Me three.
But I will add another positive in a post-Fevola future is that ALL players on our list will be given a better opportunity to develop as a team and to follow the coach’s instructions.
That raises the next question as to whether Ratten can implement successful strategies to work with a new F50 setup. One thing is certain, we won’t have an over domineering senior player on the list more worried about how he looks on the big screen than he is about following the team’s instructions.
Make no mistake, there will be times in 2010 that (from the outside) the club will look like duffers for trading Fev. Internally, though, I expect the feeling will be vastly different.
So, getting back to molsey’s original question, I think we had to move on with Fev, so as noted, we are already ahead on the deal. The icing on the cake will be how good Henderson and #12 end up becoming. The possible upside for us is massive. The downside, less of an issue, as it seems abundantly clear that we just had to let him go.
In many respects whatever Fev does at Brisbane should be irrelevant, as he is no longer a player on our list. But, yes, you’re right molsey, if/when Fev does kick a few bags there will be plenty of action on TC pointing out that fact.
Just quietly, I’m liking the scenario he has already created at his new club whereby his arrival has already pushed Bradshaw and Henderson out of the team, and one also suspects the chances of Rishictelli playing for the Gold Coast are better than slim as well. For the sake of Michael Voss and Brisbane, they’d better hope Fevola is a good get.
Whatever happens now, any shit Fev gets himself into won’t be a problem we have to deal with.
