Wojee wrote:
It's a penalty based on "could have".
Judd's fingers in the bloke's face "could have" caused serious eye damage, but they didn't cause any.
Judd attempting to find a pressure point "could have" caused injury, but it didn't cause any.
..agreed.. ..like i said in the other thread, it's very much like Lynchy copped all those weeks after the granny.. ..we know he didn't actually land any of those punches, otherwise they'd still be looking for wake's head behind the goal posts.. ..but it was the biggest match of the year, and it just didn't look good.. ..so he copped it.. ..same thing with Juddles.. ..a finals match, standing over a guy on the ground, putting your fingers on another's face.... ..factor in the brown incident which they were aching to 'eve up', and he gets 2 weeks.. ..unreasonable sure, but more so cos worse hits get off with the same or lighter penalty.. ..3 weeks is our fault..