Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:26 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 415 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 21  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:47 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Dukes wrote:
As for cutting Fev loose without gaining any compensation, all I can say is that I'm glad you aren't at the helm of the Carlton FC. He has HUGE currency in this market with most clubs crying out for a power forward who can kick bags of goals. Why would we turn our back on draft picks or quality players if they are offered up to us.

For what it's worth ... I'd keep him.


You need to read what was written again.
You are missing the point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:48 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 1:16 pm
Posts: 93
Location: Melbourne
Well, the media are gathering around Optus Oval as we speak and the rumour is that he is gone.

This is reported by SEN so who really knows...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34533
Location: The Brown Wedge
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
If anyone thinks for a millisecond that Brendan Fevola can punt an NFL football, they are sorely mistaken. Not an option for him.


I don't think that - after all, they're professionals.

If we aren't going to be offered a trade, or for someone to take his entire contract for nothing, the next option (possibly, just throwing it out there) is to give him 12 games for the H&A year. That's it 12 games. We choose when he plays but he doesn't play any more than that.

At the end of 2010 we offer him up for trade again, his attitude and ability on field will determine his value.

This way the ball returns to the clubs side of the court and Fev learns the hard way that he's no longer the boss.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:49 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 284
Quote:

As for cutting Fev loose without gaining any compensation, all I can say is that I'm glad you aren't at the helm of the Carlton FC. He has HUGE currency in this market with most clubs crying out for a power forward who can kick bags of goals. Why would we turn our back on draft picks or quality players if they are offered up to us.



I don't think anyone is saying that we should not try to get whatever we can in return for him; just that the decision should not hinge on what we can get. The decision should be about what the club stands for (if it stands for anything :sad:)


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
quotes fixed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:51 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
The Duke wrote:
woof wrote:
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
There are no suitors.


I believe the decision the club needs to make today should be limited to whether we want him at the club? What we get for him should not be a consideration.


I agree. We sack him like WCE did with Cousins. If we get something in return it'll be a bonus - if not who cares, at least he won't be infecting our young crop.

If this means we spend the next 2 years waiting for another real shot at the flag, then so-be-it. Our own fault for !@#$%& things up.


Waiting another 2 years, you're kidding aren't you. There 's only one reason we play and support footy, to win flags, no other reason, not for players to be the moral pillars of society. Not into the losers mentality.

That type of political correctness hasn't kicked in with me yet. At least with the Eagles bad culture they won a flag. So much there for infecting. All I, and many others, care about. The rest is not our problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
jim wrote:

Waiting another 2 years, you're kidding aren't you. There 's only one reason we play and support footy, to win flags, no other reason, not for players to be the moral pillars of society. Not into the losers mentality.

That type of political correctness hasn't kicked in with me yet. At least with the Eagles bad culture they won a flag. So much there for infecting. All I, and many others, care about. The rest is not our problem.



..it's not about being a good role model.. ..it's about how he's treating the club.. ..it's officials, coaches and players..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
There are replacements out there...

Barry Hall and Matthew Lloyd.

The biggest issue is offloading his salary to someone else.

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:58 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Goltzenberg wrote:

From Fev's article the other day, this is his first official wake up call. He probably won't be on the footy show anymore, NFL clubs won't be interested in a known trouble maker and his days as a AFL player are numbered. If that isn't a big enough wake up call, l dont know what is.


I beg to differ - Fev has been given numerous wake up calls dating back to almost being sacked in 2002.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:00 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 9121
Location: Melbourne
Ando the Wonderkid wrote:
The Duke wrote:
In fact, it could well be the dumbest decision by any club in the history of the game :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: .


Pick 31 (Chapman) for Mick Mansfield.


:oops:

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:03 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
George Harris wrote:
There are replacements out there...

Barry Hall and Matthew Lloyd.

The biggest issue is offloading his salary to someone else.



What are you saying George? That Lloyd is a possibility?

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20245
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
As soon as Caro said he was gone I knew he'd be lining up for us next year.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:11 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
Again on the pragmatic as opposed to moralistic side of the argument.......

there is a fundamental bias in human decision making called the 'sunk-costs' bias......it basically states that the more resources/investment you have put into a plan, the more likely you will be to see that plan through, even if it becomes apparent that plan may be flawed.

Again my concern is that the decision making is too influenced by having arguably the best power forward in the comp over the last 10 years and not yet maximising a return from that, that we begin pouring too many resources (mental or physical) into that plan at the expense of putting resources into the contingency plan.

If we don't net a premiership in the next 2-3 years we may rue that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Gilly34 wrote:
Again on the pragmatic as opposed to moralistic side of the argument.......

there is a fundamental bias in human decision making called the 'sunk-costs' bias......it basically states that the more resources/investment you have put into a plan, the more likely you will be to see that plan through, even if it becomes apparent that plan may be flawed.

Again my concern is that the decision making is too influenced by having arguably the best power forward in the comp over the last 10 years and not yet maximising a return from that, that we begin pouring too many resources (mental or physical) into that plan at the expense of putting resources into the contingency plan.

If we don't net a premiership in the next 2-3 years we may rue that.


I agree, but I don't think the boys will have the necessary mental strength and conditioning to win on grand final day for at least another 3 or 4 years.

I don't think Fevola will be around that long.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:19 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 505
Location: Melbourne
If some of the things I've heard are right, then he should not only be gone, but have to run the gauntlet on the way out. :evil:

_________________
Gaga and The Hoff party hard in London


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:35 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20245
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
The goat, bleach and handcuffs? You heard THAT one?

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:36 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 437
Location: The Pratt Stand
Just hope Sticks and the boys have the balls to put Fev up for trade while he still has some currency,
and not just have another of these meetings ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YawagQ6l ... re=related

_________________
Number 17 - come on down!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17222
Gilly34 wrote:
Again on the pragmatic as opposed to moralistic side of the argument.......

there is a fundamental bias in human decision making called the 'sunk-costs' bias......it basically states that the more resources/investment you have put into a plan, the more likely you will be to see that plan through, even if it becomes apparent that plan may be flawed.

Again my concern is that the decision making is too influenced by having arguably the best power forward in the comp over the last 10 years and not yet maximising a return from that, that we begin pouring too many resources (mental or physical) into that plan at the expense of putting resources into the contingency plan.

If we don't net a premiership in the next 2-3 years we may rue that.


:clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:39 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 505
Location: Melbourne
bluehammer wrote:
The goat, bleach and handcuffs? You heard THAT one?

:lol: :thumbsup:

_________________
Gaga and The Hoff party hard in London


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:42 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
dont suppose anyone wants to pm me with what they have heard?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:44 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:33 pm
Posts: 4079
Location: The corner of BumF*** and YouGotAPrettyMouth
the first person to pre-met was over on bigfooty... they reckon the meeting is done and fev is up for trade...

_________________
R A D I C A L B R O T H E R S

Inspired by the One-Minute Sculptures of Erwin Wurm

"All in all is all we are..."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 415 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 21  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], stroby1 and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group