Hotcox wrote:
london blue wrote:
why would kruezer's game be a con?....what, we are in week 4 of his comeback?...positive was that he got another game under his belt.
any suggestion of his game being a negative is demonstration of short sighted thinking.
Take you Carlton glasses off and actually have a look at what he produced yesterday. I do realise he is only 4 games back from a knee reco and he will probably not recapture his best form until next year. In saying that in a team that won by 100 points he was in Carlton's worst 3 or 4 players for the day.
When a team wins by 103 points its hard to point out 22 stars.
What Kreuzer did can only be comprehended with the comparioson of his opponent.....
His opponent did NOTHING. Surely that counts for SOMETHING.
I think what LB is saying is (and axcuse me if I'm wrong LB) that we should be grateful that he's back, getting plenty of games under his belt before the finals. IMO he's carried us over the line against the Swans, and had a dip. I will also have a punt and suggest that any team would want him in their side come finals and they would be getting as many games into him now. I don't suggest here that Hottie is suggesting its not a good thing, but then again he isn't looking at the positives Kreuzers game brings to the table.
I'll ask: Hotcox, can you see the postives from Kreuzer's game yesterday? Do you see the games he gets uinder his belt in round 12, 13, 14 etc etc being a benefit to our finals campaign or is the MC wasting their time playing Kreuzer in the 2nd half of the 2011 season?