Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:10 am 
Offline
John James

Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:07 pm
Posts: 624
Location: Melbourne
Make a stand. Challenge it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:35 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
on one hand we complain we have not mongrel in hte team. on the other we get stuck into a bloke who does.

waite has been unlucky with two of the three reports.

hawks had loads of suspensions during 2008.

we can win games without waite. we have shown that.

all is not lost.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:43 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
Yeah, club29 is right. If anything we lack a bit of mongrel in the team. I thought it was really stiff to get two weeks. The Freo player was running towards one of our blokes who had the ball. What was he supposed to do? Let him keep running at him? He didn't do anything wrong.

It's a shame to see him go as he's a handy player, but as we've proven earlier this year we can win without him.

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:49 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
WTF Carrots getting suspended. He was flowering pushed into the umpires path! Unbelivable

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:20 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13435
Location: Melbourne
I thought he just got fined?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:22 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
AFL website;

Quote:
Bomber Dustin Fletcher and Blue Jarrad Waite have both accepted two-match bans, opting against fighting their charges and the potential of missing a third match should the tribunal have found them guilty of their offences.

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
Oops sorry WTF Carrots getting fined! He was pushed into the umpires path!!!!

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:50 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:09 am
Posts: 909
Location: Melbourne
The Club's decided to accept the 2 match suspension for JW.

http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/4311/newsid/96748/default.aspx

_________________
“In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.”
- Martin Luther King Jr.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:22 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3189
Location: Whistler
club29 wrote:
on one hand we complain we have not mongrel in hte team. on the other we get stuck into a bloke who does.

waite has been unlucky with two of the three reports.

hawks had loads of suspensions during 2008.

we can win games without waite. we have shown that.

all is not lost.


Wrong kind of mongrel aimed at wrong player. He should have got 2 weeks for sending McPhee into next week. At least then it would have sent a message regarding players targeting Judd.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:07 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
Waitey needs to give up the hip and shoulder, given the AFL's stance on head high contact. With his height, he's gonna cop a few blokes high even if unintentional. You can learn to shepherd without hip and shoulder.

Buddy has the same problem. Haven't a few other clubs basically instructed their players not to use the bump ? (Filth ?).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:39 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
problem in this case is Waite couldn't tackle so his option is to let the Freo player run past and pressure our ball carrier

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:03 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 5:29 pm
Posts: 327
i reckon waitey deserved 2 weeks, u cant bumop off the ball like that anymore and the players know it so dont know what we are complaining about, and with judd we are so lucky, be grateful boys


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2760
Seemed a bit soft but Waite had other options.
He was pretty far off the ball for starters and was thus not really a danger to our guy. He could also have shepparded in the more traditional way, spreading arms etc... and, even if he decided to go ahead and apply a robust bump/block, he could have done so without hitting the head.
I think it was just another example of several where we played it dumb on the weekend.

I am not a Carlton bagger and think there were some positives - eg. we got generally smashed and everything that could go wrong did yet we still lost by 9points to top 4 team.
I also think we have a v strong team with a couple of weaker links - we don't need any more big names, draft picks etc... just need to get our best team on the park, improve our attitude, sharpen our strategies and those weak links need to lift their games by 10% and we're a top 4 team.

However, Waite played it dumb. Unfortunate he got pinged - other players would not have. But it is not a wrong decision from the Match Review Panel.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:10 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
17th Premiership wrote:
Seemed a bit soft but Waite had other options.
He was pretty far off the ball for starters and was thus not really a danger to our guy. He could also have shepparded in the more traditional way, spreading arms etc... and, even if he decided to go ahead and apply a robust bump/block, he could have done so without hitting the head.
I think it was just another example of several where we played it dumb on the weekend.

I am not a Carlton bagger and think there were some positives - eg. we got generally smashed and everything that could go wrong did yet we still lost by 9points to top 4 team.
I also think we have a v strong team with a couple of weaker links - we don't need any more big names, draft picks etc... just need to get our best team on the park, improve our attitude, sharpen our strategies and those weak links need to lift their games by 10% and we're a top 4 team.

However, Waite played it dumb. Unfortunate he got pinged - other players would not have. But it is not a wrong decision from the Match Review Panel.


Good post.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
17th Premiership wrote:
Seemed a bit soft but Waite had other options.
He was pretty far off the ball for starters and was thus not really a danger to our guy. He could also have shepparded in the more traditional way, spreading arms etc... and, even if he decided to go ahead and apply a robust bump/block, he could have done so without hitting the head.
I think it was just another example of several where we played it dumb on the weekend.


If it was "pretty far off the ball" as you say, then he's not allowed to shepherd either. Really, given the direction the two players were running, the only option available to him was to let the Freo bloke get a free run at Armfield.

As noted, he could have pole axed the guy.

Regardless of Waite's actions and subsequent suspension, the tribunal and match review panel consistently show what a total @#$%&! joke they are. It's embarrassing that a bloke of Andrew McKay's supposed calibre is partly responsible. :oops:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:45 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
When you look at it from the view point that if Waite was 3-4 metres closer to the ball then it wouldn't\shouldn't have even been a free kick then you realise how pathetic the review is.

End of story.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:26 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
camelboy wrote:
17th Premiership wrote:
Seemed a bit soft but Waite had other options.
He was pretty far off the ball for starters and was thus not really a danger to our guy. He could also have shepparded in the more traditional way, spreading arms etc... and, even if he decided to go ahead and apply a robust bump/block, he could have done so without hitting the head.
I think it was just another example of several where we played it dumb on the weekend.


If it was "pretty far off the ball" as you say, then he's not allowed to shepherd either. Really, given the direction the two players were running, the only option available to him was to let the Freo bloke get a free run at Armfield.

As noted, he could have pole axed the guy.

Regardless of Waite's actions and subsequent suspension, the tribunal and match review panel consistently show what a total !@#$%& joke they are. It's embarrassing that a bloke of Andrew McKay's supposed calibre is partly responsible. :oops:


Don't think Andy has the gig anymore

http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/208/default ... wsid=88814

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
dannyboy wrote:
problem in this case is Waite couldn't tackle so his option is to let the Freo player run past and pressure our ball carrier


The other problem is that DeBoer was nowhere near Armfield and was not running at him to pressure him. My biggest problem is working out whether Waite is clumsy or just plain dumb.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
woof wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
problem in this case is Waite couldn't tackle so his option is to let the Freo player run past and pressure our ball carrier


The other problem is that DeBoer was nowhere near Armfield and was not running at him to pressure him. My biggest problem is working out whether Waite is clumsy or just plain dumb.


I was at the game and before the incident happened I screamed out "shepherd Waitey" and he did. He didn't hear me, but it looked to me to be the right thing to do.

There'a also 2 different camera angles I've since seen the same incident. One angle makes it look late, but the camera vision taken behind Armfield's run seems to warrant Waites shepherd. And it wasn't malicious by any stretch of the imagination.

What the suspension tells me is that Waite is a victim of his 2010 reputation. Not fair, sure, but the reputation is not good.
Many years ago Fletcher was let off lots of times when he should have been suspended, but his reputation has caught up with him too.

Sad to see really, because Waite is a great footballer to watch, and he's one of the few who have a bit of mongrel in them too...not Hall like either. And speaking of Hall, he too is tarnished by his record. Shouldn't be the case in this day and age of intelligence and era of common sense debate :lol: :lol: :lol:

Sad really...and a lot of bad luck.

My advice to posters taking pot shots at Waite is take a rest, and that it's not fair and all for a borderline incident requiring interpretation. Don't take the side of the adjudicators because they are not deciding on the punishment purely on what is presented before them imo. Precedence is set, and you hope it is a precedent; somehow I doubt it and strongly believe Waite has been sodomised by the tribunal...I mean victimised. :wink:

I hope Waite continues to be aggressive and sets the standard on what we expect from all our players ...without stepping over the line...the one that suspension is warranted.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
I don't intend to stop taking potshots where they're deserved. This suspension has been coming for weeks. It was dumb the first time and it was dumber this time and unless he gets his head on straight it will be seriously dumber next time. He didn't have to do it. He did it.
Harry the blind miner can see he will be more scrutinized than before. He'e too good to be sitting in the grandstand. He has to be sensible. Even Barry Hall has worked that out.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group