molsey wrote:
Bondi, perception is reality but my perception is different to yours. No doubt we have players who break the lines, can break the lines, but if we play Armfield as hard tag, Joseph on hard tag, Bower on the best defender and we accept Jamison doesnt attract the ball (avg 8 stats per game or so) then we lose drive. Russell can break the lines with his top notch kicking but he does suffer, as we all do (and one of the key themes of this thread) that his 40 metre passes either foot might only make 10 metres in territory.
My view is from mid-year last year, after Waite's injury, we lost drive and direction from defence. It could have been Coaches blocking us better but when Thornton had to go to key defence rather than the floating 3rd defender, we lost drive. His stats, as did Bowers, dropped after that phase.
I never said drive dropped away entirely but said that we missed Waite from defence (and from all over really). No doubt Bower likes to run with the wind and nothing will stop that.
While the defence did well last year there's always a lot of improvement in how we can use possession that we get in the back half to set up well to half forward. The Swans game didnt show me much improvement, but you were there and i was interested in your comments in the game review. It also looked like a thin ground on TV so I wasnt sure if that was a factor (Cobwebs also a factor).
Fair enough and you're right perception is an individual thing.
I don't think we lost drive from defense so much so that the defense came out of the defensive half with no direction.
I thought the major problem was more to do with the 'go to men' and their average efforts with positioning and presentation of a target for the defenders to go to.
But you are right we did lose Waite's influence everywhere.