Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 7:09 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 11:35 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
I think there is a bit of confusion about what our goal is. According to the website and Jammo ( http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/newsar ... fault.aspx )

Quote:
CARLTON will accept nothing less than a home final in 2011 after first-week exits in each of its last two campaigns.


We can finish 8th, get a home final and lose it by 20 goals and meet that aim. It's pretty simple to have one easily understood and explained aim. 2008 it was to have a % over 100 which was a reasonable aim from where we were. 2009 was to play finals, 2010 was to win a final - ie to make the second week of the finals. Surely if we are intent on improving, our aim this year has to be top 4, if we are really progressing.

Its the mixed messages that are confusing and destabilising. Swan says significant improvement, Ratts and Jammo are setting golas the same as 2010, Kerna says, during the season, we are trading a ruckman, Ratts says not.

The roles of Kerna and Swan, regardless of their footy history, is primarily in admin, resourcing and staffing the footy dept, not speaking for it or being part of it. So Ratts at least needs a year run where he is delivering the footy messages, and those messages need to be consistent and ambitious. If we don't improve on this year, then we get someone other than Kerna and Swan to set up a process for selecting a new coach sometime in September. And when Kerna and Swan say Vossy is the man, someone needs to tell them to shut up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 11:47 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
how do you get a home final finishing 8th?

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 46
grrofunger wrote:
how do you get a home final finishing 8th?

easy,the top 8 are all vic clubs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
gee we could finish last then there's this plane crash/earthquake/alien invasionthing and only eight teams remain - we get to play finals and lose by 7,658 goals but still we got the home final.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 46
dannyboy wrote:
gee we could finish last then there's this plane crash/earthquake/alien invasionthing and only eight teams remain - we get to play finals and lose by 7,658 goals but still we got the home final.

wtf are you on mate?what was that supposed mean?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
:lol:

Yeah Danny, wtf are you on .....mate?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:23 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
gerry atric wrote:
I think there is a bit of confusion about what our goal is. According to the website and Jammo ( http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/newsar ... fault.aspx )

Quote:
CARLTON will accept nothing less than a home final in 2011 after first-week exits in each of its last two campaigns.


We can finish 8th, get a home final and lose it by 20 goals and meet that aim. It's pretty simple to have one easily understood and explained aim. 2008 it was to have a % over 100 which was a reasonable aim from where we were. 2009 was to play finals, 2010 was to win a final - ie to make the second week of the finals. Surely if we are intent on improving, our aim this year has to be top 4, if we are really progressing.

Its the mixed messages that are confusing and destabilising. Swan says significant improvement, Ratts and Jammo are setting golas the same as 2010, Kerna says, during the season, we are trading a ruckman, Ratts says not.

The roles of Kerna and Swan, regardless of their footy history, is primarily in admin, resourcing and staffing the footy dept, not speaking for it or being part of it. So Ratts at least needs a year run where he is delivering the footy messages, and those messages need to be consistent and ambitious. If we don't improve on this year, then we get someone other than Kerna and Swan to set up a process for selecting a new coach sometime in September. And when Kerna and Swan say Vossy is the man, someone needs to tell them to shut up.


As I wrote in your thread gerry it is your interpretation that assumes just winning a final is our only aim. I'll post my reply to you in that thread again. I think they are all expecting significant improvement.



You originally stated... "How low are we aiming? I thought after Ratts claimed this as his aim at the end of the season he would have been told to get serious and aim to actually be better than last season, like win a final, finish top 4, win more games than we lose, win 14 games. For heaven's sake raise the bar! This is such a nothing aim."






And I replied

''I'm not so sure Gerry. I don't think you have read the article the right way.


I don't think the implication was that we expected to limp into the finals and hope we play a vic team to get a home final. Michael states, "but a home final has to be our goal this year, if not top four." Considering he is linking that aim to just below a top four spot then I think he is talking about a guaranteed home final based on ladder position, either fifth or sixth. That should cover your win more games than you lose query and move towards the 14 wins goal.


The fact that Michael also states that (well according to the author anyway) that the final losses, ''have left a bitter taste in the players' mouths" and that he '' believes there is plenty to suggest the Blues can go deeper into September'' would indicate to me that they fully expect to win a final. Which knocks off another of your requests.

Possibly a valid critcism is the aim of top four, although he does say, ''if not top four"

I really do think the article was actually about us expecting to do better than last season, rather than some sort of stagnation.

One of us is wrong anyway Or both partly right''


Last edited by Belisarius on Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
molly23 wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
how do you get a home final finishing 8th?

easy,the top 8 are all vic clubs


thats not really a home final per se'

its a final in vic but not a true home final

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35893
Location: Half back flank
Just GIVE us a home final

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:37 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
I see your point Belisarius, but why isn't the club's simple message that we are aiming at top 4. Then there is no problem with interpretation and no mixed messages, and it indicates we are aiming clearly to improve.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 2:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16958
Location: Melbourne
gerry atric wrote:
I see your point Belisarius, but why isn't the club's simple message that we are aiming at top 4. Then there is no problem with interpretation and no mixed messages, and it indicates we are aiming clearly to improve.


Probably because we could end up 5th on percentage and some of you lot would be saying 'Sack Ratten because we didn't finish top 4'.

I doubt there is any problem with interpretation within the Clubs inner sanctum. The suggested mixed messages have no real bearing on what you or I or anyone else thinks does it. Personally we have our own expectations on the team so other peoples opinions are just that.

Does anyone really think at the end of the year Jamo says 'Oh I thought we just had to finish 6th so I only tried hard enough to reach that goal' and Gibbo says 'I thought we were aiming for top 4 so I tried abit harder'.

It's all semantics as I said earlier.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 2:30 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
gerry atric wrote:
I see your point Belisarius, but why isn't the club's simple message that we are aiming at top 4. Then there is no problem with interpretation and no mixed messages, and it indicates we are aiming clearly to improve.



Could be because some of the kids were jumped on for suggesting we could go all the way when we were doing so well early last season. It is a no win situation. If players etc come out with lofty goals they are accused of getting ahead of themselves by some, if they hose down expectation they are accused of lacking ambition by some. Different people have different views as to how we should go about things and unfortunately you can't please everyone. As Cazz has just written I suspect that they are pretty clear within the inner sanctum as to what they expect. We'll just have to see how the season pans out :smile:


Last edited by Belisarius on Sun Nov 28, 2010 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 2:31 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3258
played a round of golf today with an ex Blues champion - he suggests expectations amongst the ex players is high (I like the bloke, no bullshit, hard as nails and helped us win 4 flags)

words to the effect = no excuses.......everyone, coach included, needs to stand up!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25230
Location: Bondi Beach
london blue wrote:
played a round of golf today with an ex Blues champion - he suggests expectations amongst the ex players is high (I like the bloke, no bullshit, hard as nails and helped us win 4 flags)

words to the effect = no excuses.......everyone, coach included, needs to stand up!


Thanks for that LB.

Our expectations are high too. I have no doubt that Ratts knows all eyes are on him and he will not be spared if he fails to earn a home final and win one. It's a tough gig considering other teams with equally high aspirations are catching to us. Ratts hopes they don't pass us in 2011. I don't think they will moreso because of our new recruits Richardson and Brown.

4 Flags: Jezza. McKay. Doull. MacLure....there's a few more and the last one mentioned should be on our Board of Directors.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:54 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
molly23 wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
gee we could finish last then there's this plane crash/earthquake/alien invasionthing and only eight teams remain - we get to play finals and lose by 7,658 goals but still we got the home final.

wtf are you on mate?what was that supposed mean?



see! see!

I set a goal and already I'm being slammed!

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:38 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Cazzesman wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
I see your point Belisarius, but why isn't the club's simple message that we are aiming at top 4. Then there is no problem with interpretation and no mixed messages, and it indicates we are aiming clearly to improve.


Probably because we could end up 5th on percentage and some of you lot would be saying 'Sack Ratten because we didn't finish top 4'.


Regards Cazzesman


The season just past the clubs goal was to win a final and we failed to do so. I am pretty sure that a majority of supporters are comfortable to see Ratts see out the final year of his contract. I did not see or hear much "sack Ratten" after the season was over because we failed to win a final.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:15 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
molly23 wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
gee we could finish last then there's this plane crash/earthquake/alien invasionthing and only eight teams remain - we get to play finals and lose by 7,658 goals but still we got the home final.

wtf are you on mate?what was that supposed mean?


yer........ wtf, mate! In fact: maaaaaaate

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:23 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
bondiblue wrote:
london blue wrote:
played a round of golf today with an ex Blues champion - he suggests expectations amongst the ex players is high (I like the bloke, no bullshit, hard as nails and helped us win 4 flags)

words to the effect = no excuses.......everyone, coach included, needs to stand up!


Thanks for that LB.

Our expectations are high too. I have no doubt that Ratts knows all eyes are on him and he will not be spared if he fails to earn a home final and win one. It's a tough gig considering other teams with equally high aspirations are catching to us. Ratts hopes they don't pass us in 2011. I don't think they will moreso because of our new recruits Richardson and Brown.

4 Flags: Jezza. McKay. Doull. MacLure....there's a few more and the last one mentioned should be on our Board of Directors.


Jezza, McKay, Doull, Johnston, Jones. Maclure only 3.

I can't see Perc or Dominator getting around 18 holes. I wouldn't imagine Doull going out to play. So it's gotta be Jezza or Swanny. I think Jezza would've been written about a little differently, so I'm going with Swan McKay!

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:02 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
keogh wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
keogh wrote:
I have taught kids in a low socio economic area for 20 years
The quality of the teacher makes very little difference to student achievement in this area.

Couldnt give a !@#$%& what research they say.

It comes down to motivation within the individual

You can make a difference but it is marginal

Ratten has the advantage of delisting players if they dont peform.


I'm sorry but that has not been my experience and I don't believe it's supported by research.

The teacher can make all the difference.






The evidence based on VCE results is that the poorest peformed schools are from low socio economic areas such as Corio in Geelong
Highest unemployment rates
highest incidence of domestic violence
Highest crime rate
Highest use of Centerlink benefits
Poorest attendance of parents in school based activities

Your argument suggests that the teachers in these schools are shit therefore the students results are poor
Many teachers in these schools are just as good if not better than those at Scotch College.


Its not about the absolute VCE score thats the issue. good teachers get the best out of their kids, regardless of where they sit along the learning continuum. same with coaches. look at the 02 and 03 coll.gf sides. more spuds than talent

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 46
moshe25 wrote:
molly23 wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
gee we could finish last then there's this plane crash/earthquake/alien invasionthing and only eight teams remain - we get to play finals and lose by 7,658 goals but still we got the home final.

wtf are you on mate?what was that supposed mean?


yer........ wtf, mate! In fact: maaaaaaate

are you guys still at school or just computer geeks, because i doubt you would show the same sarcasm if you were face to face.what do they call guys like you ?keyboard heroes?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group