Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Are we soft?
Yes 95%  95%  [ 169 ]
No 5%  5%  [ 9 ]
Total votes : 178
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:29 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
I think no one here is going to be impresse by random wins against top opposition anymore, they are false dawns. Until there is consistent effort and stop putting in absolute shockers every 2-3 weeks we deserve no respect whatsoever. Outside the club we didn't gain much this year for that reason and that's fair enough.

Unless we bounce back and win our next 3 nothing has changed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:58 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:42 am
Posts: 336
Juzzy wrote:
It's amazing the hate for O'hAilpin when he has kicked as many or more goals then 'superstars' Travis Cloke, Alan Didak, Jason Porplyzia and et. al. He also offers a damn site more around the ground in form..

What you people must understand is that other clubs never rated Sentanta, so they always put their worst player on him and even then most of the time they run off him and what was even worst is that he is always chasing goals by attracting his man to the area where the ball is being kicked and this way when our player leading to the ball suddenly finds an extra player competing for the ball with him and when the opposition punch the ball away he tries to rove to the loose ball, now that the other teams woke up to him, they started to tag him more and that why in my opinion he starting to straggle, even in years gone past when Carlton played him in defence, every time Carlton Players got the ball, they often bypassed him and looked for other player, I think that did tell me that even the players had not have much confidence in him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:28 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 1362
bluekettle wrote:
Juzzy wrote:
It's amazing the hate for O'hAilpin when he has kicked as many or more goals then 'superstars' Travis Cloke, Alan Didak, Jason Porplyzia and et. al. He also offers a damn site more around the ground in form..

What you people must understand is that other clubs never rated Sentanta, so they always put their worst player on him and even then most of the time they run off him and what was even worst is that he is always chasing goals by attracting his man to the area where the ball is being kicked and this way when our player leading to the ball suddenly finds an extra player competing for the ball with him and when the opposition punch the ball away he tries to rove to the loose ball, now that the other teams woke up to him, they started to tag him more and that why in my opinion he starting to straggle, even in years gone past when Carlton played him in defence, every time Carlton Players got the ball, they often bypassed him and looked for other player, I think that did tell me that even the players had not have much confidence in him.



I like that bluekettle .... yes we are straggling at the moment :wink:

_________________
NG
S M C , S F L


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:18 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3258
Are we soft?
....we have never played a hard brand of football, other than during our premiership years. An oxymoron? Perhaps it is, because when did any soft side win a premiership?
However, with the collective talent we have had at the club over my 40+ years, we should have achieved more than 8 premierships.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
bluekettle wrote:
Juzzy wrote:
It's amazing the hate for O'hAilpin when he has kicked as many or more goals then 'superstars' Travis Cloke, Alan Didak, Jason Porplyzia and et. al. He also offers a damn site more around the ground in form..

What you people must understand is that other clubs never rated Sentanta, so they always put their worst player on him and even then most of the time they run off him and what was even worst is that he is always chasing goals by attracting his man to the area where the ball is being kicked and this way when our player leading to the ball suddenly finds an extra player competing for the ball with him and when the opposition punch the ball away he tries to rove to the loose ball, now that the other teams woke up to him, they started to tag him more and that why in my opinion he starting to straggle, even in years gone past when Carlton played him in defence, every time Carlton Players got the ball, they often bypassed him and looked for other player, I think that did tell me that even the players had not have much confidence in him.


and rightly so...he just does not have any idea on how to play footy....it's really that simple..not his fault..

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:04 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:42 am
Posts: 336
bluekettle wrote:
Juzzy wrote:
It's amazing the hate for O'hAilpin when he has kicked as many or more goals then 'superstars' Travis Cloke, Alan Didak, Jason Porplyzia and et. al. He also offers a damn site more around the ground in form..

What you people must understand is that other clubs never rated Sentanta, so they always put their worst player on him and even then most of the time they run off him and what was even worst is that he is always chasing goals by attracting his man to the area where the ball is being kicked and this way when our player leading to the ball suddenly finds an extra player competing for the ball with him and when the opposition punch the ball away he tries to rove to the loose ball, now that the other teams woke up to him, they started to tag him more and that why in my opinion he starting to straggle, even in years gone past when Carlton played him in defence, every time Carlton Players got the ball, they often bypassed him and looked for other player, I think that did tell me that even the players had not have much confidence in him.

Even worse, Ratten never even stopped Sentanta from attracting his man to the area where the ball is being kicked, surely he must have picked this up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:44 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
bluekettle wrote:
What you people must understand is that other clubs never rated Sentanta, so they always put their worst player on him


Like Brian Lake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:04 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21546
Location: North of the border
woof wrote:
bluekettle wrote:
What you people must understand is that other clubs never rated Sentanta, so they always put their worst player on him


Like Brian Lake.



He had an incredible run at the start of the season where we kept getting sides minus one or two key defenders - like the Pies game and Geelong game -

I said right from the start of this year it would take 8-9 rounds for the gloss to wear off and the very worst thing he could do was attract attention to himself - and right on queue it happened

we should have persisted with Kruezer forward with Hendo - by now we would have had the makings of two very good forwards

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:25 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:04 pm
Posts: 976
KROOTSA [geez I miss the big fella] will only pinch hit at CHF.. we need to trade for a gun forward,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:39 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Sydney Blue wrote:
woof wrote:
bluekettle wrote:
What you people must understand is that other clubs never rated Sentanta, so they always put their worst player on him


Like Brian Lake.



He had an incredible run at the start of the season where we kept getting sides minus one or two key defenders - like the Pies game and Geelong game -

I said right from the start of this year it would take 8-9 rounds for the gloss to wear off and the very worst thing he could do was attract attention to himself - and right on queue it happened

we should have persisted with Kruezer forward with Hendo - by now we would have had the makings of two very good forwards


I disagree, all good in hindsight. I mean Hendo has played more games than he hasn't and Kreuze is so good around the ground it would be a waste to have him up forward too much.

We do miss him massively. Jacobs impresses, Warnock looks as lost a trade as the McLean one at this stage. At least he is younger and a big man who has some time on his side.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:52 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
TheGame wrote:
Are we soft?

Mentally? Yes.

Physically? Depends on our mentality.

Sydney Blue wrote:
woof wrote:
bluekettle wrote:
What you people must understand is that other clubs never rated Sentanta, so they always put their worst player on him


Like Brian Lake.



He had an incredible run at the start of the season where we kept getting sides minus one or two key defenders - like the Pies game and Geelong game -

I said right from the start of this year it would take 8-9 rounds for the gloss to wear off and the very worst thing he could do was attract attention to himself - and right on queue it happened

we should have persisted with Kruezer forward with Hendo - by now we would have had the makings of two very good forwards

For mine Setanta was given two jobs.

1 - Drag your man out of the forward 50.

2 - Create a contest, and bring the ball to ground for our small forwards (I remember reading a stat that Setantas' helpers score three more goals a game when he's in the side compared to when he's not).

For the first half of the season this plan worked very well.

Once teams figured this out, Setantas' man zoned off of him, and went third man up.

The problem lies with our midfielders not realising this (probabally more not having the composure to lower their eyes, cheers Spud), and using it to our advantage by spotting up Setanta.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:02 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
I swear since I started this thread we've become even softer. All the commentators keep saying Judd needs more protection but the problem is Murphy wants his protection, Gibbs wants his protection etc.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:37 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13435
Location: Melbourne
TheGame wrote:
I swear since I started this thread we've become even softer. All the commentators keep saying Judd needs more protection but the problem is Murphy wants his protection, Gibbs wants his protection etc.


when they start going into contests they can get protection until then they can HTFU!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:16 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
The theme of this thread as a lot of others on Talking Carlton generally seems to be that Ratts is

A.
- too soft
- too matey
- not enough of a bastard
- doesn't have the mongrel in him

B.
Therefore, it is his fault

- apart from a few exceptions, the players skills are kaput
- mentally they are as soft as dog pooh
- their courage woudn't stand up in a kindergarten fight

I don't know Ratts personally, but the way the team is going A. seems a reasonable assumption.

However, the team are grown men and have to take some responsibility for their own individual performances. Therefore to blame Ratts for some of the things I have grouped under B. is not fair to him.

Sure, blame Ratts for that which is in his control such as the game plan which I agree is non existant and team work ethic which I also agree is non existant (Murphy, Gibbs, Walker?).

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:42 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
We can blame Ratts for many things, gameplan, coaching moves, selection, trading etc. but he was one of the toughest players to play for our club and would not be responsible for our boys shirking the issue. They only need to look in the mirror to see where that blame lies.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:02 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21546
Location: North of the border
TheGame wrote:
We can blame Ratts for many things, gameplan, coaching moves, selection, trading etc. but he was one of the toughest players to play for our club and would not be responsible for our boys shirking the issue. They only need to look in the mirror to see where that blame lies.



Maybe they shirk because they haven't learnt to earn their position in the side - There are a shit load of players who have been given game time just because we have tried to get games into our youth and haven't really had to earn their spot in the side . They have been picking on potentail for a few years now instead of picking players who showed form
Murphy- Gibbs - Yarren Garlett- Betts- Hampson- Jamison- Joseph - Kruezer - Lucas - Bower - Setanta - Scotland - Houlihan- Walker Armfield and even Russell since Ratts took over have never had to earn their place in the side . You can see what the recent efforts of Grigg and Warnock the difference it makes when they have to force their way in
There seems to be this urban myth out there that once we have a core group at 100 plus games everything will fall into place - That will only happen if they have worked hard to get to 100.

It has come about through supporters and the club losing patience and demanding that our early draft picks be played every week we had enough of the crap and demanded to see the future


Pagan actually tried to hold some back as he did with Russell and Harlett and Edwards but everything for him came unstuck when he promoted Gibbs to the leadership group - Have a feeling that created an us and them with in the playing group and then things really turned to shit when Leading teams come on board and replaced some of the us's with a few of the them's

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:22 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
The SOFTEST Carlton list in my time following the club (since 70's)

Need to recruit some battering rams - ala Rooke, C.Brown, Hayes, Boyd.

Also players should be taking a leaf out of Judd and Simpson's book - get your own hard ball.

Need at least 5 on the list.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:31 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
David Parkin called Hawthorn "mummy's boys" on year. 3-4 years later they win a flag playing "unsociable football".
I think we are still recruiting the nice, silky skilled running player who likes to recieve the ball and run.
We should prioritise players who hit the packs hard, not to the extent that we end up with 15 Wiggos but if there are 2 or 3 players hard to split, take the hard nut rather than the one with a nicer kick when unopposed.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:50 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21546
Location: North of the border
You wonder who in the coaches box can teach them hardness at the ball except for Ratten

A lot of softness sitting up there let me tell you
Lappin
Bradley
Harvey
Montgomery
Riley
Capuano

Handbag Hilton

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we soft?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Sydney Blue wrote:
You wonder who in the coaches box can teach them hardness at the ball except for Ratten

A lot of softness sitting up there let me tell you
Lappin
Bradley
Harvey
Montgomery
Riley
Capuano

Handbag Hilton


I think that's a harsh call SB.

I think the term softness has more to do with a mental lack of attention to our work rate.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group