Sydney Blue wrote:
See bondi you go on about my bias against him then make the statement that he was ok in the dry against Melbourne . He had 3 possesions to half time obe of which was a free before the ball was bounce so 2 possessions in half a game of forty in general play and you say that's ok
but I'm the one that is biased
I have indicated in the Freo thread and last weeks pregame discussion that I would have replaced Setanta for Hendo for various reasons; not one being that I have put a line through his name.
As for the Melbourne game, there's no bias from me at all. I explained my position, but you have decided to throw the bias line at me.
Here I go again:
I know what his stats say in the Melb game, but I know that he had a hand in nearly every goal in that first quarter and the stats don't show that. There was a shepherd, a tackle and a tap on which didn't involve a kick or a handball, but the result my friend was what mattered most; GOALS to our forwards. We were up 5 nil. That first quarter set up the win, don't you agree. He had a hand in them. Fact. Not bias. Therefore he had a hand in our win. I'm not saying he was sensational.
I too would like to see more than the 1%ers from Setanta, and whilst Hendo is doing more than that on the possession ledger he gets my nod for selection, ahead of Setanta. This does not imply Setanta is finished for the season. In fact a fit and in form Setanta (as he was for most of the first half season), is an important assett for us in 2010.
2010 is what I'm focussed on, and I like the idea of pressure sor spots in the seniors and selecting on form.