hungry' and I think we need to get another AFL game into Curnow, Hammer, JR & Setanta - they may be required for the finals.

Hammer to go forward and share the 2nd ruck duties with Setanta (I suspect the MC will seek to protect Hammer from centre bounces, due to his knee). Kreuzer as first ruck, rotating through the forward line and bench with both Setanta and Hammer.

Betts as sub. Hopefully this will fire him up before the finals and it might also sting Garlett into action.

Do we persist with Hendo in defence, or do we move him forward? If moved forward, does that mean T-Bird goes to the backline? Or does Davies hold his place instead of T-Bird (meaning at least one of Laidler, Duigan, JR or Davies would have to play taller)? This might give us more run and flexibility (I'm conscious of the fact that my team is a bit tall). Or does Gibbs go back and either Armfield or Ellard are picked ahead of T-Bird or Setanta? FWIW, my feeling is that Hendo will stay in defence for the remainder of the year (but that's not to say he will stay there in 2012 and beyond).

I thought seriously about bringing in Bower (and moving Hendo forward), but he's left his run too late this year I suspect. I also considered playing White at CHF instead of T-Bird. White played CHF for the Bullants last week and seems to have his supporters amongst the MC, but ultimately I thought 5 was too many changes and I'm not convinced he's an improvement on T-Bird.

Unfortunately, I don't think Waite will make it back this season. However, depending how he trains next week, the MC may take a punt and play him against the Saints (probably at the expense of T-Bird which means Setanta would have to play higher, or they might simply pick Waite ahead of Setanta).

Personally, I wouldn't be bringing in the likes of Lucas, Kerr, ROK, Tuohy or Watson. Hopefully they have a good VFL finals series which leads into a solid pre-season, but I can't see how they could come into the Carlton side now and make us a better finals team this year.

And Austin, Brock, Hoops & Twomey are decent back-ups if we get a sudden glut of injuries, but otherwise they shouldn't be considered IMO.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18026
I must admit that the McLean situation perplexes me.
He is probably the fittest and healthiest he's been for years yet he cant get a game. That's no problems but if McLean at his fittest isn't good enough to get a game, why would we give pick 9 for him?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:38 am
Posts: 1313
Location: brunton room
Blue Vain wrote:
I must admit that the McLean situation perplexes me.
He is probably the fittest and healthiest he's been for years yet he cant get a game. That's no problems but if McLean at his fittest isn't good enough to get a game, why would we give pick 9 for him?



It is perplexing isn't it! Why weren't the coaching staff confident in Robinson becoming the player he is now. I think they must have lacked the belief that they could turn Robinson from a HFF into a hard as nails midfielder in the time frame that it has actually happened.

I thought when he made his way back into the side that he would be given a extended run to the finals. 11 games in two years for a player you were prepared to give up a first rounder 22 months ago is a disgrace.

_________________
You heard it here first!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:21 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
Hotcox wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
I must admit that the McLean situation perplexes me.
He is probably the fittest and healthiest he's been for years yet he cant get a game. That's no problems but if McLean at his fittest isn't good enough to get a game, why would we give pick 9 for him?



It is perplexing isn't it! Why weren't the coaching staff confident in Robinson becoming the player he is now. I think they must have lacked the belief that they could turn Robinson from a HFF into a hard as nails midfielder in the time frame that it has actually happened.

I thought when he made his way back into the side that he would be given a extended run to the finals. 11 games in two years for a player you were prepared to give up a first rounder 22 months ago is a disgrace.


He needed to be given an extended run at some point, which he just hasn't had. In fact, he's never played more than three consecutive games for Carlton. He was extremely unlucky to be dropped for the Freo game, even if we can probably guess as to the reason why he would have been left out of that one (i.e., concerns about his lack of pace on the big Subiaco Oval). He'd probably argue that he hasn't had a great run at it and he's probably got a point.

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18654
Location: threeohfivethree
Hotcox wrote:
It is perplexing isn't it! Why weren't the coaching staff confident in Robinson becoming the player he is now.


It's because he's an utter nutjob.

Why would you bank on anything when it comes to Robbo?

Love the guy but he's certainly not sharpest tool in the shed.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:39 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 11:00 am
Posts: 449
Blues2005 wrote:
Hotcox wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
I must admit that the McLean situation perplexes me.
He is probably the fittest and healthiest he's been for years yet he cant get a game. That's no problems but if McLean at his fittest isn't good enough to get a game, why would we give pick 9 for him?



It is perplexing isn't it! Why weren't the coaching staff confident in Robinson becoming the player he is now. I think they must have lacked the belief that they could turn Robinson from a HFF into a hard as nails midfielder in the time frame that it has actually happened.

I thought when he made his way back into the side that he would be given a extended run to the finals. 11 games in two years for a player you were prepared to give up a first rounder 22 months ago is a disgrace.


He needed to be given an extended run at some point, which he just hasn't had. In fact, he's never played more than three consecutive games for Carlton. He was extremely unlucky to be dropped for the Freo game, even if we can probably guess as to the reason why he would have been left out of that one (i.e., concerns about his lack of pace on the big Subiaco Oval). He'd probably argue that he hasn't had a great run at it and he's probably got a point.


So where does that leave McLean then? We look like idiots getting him and for what we gave up for him .. really bad decision. Will he stay on next season?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:34 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Bad decision to get Brock. The idea was right but the player was wrong and the trade now looks foolish. No point crying over it. We also had chances in that draft to get Barlow or JPod so focussing on the Brock deal is probably wrong. The only way to shut folk up is to win a flag in the next couple of years.
Noone talks about what collingwood gave up for Cameron Wood and how bad a trade that was. Even Geelong get overlooked for giving up Laidler in favour of getting another year out of Milburn.

Get a Flag Blues !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:32 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Perth
aboynamedsue wrote:
I reserve the right to change my prediction, but at this stage (ie. 10 days before the game and with a VFL match still to be played)...

Duigan Jamo Laidler
Yarran Hendo JR
Simmo Judd Scotland
Carrazzo T-Bird Robbo
Garlett Setanta Tex

Kreuzer Gibbs Murphy

Inter: AJ, Curnow, Hammer
Sub: Betts

In - Curnow, Hammer, JR, Setanta
Out - Armfield, Davies, Ellard, Warnock

4 changes is more than what's ideal. The players being dropped are unlucky but it might serve to keep them 'hungry' and I think we need to get another AFL game into Curnow, Hammer, JR & Setanta - they may be required for the finals.

Hammer to go forward and share the 2nd ruck duties with Setanta (I suspect the MC will seek to protect Hammer from centre bounces, due to his knee). Kreuzer as first ruck, rotating through the forward line and bench with both Setanta and Hammer.

Betts as sub. Hopefully this will fire him up before the finals and it might also sting Garlett into action.

Do we persist with Hendo in defence, or do we move him forward? If moved forward, does that mean T-Bird goes to the backline? Or does Davies hold his place instead of T-Bird (meaning at least one of Laidler, Duigan, JR or Davies would have to play taller)? This might give us more run and flexibility (I'm conscious of the fact that my team is a bit tall). Or does Gibbs go back and either Armfield or Ellard are picked ahead of T-Bird or Setanta? FWIW, my feeling is that Hendo will stay in defence for the remainder of the year (but that's not to say he will stay there in 2012 and beyond).

I thought seriously about bringing in Bower (and moving Hendo forward), but he's left his run too late this year I suspect. I also considered playing White at CHF instead of T-Bird. White played CHF for the Bullants last week and seems to have his supporters amongst the MC, but ultimately I thought 5 was too many changes and I'm not convinced he's an improvement on T-Bird.

Unfortunately, I don't think Waite will make it back this season. However, depending how he trains next week, the MC may take a punt and play him against the Saints (probably at the expense of T-Bird which means Setanta would have to play higher, or they might simply pick Waite ahead of Setanta).

Personally, I wouldn't be bringing in the likes of Lucas, Kerr, ROK, Tuohy or Watson. Hopefully they have a good VFL finals series which leads into a solid pre-season, but I can't see how they could come into the Carlton side now and make us a better finals team this year.

And Austin, Brock, Hoops & Twomey are decent back-ups if we get a sudden glut of injuries, but otherwise they shouldn't be considered IMO.


If Hampson is picked it wont be as second ruck. He'll need to be up and going and able to take any centre bounce as required. Otherwise we might as well stick with Warnock. I do agree that even the contest Hammer will provide up forward would be good for Betts and Jeffy. I would personally give him a go against the Saint. At worst Warnock will come in extra fresh for the first final.

No way will Thornton be dropped. I think Ratts loves his flexibilty this year. He would also add expirience in a final.

I think Waite will be given a crack whenever he is fit. If it's first week of the finals he'll still come straight in. He is one of our most important.

Sorry but I just don't rate Setanta's ability to produce anything in a final. I know he will try his guts out but that's not enough, you need to have an influence on the game if you're going to be a forward. If he get a go against the Saint he will need to put in a pretty good one.

_________________
I support the Navy Blues whatever happens!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18026
club29 wrote:
Bad decision to get Brock. The idea was right but the player was wrong and the trade now looks foolish. No point crying over it. We also had chances in that draft to get Barlow or JPod so focussing on the Brock deal is probably wrong. The only way to shut folk up is to win a flag in the next couple of years.
Noone talks about what collingwood gave up for Cameron Wood and how bad a trade that was. Even Geelong get overlooked for giving up Laidler in favour of getting another year out of Milburn.

Get a Flag Blues !


I dont think anyones advocating we cry about it. The idea is to assess your past efforts and learn from them.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:10 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
true.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:51 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10582
club29 wrote:
The only way to shut folk up is to win a flag in the next couple of years.
Get a Flag Blues !


Way to manipulate a quote to get what I want to say across .... :grin: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 1057
Location: melbourne
in; LUCAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
finally after 6 weeks in the best, it's time


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:57 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10582
Do we rest some sore players and maybe have a look at some others?
Do we now do a Fremantle and setup for Essendon* and right this game off?
Interesting selections coming for this week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 11:01 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
SurreyBlue wrote:
Do we rest some sore players and maybe have a look at some others?
Do we now do a Fremantle and setup for Essendon* and right this game off?
Interesting selections coming for this week.

Yes and yes...

Winning this game is irrelevant for us and the Aints will hit us hard in order to secure a home final.

It's all about the Bummers now.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:26 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
The boys have had a rest. Hit the Saints with everything, flower 'em. Full dress rehearsal.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:06 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4941
blueboy23 wrote:
in; LUCAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
finally after 6 weeks in the best, it's time


I agree.
Also time to bring JR back in the side.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 290 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group