Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:33 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:59 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Murphy is not hard enough to be the leagues number one
Gibbs doesn't run hard enough
Kruezer won't do it as a ruckman (not big enough) He could be a top forward


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:31 pm
Posts: 38
Location: Melbourne
Brock Landers wrote:
Kruezer will be the best out of the 3. I think most people dont realise how much upside the kid has. His scope for improvement is massive and I think his role is the hardest to master.





Agreed :grin:

_________________
I absolutely love Carlton Football Club.


Rambo Robinson #12


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
bax wrote:
Reiwoldt was considered the best player in the comp before he got injured, ditto Jonathan Brown... last time I checked they weren't midfielders. You don't need to be a midfielder to be the best player.


Simple as that. If you can't comprehend what I'm saying then you have issues.



I'd say you have issues. You always seem to have a crack at the posters. From reading your posts I don't think you really understand the game. I think I'll make a point of avoiding replying to any post's from you from now on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
bax wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
bax wrote:
Reiwoldt was considered the best player in the comp before he got injured, ditto Jonathan Brown... last time I checked they weren't midfielders. You don't need to be a midfielder to be the best player.


Simple as that. If you can't comprehend what I'm saying then you have issues.



I'd say you have issues. You always seem to have a crack at the posters. I think I'll make a point of avoiding replying to any post's from you from now on.


LMAO yet it was you who instigated this conversation by having a crack at me......go figure. :thumbsup:

As for not understanding the game, I take it as a compliment from someone who clearly speaks rubbish and hopes for the best.

And you didn't respond to my response, if you are going to quote things don't leave out my answer and try to give the impression that my response was "you have issues". That's misrepresentation and quoting out of context which last time I checked is against forum rules. But leave it to you to stoop that low.

You like to debate issues but your attempts are feeble and when you end the debate with "I'm not talking to you any more" it robs you of what little credibility you had in the first place. Next!

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Last edited by HELLAS BLUE on Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:00 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
Molly wrote:
James Hird was the best midfielder in the comp for a long while and he never had speed of legs. He had speed of mind, and an innate ability to read the play.

I'm not saying Gibbs will be as good as Hird. What I am saying is that you can be the best midfielder in the comp and not have amazing speed.


Hird had stints in the midfield but he wasn't a midfielder nor did he have the tank to be one.

As for not having speed but being the best, maybe so ten or twelve years ago but certainly not so now. We all can acknowledge how much the game has changed (sped up to be exact). Players that would have been superstars ten years ago are no longer that because of their footspeed or lack thereof. IMO.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:12 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 5:16 pm
Posts: 276
Interesting thoughts All.

Am I too harsh i n expecting that one of these guys should be indomitable?

I would hope that one of these guys, if not all, would go on to to be of the ilk of player that takes the comp by storm. At this stage I think only Murphy has played a game where he himself carved a team up.

Gibbs has class, but has not taken a game apart (those 45 disposals against West Coast included alot of chips), and Kreuz has class but again has not dominated a game in the way of a G. Ablett Jnr, Judd, Hodges, Riewoldt or Kouta.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Once Gibbs gets more time in the middle for longer periods he will explode onto the scene and surprise many...

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:33 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
As for not having speed but being the best, maybe so ten or twelve years ago but certainly not so now. We all can acknowledge how much the game has changed (sped up to be exact). Players that would have been superstars ten years ago are no longer that because of their footspeed or lack thereof. IMO.


Lenny Hayes, Jimmy Bartel, Joel Selwood ....... none are fast, all of them are midfielders.
They would have been superstars 10 years ago and are superstars now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:08 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
All three have stalled IMHO and still have away to go to make it to elite level......all three show flashes but lack consistency, they also need to start winning us games and take some responsibilty from Judd.
Kade Simpson while less talented has the right attitude and excels when the chips are down..like to see out No 1 draft picks do similar.

Kruezer has the ability to be the No 1 player in the comp, has size, skills and agility.....Gibbs I equate more with Nathan Buckley...talented but less of an impact player like Voss, Hird or Kouta.

Murphy is/will be similar to Brent Harvey IMO......not the best player in the comp but one of the best when he can be consistent like Harvey has been over the journey.

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:37 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:57 pm
Posts: 636
Location: Hawthorn
I'm taking Yarran as my man. Has all the attributes to be better than anyone. If he approaches it the right way and listens to the right people then he's got it all in front of him.

In this kind of situation there are two sorts of people, one who expects to be great and one that wants to be great. Those that want it chip away at every flaw in their game turning them into strengths while those that expect it rely too heavily on their strengths, which could still make them great but not as good as they can be.

An obvious example is Richmond, they've had some talented players over the years but they didn't have the right minds to carry them through, internally and externally. So what you hope for is that the players and coaches are working on the foundation and not thinking about the ceiling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:41 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
woof wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
As for not having speed but being the best, maybe so ten or twelve years ago but certainly not so now. We all can acknowledge how much the game has changed (sped up to be exact). Players that would have been superstars ten years ago are no longer that because of their footspeed or lack thereof. IMO.


Lenny Hayes, Jimmy Bartel, Joel Selwood ....... none are fast, all of them are midfielders.
They would have been superstars 10 years ago and are superstars now.


Hayes and Selwood are quicker than Gibbs and they're quicker hand to foot as well. Bartel has had less impact as each year goes on and I certainly don't see him as a superstar. Nonetheless, none of them have been or will be the best player in the comp and that's what I'm saying about Gibbs. If you go back and check I did say that Gibbs is just about elite now as we speak if played in the right position.

Anyway, I think I've had my say in this thread so I'm now going to opt out.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Last edited by HELLAS BLUE on Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:55 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10593
Twinkle toes ... MURPHY!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:32 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
woof wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
As for not having speed but being the best, maybe so ten or twelve years ago but certainly not so now. We all can acknowledge how much the game has changed (sped up to be exact). Players that would have been superstars ten years ago are no longer that because of their footspeed or lack thereof. IMO.


Lenny Hayes, Jimmy Bartel, Joel Selwood ....... none are fast, all of them are midfielders.
They would have been superstars 10 years ago and are superstars now.


Hayes and Selwood are quicker than Gibbs and they're quicker hand to foot as well. Bartel has had less impact as each year goes on and I certainly don't see him as a superstar. Nonetheless, none of them have been or will be the best player in the comp and that's what I'm saying about Gibbs. If you go back and check I did say that Gibbs is just about elite now as we speak if played in the right position.

Anyway, I think I've had my say in this thread so I'm now going to opt out.


You are a hard man to please Hellas.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
But Woof, I did say that Gibbsy is elite, I just feel he has certain limitations that will hold him back from being the best in the comp. I am more than happy with his selection at #1 and would have him in my fav 3 players at the club. The guy is all class. :thumbsup:

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:18 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8166
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
Hayes and Selwood are quicker than Gibbs.


That is almost certainly incorrect. I also doubt whether Goddard is quicker than Gibbs.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group