Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:17 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:59 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
Its becoming very clear that :

Ratts is the Man.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:19 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
gerry atric wrote:
If we make the 8 then on the surface it will have been a successful season but it is more to do with what has happened this year tells us about the future.

Comparing us to 2003 is ridiculous. Even comparing us to 2007 is silly. We had a team that hated the coach and the next most senior coach at Carlton (Mitch) hated the coach. We were utterly disfunctional, and just starting to get things together off the field let alone on the field. Let's face it recruiting Judd makes 5 goals difference a game, add in 3 #1 picks several years into their careers, natural improvement you would expect from young players and a very talented but wayward full forward, and we would expect improvement. Under drafting no-one stays down forever. Sides naturally go up and down as the talent changes. The extent of the talent and the talent of the coach might create a premiership team. The coach is there to make the team better than the sum of its parts. Is Ratts doing that? Too often we are uninspired and seem to have stagefright. The coach needs to get us up not down. Our ball movement is excrutiating. Clarkson says ball movement is getting quicker and you move it quickly or fail, yet our plan appears to be to move it really slowly. Too ofetn our wins revolve around individual performances from Judd and Fev.

The process doesn't mean Ratts can't coach but it does mean Carlton as a club is still behind in our thinking. Is Lappin the best forward caoch in the business or a guy who the club wanted to retire and offered a sweetener. Maybe its the former and after an exacting search of all possible candidates around Australia we were lucky that the best assistant was at our club.

Ratts just sounds a bit out of his depth, he speaks in cliches. Some coaches do becasue they have contempt for the press, Ratts seems to do it because he has nothing deeper to say. He runs out stats and excuses. Maybe just tell us why he has prepared a side that wasn't up to play against the Woods and the Dons. Should have been given a contract till end of 2010 to give him a fair crack - if we were sure that he was the best available when we appointed him (and not just an ex Carlton guy in the right place at the right time) - and then assessed honestly. If we have got it wrong with our coach again, the first decade of the new millenium will indeed be a lost one. You need to have everything right to win a flag and if you don't the window shuts and may not open for ten years. Big responsibility, let's hope everyone has it right.
I'm not comparing the list as such, i'm pointing out the fact that the vast majority on those player lists at the time were absolute rubbish. As close back as 2007 the vast majority of the list were absolute rubbish.

You can't turn over a list in 2 years. In fact we still have a fair amount of rubbish on our list currently. Slowly but surely the rubbish will be replaced by new draftees or players traded for. Some will be rubbish, some will be gold.

But the point is, yes we have 3 number 1's + Judd and Fev but those number 1's are nowhere near a peak that they will hopefully have in their careers. We have a couple of important senior players horribly out of form and the rest could be good or they could be rubbish. Far too early to tell on most of them.

What i've seen in patches this year is absolute brilliance, in other patches absolute abomination. Consistency's not there from quarter to quarter let alone week to week. That happens.

Quite rightly Ratts is being pointed at, there are issues there no doubt, but nowhere near as bad as some are making out.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:48 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
teagueyubeauty wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
If we make the 8 then on the surface it will have been a successful season but it is more to do with what has happened this year tells us about the future.

Comparing us to 2003 is ridiculous. Even comparing us to 2007 is silly. We had a team that hated the coach and the next most senior coach at Carlton (Mitch) hated the coach. We were utterly disfunctional, and just starting to get things together off the field let alone on the field. Let's face it recruiting Judd makes 5 goals difference a game, add in 3 #1 picks several years into their careers, natural improvement you would expect from young players and a very talented but wayward full forward, and we would expect improvement. Under drafting no-one stays down forever. Sides naturally go up and down as the talent changes. The extent of the talent and the talent of the coach might create a premiership team. The coach is there to make the team better than the sum of its parts. Is Ratts doing that? Too often we are uninspired and seem to have stagefright. The coach needs to get us up not down. Our ball movement is excrutiating. Clarkson says ball movement is getting quicker and you move it quickly or fail, yet our plan appears to be to move it really slowly. Too ofetn our wins revolve around individual performances from Judd and Fev.

The process doesn't mean Ratts can't coach but it does mean Carlton as a club is still behind in our thinking. Is Lappin the best forward caoch in the business or a guy who the club wanted to retire and offered a sweetener. Maybe its the former and after an exacting search of all possible candidates around Australia we were lucky that the best assistant was at our club.

Ratts just sounds a bit out of his depth, he speaks in cliches. Some coaches do becasue they have contempt for the press, Ratts seems to do it because he has nothing deeper to say. He runs out stats and excuses. Maybe just tell us why he has prepared a side that wasn't up to play against the Woods and the Dons. Should have been given a contract till end of 2010 to give him a fair crack - if we were sure that he was the best available when we appointed him (and not just an ex Carlton guy in the right place at the right time) - and then assessed honestly. If we have got it wrong with our coach again, the first decade of the new millenium will indeed be a lost one. You need to have everything right to win a flag and if you don't the window shuts and may not open for ten years. Big responsibility, let's hope everyone has it right.
I'm not comparing the list as such, i'm pointing out the fact that the vast majority on those player lists at the time were absolute rubbish. As close back as 2007 the vast majority of the list were absolute rubbish.

You can't turn over a list in 2 years. In fact we still have a fair amount of rubbish on our list currently. Slowly but surely the rubbish will be replaced by new draftees or players traded for. Some will be rubbish, some will be gold.

But the point is, yes we have 3 number 1's + Judd and Fev but those number 1's are nowhere near a peak that they will hopefully have in their careers. We have a couple of important senior players horribly out of form and the rest could be good or they could be rubbish. Far too early to tell on most of them.

What i've seen in patches this year is absolute brilliance, in other patches absolute abomination. Consistency's not there from quarter to quarter let alone week to week. That happens.

Quite rightly Ratts is being pointed at, there are issues there no doubt, but nowhere near as bad as some are making out.


But you havent seen a gameplan.

The brilliance is when we throw caution to the wind...

Usually its when its unstructured attack .

Or playing a totally 'snip' and underprepared Richmond...

We have rarely played well against organised footy teams.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Last edited by DownUnderChick on Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Breach 2.3


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:51 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10406
Location: Coburg
at some point Judd and the numbers must either kick to or receive from players that are not Judd or Number 1's - and that's where the problem sets in.

I actually think many of our kids have come on. Bower, Betts, Kruise, Murph, Hammer, Santy, Army, Austin, JR, Jacobs, Waite, Browne, Jammo, Gibbs, and AJ have all come on in leaps and bounds this yea.

Simmo is Simmo

Judd is Judd

Carrots has been used better this year.

Houla is more defensive though he still hurts us when moved to the wing or defense (in my opinion)

Fev is still Fev

T-Bird is having a fine year

Scotland missed preseason but is struggling with the defensive side (any coach would demand it of him)

Stevens is struggling with the defensive side

Cloke has been disappointing but he may not make it as a CHF for the very reasons Collingwood traded him.

Warnock not played
Tex Not played

Johnson - I worry about this draft - weak body on body.

in that list above almost all the players are still kids, still below their peak and apart from 4 players all are our main players

Fev Judd Waite and T-Bird are the main players who are at their peak (maybe Simmo - so that makes 5). The rest have not peaked yet. Murph is still a couple of years away. Tex needs to stay injury free.

Stevens and Scotland (with Houla and Carrots I'd suggest) will not see the 17th. and I have never had either of them in our top 10 - both are too unaccountable and struggle with the modern game, (the same modern game Ratts may struggle with).

We are young, no matter how many number 1's you throw at me, they are young and not at their peak. We need a CHF, we need 2 more midfielders, we need a couple of HB flankers who can be defensive and deliver the ball exceptionally, we need more depth but we are improving and will continue to improve as the kids reach around 25 years. This list is better than what it was 2 years ago and in 2 more years will be far better than what it is now. Currently no matter who the coach, this is not a flag list, not even a top four list, not yet. We can get frustrated as hell (I know I do) with coaches, with players, with lack of effort or whatevers, but the truth is around 7th is about right - though I had hoped for a 5th finish (the best of the rest).

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:52 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Wolfe wrote:
I think some posters are starting to sound like a broken record goin over and over again

Image

Thats the inefficient gameplan...!!! :thumbsup:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:22 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
Synbad wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
If we make the 8 then on the surface it will have been a successful season but it is more to do with what has happened this year tells us about the future.

Comparing us to 2003 is ridiculous. Even comparing us to 2007 is silly. We had a team that hated the coach and the next most senior coach at Carlton (Mitch) hated the coach. We were utterly disfunctional, and just starting to get things together off the field let alone on the field. Let's face it recruiting Judd makes 5 goals difference a game, add in 3 #1 picks several years into their careers, natural improvement you would expect from young players and a very talented but wayward full forward, and we would expect improvement. Under drafting no-one stays down forever. Sides naturally go up and down as the talent changes. The extent of the talent and the talent of the coach might create a premiership team. The coach is there to make the team better than the sum of its parts. Is Ratts doing that? Too often we are uninspired and seem to have stagefright. The coach needs to get us up not down. Our ball movement is excrutiating. Clarkson says ball movement is getting quicker and you move it quickly or fail, yet our plan appears to be to move it really slowly. Too ofetn our wins revolve around individual performances from Judd and Fev.

The process doesn't mean Ratts can't coach but it does mean Carlton as a club is still behind in our thinking. Is Lappin the best forward caoch in the business or a guy who the club wanted to retire and offered a sweetener. Maybe its the former and after an exacting search of all possible candidates around Australia we were lucky that the best assistant was at our club.

Ratts just sounds a bit out of his depth, he speaks in cliches. Some coaches do becasue they have contempt for the press, Ratts seems to do it because he has nothing deeper to say. He runs out stats and excuses. Maybe just tell us why he has prepared a side that wasn't up to play against the Woods and the Dons. Should have been given a contract till end of 2010 to give him a fair crack - if we were sure that he was the best available when we appointed him (and not just an ex Carlton guy in the right place at the right time) - and then assessed honestly. If we have got it wrong with our coach again, the first decade of the new millenium will indeed be a lost one. You need to have everything right to win a flag and if you don't the window shuts and may not open for ten years. Big responsibility, let's hope everyone has it right.
I'm not comparing the list as such, i'm pointing out the fact that the vast majority on those player lists at the time were absolute rubbish. As close back as 2007 the vast majority of the list were absolute rubbish.

You can't turn over a list in 2 years. In fact we still have a fair amount of rubbish on our list currently. Slowly but surely the rubbish will be replaced by new draftees or players traded for. Some will be rubbish, some will be gold.

But the point is, yes we have 3 number 1's + Judd and Fev but those number 1's are nowhere near a peak that they will hopefully have in their careers. We have a couple of important senior players horribly out of form and the rest could be good or they could be rubbish. Far too early to tell on most of them.

What i've seen in patches this year is absolute brilliance, in other patches absolute abomination. Consistency's not there from quarter to quarter let alone week to week. That happens.

Quite rightly Ratts is being pointed at, there are issues there no doubt, but nowhere near as bad as some are making out.


But you havent seen a gameplan.

The brilliance is when we throw caution to the wind...

Usually its when its unstructured attack .

Or playing a totally 'snip' and underprepared Richmond...

We have rarely played well against organised footy teams.
Or you can go the other way and say its another game plan within a gameplan that they are learning. You and i both have absolutely no idea because we're not in team meetings or the like.

And i do seem to remember back in the last year or two of the Pagan years many, many people whinging and complaining we only had one game plan.

No doubt you'll find fault with what i've said but you can't seriously look in the mirror and suggest to yourself that the only time we look good is when Ratts says play the way you want to play and throw caution to the wind. That's just ludicrous.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Last edited by DownUnderChick on Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Breach 2.3


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:18 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 505
Location: Melbourne
I firmly believe that a Malthouse would have been able to instill a gameplan into the team in the amount of time that Ratten has had. :fight:
He also wouldn't accept the lack of team play or blocking for each other, poor manning up and zoning, bystanding, etc.

_________________
Gaga and The Hoff party hard in London


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:22 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:55 pm
Posts: 315
I am on this site almost every day. I don't post very often but I enjoy reading everyone's views. Here is my take on things:

  • We don't need the personal swiping at each other. I think we all love the club. If there is anyone who is a laurel and hardy type then its me. :razz: Although I'm not sure who is who exactly. Which one's the fat one? :wink:
  • It's bloody hard to win a premiership. Everything needs to go right for you to win one. Injuries, coaching/development, recruiting. If we don't get everything right we won't win one during our premiership window.. (maybe 2011-2016) and we will be looking towards our next premiership window (god!! 2025 maybe?) for our next window of opportunity. There are posters on here who assume we will win a premiership and that a good coach might be the difference between 1 premiership or 3. I think that's a very optimistic view on things. I think we will be lucky to win just one premiership.. and that assumes we get everything right.
  • I've also been frustrated too many times that we cant get the basics right. kicking in. Our stop start play. I hate watching Judd.. (and Murph) getting smashed every week. I was hoping to see some sort of pattern emerging or a structure of play, but I can't. Maybe its because I am such a football layman.
  • It may be my perception only but I don't see our kids developing or stepping up as fast as those of other clubs. I don't know if it's recruiting, development or coaching but it bugs me. Maybe its just me, but it's frustrating.
  • It irks me that we didn't go through the process to choose a coach. Or at least seem to. I don't know what went on inside the club. And then we have Rattens contract extended without no real return. Do we have the best coach? Look at Collingwood with their new coaching setup? They are thinking outside of the box. I think it will work for them as I rate Malthouse and Bucks very highly.
  • Sticks needs to make way. He needs to find his replacement. There is no room for a president who is a symbol only. We need a business man, a symbolic leader, a marketing person, etc, etc all in one. And get out of the coaches box!!
  • Our win/loss might be about right for where we are at. But it means nothing if its a not a step further up the ladder next year. Things have fallen our way a little this year. We have never been a team to judge ourselves on win/loss. We are Carlton. The only things we are judged on is premierships. Our win/loss ratio this year will mean nothing if its not a stepping stone to top four and a premiership in the next few years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 1362
Synbad wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
Just in case people don't remember :wink:

1: Rd22 2003 Kangaroos 124pts
2: Rd16 2007 Brisbane 117pts
3: Rd15 2003 West Coast 116pts
4: Rd10 2004 StKilda 108pts
5: Rd6 2004 Melbourne 105pts
6: Rd12 2007 Hawthorn 100pts
7: Rd21 2005 Essendon* 99pts
8: Rd8 2006 StKilda 92pts
9: Rd22 2006 Sydney 92pts
10: Rd20 2003 StKilda 91pts
11: Rd7 2005 Richmond 85 pts
12: Rd15 2004 Port Adel 83 pts
13: Rd15 2005 StKilda 80pts
14: Rd2 2007 Geelong 78pts
15: Rd12 2007 Fremantle 77pts
16: Rd9 2003 Brisbane 77pts
17: Rd14 2005 West Coast 77pts
18: Rd21 2003 Hawthorn 74pts
19: Rd1 2003 Sydney 74pts
20: Rd17 2003 Collingwood 73pts
21: Rd6 2006 Collingwood 72pts
22: Rd8 2005 Geelong 70pts
23: Rd14 2006 Geelong 65pts
24: Rd9 2006 Adelaide 64 pts
25: Rd20 2004 West Coast 62pts
26: Rd15 2007 Sydney 62pts
27: Rd4 2007 West Coast 61pts



Round 17 2009 Collingwood 10 goals against a team we thought we could beat...





having been to most of the games mentioned ... it's just so good to know that a bad game is just that and not an indication of things to come

a swallow, once in a while doesn't make a summer of discontent

_________________
NG
S M C , S F L


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 2:48 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
dannyboy wrote:
at some point Judd and the numbers must either kick to or receive from players that are not Judd or Number 1's - and that's where the problem sets in.

I actually think many of our kids have come on. Bower, Betts, Kruise, Murph, Hammer, Santy, Army, Austin, JR, Jacobs, Waite, Browne, Jammo, Gibbs, and AJ have all come on in leaps and bounds this yea.

Simmo is Simmo

Judd is Judd

Carrots has been used better this year.

Houla is more defensive though he still hurts us when moved to the wing or defense (in my opinion)

Fev is still Fev

T-Bird is having a fine year

Scotland missed preseason but is struggling with the defensive side (any coach would demand it of him)

Stevens is struggling with the defensive side

Cloke has been disappointing but he may not make it as a CHF for the very reasons Collingwood traded him.

Warnock not played
Tex Not played

Johnson - I worry about this draft - weak body on body.

in that list above almost all the players are still kids, still below their peak and apart from 4 players all are our main players

Fev Judd Waite and T-Bird are the main players who are at their peak (maybe Simmo - so that makes 5). The rest have not peaked yet. Murph is still a couple of years away. Tex needs to stay injury free.

Stevens and Scotland (with Houla and Carrots I'd suggest) will not see the 17th. and I have never had either of them in our top 10 - both are too unaccountable and struggle with the modern game, (the same modern game Ratts may struggle with).

We are young, no matter how many number 1's you throw at me, they are young and not at their peak. We need a CHF, we need 2 more midfielders, we need a couple of HB flankers who can be defensive and deliver the ball exceptionally, we need more depth but we are improving and will continue to improve as the kids reach around 25 years. This list is better than what it was 2 years ago and in 2 more years will be far better than what it is now. Currently no matter who the coach, this is not a flag list, not even a top four list, not yet. We can get frustrated as hell (I know I do) with coaches, with players, with lack of effort or whatevers, but the truth is around 7th is about right - though I had hoped for a 5th finish (the best of the rest).


Good post - agree that our list isn't there yet - development is more important than recruitment to improvement.

Disagree about the players who've "come on in leaps and bounds"

Bower, Hammer, Setanta, Joseph are the big improvers - they've jumped up and made a big difference
Betts has made good strides forward, though his first 8 or so games were much better than the rest.
Austin, Kreuzer, Murphy has shown the improvement I expected
Jacobs has briefly looked a decent AFL ruckman which is a big improvement
Army and Browne have disappointed, while Jamo has gone backwards restricted by injury.
JR one step forward, 3/4 step backwards
Gibbs stagnated (or at least rate of improvment slowed significantly)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:21 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
Gibbs hasn't stagnated, that's bollocks.

Gibbs big improvement this year is his consistency from game to game. He's not tearing it apart yet, but he will.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:25 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Quote:
while Jamo has gone backwards restricted by injury


Would definitely dispute that aramari.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:28 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
DownUnderChick wrote:
Quote:
while Jamo has gone backwards restricted by injury


Would definitely dispute that aramari.


Jamo has definitely been restricted this year IMO and it's a credit to him that he's played as much as he has.

Jamo's an A grader when he's 100%.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:30 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
budzy wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Quote:
while Jamo has gone backwards restricted by injury


Would definitely dispute that aramari.


Jamo has definitely been restricted this year IMO and it's a credit to him that he's played as much as he has.

Jamo's an A grader when he's 100%.


But would you say his development has gone backwards budzy?

Obviously being injured would hamper your development, but to me Jamo is rare find that when fit, he is an A grader as you say.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
His development has been restricted IMO :wink:




this maximum quote thingy is PMO!!! :hitcomputer:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:08 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 301
Location: Adelaide
aramari wrote:

Disagree about the players who've "come on in leaps and bounds"

Bower, Hammer, Setanta, Joseph are the big improvers - they've jumped up and made a big difference
Betts has made good strides forward, though his first 8 or so games were much better than the rest.
Austin, Kreuzer, Murphy has shown the improvement I expected
Jacobs has briefly looked a decent AFL ruckman which is a big improvement
Army and Browne have disappointed, while Jamo has gone backwards restricted by injury.
JR one step forward, 3/4 step backwards
Gibbs stagnated (or at least rate of improvment slowed significantly)


This is absolutely spot on.

_________________
The AFL equalisation policy (designed with StKilda firmly in mind) is the only reason they exist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:25 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
LFTWNG11 wrote:
aramari wrote:

Disagree about the players who've "come on in leaps and bounds"

Bower, Hammer, Setanta, Joseph are the big improvers - they've jumped up and made a big difference
Betts has made good strides forward, though his first 8 or so games were much better than the rest.
Austin, Kreuzer, Murphy has shown the improvement I expected
Jacobs has briefly looked a decent AFL ruckman which is a big improvement
Army and Browne have disappointed, while Jamo has gone backwards restricted by injury.
JR one step forward, 3/4 step backwards
Gibbs stagnated (or at least rate of improvment slowed significantly)


This is absolutely spot on.


phew! :wink:

Jamo is a very good AFL player (I'd say B or B+ grade) - his form has been less impressive than last year, largely due I assume to his shoulder problems and lack of playing continuity. No way has he come on in leaps and bounds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:31 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
DownUnderChick wrote:
budzy wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:

Would definitely dispute that aramari.


Jamo has definitely been restricted this year IMO and it's a credit to him that he's played as much as he has.

Jamo's an A grader when he's 100%.


But would you say his development has gone backwards budzy?

Obviously being injured would hamper your development, but to me Jamo is rare find that when fit, he is an A grader as you say.


Quality player, but sorry, Scarlett is A grade, Lake's last month has been A grade, Presti's year has been A-grade as a pure stopper. Glass and Rutten are proven A grade when fit and firing, though they may have slipped.

Jamo isn't at that level...yet. Wasn't last year, isn't this year. At his best Jamo is a highly competent full back with scope to reach A grade one day. Either way, he's a very important player who's absence or restrictions from injury are keenly felt.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:35 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Within the context of our team, Jamo is A grade.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17514
Location: Left Cuckistan
kaxsta wrote:
I am on this site almost every day. I don't post very often but I enjoy reading everyone's views. Here is my take on things:

  • We don't need the personal swiping at each other. I think we all love the club. If there is anyone who is a laurel and hardy type then its me. :razz: Although I'm not sure who is who exactly. Which one's the fat one? :wink:
  • It's bloody hard to win a premiership. Everything needs to go right for you to win one. Injuries, coaching/development, recruiting. If we don't get everything right we won't win one during our premiership window.. (maybe 2011-2016) and we will be looking towards our next premiership window (god!! 2025 maybe?) for our next window of opportunity. There are posters on here who assume we will win a premiership and that a good coach might be the difference between 1 premiership or 3. I think that's a very optimistic view on things. I think we will be lucky to win just one premiership.. and that assumes we get everything right.
  • I've also been frustrated too many times that we cant get the basics right. kicking in. Our stop start play. I hate watching Judd.. (and Murph) getting smashed every week. I was hoping to see some sort of pattern emerging or a structure of play, but I can't. Maybe its because I am such a football layman.
  • It may be my perception only but I don't see our kids developing or stepping up as fast as those of other clubs. I don't know if it's recruiting, development or coaching but it bugs me. Maybe its just me, but it's frustrating.
  • It irks me that we didn't go through the process to choose a coach. Or at least seem to. I don't know what went on inside the club. And then we have Rattens contract extended without no real return. Do we have the best coach? Look at Collingwood with their new coaching setup? They are thinking outside of the box. I think it will work for them as I rate Malthouse and Bucks very highly.
  • Sticks needs to make way. He needs to find his replacement. There is no room for a president who is a symbol only. We need a business man, a symbolic leader, a marketing person, etc, etc all in one. And get out of the coaches box!!
  • Our win/loss might be about right for where we are at. But it means nothing if its a not a step further up the ladder next year. Things have fallen our way a little this year. We have never been a team to judge ourselves on win/loss. We are Carlton. The only things we are judged on is premierships. Our win/loss ratio this year will mean nothing if its not a stepping stone to top four and a premiership in the next few years.


Are you me? That is exactly my thoughts on the subject. Except maybe not with the coach/process thing. It doesn't have to be one thing or the other - there is a lot of in between.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group