WA Blue wrote:
If TC was listened to by anyone important we'd have Voss coaching, Rich not Yarran (anyone want to swap now?), Fev would be on our list and not playing, Duigan would have been banished last week, Waite dropped and White wouldn't have got a game.
While that's true, you've got to factor in we're not privy to a lot of info inside the club.
The coach and the MC know when a player has responded to criticism or a rocket during the week, ala Duigan. Or when one player has demonstrated a superior working knowledge in taking on a key player, ala White. Or who's fit and who's not, who had niggles, how they're managing it.
We're dealing with incomplete information, and we're making calls. The Duigan call was right: Ratten gave him a bake. We just didn't hear what Nick had to say for himself. White was dropped for poor defensive play, and the MC opted to give his experience playing on Hurley a go to re-ignite his form, over sticking with the attacking advantages of Watson.
I'd hope the footy club has more insight, but I'll continue to make calls from week to week, as will many. We're interested in it, and as a group we're not that far off when we break things down and think critically.
And for the record, I'd reckon it was about 50/50 Yarran/Rich at draft time, and most wanted Fev gone after the Brownlow efforts. Not many people had much clue on the coaching situation, but thought Voss was a worthwhile candidate to interview. Calls in hindsight are irrelevant; people are just riding the wave at that point.
This is exactly my point. People have very strong opinions on what should happen without having all the facts.
Yes I know people are entitled to have one and all that...