Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:07 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:04 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:25 pm
Posts: 925
Watched on tv.
IMO it was Sauce who set up the win and is my BOG. Thornton grew in confidence and influence the longer the game went but we really were on top. He played like he did end 2009 - but this is a different level. If White was healthy I reckon he wuld be way ahead of Thornton, although he can still play a role as the 3rd tall floating if he learns to attack up the guts (like Jamo is trying to teach himself). We've got quite a few very good VFL players on our senior list!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:47 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
kingkerna wrote:
I can't think of a worse backman then Bower, simply horrible.


Don't be so hard on yourself. It's not horrible. Sometimes your brain just doesn't work as well as you want it to.

Just the other day, I couldn't think of a word that was on the tip of my tongue. But once I relaxed, it came to me. (btw, that word was "hyperbole", if you're interested).

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:50 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
:lol:

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:15 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:24 pm
Posts: 194
Location: South of the Yarra
Rexy wrote:
No.

Counter-productive to go back to Thornton as his static and sideways style of play isn't conducive to the fast rebounding football that the AFL has become. We need to persist with players who push forward and are proactive and we must keep getting games and experience into Davies Russell Jamison Bower etc and keep building for next year where we can hopefully add O'Keefe Tuohy and Lucas into the defensive mix.

Thornton is a good and effective player at the VFL level and will help the bullants push for a flag.


If Thornton isn't conducive to today's football then how the hell is Jamo more suited? Thornton actually uses the ball well and attacks the footy. He is prepared to come off his man and take marks and create a link off half back. Jamo gets very few possessions and is ineffective with them anyway.

In relation to Davies, I think he shows some positive signs however in the heat of battle last night he was taken off the ground and we had to send Henderson to defence in that last quarter. Not sure how this will work next week with Goodes, White and a resting ruckman pushing forward to expose the lack of a 3rd tall defender.

_________________
Life is made up of 3 things: Pre-Season, Post Season & Footy Season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:11 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
Can Eater wrote:
If Thornton isn't conducive to today's football then how the hell is Jamo more suited? Thornton actually uses the ball well and attacks the footy. He is prepared to come off his man and take marks and create a link off half back. Jamo gets very few possessions and is ineffective with them anyway.


Exactly, people keep pointing to Thornton's weaknesses but the facts are, Jamo and Bower are weaker in the same areas ATM!!

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:16 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Can Eater wrote:
Rexy wrote:
No.

Counter-productive to go back to Thornton as his static and sideways style of play isn't conducive to the fast rebounding football that the AFL has become. We need to persist with players who push forward and are proactive and we must keep getting games and experience into Davies Russell Jamison Bower etc and keep building for next year where we can hopefully add O'Keefe Tuohy and Lucas into the defensive mix.

Thornton is a good and effective player at the VFL level and will help the bullants push for a flag.


In relation to Davies, I think he shows some positive signs however in the heat of battle last night he was taken off the ground and we had to send Henderson to defence in that last quarter. Not sure how this will work next week with Goodes, White and a resting ruckman pushing forward to expose the lack of a 3rd tall defender.


I think White will be the resting ruck man based on last nights game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:21 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:02 am
Posts: 885
Location: Where do you think i am??
After watching T-Birds game against the filth's 2nd's i believe he deserves a recall.

_________________
When you're a Jet you're a Jet all the way!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Can Eater wrote:
Rexy wrote:
No.

Counter-productive to go back to Thornton as his static and sideways style of play isn't conducive to the fast rebounding football that the AFL has become. We need to persist with players who push forward and are proactive and we must keep getting games and experience into Davies Russell Jamison Bower etc and keep building for next year where we can hopefully add O'Keefe Tuohy and Lucas into the defensive mix.

Thornton is a good and effective player at the VFL level and will help the bullants push for a flag.


If Thornton isn't conducive to today's football then how the hell is Jamo more suited? Thornton actually uses the ball well and attacks the footy. He is prepared to come off his man and take marks and create a link off half back. Jamo gets very few possessions and is ineffective with them anyway.

In relation to Davies, I think he shows some positive signs however in the heat of battle last night he was taken off the ground and we had to send Henderson to defence in that last quarter. Not sure how this will work next week with Goodes, White and a resting ruckman pushing forward to expose the lack of a 3rd tall defender.


Thornton might have a good disposal efficiency but he does not use the ball well. His sideways and hesitant style of play allows the opposition time to flood upfield making it doubly difficult to go forward.
I agree he is good at reading the incoming opposition attack and being the 3rd man up but you need more tricks in your bag to be an effective AFL level player.

Jamo has struggled this year but the last few weeks he has shown positive signs IMO. He has only played 56 games so has plenty of upside and development left in him.

We need to keep building with our young guys and get valuable (finals) experience into them and think long term.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
17th Premiership wrote:
yes, after watching bullants today, i'd bring in walker and thornton. probably for davies and carrazzo. but if carrazzo is right, i might think about walker for robinson...

and i'd play walker midfield or wing. thornton back.
thought sauce was very good in bullants but still prefer hampson.

and i really like the look of touhy for next year...


All of the above

agree 100%
:thumbsup:

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:50 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Always thought thorntons only value would be as a full back but Jamo was better at that so he was not of use to us. At the minute Jamo is out of touch. THornton looks in touch so the only way i would bring in Thornton would be to play full back in place of jamison. Further up the ground he plays too safe and holds on to the ball for that split second too long.

Not sure he is in the good books with the coaches either so he may be copping a punishment that will set an example to the younger players coming through. If that is the case then good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:06 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
Sure .. bring him back ... give Fisher his 100th game to ... it won't matter ... we have no chance of beating Sydney in Sydney. We are a poorly skilled team and it will take several years of good recruiting to get us to into the A-Grade.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
Well, that's that then ...

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:27 am
Posts: 72
For the last two weeks Bower has been BOG for the other team! Bring back Thornton, he has had so many loses, he will play his guts out and not give it straight to the opposition as Bowe has done consistently.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 1756
kennyhunter wrote:
Well, that's that then ...


C'mon Kenny spill the beans.............................


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:09 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
I didn't watch the reserves but he should be in as he didn't deserve to be dropped in the first place.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:29 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..who knows, those years of smashings where he was the lone hand down back may have scarred him.. ..i think he has the qualities to play, but he does seem to play too 'safe', and the sideways/backwards little chip kicks drive my batty.... ..However, it still creeps into our defensive play, those little chip kicks that go nowhere and Thorny hasn't played is ages.. ..so it's not like we're all that much quicker with him out.. ..aside from Army, who almost always is a player that will run and carry, not many of our defenders do.. ..Rusty tries, but sometimes his opponent drags him deep.. ..the Gibblet isn't exactly a run and carry type.. ..Walker used to, but he's in and out anyway, and hasnt been that run and carry player for us since he did his collarbone.. ..bower likes to run, but so do chickens sans their heads..

..what i dont understand, is why other teams have plans in place for their defensive stoppers and we dont.. ..not all teams have a bunch of run and carry defenders.. ..usually only one or two..but their defensive stoppers know to quickly offload to their run and carry defenders...these types in turn, know to run off their man as soon as the stopper takes possession.. ..why cant we do that for torny and/or jamo.?

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:10 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
moshe25 wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
I can't think of a worse backman then Bower, simply horrible.


Don't be so hard on yourself. It's not horrible. Sometimes your brain just doesn't work as well as you want it to.

Just the other day, I couldn't think of a word that was on the tip of my tongue. But once I relaxed, it came to me. (btw, that word was "hyperbole", if you're interested).


You're a smart arse moshe!

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
club29 wrote:
Always thought thorntons only value would be as a full back but Jamo was better at that so he was not of use to us. At the minute Jamo is out of touch. THornton looks in touch so the only way i would bring in Thornton would be to play full back in place of jamison. Further up the ground he plays too safe and holds on to the ball for that split second too long.

Not sure he is in the good books with the coaches either so he may be copping a punishment that will set an example to the younger players coming through. If that is the case then good.


Can't say I'm much of a Thorton fan, but ... if the reason he's not playing is because of personal issues with
the coach then they need to grow up and sort it out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:51 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Bring him back for Bower. Or Davies.

Developing kids is all well and good, but I'd rather win this game and have a massive final at the MCG, which would be a development opportunity for the whole squad.

Davies is promising but not at the required level yet. Bower is a disaster right now. You might not like what Thornton brings to the table, but at least you know what he's going to bring, and he rarely makes egregious errors.

I'd be bringing in Walker and Thornton for Davies and Bower. It won't happen, but that's what I'd do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 1617
Location: Deep Blue Sea
T-Bird has to play this week. It might even free up Gibbs.

_________________
"IF YOU FAIL TO PREPARE, YOU'RE PREPARED TO FAIL" - Mark Spitz


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group