Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 9:29 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 544 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 28  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16962
Location: Melbourne
MPH78 wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Don't hold your breath...

http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/newsar ... fault.aspx

Quote:
"From half way, we won the battle. Still, we had to work extremely hard to score our goals and they scored soft goals but I thought from half time we were right in the game."


Oh dear :mad: :sad: :yikes: :eek: :screwy: :roll:



Well at the risk of sounding supportive we outscored them 7.7 to 6.5 so I guess factually he has a point.

Doesn't explain the woeful first 60 minutes when the game was done and dusted but what he has said is 100% accurate.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:41 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4451
Location: Perth
Well at the risk of sounding supportive we outscored them 7.7 to 6.5 so I guess factually he has a point.

Doesn't explain the woeful first 60 minutes when the game was done and dusted but what he has said is 100% accurate.
Regards Cazzesman
[/quote]

Exactly.

There's a fine line between trying to put a positive spin on things and having NFI. I view Ratts comments as very much clutching at straws.

You could almost accept his comments if it was a one off performance. We all know that is not the case and we have serious issues.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:43 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Good to see Ratts and the M.C. on Hammer's bandwagon :wink: :thumbsup: :clap:

_________________
Bawditawaba


Last edited by isdonis.george on Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:48 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 1617
Location: Deep Blue Sea
There are coaches out there that bleed even when they win the game but lose a quarter. We appear to be happy if it's the other way round.

_________________
"IF YOU FAIL TO PREPARE, YOU'RE PREPARED TO FAIL" - Mark Spitz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:51 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:37 pm
Posts: 417
Well at the risk of sounding supportive we outscored them 7.7 to 6.5 so I guess factually he has a point.

Doesn't explain the woeful first 60 minutes when the game was done and dusted but what he has said is 100% accurate.

Regards Cazzesman
[/quote]

I disagree, he isnt being factual, he is being weak!!. He should be saying that after the first half we put up some resistance or we tried abit harder, but to say we 'won the battle' is just weak!

We were well out of the contest after the first 10 min and never looked like posting a winning score, Ratts is just covering up the brutal reality that we butchered the ball, didnt work hard enough, played dumb footy and played like a bunch of soft cocks for much of the game, including the 2nd half.

That fact the swans didnt go on and beat us by 100 points is probably an indictment on them rather than our own endeavours, we were piss poor as a team effort, save a few moments of individual skill and courage.

Thats what ratts should be saying!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:52 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1354
How come Ratts seems to be the only one under the microscope at the club at the minute.

What about the performances of Kernahan, Swann, Icke and Hughes. Anybody remember how far back we actually started when Ratten took over ? Next time the team runs out have a look at how many players aged 28 - 32 are the type that are "revered" by their team mates. How many mature men do we have on our list.

Anyone out their prepared to defend how we have assembled a list of players with so poor disposal skills.

We have given away the farm in the last four years on getting ruckmen and got beaten in the ruck today by a 34 gamer.

Do people still want to defend the strategy of giving up pick 11 for a Brock McLean ? Brock may still turn out to be a good player for us but not at the expense of the opportunity to obtain another young player given the situation with draft concessions to GC 17 and GWS coming up. In 5 years time we may have gloated how we got the pick 11 and also 12.

I am not saying Ratten doesn't have his flaws. He coaches at his best when the team gets off to a good start. He seems to be only able to coach to victory when the game is on his terms.

Very simple to lay the blame on one person.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:02 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:37 pm
Posts: 417
dadadadada wrote:
How come Ratts seems to be the only one under the microscope at the club at the minute.

What about the performances of Kernahan, Swann, Icke and Hughes. Anybody remember how far back we actually started when Ratten took over ? Next time the team runs out have a look at how many players aged 28 - 32 are the type that are "revered" by their team mates. How many mature men do we have on our list.

Anyone out their prepared to defend how we have assembled a list of players with so poor disposal skills.

We have given away the farm in the last four years on getting ruckmen and got beaten in the ruck today by a 34 gamer.

Do people still want to defend the strategy of giving up pick 11 for a Brock McLean ? Brock may still turn out to be a good player for us but not at the expense of the opportunity to obtain another young player given the situation with draft concessions to GC 17 and GWS coming up. In 5 years time we may have gloated how we got the pick 11 and also 12.

I am not saying Ratten doesn't have his flaws. He coaches at his best when the team gets off to a good start. He seems to be only able to coach to victory when the game is on his terms.

Very simple to lay the blame on one person.

If you had read carefully most people are saying there needs to be major overhaul, not just the senior coach, but of course the simple version is ratts is doing a very poor job at getting the best out of the team that takes the field over the last 2 months.

He is doing a very poor job at teaching his players. We still struggle to move the ball with any fluidity under pressure and his player positioning is poor. He has a limited understanding of the tools at his disposal because he very rarely makes a game changing move. It is predictable what he will do and we've seen ample evidence of the same mistakes being made.

Let me ask you what do you think of Matthew knights' coaching ability? Should ratts not equally be under as much, if not more scrutiny (given I think our list is a fair but better than theirs) than Matthew knights?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:05 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 2220
fascinating to watch how things ae unfolding.

_________________
My Blue Heaven


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:37 pm
Posts: 417
blueman wrote:
fascinating to watch how things ae unfolding.


Dont tell me.......you saw this coming!!!

Please......your a fraud Blueman, plain and simple!!!!!!

I dont mind your hypothesizing, its fun, just dont call it something its not!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Ratts wrote:
From half way, we won the battle. Still, we had to work extremely hard to score our goals and they scored soft goals but I thought from half time we were right in the game."


This is just embarrassing. How would Mick MAlthouse or Ross Lyon react to that performance on top of 6 weeks of similar performances? Malthouse would have been at his glowering best and reacted as he did when Swan had about 40 possies and he barely conceded he'd been okay, Ross Lyon would have taken no solace from staying with them in the second half to record a 40 point loss. He would have said it was unacceptable and done something about it.

Ratts is a nice guy but seems way out of his depth, he lacks authority, his 'support team' are mates or woefully inexperienced or both. It is his job to get the players to perform to the best of their ability consistently. If he is doing that then we have a serious talent deficiency and won't be challenging anytime soon.

I have quoted this elsewhere but it seems even more relevant after todays debacle, it is Lloyd quoting Harvey.
Quote:
you can have all the structures and team rules you like, but have if you don't have a fierce desire or a hunger for a brutal contest, structures mean absolutely nothing.


I'd give the stats man a week off and let Ratten just watch the game and make his judgements. You can see what is happening without having someone shove numbers down your throat. Do you need the figures to know you are tackling well or badly. Be interesting to see where Ratts would be without endless stats and KPIs.

Still I guess we can be grateful that the idiot committee were unable to convince Voss to take the job and that Knights ended up at the Bombers.

Despite all the talk of a new dawn we still seem like an old fashioned creaky machine, dependent on the Pratts goodwill, with Kerna's relishing his 'temporary' role as pres and unwilling to relinquish it, and still a key man in appointing the wrong choices and then sacking them before the contract is up.

I feel sorry for Ratts, but what other club would have given the job to a guy with one year's experience as an assistant at AFL level, and whose most recent experience was coaching a suburban second division team. Would a CV like that get you anywhere near a senior coaching job if you weren't a former team mate of the Pres?


Last edited by gerry atric on Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:19 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
lily of laguna wrote:
blueman wrote:
fascinating to watch how things ae unfolding.


Dont tell me.......you saw this coming!!!

Please......your a fraud Blueman, plain and simple!!!!!!

I dont mind your hypothesizing, its fun, just dont call it something its not!!!


Think you're jumping the gun there.

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:22 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 184
lily of laguna wrote:
aido wrote:
mymanmurph wrote:
I hate too say this but Murphy apart from a spoil I didn't see much at all almost reminded me of n.Stevens seems lazy... For the love of god play Gibbs forward of the center !!!!!


What do you expect from Marc Murphy when Ratten and his two mates (diesel and bradley) think Murph is an outside player and give him a licence to hang out side the packs rather than hunt the ball himself...... dur!!!!

Stupid people ruining this team and club.


This is just plain wrong!!! By all means vent your frustration but dont make up utter rubbish and pass it off as inside knowledge, you just look like a tool!!!

I too am disappointed Murph doesnt put his head over the ball as often as he should, but to say it is a directive of the coach/coaches is laughable!!

DUR!!!


yeah you would know. believe it or not, i don't care. But Murph was instructed to play more of an outside role and the move was orchestrated by Diesel.

and don't forget how Mr Murphy voiced his concern that his precious son was copping to much physical pressure in his early days.

and then there is his mate Bryce who's always been told how he is the best at everything. Who's never had to win his own ball cause its always been 'get it to gibbsy'. Since he's been at the club i can not ever recall him coming of the ground absolutely spent sucking in the big ones, actually i've never seen him work up a sweat or even a scratch. Scathing as it may sound but FFS put your bloody body on the line and stop chasing cheap kicks - someone should put together a tape of how Joel Selwood goes about it and send it to Gibbsy.


Last edited by aido on Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:25 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
MIL wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
verbs wrote:
My coaching wish list (in order of preference):

Dunstall
Hird
Frawley
Choco
Ayres
Mark Harvey
Malthouse
Jack Riewoldt
Dwayne Russell
Laidley
Walls
Mike Sheahan
Gerard Healy
Leigh Colbert
Kouta
Campo
Knights
K Bartlett
Pagan
Brittain
Voss
Judd
Mark Jamar
Worsfold
The old guy who coaches Adelaide
Earl Spalding
Scott Spalding
Sumich
Nathan Buckley
Brian Taylor
Harry Taylor
The old guy who coaches Melbourne
S Silvagni
Tim Lane
Joyce Brown
Either of the Scott twins
Hinkley
McKenna
Whitnall
James Manson
Gary Ablett Snr
Adrian Whitehead
Nick Maxwell
Dean Jones


POW


Gee..........Campo a tad high ??



well he has no emotional ties with the club!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13435
Location: Melbourne
Cazzesman wrote:

Well at the risk of sounding supportive we outscored them 7.7 to 6.5 so I guess factually he has a point.

Doesn't explain the woeful first 60 minutes when the game was done and dusted but what he has said is 100% accurate.

Regards Cazzesman


yes and this is where Ratts has lost me, I am tired of him pointing at numbers to say "Hey guys don't worry it's not so bad!"
I don't give a stuff if we outscored them in the second half if we didn't outscore them in the first half as well! Sure it's an improvement on last week but jeeeeeeeeeeeeez.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:46 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4601
Location: lygon street
Whilst we all think Ratten should be on his way out, you can forget about it. The club just agreed to exercise the optional 3rd year on his contract, so he isn't going anywhere..... not while his ole mate, the interim president is at the helm. I can't help but think that there are deep deep problems at this club, and it starts at the very top.

Ratten is so far out of his depth it's not funny. He coaches like a man who spent 1 year as an assistant at an AFL club and 1 year coaching a outer eastern suburban side.

The players may like Ratts, but they sure as hell don't believe in him, or trust in him. They can't or we wouldn't be continually served up these gutless performances.

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Captain Dan wrote:
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Rexy wrote:

He's no good with gen-Yers


I don't think anyone is. Waste of a generation.


Only gotta blame the people that raised Gen Y for that :lol:


Never thought I'd do this but: :clap:

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:02 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
missnaut wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:

Well at the risk of sounding supportive we outscored them 7.7 to 6.5 so I guess factually he has a point.

Doesn't explain the woeful first 60 minutes when the game was done and dusted but what he has said is 100% accurate.

Regards Cazzesman


yes and this is where Ratts has lost me, I am tired of him pointing at numbers to say "Hey guys don't worry it's not so bad!"
I don't give a stuff if we outscored them in the second half if we didn't outscore them in the first half as well! Sure it's an improvement on last week but jeeeeeeeeeeeeez.


Ratts is talking in riddles; I don't understand how you can still be in a game in the second half when it is done and dusted by half time!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:05 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 184
I'd trade one of the 'fab four' (HA fab four) in Gibbs to the crows for Dangerfield in a heart beat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:07 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
dadadadada wrote:
How come Ratts seems to be the only one under the microscope at the club at the minute.

What about the performances of Kernahan, Swann, Icke and Hughes. Anybody remember how far back we actually started when Ratten took over ? Next time the team runs out have a look at how many players aged 28 - 32 are the type that are "revered" by their team mates. How many mature men do we have on our list.

Anyone out their prepared to defend how we have assembled a list of players with so poor disposal skills.

We have given away the farm in the last four years on getting ruckmen and got beaten in the ruck today by a 34 gamer.

Do people still want to defend the strategy of giving up pick 11 for a Brock McLean ? Brock may still turn out to be a good player for us but not at the expense of the opportunity to obtain another young player given the situation with draft concessions to GC 17 and GWS coming up. In 5 years time we may have gloated how we got the pick 11 and also 12.

I am not saying Ratten doesn't have his flaws. He coaches at his best when the team gets off to a good start. He seems to be only able to coach to victory when the game is on his terms.

Very simple to lay the blame on one person.



I didn't even finish reading your whole post, and for that I apologise, I do in part agree with what you say but i felt compelled to respond.

Ratts has to take SOME responsibility for our appaling game plan and Matty Lappin (who was my fav player) is clearly not up to it as a forward coach.

it looks shit on telly but, as you see guys with space streaming forward (for the opposition), but it really rang home how hopless we are with our forward structures when I got to see the north and freo games live, christ who are we supose to kick the ball too?

maybe its the players falling back into the safe mode of kick it to fev, but he aint there (and dont worry I was happy when we traded the fev) or maybe it was that we had such a decent full forward that was hiding the fact that we are an average team without him? I don't know but we have the most in-effective forward structure i've ever seen and if ratts or lappin is the scapegoat then so be it.

I'm sick of blind faith, i'm @#$%&! sick of paitence and excuses.

I'm a glass half full - optimist and my psyche and moral is broken.

The Carlton Football Club is a representation of who I am as a person.

A person with pride, hope, belief and self respect. My club no longer falls in line with my beliefs and way of life.

They give me no hope, pride or inspiration.

I am ashamed to be a Carlton suppoter. I can't look people in the eye anymore incase they bring up "my club".

I feel crushed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:24 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:37 am
Posts: 770
hey blueman, it seems things are unfolding differently to what you were saying at the start of the year. We started ok and peaked against the saints, where you were thinking the saints would be a smashing. This game was also supposed to be the turnaround, which it was , but in a negative way, we have gone backwards instead of forwards. Your timeline seems correct, but in reverse ??

Thoughts???

ALSO, the new young coach , how about Sanderson ??

I love blueman, keeps me thinking , :yikes:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 544 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 28  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group