Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:18 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:04 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
bondiblue wrote:
I have a big party weekend happening and that started last night.
The first to arrive was a Demons supporter. He thinks Brock still has a lot to offer the Blues, and injury had interupted his last 2 seasons, but he's still oung and talented.

I was rapt we got McLean for the in and under role, and still hope he will improve starting round 1.

I do think that there will be some serious questions raised if both Johnson and McLean fail. It's unCarlton like not to.

I'm not too fussed about the selections of McLean and Johnson because I'm focussing on us reaching the top 4 with or without them, such is my confidence in the list.


bondi I don't have a big party weekend but was also speaking to a Melbourne supporter who had big wraps for McLean. Said pretty much what you have said, Melbourne kept playing him injured because that's the type of player he is, and they had no one else anyway. The injuries were not chronic and as we have heard he has been training the house down over summer so is now fit.

The players themselves were sorry to see him go as he brought a toughness and leadership onto the field. That is something we can really do with.

His skills are not the greatest but we already know that. :roll: What he can do is kick long and accurately and get the ball out of tight situations.

My source is the same guy who was talking him down when the Demons first traded him. What is now obvious is that he was a wanted player at Melbourne but had determined he was going and all parties believed pick 11 was fair and the deal was done.

Although we already have Hadley, he is continually getting injured himself. Plus why can't you rotate the two off the bench so there is a specialist stoppage player on the ground at all times. It would mean that Judd, Murphy, Gibbs, would not have to go in but be on the periphery where they can be at their most damaging.



This guy is close to the players so my info is pretty right.

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..can definately play both hads and brock in the same team.. ..hell, if the opposition gets a roll on us, throw them both in the guts at the same time to just clog everything up and arrest the rampage a team has on us.. ..there's a time and tactic for almost every game, and often a game will switch styles as it goes.. ..we need to learn to play a variety of game styles on the same day..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:18 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6417
I thought McLean was a good pickup
Was injured a lot 23 ready to show his stuff
Buthe is slower than I thought


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34527
Location: The Brown Wedge
Bluey44 wrote:
We should have picked Dale Thomas.

Our premiership window is flowered now.

Sack everyone.
Offer Talia $1 million.
Do it now before it's too late!!!!
:yikes: :yikes:


Sarcasm - I get it. If you're not prepared to debate the pros and cons - don't bother.

If you think we're immune from another Mick Mansfield type situation then you're kidding yourself. I'm not suggesting that's the case with McLean, but it's a very real possibilty. Of courese I'll support every Carlton player that takes the field but that doesn't mean I have to support every decision the board and coach makes.

I didn't support the trade last year, and I still don't believe it was a good move today.

Hopefully Brock can prove me wrong. I'm sure I'll be wrong one day :wink: .

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:38 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Time to lock this thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:11 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Agree.
Bentick can't play at the level McClean can.
We will look even better when McClean is doing what he does best and Judd is on the end of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:13 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Sorry to be a pedant woof, but it's 'McLean'. 'McClean' is weird to look at.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:25 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23924
I have a little crush on McLean now. :oops: (is that wrong?)
thought he was great last night..looked and played like a long time blueboy.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:42 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14731
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
The Duke wrote:

Hopefully Brock can prove me wrong. I'm sure I'll be wrong one day :wink: .

You mean like you were with Russell

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:48 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34527
Location: The Brown Wedge
Megaman wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Hopefully Brock can prove me wrong. I'm sure I'll be wrong one day :wink: .

You mean like you were with Russell


When I get proven wrong about Rusell, I'll admit it :thumbsup: . He's improved a small percent but IMO still isn't a player I'd want going in to a GF.

Brock was good in patches last night and will get better I'm sure. I just question the amount we paid and whether it will be worthwhile in the long run.

Let's not get too carried away with 1 win over Richmond - who, let's be honest, are an absolute disgrace.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:51 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
Brock will be a good get in the long run for us. Very happy with his output last night.

_________________
The measure of a life is a measure of love and respect
So hard to earn, so easily burned
In the fullness of time
A garden to nurture and protect

#DopeThenStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Brock had a great debut game last night. Consistent performances like that will see most supporters happy with the trade.

Quote:
Bentick can't play at the level McClean can.


I remember a great game by AB against the pies a few years ago. A Brownlow 3 voter IIRC.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:53 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
The Duke wrote:
Megaman wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Hopefully Brock can prove me wrong. I'm sure I'll be wrong one day :wink: .

You mean like you were with Russell


When I get proven wrong about Rusell, I'll admit it :thumbsup: . He's improved a small percent but IMO still isn't a player I'd want going in to a GF.

Brock was good in patches last night and will get better I'm sure. I just question the amount we paid and whether it will be worthwhile in the long run.

Let's not get too carried away with 1 win over Richmond - who, let's be honest, are an absolute disgrace.


Duke, you are a hard man to please. Russell has improved substantially. As has McLean from his pre season form. Although as you say it was against a disgrace who will probably be the wooden spooners, a win is a win. Enjoy. :grin:

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:22 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
This thread should die.

I saw more in brock this game and more I have ever seen from Bentdick.

Reincarnation of Ratts :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 6:00 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
The Duke wrote:
Megaman wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Hopefully Brock can prove me wrong. I'm sure I'll be wrong one day :wink: .

You mean like you were with Russell


When I get proven wrong about Rusell, I'll admit it :thumbsup: . He's improved a small percent but IMO still isn't a player I'd want going in to a GF.

Brock was good in patches last night and will get better I'm sure. I just question the amount we paid and whether it will be worthwhile in the long run.

Let's not get too carried away with 1 win over Richmond - who, let's be honest, are an absolute disgrace.
\

My God now there is someone who simply cannot admit when they're wrong. I feel for you missing out on the enjoyment of watching JR play.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McLean v Bentick
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
The Duke wrote:
Megaman wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Hopefully Brock can prove me wrong. I'm sure I'll be wrong one day :wink: .

You mean like you were with Russell


When I get proven wrong about Rusell, I'll admit it :thumbsup: . He's improved a small percent but IMO still isn't a player I'd want going in to a GF.

Brock was good in patches last night and will get better I'm sure. I just question the amount we paid and whether it will be worthwhile in the long run.

Let's not get too carried away with 1 win over Richmond - who, let's be honest, are an absolute disgrace.


If JR has improved a "small percent", gee I'd like to see a big improvement then !

JR is now definitely in our top dozen or so players IMHO, and that is huge from where he was not that long ago. Its all coming together (finally) for JR.

Brock was great, and even though it was only Richmond, he is so much better than Bentick. Judd and Murph can only benefit from having him in the team.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bmaurizio, ByteDanceSpider, Traveller86 and 64 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group