Siegfried wrote:
Firstly, I would like to apologise to anyone who I put offside when I stated that I was an expert in the field of leadership. In reflection, it was a poor choice of words. I was merely trying to point out that I work in the area, and have some kind of experience in what leadership means, and the impact it has. But I take onboard the feedback that it may have come across as me trying to 'show off my intellectual muscle'. It was certainly not my intention.
Some have asked what I think needs to happen at Carlton. The answer is, in specific terms, I don't know. I am not close enough to the Club to know what the real issues are, and therefore, it is not possible to come up with specific suggestions. What I will say is that from an outsiders perspective, from someone who watches the events and unfolding issues qt Carlton very closely, it seems clear to me that SOMETHING has to change. My post was trying to demonstrate 2 things: that leadership and culture are vital to the overall success of a football club; and that there appears to be cultural and leadership issues at Carlton. My post was an attempt at observation, rather than specific judgement as to why.
I think that Kernahan, Swann, Icke, Ratten, Judd et al need to have a very clear, very firm set of values upon which they want the Club to operate, and adhere to them completely. That means it doesn't matter if it is Cloke / Betts / Garlett who step out of line, or Fevola / Judd / Gibbs. Clearly that hasn't happened. I know that there has been a leadership program in place at Carlton (it was a group associated with one of the tertiary institutions, not Leading Teams), it seems to me there is still some work to be done. As has been mentioned many times, look at the results that Geelong had with Steve Johnston.
As for Fevola, once again, we are having a 30 page thread on what to do with him, on whether he needs to be 'punished'. Once again, there are those saying that nothing should be done, he didn't do anything wrong. Perhaps if something had been done last time, or the time before, this time wouldn't have occured, and we wouldn't be having the current discussion. If he is not 'punished' now, what incentive will there be for him to change? And what then goes on in the minds of the other players, especially the younger ones, who a. didn't get away with missing a training session, but Fevola gets away with something arguably much more significant, and b. look at him and say, well if he can do that, so can I.
Whether we should trade him, or suspend him, is a tricky question. Will he change after this episode? Maybe. Maybe not. Do we take the risk? Do we trade him while he still has currency, or keep him and hope he sorts himself out. What if we do keep him, and in 2011, when we are a serious contender, he goes off the rails, once and for all? We lose him for nothing, and derail a Premiership tilt. These are difficult questions. Whatever happens, IMHO, a very strong statement needs to be made. Trade him. Suspend him for 6 weeks. Something. He needs to be made responsible for his actions, and know that if he steps away from the core values of the football club, that he will pay the price. As any other player will. To date, with all his misdemeaners, he has yet to pay a significant price.
I think it is also vitally important to the Club that this happens. It sets the tone of the values that you are trying to build, and the culture you are trying to create. Geelong did it, they have won 2 flags in 3 years. St Kilda are doing it, they are on the cusp. Brisbane certainly did it, they won 3 flags (and yes, Voss et al steppe out of line, but it was a one off. And I would bet my last dollar that internally, they copped it big time).
And if it is true that Fevola hit a fellow player, then that is very serious. Again, without knowing full details, you would have to think very seriously about trading him.
To answer the question...could we ever be like Geelong? My answer is, IF we sort out leadership and culture, and IF we make sure that we have the right coaches in place, and our recruiting is right, and IF we have the right development processes, then yes, I think we can. I think we have enough core A grade material there now, that if the B and C graders are developed in the right way, and if the game plan is sound (which I don't think is quite there yet), then we can get there. But all those things need to happen. My personal opinion is that no matter how good the cattle on the field, if we don't get the culture right, the rest will ultimately fail. That's just my view.
To quote Neil Young...
'You spout ideas from books that you've read...
don't you care about this guy' head...'
(the old homestead' - Hawks and Doves)
We were far worse as a club when we had the most success..
I happen to believe we are progressing nicely without turning in to some kind of android brained super army.
The Swans are often touted as being superior in these areas...and they suspended Hall 'indefinately'...yep...what was that...2...3 weeks?
The dogs are beloved by most and they are very close to winning a flag...who are they taking on next year?
Geez.....sorry for the grump..but you mentioned Fev being egocentric..then you post these doctrines instead of posts..and
well..I may as well apologise now for offending you or anyone else with this response.