steve7 wrote:
I think that you have under sold Carrazzo.
While we have been recruiting more quality mids that he will be competing spot with, he has improved his game every year that he has been at the club to the point that he now has very few flaws and still can find the footy better than anyone who could take his spot.
Not every player we recruit is going to be elite natural talent and that is why he should be in the leadership group, to show them that you can make it if you are prepared to work your arse off to get there. Remember leadership is an assessment of character, not skill
Agree Steve. He is the second leader after Judd I think. He has overcome lots of rejections to become a solid player, is disciplined, determined, unselfish, doesn't seem to belong to cliques and I thought was good last year especially in some defensive forward roles. Seems mature, and he can put two words together reasonably articulately and without being a smart alec.
I was interested to not Fish was in the leadership group, which I first thought was a bad idea, but if he has the personal qualities the fact that he might be leading in the Ants mightn't be a bad thing, might help the group learn a bit of humility and work harder. I'd leave Murph, Gibbs and Big K out at this stage, although Big K would be my next captain (in some years time).
Jamo is a must for the leadership group, good head on his shoulders, mature, not dumb, can talk sensibly, qualities relatively rare at AFL level.