Megaman wrote:
I keep reading that Ratts would rather surround himself with numptys (ie unlikely future senior coaches) but rather than a guess, that Ratts is just covering his arse, where does this come from? Will Swann and co only realise Ratts isnt up to it if there is a "decent" coach also at the club, and so by not recruiting any, his job is secure for ever?
Megaman I'm pretty sure the club (and Ratts himself) didn't want to put the senior coach under too much pressure by having someone there with the credentials to 'take over' should the team not perform and the pressure get too much. After all - there is already enough pressure with the President breathing down your back...but the President has to keep Ratts honest and report back to Fraser Brown over a few ales that 'our mate is doing alright'. Now - I've shocked myself in saying that last bit because I am actually a believer in Carlton nepotism - but the 'favours' might have gone a bit far. Which leads me to Lappin...
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Doc, what is it you see at training that leads you to say that?
Is it what he is doing or what he's not doing?
A bit of both Brad. He was really only appointed as a favour because we'd told him he had to retire...but he got to hang around the club with the boys for a couple extra years with his mate Teague who couldn't run a bath let alone a training session. Look - to simplify it...neither are committed enough...neither have the drive, the football intelligence, the ability to 'tear strips' off the boys when warranted and neither are the answer as assistant coaches. Why do we have to continually offer work experience to guys who aren't committed to the cause?