Ratts wrote:
From half way, we won the battle. Still, we had to work extremely hard to score our goals and they scored soft goals but I thought from half time we were right in the game."
This is just embarrassing. How would Mick MAlthouse or Ross Lyon react to that performance on top of 6 weeks of similar performances? Malthouse would have been at his glowering best and reacted as he did when Swan had about 40 possies and he barely conceded he'd been okay, Ross Lyon would have taken no solace from staying with them in the second half to record a 40 point loss. He would have said it was unacceptable and done something about it.
Ratts is a nice guy but seems way out of his depth, he lacks authority, his 'support team' are mates or woefully inexperienced or both. It is his job to get the players to perform to the best of their ability consistently. If he is doing that then we have a serious talent deficiency and won't be challenging anytime soon.
I have quoted this elsewhere but it seems even more relevant after todays debacle, it is Lloyd quoting Harvey.
Quote:
you can have all the structures and team rules you like, but have if you don't have a fierce desire or a hunger for a brutal contest, structures mean absolutely nothing.
I'd give the stats man a week off and let Ratten just watch the game and make his judgements. You can see what is happening without having someone shove numbers down your throat. Do you need the figures to know you are tackling well or badly. Be interesting to see where Ratts would be without endless stats and KPIs.
Still I guess we can be grateful that the idiot committee were unable to convince Voss to take the job and that Knights ended up at the Bombers.
Despite all the talk of a new dawn we still seem like an old fashioned creaky machine, dependent on the Pratts goodwill, with Kerna's relishing his 'temporary' role as pres and unwilling to relinquish it, and still a key man in appointing the wrong choices and then sacking them before the contract is up.
I feel sorry for Ratts, but what other club would have given the job to a guy with one year's experience as an assistant at AFL level, and whose most recent experience was coaching a suburban second division team. Would a CV like that get you anywhere near a senior coaching job if you weren't a former team mate of the Pres?