Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 12:05 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:15 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Molly wrote:
Out of interest Molsey,

you say we didn't have a rebounding tall defender after Waite went down last season. You don't think Bower played that role before Jamison went down too?


I think went Waite went down we had to put Thornton back as a true defender more and we lost his drive. Yes Bower delivers substantial run but you have to be mindful that he's also taking KF#1 (Franklin) and some times will be limited in his ability to run off. That being said God Love him he keeps on running.

So yes we did have such a defender but IMHO we lost a lot of run from defence overall.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:17 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Rexy wrote:
Chipping doesn't really apply pressure to the opposition though and it's a reactive style.
I'd rather see us be proactive and applying pressure.


Fair enough. There's good and bad chipping though I guess - you can make ground with the little chip kick but if you're not challenging the defensive zone with either upfield movement or good aggressive movement from the defenders (either making ground with running or with a direct kick). You see the Swans go their sweeping left footers to cross the field and make good aggressive distance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25309
Location: Bondi Beach
molsey wrote:
Molly wrote:
Out of interest Molsey,

you say we didn't have a rebounding tall defender after Waite went down last season. You don't think Bower played that role before Jamison went down too?


I think went Waite went down we had to put Thornton back as a true defender more and we lost his drive. Yes Bower delivers substantial run but you have to be mindful that he's also taking KF#1 (Franklin) and some times will be limited in his ability to run off. That being said God Love him he keeps on running.

So yes we did have such a defender but IMHO we lost a lot of run from defence overall.


You just can't stop the Bower from rebounding no matter who he plays on and whatever your perception is. Bower breaks lines, so does Russell in the last 8 rounds (post Waite).

Rebounding didn't just die or subside when Waite got injured as well as Jamison too.....Army does breaks lines too. Add Scotto....perception is reality Molsey. Sure we lost it from Waite but we didn't lose it from the backline in general.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
molsey wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Chipping doesn't really apply pressure to the opposition though and it's a reactive style.
I'd rather see us be proactive and applying pressure.


Fair enough. There's good and bad chipping though I guess - you can make ground with the little chip kick but if you're not challenging the defensive zone with either upfield movement or good aggressive movement from the defenders (either making ground with running or with a direct kick). You see the Swans go their sweeping left footers to cross the field and make good aggressive distance.


Yes but that's not really a chip, it's more of a sweep. Not enough sweepers in the backline. Russel's the only one cleaning house. Everyone else is off playing golf.

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:00 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
A week ago I read Ratten had no gameplan. This week I learn he has.

1 week is a long time on Talking Carlton.

Bring on the Tigers :twisted:

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:05 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
fraser murphy wrote:
Yes but that's not really a chip, it's more of a sweep. Not enough sweepers in the backline. Russel's the only one cleaning house. Everyone else is off playing golf.


yes, I didnt explain myself correctly. The chip and the sweep are the mechanisms of the switch or attempted set-up. We have some chip kickers and the time in the air those kicks take frustrate us all and dont really look like they're setting anything up. The good directed kicks to strong leads or advantaged situations are what its all about in these Hawks / Swans / Saints game plans.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:11 am 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4773
Agree, we rarely kick in front of someone on a lead.

Its often kicked on their heads, where the opposition can easily spoil.......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:24 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Bondi, perception is reality but my perception is different to yours. No doubt we have players who break the lines, can break the lines, but if we play Armfield as hard tag, Joseph on hard tag, Bower on the best defender and we accept Jamison doesnt attract the ball (avg 8 stats per game or so) then we lose drive. Russell can break the lines with his top notch kicking but he does suffer, as we all do (and one of the key themes of this thread) that his 40 metre passes either foot might only make 10 metres in territory.

My view is from mid-year last year, after Waite's injury, we lost drive and direction from defence. It could have been Coaches blocking us better but when Thornton had to go to key defence rather than the floating 3rd defender, we lost drive. His stats, as did Bowers, dropped after that phase.

I never said drive dropped away entirely but said that we missed Waite from defence (and from all over really). No doubt Bower likes to run with the wind and nothing will stop that.

While the defence did well last year there's always a lot of improvement in how we can use possession that we get in the back half to set up well to half forward. The Swans game didnt show me much improvement, but you were there and i was interested in your comments in the game review. It also looked like a thin ground on TV so I wasnt sure if that was a factor (Cobwebs also a factor).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:48 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25309
Location: Bondi Beach
molsey wrote:
Bondi, perception is reality but my perception is different to yours. No doubt we have players who break the lines, can break the lines, but if we play Armfield as hard tag, Joseph on hard tag, Bower on the best defender and we accept Jamison doesnt attract the ball (avg 8 stats per game or so) then we lose drive. Russell can break the lines with his top notch kicking but he does suffer, as we all do (and one of the key themes of this thread) that his 40 metre passes either foot might only make 10 metres in territory.

My view is from mid-year last year, after Waite's injury, we lost drive and direction from defence. It could have been Coaches blocking us better but when Thornton had to go to key defence rather than the floating 3rd defender, we lost drive. His stats, as did Bowers, dropped after that phase.

I never said drive dropped away entirely but said that we missed Waite from defence (and from all over really). No doubt Bower likes to run with the wind and nothing will stop that.

While the defence did well last year there's always a lot of improvement in how we can use possession that we get in the back half to set up well to half forward. The Swans game didnt show me much improvement, but you were there and i was interested in your comments in the game review. It also looked like a thin ground on TV so I wasnt sure if that was a factor (Cobwebs also a factor).


Fair enough and you're right perception is an individual thing.

I don't think we lost drive from defense so much so that the defense came out of the defensive half with no direction.

I thought the major problem was more to do with the 'go to men' and their average efforts with positioning and presentation of a target for the defenders to go to.

But you are right we did lose Waite's influence everywhere.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:10 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
I am agreeing and disagreeing with everybody.

I reckon our defence stacks up. Jamison, Thornton, and Bower on the talls. Throw in Austin if need be. Mids are Russell and Robinson (love to see him run in a straight line). Smalls Joseph and Armfield. I don't have a problem with it. You can throw in Carazzo, Wiggins, Houlihan, Waite etc. for variety. But they can be overwhelmed with the ball flowing through by opponents midfielders.

Midfield we are great. We all know that.

But the midfield and the forward line have the same problem. We do not exert the defensive pressure required to be a top 4 side. If there was the structured gameplan and the players were drilled properly the turnovers would occur and the offensive game I am talking about could come into play.

And that is the balance I am talking about.

Footballers aren't rocket scientists. Just keep it simple stupid. When we haven't got the ball set up the defensive structure and pressure, pressure, pressure. When we have the ball create the loose man, run into space and keep running. Preferably up the guts.


Again I probably agree with the general theme of your post there Teddy, just not some of the fine detail :smile:


Agreed that players aren't rocket scientists (although how many people are :grin:) but I do think that football as it stands now requires players to think about the game more than ever before. Thus the snazzy little lecture theatres. It must come as a shock for many of those who snuck out the back to have a kick instead of concentrating on the homework.. make it to the AFL...and back to school and tactics lessons :lol: You can't dumb it down too much because other clubs aren't. Just need those leaders I mentioned in an earlier post to keep those slow learners up to scratch :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:14 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
molsey wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Chipping doesn't really apply pressure to the opposition though and it's a reactive style.
I'd rather see us be proactive and applying pressure.


Fair enough. There's good and bad chipping though I guess - you can make ground with the little chip kick but if you're not challenging the defensive zone with either upfield movement or good aggressive movement from the defenders (either making ground with running or with a direct kick). You see the Swans go their sweeping left footers to cross the field and make good aggressive distance.



Some of that is about players getting stuck in the process and losing sight of what the process is actually trying to achieve :donk:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:12 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 4055
Location: Recovering from the 1st effort
Interesting topic, apologies for not reading all of the history. As a Mr average out in suburbia, I cant remember a pre-season so dull and uninspiring. Even when we were getting pole-axed in the pagan years there was always some kind of story to keep us punters rolling up. Maybe I am sooo far out in suburbia that I've missed it all but this year there has been nothing, no encouraging signs, no new players that appear better than expected and worthy of genuine excitement, nothing except a sigh of releif that we arent being dragged through the gossip columns since dumping Fev, well at least I've seen nothing anyway.

Obviously there are the reports of February Brownlow medallists, record skinfolds etc but every year you hear about these. Every draftee is a steal, every player sets a PB on the training runs, this happens every year in the media. I hope that this is all part of some larger deception plan by the Carlton brains trust because as Mr Joe average there isnt much to get excited about. Some of the posters on here rate their reason for excitement as being that there is a chance we could go either way, good or bad! I dont want that, I want to be excited becauser I know I get to roll up every week and watch our boys smash whatever mob of dolts they roll out against us!! I dont get excited by a chance that we might go backwards! I get excited because I want to see results, I want to get arrogant again, I want to laugh at St Kilda supporters again, I'm sick of talking about our team in terms of how much potential or good they are GOING to be!!!

In 30 something years I cant remember a season where I have been so uninspired. Normally I am counting down the minutes to the 1st game and agonising over the team. This year I cant even get excited about that. This year I'm hoping for the best but expecting worse than last year. Frankly, after the trough we've been through I was hoping for a little more than a development year, especially after last year's encouraging improvement.

_________________
"Who discovered we could get milk from cows, and what did he think he was doing at the time?" Billy Connolly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:19 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I blame the retirement of Mike & Dan for the lack of pre-season fluff articles to which you refer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:56 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21566
Location: North of the border
I must be old because I remember a time when you didn't even start thinking of footy until the beginning of March and no one gave a hoot about what was happening preseason

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17222
molsey wrote:
I blame the retirement of Mike & Dan for the lack of pre-season fluff articles to which you refer.


Nah...they were never very good...welll - I guess Dan was ok...but Mike? Fluffier than a poodle in a mohair bodywarmer eating a french omelette.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:01 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
molsey wrote:
I blame the retirement of Mike & Dan for the lack of pre-season fluff articles to which you refer.


Nah...they were never very good...welll - I guess Dan was ok...but Mike? Fluffier than a poodle in a mohair bodywarmer eating a french omelette.


No arguments here :wink:

I do feel however that the absence of Mike & Dan will cost the club at least 5000 members.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:06 am 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:09 am
Posts: 497
TheBluesMuse wrote:
aramari wrote:

Flowered if I know. But regardless of how the season unfolds, I hope people on this forum can be tolerant of how others deal with this tension, whether they're unicorn-loving sugercoaters in denial or embittered curmudgeonly prophets of doom (I oscillate wildly between the two :smoking: )


Absolutely. I love the diversity of opinions here, how one mans attitude can vary so greatly to the next....the more respectfully you can carry out this discussion the better it is because it doesn't get things deleted or the mods angry.




funny how football can do this to a man.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:46 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
molsey wrote:
....

I do feel however that the absence of Mike & Dan will cost the club at least 5000 members.


Modern technology allows for ease of communication on a massive scale.

The lack of meaningful communication (other than the increasing pleas for money) with members at grassroots level is, IMO, poor and in large taking them totally for granted.

The lack of communication together with the erosion of grassroots democracy is my reason for not renewing.

While membership levels may reach last years figures, I'd suggest they'd reach far greater heights with greater respect and effort directed at grassroots supporters Australia wide.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
im more excited for the start of the formula 1 season this weekend than the start of the footy season in a few weeks

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Season Tension
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:42 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
molsey wrote:

I do feel however that the absence of Mike & Dan will cost the club at least 5000 members.
Wait until the shower pic`s come out. We will be glad we got rid of them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Duked, Majestic-12 [Bot], SammyTheBagel, tap in 79 and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group