Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:29 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18662
Location: threeohfivethree
dannyboy wrote:
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
no, my opinion is that how can we know if we are on the right track (or not) if all the indicators we would use must (this year) be discounted?

age - discounted
experience - discounted
where we have come from in the past 7 years - discounted
Injuries - discounted (except injuries to other teams, we count those ones in the negative).
Position on the ladder - discounted
Forward entries - discounted
Percentage - discounted
wins - discounted
Play finals - discounted
etc.

Yet the only indicator we seem to use (How he was appointed) is an indicator about a different process - how to find a coach, not, can he coach.


So from your perspective...what do we do? We wait and see another year, two, three and then re-assess. What should Ratts's performance be based on in your opinion? 11wins? Or should it be more performance/development based? By performance I mean the 'HOW' we play. - well I'd have thought make finals this year was more important than the 'how we play' argument because making the finals is a real indicator, you make the finals or you don't. The 'how' is subjective. Now I know those who are agin Ratts ( :grin: ) prefer the 'how' argument because it cannot easily be shot down. If we play finals this year then good job (not a great job) but well done. Next year we need to make it to the second week if we can but truthfully, and this is where it all gets hard, we may not, yet have improved (the 'how - :grin: ).

And the how he was appointed is not what his ability as a coach is being based on...if you think it is then no probem...but it's not. - so why is it always mentioned?

Just as a side issue forgetting about his appointment for a minute and assume it was above board...what do you think about his contract extension? Was it a little premature? Or the professional thing to do given that nothing visible had been achieved as yet? I know the common argument here is that his initial contract wasn't long enough..yeah but maybe it wasn't long enough for a reason...because there were doubters....so why extend it so quickly?
- wished it hadn't occured, it did, so what. Truthfully , what the !@#$%& would I or the Synbads or the Melveys or the Cazzes really know about any of this - sure we can speak the speak ( :wink: ) but all of our info is based on gossip. None of us were at any of those meetings etc so none of us really know. There is a reason why second hand info doesn't carry as much weight as first hand. Any good communications teacher can show you how interpretations enter swiftly into any 'factual' retelling of an event.

The point to all is that its very difficult to judge a lot of these things without looking at what has gone before - yet we are constantly told the circumstances are different this time - its not true of course, its just that we are all nervous - understandably so, we have been shite for far too long and none of us want to go back there - but none of us are in team meetings, train every day, sit with the lads around the whiteboard etc. None of us know all the niggles, or the facts about certain games.

And we never consider the other team or other factors - take friday night. If Fev had kicked that 1st goal, if Yarran had not hit the post - in fact if just 3 of the six posters had been goals, the game would have been very different. Who is to say the lads just dropped their bundles feeling it wasn't 'their night' it happens to all teams but as supporters we want a reason for this and at the moment the flavour is Ratts is at fault. None of us know this no matter how strident because it is too early to tell. We are a young developing side improving - has the improvement been rapid or unexpected - no - but that does not belittle the development, nor does it mean something is wrong, in fact it could mean the opposite, it could mean we are doing the little things that in 3 years time might be the difference between a flag or just playing finals (the Ross Lyon effect if in fact they win the flag).

If all of this is too nebulous - you're right it is. But I am a supporter, I really know nothing about what happens inside, despite what people say, gossip means jack shit all the time. While it may be true where there is smoke there is fire, it is equally true that sometimes its not smoke, rather it is mist clouding judgement.

The mist clears, the sun shines and we think 'how the !@#$%& did we get there' because development is not a gradual constant slope up to the top. it comes in lurches and staggers and steps and rolls and runs and stutters and jumps and then the top is reached.

Mind you, I still worry about Ratts but, for me, nothing that has happened so far this year has made my opinion of Ratts the slightest bit clearer, not for or against.


That's actually a really good post.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18662
Location: threeohfivethree
Which doesn't excuse your poetry...

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
teagueyubeauty wrote:
Just in case people don't remember :wink:

1: Rd22 2003 Kangaroos 124pts
2: Rd16 2007 Brisbane 117pts
3: Rd15 2003 West Coast 116pts
4: Rd10 2004 StKilda 108pts
5: Rd6 2004 Melbourne 105pts
6: Rd12 2007 Hawthorn 100pts
7: Rd21 2005 Essendon* 99pts
8: Rd8 2006 StKilda 92pts
9: Rd22 2006 Sydney 92pts
10: Rd20 2003 StKilda 91pts
11: Rd7 2005 Richmond 85 pts
12: Rd15 2004 Port Adel 83 pts
13: Rd15 2005 StKilda 80pts
14: Rd2 2007 Geelong 78pts
15: Rd12 2007 Fremantle 77pts
16: Rd9 2003 Brisbane 77pts
17: Rd14 2005 West Coast 77pts
18: Rd21 2003 Hawthorn 74pts
19: Rd1 2003 Sydney 74pts
20: Rd17 2003 Collingwood 73pts
21: Rd6 2006 Collingwood 72pts
22: Rd8 2005 Geelong 70pts
23: Rd14 2006 Geelong 65pts
24: Rd9 2006 Adelaide 64 pts
25: Rd20 2004 West Coast 62pts
26: Rd15 2007 Sydney 62pts
27: Rd4 2007 West Coast 61pts



Round 17 2009 Collingwood 10 goals against a team we thought we could beat...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18662
Location: threeohfivethree
Actually it was 9 goals... :wink:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
GWS wrote:
Actually it was 9 goals... :wink:


Oh yeah your right and the Essendon* game was uhmmm 11 and a half???... :razz:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18662
Location: threeohfivethree
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
GWS wrote:
Actually it was 9 goals... :wink:


Oh yeah your right and the Essendon* game was uhmmm 11 and a half???... :razz:


Yeah but they're shit...

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
GWS wrote:
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
GWS wrote:
Actually it was 9 goals... :wink:


Oh yeah your right and the Essendon* game was uhmmm 11 and a half???... :razz:


Yeah but they're shit...


and so that leaves us where exactly???.... :sly: :razz:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
GWS wrote:
Actually it was 9 goals... :wink:


Oh yeah your right and the Essendon* game was uhmmm 11 and a half???... :razz:

And the St Kilda game was nine points.

A shame the Dogs couldn't get that close.

They can't even perfect the art of interchanging players.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:08 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Kouta wrote:
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
GWS wrote:
Actually it was 9 goals... :wink:


Oh yeah your right and the Essendon* game was uhmmm 11 and a half???... :razz:

And the St Kilda game was nine points.


Do we round that one up to two goals or down to a kick?... :grin:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
The difference being though Synbad is that we were in it up to our eye balls with a minute to go in the third after some of the worst butchering of the footy i think i've ever seen. We dominated the most of the second term and all of the third except for that last goal close to the siren. I walked out for my 3/4 time ciggy and wasn't going to go back in because i knew we were done. Mentally they would have been shot at 3/4 time.

None of those games in that period were we in, if you look at them closely you'd probably find alot of them had plenty of junk time goals making the scoreline a bit prettier than they should have been.

Quite clearly only the earlier University teams, Fitzroy of 95 and any one of the 26 wooden spoon teams St.Kilda have had have been worse than teams Carlton put out in those years.

There are a lot of people on this board, and others, that have question marks in regards to Ratts but you're expecting miracles. Sometimes they happen, most of the time they don't. Dannyboy's spelt out the improvements for the year, on the face of it they ARE quantifiable improvements. Visually, yes we still have a lot of work to do but this competition isn't easy to win games let alone play perfect football every week. The teams inconsistent, would be easier to understand if it was week to week but its not even quarter to quarter. That's what happens with a very young side, its hardly ever been different throughout the history of the AFL\VFL.

I think you need to concentrate on the positive parts of our game when we've shown what this team is capable of instead of the negative all of the time. Otherwise you'll be locked down in a mental institution right at the time we're next playing off for the flag.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Synbad wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
Just in case people don't remember :wink:

1: Rd22 2003 Kangaroos 124pts
2: Rd16 2007 Brisbane 117pts
3: Rd15 2003 West Coast 116pts
4: Rd10 2004 StKilda 108pts
5: Rd6 2004 Melbourne 105pts
6: Rd12 2007 Hawthorn 100pts
7: Rd21 2005 Essendon* 99pts
8: Rd8 2006 StKilda 92pts
9: Rd22 2006 Sydney 92pts
10: Rd20 2003 StKilda 91pts
11: Rd7 2005 Richmond 85 pts
12: Rd15 2004 Port Adel 83 pts
13: Rd15 2005 StKilda 80pts
14: Rd2 2007 Geelong 78pts
15: Rd12 2007 Fremantle 77pts
16: Rd9 2003 Brisbane 77pts
17: Rd14 2005 West Coast 77pts
18: Rd21 2003 Hawthorn 74pts
19: Rd1 2003 Sydney 74pts
20: Rd17 2003 Collingwood 73pts
21: Rd6 2006 Collingwood 72pts
22: Rd8 2005 Geelong 70pts
23: Rd14 2006 Geelong 65pts
24: Rd9 2006 Adelaide 64 pts
25: Rd20 2004 West Coast 62pts
26: Rd15 2007 Sydney 62pts
27: Rd4 2007 West Coast 61pts



Round 17 2009 Collingwood 10 goals against a team we thought we could beat...



@#$%&! that list is frightening

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
teagueyubeauty wrote:
The difference being though Synbad is that we were in it up to our eye balls with a minute to go in the third after some of the worst butchering of the footy i think i've ever seen. We dominated the most of the second term and all of the third except for that last goal close to the siren. I walked out for my 3/4 time ciggy and wasn't going to go back in because i knew we were done. Mentally they would have been shot at 3/4 time.

None of those games in that period were we in, if you look at them closely you'd probably find alot of them had plenty of junk time goals making the scoreline a bit prettier than they should have been.

Quite clearly only the earlier University teams, Fitzroy of 95 and any one of the 26 wooden spoon teams St.Kilda have had have been worse than teams Carlton put out in those years.

There are a lot of people on this board, and others, that have question marks in regards to Ratts but you're expecting miracles. Sometimes they happen, most of the time they don't. Dannyboy's spelt out the improvements for the year, on the face of it they ARE quantifiable improvements. Visually, yes we still have a lot of work to do but this competition isn't easy to win games let alone play perfect football every week. The teams inconsistent, would be easier to understand if it was week to week but its not even quarter to quarter. That's what happens with a very young side, its hardly ever been different throughout the history of the AFL\VFL.

I think you need to concentrate on the positive parts of our game when we've shown what this team is capable of instead of the negative all of the time. Otherwise you'll be locked down in a mental institution right at the time we're next playing off for the flag.



We had no money then.
We didnt have a list then.
We were fighting to keep our heads above water due to salary cap breaches and the subsequent repercussions.

The club has moved on....

But youre still comparing it to the biggest basketcase in AFL history for a positive.

Why not compare it to a real standard???

You cannot compare us to the darkest of the dark to find postives today.

If thats how you view things... God help us!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10406
Location: Coburg
and yet we must pretend that list has not effect the team - we're just a clean slate. Reading that list I am leaning a bit more towards being happy with the efforts this year and last.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
dannyboy wrote:
and yet we must pretend that list has not effect the team - we're just a clean slate. Reading that list I am leaning a bit more towards being happy with the efforts this year and last.


That was always going to happen.....

Judd Fev 3 number 1 picks.. a swag of earlier picks and some cash...

But yeah.... were no longer the new Fitzroy.. rejoice!!!


Why not look at the improvement of the individuals on our list?
Why not look at the improvement in gameplan and pattern of play?

Why compare us to nothing??

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:40 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10406
Location: Coburg
Oh and GW nothing excuses poetry - and yes, scary isn't it. So lets go back to p[pretending I make no sense - life's far easier that way :wink:

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:51 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Just for the record... when I said earlier about wins not being a true measure, it was TO AN EXTENT. Of course every coach would be judged by the W/L column, my point was that different coaches would be judged on that measure to diffeent degrees.

On the scale of Thompson to Bailey, Ratts would be somewhere in between in terms of where other factors, such as development, cohesion, not beating ourselves etc come into play.

Just so you know, danny, I'm not saying ladder position is irrelevant, but it's only one of a few things (I think) Ratts and the coaching staff should be judged on. :smile:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
If we make the 8 then on the surface it will have been a successful season but it is more to do with what has happened this year tells us about the future.

Comparing us to 2003 is ridiculous. Even comparing us to 2007 is silly. We had a team that hated the coach and the next most senior coach at Carlton (Mitch) hated the coach. We were utterly disfunctional, and just starting to get things together off the field let alone on the field. Let's face it recruiting Judd makes 5 goals difference a game, add in 3 #1 picks several years into their careers, natural improvement you would expect from young players and a very talented but wayward full forward, and we would expect improvement. Under drafting no-one stays down forever. Sides naturally go up and down as the talent changes. The extent of the talent and the talent of the coach might create a premiership team. The coach is there to make the team better than the sum of its parts. Is Ratts doing that? Too often we are uninspired and seem to have stagefright. The coach needs to get us up not down. Our ball movement is excrutiating. Clarkson says ball movement is getting quicker and you move it quickly or fail, yet our plan appears to be to move it really slowly. Too ofetn our wins revolve around individual performances from Judd and Fev.

The process doesn't mean Ratts can't coach but it does mean Carlton as a club is still behind in our thinking. Is Lappin the best forward caoch in the business or a guy who the club wanted to retire and offered a sweetener. Maybe its the former and after an exacting search of all possible candidates around Australia we were lucky that the best assistant was at our club.

Ratts just sounds a bit out of his depth, he speaks in cliches. Some coaches do becasue they have contempt for the press, Ratts seems to do it because he has nothing deeper to say. He runs out stats and excuses. Maybe just tell us why he has prepared a side that wasn't up to play against the Woods and the Dons. Should have been given a contract till end of 2010 to give him a fair crack - if we were sure that he was the best available when we appointed him (and not just an ex Carlton guy in the right place at the right time) - and then assessed honestly. If we have got it wrong with our coach again, the first decade of the new millenium will indeed be a lost one. You need to have everything right to win a flag and if you don't the window shuts and may not open for ten years. Big responsibility, let's hope everyone has it right.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:55 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
I love how this thread has expanded 30 odd pages since Friday night.

Like everyone else, I was annoyed at Friday night, but not terribly shocked. We still have a fair few missing pieces to our side, which no coach is going to magically fix in the space of 2 years. Out of the sides above us who do we currently have more talent than? Collingwood bat deeper than us at the moment, Dogs are more seasoned and bat deeper, same applies to Adelaide and Brisbane, so really where should we be?

So Synbad, which specific players are showing a lack of improvement, or playing well below their potential? I can't actually think of many, we either have players that are just not very good (Bentley, Bannister, Hartlett), or players who are getting better,and from the stars (Judd and Fev) about what you would expect.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
I think some posters are starting to sound like a broken record goin over and over again

Image

_________________
CFC TAC Squad everyone over 25 must be traded sounds like Loguns Run


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
8 more pages and we can lock this sucker !

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group