Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:27 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 174 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:55 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
fraser murphy wrote:
So anyway at the football on Friday night I noticed that Richard Hadlee was great in close but his disposal and lack of leg speed is a liability when playing a man-on-man style defence as his opponent often dragged him into defensive 50 where he was able to beat him for pace on the lead. So my question is how do we best counteract player deficiencies like these when we are seemingly tactically incapable at this stage of playing full-field zone defence?

Thoughts?


Daniel Rich.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Melvey wrote:
fraser murphy wrote:
So anyway at the football on Friday night I noticed that Richard Hadlee was great in close but his disposal and lack of leg speed is a liability when playing a man-on-man style defence as his opponent often dragged him into defensive 50 where he was able to beat him for pace on the lead. So my question is how do we best counteract player deficiencies like these when we are seemingly tactically incapable at this stage of playing full-field zone defence?

Thoughts?


Daniel Rich.


I really wish you were a man of your word melvey.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
Melvey wrote:
fraser murphy wrote:
So anyway at the football on Friday night I noticed that Richard Hadley was great in close but his disposal and lack of leg speed is a liability when playing a man-on-man style defence as his opponent often dragged him into defensive 50 where he was able to beat him for pace on the lead. So my question is how do we best counteract player deficiencies like these when we are seemingly tactically incapable at this stage of playing full-field zone defence?

Thoughts?


Daniel Rich.


Trade Hadlee back to Brisbane to Rich?

Mmmm...that's a pretty good idea Melvey.

But then if the same thing were to happen to Rich in a Carlton jumper would he have the necessary reach to be able to spoil?

Man this coaching caper's a lot harder than my armchair makes it seem...

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Last edited by fraser murphy on Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:05 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
fraser murphy wrote:
Melvey wrote:
fraser murphy wrote:
So anyway at the football on Friday night I noticed that Richard Hadlee was great in close but his disposal and lack of leg speed is a liability when playing a man-on-man style defence as his opponent often dragged him into defensive 50 where he was able to beat him for pace on the lead. So my question is how do we best counteract player deficiencies like these when we are seemingly tactically incapable at this stage of playing full-field zone defence?

Thoughts?


Daniel Rich.


Trade Hadlee back to Brisbane to Rich?

Mmmm...that's a pretty good idea Melvey.

But then if the same thing were to happen to Rich in a Carlton jumper would he have the necessary reach to be able to spoil?

Man this coaching caper's a lot harder than my armchair makes it seem...


Hadley does give us something in the clinches but his lack of pace is an issue but I'm sure we can still use him to his strengths...how do Geelong use Ling? He cannot be much pacier than Hadley.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:07 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2761
ok, back to post game....

Over the past few months we have just seemed way too tentative, both with and without the ball. trying too hard to find the perfect option with the ball; watching a bit as opposition charges straight at the ball and then trying to tackle them with one arm out etc...

i am very worried about ratts' coaching - not sure we have an effective and coherent game plan.

HOWEVER, it seemed like ratts' observations after the match were exactly the concerns that i have been having which has shone a ray of sunshine over my relatively negative impression of him as a coach so far.

SO, I am prepared to take what I admit is the charitable view for the moment: that is, ratts does have a plan and he is trying to teach it to the boys who are also trying to learn it but are still thinking too much about it. doesn't yet come naturally to them. we saw this with the saints over the 1st 2yrs of ross lyon's tenure and also with the cats prior to them 'getting it' 2 yrs before they won the flag (they then had that woeful year and came back with a great team game after that).

So, for the moment, I am giving Ratts the benefit of the doubt.
Yes, we were terrible on Fri night and, if we play like that this week, we will lose our percentage advantage.
However, Ratts is not going to get sacked before next season and by the end of next year we will know for sure. if we haven't improved our game plan and performances by then, ratts position will be on thin ice and rightly so.

in the meantime, let's be thankful that there are so many underperforming teams this year that may allow us into the finals - experience which will be of benefit even if we haven't really been worthy of a finals spot. and let's hope that if we do make the finals, it doesn't paper over the issues we still need to deal with as a team.
(and for all my pessimism above, i am still enjoying the fact that we are MUCH better than we have been over the past 5yrs!!)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:07 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
dane wrote:
Melvey wrote:
fraser murphy wrote:
So anyway at the football on Friday night I noticed that Richard Hadlee was great in close but his disposal and lack of leg speed is a liability when playing a man-on-man style defence as his opponent often dragged him into defensive 50 where he was able to beat him for pace on the lead. So my question is how do we best counteract player deficiencies like these when we are seemingly tactically incapable at this stage of playing full-field zone defence?

Thoughts?


Daniel Rich.


I really wish you were a man of your word melvey.


And i wish you'd do exactly what i told you to do in the PM i sent ya.

and im not going until he is GAWN!!!!!!!! yes he's got his got him. He's gawn. Yes his gawn!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
Melvey wrote:

and im not going until he is GAWN!!!!!!!! yes he's got his got him. He's gawn. Yes his gawn!!!!


gawn ?

yes , yes you are

you never learn

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:16 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:56 pm
Posts: 723
Location: Melbourne
Melvey wrote:
and im not going until he is GAWN!!!!!!!! yes he's got his got him. He's gawn. Yes his gawn!!!!


is that part of the long lost 5th verse to "i am the walrus"?

_________________
... an eagle flew out of the night. he was something to observe, came in close i heard a voice, bending stretching every nerve, had to listen had no choice ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
OK , OK

enough of the melvey show

lets move on

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:24 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
17th Premiership wrote:
HOWEVER, it seemed like ratts' observations after the match were exactly the concerns that i have been having which has shone a ray of sunshine over my relatively negative impression of him as a coach so far.


You know what I thought was great about Ratten's post match press conference. Not one "sort of" or "I s'pose". He is totally developing.

And on Hadley J&K, I reckon Ling does have a bit more toe, in terms of both speed and kicking skills. He also plays in a team though whose first thought and action when the opponent has the ball is to apply pressure to the ball carrier rather than delegate who should be manning up the player running past. I think this may also be a factor.

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:30 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
fraser murphy wrote:
17th Premiership wrote:
HOWEVER, it seemed like ratts' observations after the match were exactly the concerns that i have been having which has shone a ray of sunshine over my relatively negative impression of him as a coach so far.


You know what I thought was great about Ratten's post match press conference. Not one "sort of" or "I s'pose". He is totally developing.

And on Hadley J&K, I reckon Ling does have a bit more toe, in terms of both speed and kicking skills. He also plays in a team though whose first thought and action when the opponent has the ball is to apply pressure to the ball carrier rather than delegate who should be manning up the player running past. I think this may also be a factor.


Maybe Bentick is the other option...

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:04 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Hadley does give us something in the clinches but his lack of pace is an issue but I'm sure we can still use him to his strengths...how do Geelong use Ling? He cannot be much pacier than Hadley.

Ling just does not stop moving.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:12 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 35
fraser murphy wrote:
So anyway at the football on Friday night I noticed that Richard Hadlee was great in close but his disposal and lack of leg speed is a liability when playing a man-on-man style defence as his opponent often dragged him into defensive 50 where he was able to beat him for pace on the lead. So my question is how do we best counteract player deficiencies like these when we are seemingly tactically incapable at this stage of playing full-field zone defence?

Thoughts?



Sack Ratten probably :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:14 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
The Chief wrote:
fraser murphy wrote:
So anyway at the football on Friday night I noticed that Richard Hadlee was great in close but his disposal and lack of leg speed is a liability when playing a man-on-man style defence as his opponent often dragged him into defensive 50 where he was able to beat him for pace on the lead. So my question is how do we best counteract player deficiencies like these when we are seemingly tactically incapable at this stage of playing full-field zone defence?

Thoughts?



Sack Ratten probably :lol:


Teaser... :grin:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 35
fraser murphy wrote:
17th Premiership wrote:
HOWEVER, it seemed like ratts' observations after the match were exactly the concerns that i have been having which has shone a ray of sunshine over my relatively negative impression of him as a coach so far.


You know what I thought was great about Ratten's post match press conference. Not one "sort of" or "I s'pose". He is totally developing.

And on Hadley J&K, I reckon Ling does have a bit more toe, in terms of both speed and kicking skills. He also plays in a team though whose first thought and action when the opponent has the ball is to apply pressure to the ball carrier rather than delegate who should be manning up the player running past. I think this may also be a factor.


must confess I haven't listened to the press conference yet, but am glad that he hasn't used "sort of" or "I s'pose". Did he use "it's an interesting one" though. Seems like this is a favourite, particularly when someone makes an observation that he and the coaching staff hadn't thought of during the week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:19 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 35
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
The Chief wrote:
fraser murphy wrote:
So anyway at the football on Friday night I noticed that Richard Hadlee was great in close but his disposal and lack of leg speed is a liability when playing a man-on-man style defence as his opponent often dragged him into defensive 50 where he was able to beat him for pace on the lead. So my question is how do we best counteract player deficiencies like these when we are seemingly tactically incapable at this stage of playing full-field zone defence?

Thoughts?



Sack Ratten probably :lol:


Teaser... :grin:


Wasn't sure that anyone had thought of this yet so I thought I'd just throw it out as an idea. Who knows, it might generate some new discussion :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 1:03 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
The Chief wrote:
fraser murphy wrote:
So anyway at the football on Friday night I noticed that Richard Hadley was great in close but his disposal and lack of leg speed is a liability when playing a man-on-man style defence as his opponent often dragged him into defensive 50 where he was able to beat him for pace on the lead. So my question is how do we best counteract player deficiencies like these when we are seemingly tactically incapable at this stage of playing full-field zone defence?

Thoughts?



Sack Ratten probably :lol:


Really insightful call there :roll: .

My point is that Ratten cops shit for trying to implement a Total Football style zone because the players have neither the tactical experience nor the work ethic to pull it off consistently. Yet in theory it would counteract the opposition's tactics of playing through our slower players, of which there are many.

Ratten cops shit for not having a consistent gameplan, but if he was to persevere with this zonal style at all times he'd not only be accused of being inflexible, but we'd lose more games than we'd win at this stage. And he'd cop shit for us not making the finals.

I'm not saying that Ratten is doing a great job or that he's doing a poor job, just pointing out that it's an extraordinarily hard job and this forum, a tough crowd.

I'm just glad Terry Wallace isn't coaching us.

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:45 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
fraser murphy wrote:
I'm just glad Terry Wallace isn't coaching us.


AMEN, BROTHER!!

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:02 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21572
Location: North of the border
Having watched the game twice - I am convinced that it was Hadleys work in the third quarter that turned that game - We won nearly every single centre clearance and Hadley was the one dishing it off . It allowed Judd to move forward and be dangerous up there . We had him trying to do a job at Half back at the start of the game - he clearly is a in and under type player and shouldn't be used any other way

We look a better side when Hadley is in there doing the grunt work - I cant understand why he keeps getting dropped and was only a late inclusion in this game

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:11 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10597
Sydney Blue wrote:
Having watched the game twice - I am convinced that it was Hadleys work in the third quarter that turned that game - We won nearly every single centre clearance and Hadley was the one dishing it off . It allowed Judd to move forward and be dangerous up there . We had him trying to do a job at Half back at the start of the game - he clearly is a in and under type player and shouldn't be used any other way

We look a better side when Hadley is in there doing the grunt work - I cant understand why he keeps getting dropped and was only a late inclusion in this game


Bingo.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 174 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], GreatEx, Hamster and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group