Stamos wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
If Hendo is selected as a sub, and we have no injuries, then he can replace Watson if need be or vice versa.
Sub needs to be a mid, or at very least a running flanker.
Playing a KPP as a sub (or even worse a ruck, like Sydney did) is a recipe for disaster. You need to cover your tall positions in your starting 21.
I expected this response from you...because you are consistent on this point.
I know where you are coming from Stamos, but your premise is just a theory, as it is for everyone in the footy community.
As Roosy said on Monday night's OTC we have to wait and see till round 4-5 before we know how the Sub works.
Hey, you may just be correct too Stamos; I don't dismiss that, but this is not a danger game (like the game against the Tiggers wasn't suppose to be)...only problem we had in the 3rd when our structure was a problem.
Going into the game last week without Jamison, Bower, Henderson, Kreuzer (I think) we went in with one less tall than what we would have liked, and with one tall (Waite) going off early nearly cost us the game; we were left short (boom boom).
There was no flexibility with the personnel we selected to fix up the structure (once we lost Waite) with blokes like TBird and White a little short for the KPD role. You have to remember that last week we were scratching for talls to select in the 22, with Setanta also injured and Austin underdone...and McCarthy and Mitchell couldn't be considered either. So it shouldn't come as a shock that we need to replace one of the midfielders (and I suggest Lucas) for a tall.
As long as we have 3 midfielders on the bench for the game, I think it doesn't change anything from last year, except we have to rotate rucks on the forwardline.
For this game, against the kids of the GC, I don't think they are going to stretch us after half time, so I reckon that Watson or Hendo can be a sub and swap them, because ideally we would want to play Jamo, Bower and Hendo against the Pies in a fortnight and the run will do Hendo and us more good than bad imo.