Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:57 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:47 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Sydney Blue wrote:
I still say there are 2 sides to a football team and there are two ways of defining a successful football club . The marketing department pumped the side up above expectations resulted in record membership and masses of supporters turning out each week
Winning football games doesn't lead to a successful club Port and the swans are good examples of that . If the club is going to be able to source and afford the best it needs the off field right first and this year that side of the club has won their premiership

We have read post after post of why are we so defencive why so negative why are we turning everyone over 190 cm into a defender well there us a good reason for this and that is for the past 7 or so years we have had the worst defence in the 100 odd year history of the club it has been our Achilles heel for several years now That side of the football team has almost been fixed

They are working on the midfield still need hardness in there

the forward line is a major worry but despite that we are the 3rd highest scoring side in the comp

what needs to happen is to get all of these sections working as one

that clearly isn't happening

Ratts might not be the man but one thing for sure going into a game each week thinking that we should win this is a lot better than knowing you are going to get flogged
At least now if they lose you are disaapointed after the loss in years gone by you were disappointed before the game had even started

We have gone from hoping to win to expecting to win that has to be a step forward


good post SB ...

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
I dont think that going to the footy "thinking we might win compared to going to the footy knowing we will get flogged" has anything to do with Ratts coaching... to believe this is lunacy....

What im saying is i do not believe Ratts is the the right man for the job... and its the clubs duty to find the best possible person for the job...to not do this is negligent...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Quote:
Melvey as previously quoted you obviously have never played a team sport. If you knew anything about what Scott is talking about you would know that he is talking just like it is. Sure coaches are important but players don't play for the coach. They can respect the coach, they can like or doislike him but they play for thier mates which is the team


You can find teams in the suburbss playing for their mates each weekend... but it doesnt make them tactially proficient or skilled.. or at AFL stadard...

What you and Scotty are saying is our players dont like each other and are more selfish than most teams .. and dont play for their mates...

Football today is abit more sophisticated than that baz......

Sure you play for your mates.... but it all comes unstuck in the hurly burly of the competition if youre undrilled... confidence evaporates very quickly if youre not sure of what youre meant to be doing in the heat of the battle..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:36 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 1:51 pm
Posts: 102
Location: Bayswater, Perth
In my opinion - Rattens future may depend on how well we go against Essendon* when we play them next. If, once again, we are run off our feet through the corridor then I think 'it will be clear' that he is not the man for the job as he is clearly not learning.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
yep I'd say the end of next year is about right - Ratts will either be gawn or not by what happens this year and next year. People can panic and get angry but I think that's the reality.

As for the Scotland/Stevens gone backwards - I actually see that as a progression. We are moving past these players because they have no place in our structure unless they become more accountable and more consistent in the things we want them to do not just in the things they like to do.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2141
Before one even looks at Ratten we need to ask questions of the person in charge of recruiting.Is he more important than ever?


Has Hughes vacated the premises?



Do you think we would have won some of the close games this year if we had Rich in the team? Ratten would look like a better coach if he had Rich at his disposal.

Brisbane's recruiting over the years has been exceptional. Rich, Black etc from the West. I guess we are recruiting more Western Australians, so that is often a positive step.


I can remember seeing one of Rich's first games of AFL and thinking...jeez...this guy kicks it 10 metres longer than other and 5 seconds quicker. Is there a better long stab passer in the game than Rich?

Hindsight eh... i guess 5 or so other clubs passed up Rich as well.


Last edited by tap in 79 on Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:54 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:44 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Synbad wrote:
I dont think that going to the footy "thinking we might win compared to going to the footy knowing we will get flogged" has anything to do with Ratts coaching...


Of course it doesn't ..the comment was just an aside..I'm guessing

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:48 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
dannyboy wrote:
yep I'd say the end of next year is about right - Ratts will either be gawn or not by what happens this year and next year. People can panic and get angry but I think that's the reality.

As for the Scotland/Stevens gone backwards - I actually see that as a progression. We are moving past these players because they have no place in our structure unless they become more accountable and more consistent in the things we want them to do not just in the things they like to do.


I've said previously we'd have a good idea by the midseason break next year.

That gives Ratts enough time to adjust things ..if he can.

Scotto and Stevo have had recent serious injuries which has to have slowed them down considering their ages.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
tap in 79 wrote:
Before one even looks at Ratten we need to ask questions of the person in charge of recruiting.Is he more important than ever?


Has Hughes vacated the premises?



Do you think we would have won some of the close games this year if we had Rich in the team? Ratten would look like a better coach if he had Rich at his disposal.

Brisbane's recruiting over the years has been exceptional. Rich, Black etc from the West. I guess we are recruiting more Western Australians, so that is often a positive step.


I can remember seeing one of Rich's first games of AFL and thinking...jeez...this guy kicks it 10 metres longer than other and 5 seconds quicker. Is there a better long stab passer in the game than Rich?

Hindsight eh... i guess 5 or so other clubs passed up Rich as well.


I definitely think our recruiting methods need to be heavily reviewed and probably adjusted at the end of the year, taps, but I really think the Rich vs Yarran issue is a red-herring.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:03 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
Synbad wrote:
Quote:
Melvey as previously quoted you obviously have never played a team sport. If you knew anything about what Scott is talking about you would know that he is talking just like it is. Sure coaches are important but players don't play for the coach. They can respect the coach, they can like or doislike him but they play for thier mates which is the team


You can find teams in the suburbss playing for their mates each weekend... but it doesnt make them tactially proficient or skilled.. or at AFL stadard...

What you and Scotty are saying is our players dont like each other and are more selfish than most teams .. and dont play for their mates...

Football today is abit more sophisticated than that baz......

Sure you play for your mates.... but it all comes unstuck in the hurly burly of the competition if youre undrilled... confidence evaporates very quickly if youre not sure of what youre meant to be doing in the heat of the battle..


My response was to Melveys post. Suburban, AFL or Country, players are team orientated and play for their mates. Your propositon about drils and plays is equally correct. The difference is that when the heat and pressure comes and the extra yeard has to be made or the cover, block 3rd effort needs to be made, thats not plays its actually for the team and certainly not for the coach. I dont care if its AFL or not, ask the players and they will tell you. They like the coach or they dont like the coach. They respect the coach or they dont respect the coach but very few play for them.

_________________
Go BLues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:08 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2141
Pafloyul wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Before one even looks at Ratten we need to ask questions of the person in charge of recruiting.Is he more important than ever?


Has Hughes vacated the premises?



Do you think we would have won some of the close games this year if we had Rich in the team? Ratten would look like a better coach if he had Rich at his disposal.

Brisbane's recruiting over the years has been exceptional. Rich, Black etc from the West. I guess we are recruiting more Western Australians, so that is often a positive step.


I can remember seeing one of Rich's first games of AFL and thinking...jeez...this guy kicks it 10 metres longer than other and 5 seconds quicker. Is there a better long stab passer in the game than Rich?

Hindsight eh... i guess 5 or so other clubs passed up Rich as well.


I definitely think our recruiting methods need to be heavily reviewed and probably adjusted at the end of the year, taps, but I really think the Rich vs Yarran issue is a red-herring.


I like the look of Yarran. It isn't Rich vs Yarran. If I had the picks again I would have:

1) kept pick 24 used it on Yarran if he was still there (keep in mind he didn't have a phenomenal u18 carnival due to injury, so he might have been there at 24).

2) used pick 6 on Rich.

3) pick 40 - Robinson - good selection.

We had Sauce and Hampson already-are they a lot worse than Warnock?
The Warnock trade may have been a mistake, the not Rich picking also could have been a mistake.... recruiting is just enormously important.


Last edited by tap in 79 on Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:09 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9108
Location: Nth Fitzroy
dannyboy wrote:
yep I'd say the end of next year is about right - Ratts will either be gawn or not by what happens this year and next year. People can panic and get angry but I think that's the reality.

As for the Scotland/Stevens gone backwards - I actually see that as a progression. We are moving past these players because they have no place in our structure unless they become more accountable and more consistent in the things we want them to do not just in the things they like to do.


Yep if we can finish with more wins than last year and phased out Scotland, Stevens and Fisher then we are on the right track.
Throwing games into Hampson, Sauce, AJ, Austin, Robo, Browne, Armfield , Garlett and Yarran is also a bonus. If someone told me at the start of the season that we would achieve this i would of been happy.

The big test for Ratts is getting the forward line working with Fev in it. Many have tried and failed. I dont see any of the teams above us with a goalsquare full forward being their main avanue to goal. Geelong dont have one, Saints have Rewoldt roaming the the fwd half of the ground, Bears have Brown cruising the arc, Collingwood only have sharp shooting half forwards, the dogs similar, the dons took LLoyd out of the square.

The work is there to be done. Can he do it? not sure. Can any coach do it? not sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
tap in 79 wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Before one even looks at Ratten we need to ask questions of the person in charge of recruiting.Is he more important than ever?


Has Hughes vacated the premises?



Do you think we would have won some of the close games this year if we had Rich in the team? Ratten would look like a better coach if he had Rich at his disposal.

Brisbane's recruiting over the years has been exceptional. Rich, Black etc from the West. I guess we are recruiting more Western Australians, so that is often a positive step.


I can remember seeing one of Rich's first games of AFL and thinking...jeez...this guy kicks it 10 metres longer than other and 5 seconds quicker. Is there a better long stab passer in the game than Rich?

Hindsight eh... i guess 5 or so other clubs passed up Rich as well.


I definitely think our recruiting methods need to be heavily reviewed and probably adjusted at the end of the year, taps, but I really think the Rich vs Yarran issue is a red-herring.


I like the look of Yarran. It isn't Rich vs Yarran. If I had the picks again I would have:

1) kept pick 24 used it on Yarran if he was still there (keep in mind he didn't have a phenomenal u18 carnival due to injury, so he might have been there at 24).

2) used pick 6 on Rich.

3) pick 40 - Robinson - good selection.

We had Sauce and Hampson already-are they a lot worse than Warnock?
The Warnock trade may have been a mistake, the not Rich picking also could have been a mistake.... recruiting is just enormously important.

Even if it did pan out that way (and I seriously doubt Yarran would have made it past about 12), you'd actually go into a season with no genuine ruckmen over the age of 21?

Don't go into football, it'll just dent your ego.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:35 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
baz_baz wrote:
Melvey as previously quoted you obviously have never played a team sport. If you knew anything about what Scott is talking about you would know that he is talking just like it is. Sure coaches are important but players don't play for the coach. They can respect the coach, they can like or doislike him but they play for thier mates which is the team


If thats the case then why did we get rid of Pagan?????? The players made a statement didn't they?????? The players could have played for each other!!!!!!

its not suburban football mate. Its a professional sport. I've played footy, yeah not everyone loves the coach. Sure there are some who think they could coach better but surburban football is far more simple than at AFL level.

And for arguments sake how is that a team like Pies who are not blessed with champions are in the top 4??????? The same could be said for Sydney and they won a premiership. THEY BELIEVE IN THERE COACH. THE COACH BELIEVES IN THERE ABILITY. AND THEY GET THE BEST OUT OF EACH OTHER


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:47 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
blueroyal wrote:
In my opinion - Rattens future may depend on how well we go against Essendon* when we play them next. If, once again, we are run off our feet through the corridor then I think 'it will be clear' that he is not the man for the job as he is clearly not learning.


Jade Rawlings can beat them with Richmond, maybe he should have a chat to Ratts on how to coach :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:50 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
ZOMG Richmond just beat Essendon*, and Essendon* beat us twice, that means Richmond are ahead of us, even though we beat them twice!!!!


Last edited by Blueboy_Dan on Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:01 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 580
Sack Knights.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Like i said its a shit comp...

What is important is that you lay down a pattern of play... so you can rise quicker...

why get bogged down with all the average clubs???

Knights might be shit but he has a side with less raw talent higher up the ladder.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:17 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
tap in 79 wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Before one even looks at Ratten we need to ask questions of the person in charge of recruiting.Is he more important than ever?


Has Hughes vacated the premises?



Do you think we would have won some of the close games this year if we had Rich in the team? Ratten would look like a better coach if he had Rich at his disposal.

Brisbane's recruiting over the years has been exceptional. Rich, Black etc from the West. I guess we are recruiting more Western Australians, so that is often a positive step.


I can remember seeing one of Rich's first games of AFL and thinking...jeez...this guy kicks it 10 metres longer than other and 5 seconds quicker. Is there a better long stab passer in the game than Rich?

Hindsight eh... i guess 5 or so other clubs passed up Rich as well.


I definitely think our recruiting methods need to be heavily reviewed and probably adjusted at the end of the year, taps, but I really think the Rich vs Yarran issue is a red-herring.


I like the look of Yarran. It isn't Rich vs Yarran. If I had the picks again I would have:

1) kept pick 24 used it on Yarran if he was still there (keep in mind he didn't have a phenomenal u18 carnival due to injury, so he might have been there at 24).

2) used pick 6 on Rich.

3) pick 40 - Robinson - good selection.

We had Sauce and Hampson already-are they a lot worse than Warnock?
The Warnock trade may have been a mistake, the not Rich picking also could have been a mistake.... recruiting is just enormously important.


I agree with most of this. I think if you get the little things right most of the time you can afford a big slip-up once in a blue moon. That's my point. I think we have trouble prioritising.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2141
Jimmae stated - [/quote]
Even if it did pan out that way (and I seriously doubt Yarran would have made it past about 12), you'd actually go into a season with no genuine ruckmen over the age of 21?

Don't go into football, it'll just dent your ego.[/quote]

Warnock was originally a pick 42 for Fremantle - not as if he has set the world on fire any time in his career. At least when Carlton had got Justin Madden from Essendon* he had already played well at the standard required.

I understand the need for a good ruckman - but should we be discounting Sauce and Hampson?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cazzesman, old blues, sinbagger and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group