Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:10 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 269 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:54 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
grrofunger wrote:
DOA wrote:
So what is this heinous crime Andy Walkz has committed?

It has been instilled in him from an early age to support family and mates,I have told him I am proud of him for going to help Ryan who was set upon by bouncers.

Walkz response in going to help a mate was instinctive.
Noone was killed ,no bones were broken,and no stiches were required, just a skirmish.

No charges were laid for assault,none for drunk and disorderly.
The Liberal Party newsletter(aka the Herald Sun)would have you believe it was a "booze fuelled brawl".
Club administrators who believe fines and suspensions would prevent a player from instinctively looking after mates, are at the very least,naive,the AFL's melee rule provides a clue.

As stated earlier,I support Andrew 100% in his actions.
Friends and family will remain long after a playing career is finished.
My advice to him? Avoid placing yourself in those situations.
I have no intention of revisiting this topic,and have been loathe to give this issue any more oxygen,moronic club administrators can fuel the media.

Oh,and for those who imagined a man to man verbal dressing down,the players were advised of their penalties via text message.


QFMFT


If that is indeed the case, we are in far worse trouble than I thought.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:33 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
DOA wrote:
My advice to him? Avoid placing yourself in those situations.


There's the nub of it though, isn't it?

Thanks for your input, DOA.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:02 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
DOA wrote:
So what is this heinous crime Andy Walkz has committed?

It has been instilled in him from an early age to support family and mates,I have told him I am proud of him for going to help Ryan who was set upon by bouncers.

Walkz response in going to help a mate was instinctive.
Noone was killed ,no bones were broken,and no stiches were required, just a skirmish.

No charges were laid for assault,none for drunk and disorderly.
The Liberal Party newsletter(aka the Herald Sun)would have you believe it was a "booze fuelled brawl".
Club administrators who believe fines and suspensions would prevent a player from instinctively looking after mates, are at the very least,naive,the AFL's melee rule provides a clue.

As stated earlier,I support Andrew 100% in his actions.
Friends and family will remain long after a playing career is finished.
My advice to him? Avoid placing yourself in those situations.
I have no intention of revisiting this topic,and have been loathe to give this issue any more oxygen,moronic club administrators can fuel the media.

Oh,and for those who imagined a man to man verbal dressing down,the players were advised of their penalties via text message.


In the pressor, Stick's clearly stated that he addressed the whole playing group and left no confusion as to what his thoughts were and what is expected. Did Walks and others not attend this meeting?

I can understand why they were text messaged their penalties as we are directed to do the same in our workplaces as these sort of directives are required to be in writing and text has replaced formal letters for pretty much everything other than termination.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:25 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
How do you know they were not told face to face before the text message?

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:51 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
I'm with Keogh on this one,

the club needed to act on whoever was handcuffed to Casboult. I understand this person was not one of the three against whom action has been taken (if I am wrong on that and the offender was one of Betts, Walker and Houlihan then he needed his exile at least doubled). But this is a person of whom the media is clearly aware, and are probably in the position to name at any time. Given the current HUN vendetta they are probably holding it above us like the sword of damocles.

According to Damien Barrett this morning, the email from the AFL to Carlton asking for an explanation by January 11 says:
Quote:
"The AFL is particularly concerned by the most recent claims of a young player being forced to drink excessive amounts of alcohol by senior players."


So what do we do on January 11? We try to brush the handcuff player under the carpet? Is that going to wash? I mean, if the AFL is particularly concerned about the Casboult incident, then how on earth have we dealt with it? If the handcuffer was Betts, Houlihan or Walker then we've done nothing to increase their penalty. If it was anybody else then they have remained unpenalised. We have had the opportunity with this one to be proactive, and instead we remain reactive and leave ourselves open to further sanctions and punishment.

Oh and here's a link to Barrett's article: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/secret-blues-upset-afl/story-e6frf9jf-1225816109602


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:52 am 
Offline
Carlton Board Member

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 110
Location: Melbourne
mikkey wrote:
Quote:
Oh,and for those who imagined a man to man verbal dressing down,the players were advised of their penalties via text message.


Piss weak stuff this. Seems to me that there might be a lack of leadership around the place and that certain administrators might not be as good as we thought.


That is inaccurate. The offenders were personally called prior to the PC. The rest of the playing group was emailed or texted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:53 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 57
My apologies if this was covered somewhere by the club but what action, if any, was taken in respect of the treatment meted out to Levi Casboult?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:00 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 2367
Location: Riyadh
Thanks Mark. Appreciate the clarification.

_________________
"The old believe everything, the middle-aged suspect everything, and the young know everything." Oscar Wilde


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:00 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..in my opinion, while i think and believe that what has happened is unprofessional for the modern game.. ..it only affects our club's premiership chances, possibly sponsorship bucks.. ..but ultimately, it's just our club holding itself back.... ..i don't see a reason for the AFL to stick their big fat nose in..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:08 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..in my opinion, while i think and believe that what has happened is unprofessional for the modern game.. ..it only affects our club's premiership chances, possibly sponsorship bucks.. ..but ultimately, it's just our club holding itself back.... ..i don't see a reason for the AFL to stick their big fat nose in..


Indeed, especially given the AFL's reluctance to even contemplate any intervention with any other club - except West Coast with Cousins, when it was painfully obvious something was very wrong - in the case of criminal allegations.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:17 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 2367
Location: Riyadh
There's a lot about the AFL's operations I disagree with, but I'm sympathetic to them this time. Given the sensitivity of corporate image at the moment, especially with soccer significantly on the rise and the new television rights agreements coming up, it's understandable that the AFL doesn't want 'surprises'.

_________________
"The old believe everything, the middle-aged suspect everything, and the young know everything." Oscar Wilde


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:21 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
Guys, unless you want us to not win a game in 2010 and suspend every player, then shut the hell up.

I think the suspensions were hard enough. Those players won't come straight into the team once the ban is lifted. They will need atleast a month of training with the seniors and to learn the new gameplan before they could play a senior game. Unless we have severe injuries they won't play atleast till round 7-8 at best.

They also will be scared as shit to drink again as they are that close to losing their job. If i was them, l would be thinking its my last season at the club and better perform.

As for Levi, l am sure he didn't complain about being tied to a senior player on the boat cruise, he just got too drunk and you can't see him complaining. He said this stuff happens all the time in the AFL , VFL, domestic football clubs. Hes over it, why arent you guys?

How about you guys stop looking for blood and get over it. Starting to think this club is turning in to richmond supporters forum.

Its 2010, lets get ready for the season, this topic is done

Nothing the club does makes you guys happy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:22 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Goltzenberg wrote:
Nothing the club does makes you guys happy.


Not entirely true......Making them unhappy about these sorts of things makes them happy.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:30 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23924
Who was the bloke chained to the kid and who was involved in that. No mention of that in both statements.This is utterly pathetic by the club. The most serious incident and is not even mentioned in both statements. Unbelievable

And the fact that the penalties were relayed via text message. Havent mobile phones added a new dimension of avoidance to difficult situations. What about facing them sticks and !@#$%& telling them. NO because you havent got any balls if what DOA says is correct.

What about Ratten's role yesterday. Did he do anything.
(quote from keogh)

Where was Swan???
Chris Judd's point on alcohol as reward is pertinent and probably key to all this.
therein lies the problem,and if we have an admin that values this booze as reward mentality,we should look at that,because in the end,its about walking the walk.
After watching the excellent doco on American National Parks,I reckon a trip to Yellowstone,or Yosemite,where nature is so overwhelming, and awe inspiring to man,would be a much more suitable reward...camping,hiking,and bonding...without booze...a little time to get some perspective,and soul time for the lads...to realize that the little inner party/wild man is only a small part of there whole selves.
They have bigger fish to fry..and they need a little help perhaps to get them a larger perspective of their lives.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:33 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Goltzenberg wrote:
Guys, unless you want us to not win a game in 2010 and suspend every player, then shut the hell up.

I think the suspensions were hard enough. Those players won't come straight into the team once the ban is lifted. They will need atleast a month of training with the seniors and to learn the new gameplan before they could play a senior game. Unless we have severe injuries they won't play atleast till round 7-8 at best.

They also will be scared as shit to drink again as they are that close to losing their job. If i was them, l would be thinking its my last season at the club and better perform.

As for Levi, l am sure he didn't complain about being tied to a senior player on the boat cruise, he just got too drunk and you can't see him complaining. He said this stuff happens all the time in the AFL , VFL, domestic football clubs. Hes over it, why arent you guys?

How about you guys stop looking for blood and get over it. Starting to think this club is turning in to richmond supporters forum.

Its 2010, lets get ready for the season, this topic is done

Nothing the club does makes you guys happy.



i dont wanna win 13 games of footy.
i wanna win a premiership.

and the only way were gunna win premierships is if the club comes down hard on the drinking culture.the unprofessional culture.. the repeat offenders...the lazy bones... etc....

And if that means we win 10 games next year and 16 the year after so be it.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:34 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
bluegirl72 wrote:
Who was the bloke chained to the kid and who was involved in that. No mention of that in both statements.This is utterly pathetic by the club. The most serious incident and is not even mentioned in both statements. Unbelievable

And the fact that the penalties were relayed via text message. Havent mobile phones added a new dimension of avoidance to difficult situations. What about facing them sticks and !@#$%& telling them. NO because you havent got any balls if what DOA says is correct.

What about Ratten's role yesterday. Did he do anything.
(quote from keogh)

Where was Swan???
Chris Judd's point on alcohol as reward is pertinent and probably key to all this.
therein lies the problem,and if we have an admin that values this booze as reward mentality,we should look at that,because in the end,its about walking the walk.
After watching the excellent doco on American National Parks,I reckon a trip to Yellowstone,or Yosemite,where nature is so overwhelming, and awe inspiring to man,would be a much more suitable reward...camping,hiking,and bonding...without booze...a little time to get some perspective,and soul time for the lads...to realize that the little inner party/wild man is only a small part of there whole selves.
They have bigger fish to fry..and they need a little help perhaps to get them a larger perspective of their lives.


Maybe we could get ned flanders to come camping with them too lol


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:39 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Goltzenberg wrote:
Guys, unless you want us to not win a game in 2010 and suspend every player, then shut the hell up.

I think the suspensions were hard enough. Those players won't come straight into the team once the ban is lifted. They will need atleast a month of training with the seniors and to learn the new gameplan before they could play a senior game. Unless we have severe injuries they won't play atleast till round 7-8 at best.

They also will be scared as shit to drink again as they are that close to losing their job. If i was them, l would be thinking its my last season at the club and better perform.

As for Levi, l am sure he didn't complain about being tied to a senior player on the boat cruise, he just got too drunk and you can't see him complaining. He said this stuff happens all the time in the AFL , VFL, domestic football clubs. Hes over it, why arent you guys?

How about you guys stop looking for blood and get over it. Starting to think this club is turning in to richmond supporters forum.

Its 2010, lets get ready for the season, this topic is done

Nothing the club does makes you guys happy.


I pay about $700 a year to the club in membership $s, I have a right to complain if our club is the only club right now qwith an apparent behaviour/drinking problem.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:40 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23924
Goltzenberg wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
Who was the bloke chained to the kid and who was involved in that. No mention of that in both statements.This is utterly pathetic by the club. The most serious incident and is not even mentioned in both statements. Unbelievable

And the fact that the penalties were relayed via text message. Havent mobile phones added a new dimension of avoidance to difficult situations. What about facing them sticks and !@#$%& telling them. NO because you havent got any balls if what DOA says is correct.

What about Ratten's role yesterday. Did he do anything.
(quote from keogh)

Where was Swan???
Chris Judd's point on alcohol as reward is pertinent and probably key to all this.
therein lies the problem,and if we have an admin that values this booze as reward mentality,we should look at that,because in the end,its about walking the walk.
After watching the excellent doco on American National Parks,I reckon a trip to Yellowstone,or Yosemite,where nature is so overwhelming, and awe inspiring to man,would be a much more suitable reward...camping,hiking,and bonding...without booze...a little time to get some perspective,and soul time for the lads...to realize that the little inner party/wild man is only a small part of there whole selves.
They have bigger fish to fry..and they need a little help perhaps to get them a larger perspective of their lives.


Maybe we could get ned flanders to come camping with them too lol

:grin: ...yeah,but I had something deeper in mind than Kumbayah!! :lol:

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:40 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
DOA wrote:
My advice to him? Avoid placing yourself in those situations.


There's the nub of it though, isn't it?

Thanks for your input, DOA.


Correct.

Agree Walks, like anyone should back up their mates.

But if you're at Crown late at night and are associated with people who are behaving inappropriately, then that is your problem.

No excuses.

He shouldn't have been in that situation in the first place.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:42 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
DOA has my complete support and I echo his sentiments.
We have all become brainwashed drones conditioned to react to tabloid sensationalism and call for mass hangings for the most minor of indiscretions.

It is clear to me that Andrew was trying to help Ryan at the time and convince him to return to his room. When bouncers decided to escalate the situation, Andrew tried to help a mate. Those traits are far more important to me than this insatiable desire to make footballers into fricken pastors!!!

Unfortunately for Andrew, wrong place, wrong time and he has been caught up in the witch hunt and copped the suspension. But Andrew certainly wont be getting any criticism from me.

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 269 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender, ByteDanceSpider, Fenwick Snap, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mickstar and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group