Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 4:52 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 572 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 29  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:16 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
What better than announcing a new sponsor leading into Christmas, oh hang on Christmas is Friday I'm tipping the rumour is true.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:17 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 296
Location: Outside Demetriou's Office - shhh!
The worrying bit for me in all of this is that 4 players were involved in 3 separate incidents.

Poor form


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:25 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
DIAMOTISM wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
I think everyone needs to take football players down off their hero pedestals and lower their expectations.

Football players are the same snotty nosed shitheads you get pissed off at in the shopping centres, on the buses, on the trains, in the pubs, at the beach etc - young rowdy flower kids with not much care or clue for the world around them.

But cos these shitheads can kick a footy and run a bit and pump weights and get overpaid everyone seems to worship them and think they are geniuses all of a sudden

I understand that with being a highly paid footballer comes responsibility but i think we expect far too much from them, its beyond them - they dont have the mental capacity

I enjoy watching them play football though - thats about as far as it goes for me nowadays , they are merely shitheads kicking a footy around and nothing more.

Not Heroes, not Role models , not Saviours, not Angels , not Perfect never were and never will be.


Try telling kids that.............aint gunna happen


Why?????....u want ur kids living in la la land, believing in the tooth fairy, Santa, and having footballers/sportspeople as their role models instead of you, their parent ?

In the last 2-3 weeks we have had the Tiger saga, Hulk Hogan's infidelity exposed, then Suliman Benn and 3 Aussies cricketers get fined, now some naughty blue boys.

Oh my the poor little kiddies will never be the same :screwy: :screwy: :screwy:

In fact how are the kiddies ever going to cope with learning this year about a gold medal runner having both a pussy and internal testicles ?....has ur daughter asked for some testicles yet ?

Public controversy is a constant among the famous including sports ppl.

Don't worry about the kids.... they get over all this crap in the media.....they are more interested in their next bowl of ice-cream.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21568
Location: North of the border
Quick question was the cruise put on by the club ???


Because if it was and the club didn't take steps to get the players home then the club is at fault

As an employer if you provide booze for your employees you automatically become responsible for their actions


So was it an end of year cruise organised by the club ??????

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Sydney Blue wrote:
Quick question was the cruise put on by the club ???


Because if it was and the club didn't take steps to get the players home then the club is at fault

As an employer if you provide booze for your employees you automatically become responsible for their actions


So was it an end of year cruise organised by the club ??????


On the Carltonfc statement Swann described the outing as a "players unofficial end of year celebrations".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:47 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Eddie fined 5K.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Over previous seasons the club has disciplined players by fining them, given them stints in the bullants and other such measures but they've obviously not been harsh enough because we still have players in the headlines for the wrong reasons.

If the club want these headlines to disappear they must apply harsher penalties that the players will think about before they think about going out for a drink.
Fines or a stint at Preston obviously don't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:06 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16967
Location: Melbourne
get rid of the hacks wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
get rid of the hacks wrote:
Yeah but sponsors must allow for a "risk factor" when sponsoring an AFL club. 40+ young guys with money that the public and press target, and that are pursued by women in nightspots.

A sponsor must be willing to accept the chance of some minor indescretions during a year. If not they should place their sponsorship elsewhere. This is all part of the risk/reward factor of sponsoring an AFL club.
This incident dosn't seem to be anything extraordinary that will have a great impact on the club's perception.



Sorry Hack but that is uninformed drivel. Do you think the TAC write a 'risk factor' for 2 or 3 Collingwood players being nabbed for .05. 2 is fine but any more is too much Does Nike write a 'risk factor' for Tiger having 10 mistresses. 5 is fine but 10 is just over the bench mark. Why should any Company paying 2.5 Million over 3 years have to put up with the person/business/club tarnishing their brand?

It's not a risk factor, it's an assessment of what the perception is by the people who buy their product. The worse the perception the more likely the plug gets pulled. The media help fuel that perception, infact they damn near engineer it. And at the moment the media are having a field day in a slow news week.

Tiger's Sponsors have jumped off because the media have wound up the huddled masses to such an extent that it was effecting sales for his Sponsors. That's where the risk is. Tiger has sullied their brand in the eyes of the public because the likes of Conan and Leno are tearing him a new one every night and the Sponsors names are part of the gag.

Every time the latest incident has been mentioned, the media has taken great joy in reading out the entire litany of past indiscretions by Carlton Footballers. The latest incident now becomes another red pin head on board full of red pin heads. That's what the Sponsors see.

How would you feel being a Carlton Sales rep trying to sell Carlton to a possible Sponsor. The 1st thing the would be Sponsor says is 'When does it stop?' The 2nd is 'What are you doing to Stop it?'

Do you think the witty Salesman says..........'Boys will be boys, get over it! Now about that big fat cheque.'

People are dreamin if they think this has no effect in the real world of dollars and cents and it's just a minor thing to be laughed off with....'He was just letting off steam'.

Regards Cazzesman


In your own words Yoda "why let the facts get in the way of a good story?"

Fact - 1 sponsor only has dumped Tiger - Accenture ( a biz consultancy firm)

Tag Heur - has reduced advertising while the dust settles...but check their website....something like "TAG HEUR backs Tiger Woods" is up on display ATM

Gillette also have not dumped Tiger, just pulled his ads until the dust settles.


http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news- ... nine-years

You must have missed this one.

And to follow up as you suggested................

Razormaker Gillette announced Saturday it would phase him out of advertisements while he takes a break from golf, calling it a supportive move.

"As Tiger takes a break from the public eye, we will support his desire for privacy by limiting his role in our marketing programs," the company said, said without announcing a timetable for the resumption of use of the golfer's image.

AT&T, which backs the US PGA Tour operated by the golfer's foundation, said in a statement, "We are presently evaluating our ongoing relationship with him."

So far, most of Woods' ad sponsors are standing by him -- but The Nielsen Company found that despite their pledges of support, television ads featuring the golfer have mostly disappeared since the controversy began on Thanksgiving weekend.

Yep he's travelling smoothly. :thumbsup:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Last edited by Cazzesman on Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:13 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
club29 wrote:
2 weeks of 4am training sessions in the bay for everyone except the offenders !
Yep i agree, we need the playing group AS A WHOLE to fight this problem. They need to get angry at the perpetrators who continually put the club in this spot. You can only expect so much from a couple of people such as Judd and Swann.

That should be a club rule from now on. Set it in stone.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:18 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6423
suspend the 4 guys till round 5. No interaction with the club at all. Then they come back front the playing group and they show if they are fair dinkum or not. Then depending on how fit they have kept themselves its off to Cramer St for a while. And any more shit and its bye bye permantly.

A pack of flower.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:24 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
keogh wrote:
suspend the 4 guys till round 5. No interaction with the club at all. Then they come back front the playing group and they show if they are fair dinkum or not. Then depending on how fit they have kept themselves its off to Cramer St for a while. And any more shit and its bye bye permantly.

A pack of !@#$%&.

Nup, take it out on their mates. That will hurt them more, guaranteed.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:28 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:13 pm
Posts: 1044
Location: sydney
"
On the Carltonfc statement Swann described the outing as a "players unofficial end of year celebrations".

This really is a worrying statement!

Our heirachy seems to be deflecting all responsibilty on this issue.

Do they really expect us to believe that not ONE senior member of the Calton Playing Staff or Management knew of this event?

Were there any members of the Carlton Players Leadership Group participants in the Boat Cruise?

Sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I revert to my earlier comments "a bunch of well known footballers are tipped off a boat after a boozey day and our Club had no idea???"

Give me strength!!!!

And the best that Swann can come up with is "that it was an unofficial trip"

CULTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
A good backhander usually does wonders :lol: :razz:

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:38 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:11 am
Posts: 456
Location: Denmark
teagueyubeauty wrote:
club29 wrote:
2 weeks of 4am training sessions in the bay for everyone except the offenders !
Yep i agree, we need the playing group AS A WHOLE to fight this problem. They need to get angry at the perpetrators who continually put the club in this spot. You can only expect so much from a couple of people such as Judd and Swann.

That should be a club rule from now on. Set it in stone.


Why not just get Kendrick to issue a code red before transferring them off the base...

I think that the issue has been well handled by the club. The Houla and Betts incidents were stupid and just goes to show the dangers of binge drinking. I think that there are lessons to be learnt there and as a parent I think that it serves as a good example to the kids - If you drink and act the fool then nobody has any tollerance for that sort of behaviour.

As for how much damage it does to the club's image, well I am sure that there are sports marketing agencies that will have opinions either way ranging from it affects potential sponsorships through to any publicity is good publicity.

From what I read, Walker was pinged while trying to help out a mate (I am guessing this is a result of the team environment and always being there for your mates when they are in trouble) and Robbo has denied that there was an issue. It was only rumour. If his incident was reported in isolation then we would not even be commenting on this, it is only that it was presented as a "B" story on the back of the Bett's incident that it seems more sinister.

I hope that the boys have learnt their lessons and realize that even when they are on a break, their actions still come under the domain of public interest and as such will be reported. I just wish that Bett's had taken action to tell the club about his misdemeanor before it broke as a seperate story.

Enjoy the Christmas break and I hope that we will be making headlines in 2010 for our on-field actions rather than our off-field antics.


PS: Anyone with close links to the club, I would be interested to know if there is a general perception that there is a problem with alcohol related behaviour within the club, as from all reports in the training forum, everyone is firing on all fours.

_________________
"our guest is dressed by hand-me-downs, hair designed by pillow"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:09 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
blueslander wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
club29 wrote:
2 weeks of 4am training sessions in the bay for everyone except the offenders !
Yep i agree, we need the playing group AS A WHOLE to fight this problem. They need to get angry at the perpetrators who continually put the club in this spot. You can only expect so much from a couple of people such as Judd and Swann.

That should be a club rule from now on. Set it in stone.


Why not just get Kendrick to issue a code red before transferring them off the base...

I think that the issue has been well handled by the club. The Houla and Betts incidents were stupid and just goes to show the dangers of binge drinking. I think that there are lessons to be learnt there and as a parent I think that it serves as a good example to the kids - If you drink and act the fool then nobody has any tollerance for that sort of behaviour.

As for how much damage it does to the club's image, well I am sure that there are sports marketing agencies that will have opinions either way ranging from it affects potential sponsorships through to any publicity is good publicity.

From what I read, Walker was pinged while trying to help out a mate (I am guessing this is a result of the team environment and always being there for your mates when they are in trouble) and Robbo has denied that there was an issue. It was only rumour. If his incident was reported in isolation then we would not even be commenting on this, it is only that it was presented as a "B" story on the back of the Bett's incident that it seems more sinister.

I hope that the boys have learnt their lessons and realize that even when they are on a break, their actions still come under the domain of public interest and as such will be reported. I just wish that Bett's had taken action to tell the club about his misdemeanor before it broke as a seperate story.

Enjoy the Christmas break and I hope that we will be making headlines in 2010 for our on-field actions rather than our off-field antics.


PS: Anyone with close links to the club, I would be interested to know if there is a general perception that there is a problem with alcohol related behaviour within the club, as from all reports in the training forum, everyone is firing on all fours.
I don't know what rock you've been hiding under but to me the punishments aren't any different to what's been handed out before. Those punishments quite clearly are not working.

By all means continue to hand them out but at the same time different thought processes need to be included in the process.

Its not Judd and Swann that are going to turn this culture around, it HAS to be the entire playing group.

Its bloody harsh on the guys that do the right thing but as i see it they need to be the ones leading the charge, its such an easy thought process to believe that the Captain, Vice Captain and CEO are the ones that will make change happen. Foolish thought actually, just isn't going to happen.

A fine doesn't work, clearly missing games don't work, basically sacking a superstar doesn't work, so how about we let the perpetrators be dealt with by their unhappy and tired mates.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:14 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
Sorry Hack but that is uninformed drivel. Do you think the TAC write a 'risk factor' for 2 or 3 Collingwood players being nabbed

In your own words Yoda "why let the facts get in the way of a good story?"

Fact - 1 sponsor only has dumped Tiger - Accenture ( a biz consultancy firm)

Tag Heur - has reduced advertising while the dust settles...but check their website....something like "TAG HEUR backs Tiger Woods" is up on display ATM

Gillette also have not dumped Tiger, just pulled his ads until the dust settles.[/quote]

http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news- ... nine-years

You must have missed this one.

And to follow up as you suggested................

Razormaker Gillette announced Saturday it would phase him out of advertisements while he takes a break from golf, calling it a supportive move.

"As Tiger takes a break from the public eye, we will support his desire for privacy by limiting his role in our marketing programs," the company said, said without announcing a timetable for the resumption of use of the golfer's image.

AT&T, which backs the US PGA Tour operated by the golfer's foundation, said in a statement, "We are presently evaluating our ongoing relationship with him."

So far, most of Woods' ad sponsors are standing by him -- but The Nielsen Company found that despite their pledges of support, television ads featuring the golfer have mostly disappeared since the controversy began on Thanksgiving weekend.

Yep he's travelling smoothly. :thumbsup:

Regards Cazzesman[/quote]

Read the GM article....the sponsorship was due to end in 09, and it is ending accordingly, they are not providing further sponsorship.
Hardly surprising whatever Tiger did as GM has had such bad financial trouble that they had to sell half the company for next to nothing recently to stay afloat.

Companies are temporarily pulling ads.....well FMD....laying low for a short time....but still Cazz.......facts are they are just pulling ads.... the facts are that he has not been dumped by most of his sponsors....whether it ties in with your story or not.

Tiger may or may not be travelling as smoothly as he would like, but your claims that all/most of his sponsors had dumped him were just plain inaccurate.

The guy still has more sponsorship $ coming his way than any other sportsman on the planet...so you need to worry more about what guys like Mitch may do to our brand than Tiger and his $billion empire having a hiccup :thumbsup:

BTW how did Mitch go in his interview and Psych testing ?

For the 1st time you didn't trot out the usual spin "WH only recruits good kids", as you are normally quick to jump to all recruits defense....was there a problem with Mitch we chose to take a risk with when he "slipped" to #40.

You said he had a good 09....but he was found guilty of king hitting a bloke in the VFL, and now some more smoking guns in his 1st year....should be an interesting guy to follow


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
MIL wrote:
The rot starts at the top - Sticks must go, and now. Enough of having "one of the boys" at the helm. No wonder he didn't have a problem with this planned grog-on cruise, he would have loved it himself :roll:

Punish the offenders with a large fine, extra training, exclusion from team social events etc, but we can't afford to have them missing too many games, esp with Judd out until round 4.

FMD we don't need this right now :hitcomputer: :hitcomputer:

The fish Sticks from the head.................................

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:37 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:42 pm
Posts: 2926
Location: dudley!!!
these indiscretions are really frustrating for a few reasons, mainly due to all of the advertising around how drinking this time of year can have a negative impact, the fev issues, which were made out to be all his fault, and because it seems all other clubs are having 'feel good' stories in the papers, and we are made to look like a joke after takijng the hard line on Brendan. This is Eddies second altercation in 4 months, Hoops has been a repeat offender, I want the club to get tough on those 2, particularly as Hoops is the oldest at the club, and Eddie is supposed to be such a role model for the younger Aboriginal kids coming through.

man I really want to see Sticks, Swann and Ratts get hard on them this time. they made a huge statement with Fev, lets see them back it up and not wimp out

merry xmas al TC'ers

_________________
my last one was rubbish


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:42 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
I don't really care personally but I understand the impact on sponsors and some of our supporters. It needs to stop but I'm not sure that banning alcohol or punishing everyone with training sessions etc will work. Things like that have the potential to cause rifts and resentments amongst the playing group. Maybe we should look at it from another angle? Most of these incidents happen end of year when the boys are on a break. If we could work out a way for the boys to blow off steam during the year maybe they wouldn't feel the need to go overboard end of season.

On a slightly unrelated note does anyone else get the feeling we've pissed off the media somehow?

It's obviously a newsworthy story by today's standards but there's a few stories out there about other clubs/players that they don't seem to be pursuing with the same vigour.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16967
Location: Melbourne
get rid of the hacks wrote:

The guy still has more sponsorship $ coming his way than any other sportsman on the planet...so you need to worry more about what guys like Mitch may do to our brand than Tiger and his $billion empire having a hiccup :thumbsup:

BTW how did Mitch go in his interview and Psych testing ?

For the 1st time you didn't trot out the usual spin "WH only recruits good kids", as you are normally quick to jump to all recruits defense....was there a problem with Mitch we chose to take a risk with when he "slipped" to #40.

You said he had a good 09....but he was found guilty of king hitting a bloke in the VFL, and now some more smoking guns in his 1st year....should be an interesting guy to follow


Yes I do need to worry about what guys like Mitch may do to our brand. So should all supporters. That's been my argument from the start. You appear to be the one who initially thought it will have no effect on Sponsors. ....didn’t you post.... “This incident dosn't seem to be anything extraordinary that will have a great impact on the club's perception”.
Have you had a change of heart now that two more in Eddie and Robbo are on the front page.

What is your new fixation with Robbo? Robbo is a feisty, excitable boy who has some growing up to do and not get ahead of himself. That is plain for all to see. The kid can also play footy. Why would I jump to the kids defence after he has been a silly lad. He has stuffed up and has been penalised accordingly with probably more to come.

It has been well documented he was rated at #9. He made it to #40 and was the highest rated on the list so he got picked. That’s the normal way WH has done it.

If you are trying to spin an argument atleast quote me correctly. What I said about Robbo was...
“09 wasn't a bad start for him prior to injury”. And that is true. As for king hitting a bloke (your words) I have no idea if that happened but getting reported shows he has some growing up to do as I have stated.

By all accounts his interview was impressive but I only have that 2nd hand. I have no idea about the test as I am not privy to it.

If you think the selection of Robbo was wrong then spit it out. If you are just trying the scatter gun effect to score some points with your arguments then you need to take better aim.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Last edited by Cazzesman on Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 572 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 29  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Mickstar and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group