bondiblue wrote:
I have a big party weekend happening and that started last night.
The first to arrive was a Demons supporter. He thinks Brock still has a lot to offer the Blues, and injury had interupted his last 2 seasons, but he's still oung and talented.
I was rapt we got McLean for the in and under role, and still hope he will improve starting round 1.
I do think that there will be some serious questions raised if both Johnson and McLean fail. It's unCarlton like not to.
I'm not too fussed about the selections of McLean and Johnson because I'm focussing on us reaching the top 4 with or without them, such is my confidence in the list.
bondi I don't have a big party weekend but was also speaking to a Melbourne supporter who had big wraps for McLean. Said pretty much what you have said, Melbourne kept playing him injured because that's the type of player he is, and they had no one else anyway. The injuries were not chronic and as we have heard he has been training the house down over summer so is now fit.
The players themselves were sorry to see him go as he brought a toughness and leadership onto the field. That is something we can really do with.
His skills are not the greatest but we already know that.

What he can do is kick long and accurately and get the ball out of tight situations.
My source is the same guy who was talking him down when the Demons first traded him. What is now obvious is that he was a wanted player at Melbourne but had determined he was going and all parties believed pick 11 was fair and the deal was done.
Although we already have Hadley, he is continually getting injured himself. Plus why can't you rotate the two off the bench so there is a specialist stoppage player on the ground at all times. It would mean that Judd, Murphy, Gibbs, would not have to go in but be on the periphery where they can be at their most damaging.
This guy is close to the players so my info is pretty right.