Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 11:56 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:56 pm
Posts: 2277
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Mark J wrote:
FlipMode2 wrote:
Mark J wrote:
Excuse me for interrupting and stating the obvious.....but would'nt it be prudent to get SOS back as an assistant ASAF*****P!!!! :thanks:


Another Ex Carlton player on our coaching board.

that would make it:

Brett Ratten - Coach
Matthew 'great half time speech' Lappin - Forward Coach
Sticks - President
Craig Bradley - Kicking Coach?
Greg Williams - Not sure what he does
Silvagni - Backline Coach
Teague - Bullants coach


I'd love to have Silvagni as backline coach IF hes the best available not just because he played for us.


Who cares if he's ex Carlton!
Have you seen the Saints defensive unit this season? :roll:
Dawson is in their best 22 FFS!
The fact that he's left the club to further his career can only be benificial.
Who's our current defensive coach...Montgomery? give me a break. The young players would REALLY look up to him, such a defensive icon! :donk: :donk: :donk:


We're the 3rd highest scoring team in the competition this year. Does that mean Matthew Lappin is one of the best forward line coaches going around? Have you seen what SOS does at StKilda first hand? speeches, set ups etc?

I'm not saying hes not a good option but is he the best option available?

_________________
Lawrence Lawrence, The man who knows all the rackets and all the racketeers!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:27 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Rafalution wrote:
Can someone explain to me why Grigg started on Heath Shaw? and why they persist trying to use him as a run with player?


This continues to baffle me week in week out. Ratts seems to have this deep down belief that we need to tag half the team we are playing. FFS why did we need to tag anyone other than Didak last night...I cannot believe the filth have anyone of real class who is damaging other than this guy. So you tag Didak with a designated tagger i.e. Joseph and tell all of your creative players to run and create NOT negate CREATE....FFS CREATE...Ratts is to reactive and defensive in his tactics...it just seems he is trying to complicate as much as possible what is in reality much simpler...

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:01 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
We beat Syd because Ratten threw his gameplan????? out and said, "see ball, run with ball make space" and then did the sign of the cross and prayed that it would work out


You're not assisting your agenda in the slightest by fabricating nonsense . :wink:


apart from the saints game, carlton's best efforts in the last 12 weeks have been when the gameplan didn't work and we were up against it.....go look at the last 10 minutes of the Haw game.

I'll keep writing nonsense and you can keep believing that everything will be rosy

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:05 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
club29 wrote:
99prelim wrote:
We beat Bris with half their defence missing-Fev got us over the line
We beat Coll with a VFL side
We beat Syd because Ratten threw his gameplan????? out and said, "see ball, run with ball make space" and then did the sign of the cross and prayed that it would work out
We beat Freo........just....Adelaide restricted them to 1 goal the following week
We beat Richmond. Thank god Riewolt didn't kick straight. would've been interesting
.


Now go through our losses Prelim.

Lost to Essendon* lucky we didnt kick straight things would have been interesting
Lost to Hawks - Ruffy got them over the line
Saints- Lucky rewolt had a good start or things could have got ugly. Lyon threw the game plan out the window and the fullback kicked the winner
Swans - Lucky we didnt kick straight early or things would have been interesting.
..etc

You struggle to deal with a loss Prelim99. Things really are not that bad......relax and enjoy the ups and downs of a developing side.


What I don't struggle with is reality. We are potentially a better side being poorly coached/developed

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:30 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
99prelim wrote:
What I don't struggle with is reality. We are potentially a better side being poorly coached/developed

Potentially a better side? Based on what exactly.

I think you underestimate your struggles with reality.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:36 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
I'd just like to touch on the Synners v's Belasarius argument a few pages back. Synners has asked IMO a reasonable question...i.e. reasons why Ratts is the man to take us forward. I would really like to hear some of these reasons (if there are any out there) so that we can thrash them around to see where we end up...and Belasaruis's request that Synners name a coach....well again is this relevant??? The point in this thread is not who should coach Carlton next year...the point of the thread is the question marks over Ratts and his inability to be the man to take this club forward to some success.

A proper process will lead to a good coach selection IMO...the name of the guy is irrelevant....So for the sake of Belasarius's request lets nominate for arguments sake as any coach selectecd via a professional process as being the coach that I would recommend for instance...I'd say Synners would be ok with this (if not then he can provide his own input) but more importantly given this Belasarius and anyone who has something to contribute...what has Ratts shown in 2 seasons that gives you the confidence that he is in fact the man??? This can cover a broad spectrum of attributes...i.e. pre season preparation, fast track player development, match day tactics, changes in our structures this year as opposed to last year...etc....

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:38 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
99prelim wrote:
An interesting observation
When the nay sayers on this forum talk about Ratts (and I will reveal my hand and say that he is a poor coach), they use a combination of observation, perception, discussion, trends, what they read, what they hear, what they're gut feeling is etc etc
Just as night follows day, all the positive posters refute all this because they have no hard data, no facts, they're not part of the inner circle, they have hidden agendas, the stats rebut the argument etc
In other words, the nay sayers were just too emotional, too simplistic.
BUT
When Carlton wins and they played shithouse, and really just won because Fev kicked 8 or Judd carried everyone or the opposition was deplorable or the opposition had a quarter of their best players out etc, facts, stats and more complex arguments are thrown out the window by the positive posters, ripping into the naysayers with, "Just enjoy the win, we've won more than last year, can't believe we won and you're still not happy....etc...etc". you can't have it both ways

We beat Bris with half their defence missing-Fev got us over the line
We beat Coll with a VFL side
We beat Syd because Ratten threw his gameplan????? out and said, "see ball, run with ball make space" and then did the sign of the cross and prayed that it would work out
We beat Freo........just....Adelaide restricted them to 1 goal the following week
We beat Richmond. Thank god Riewolt didn't kick straight. would've been interesting
Carlton are becoming a joke. I don't really give a flying toss that some people don't value the opinion of Walls, Buckley, Sheahan, Cometti, Shaw and co. they have infinitely more credibility that the sum total of this site, certainly in terms of experience. i just hope that those people who play the credibility card when people like Synbad, Melvey or whoever articulate their opinions don't then just as simply dismiss the opinions of people who've played the game successfully at the highest level
Carlton are on the verge of going backwards. thank god Hawthorn had their year from hell.....everyone beat them...except us.
Ratten IS NOT THE ANSWER. He is not value-adding to that squad one iota.



conviently left out the fact that we took the game to the siaints, and very nearly could have won it. are we still teh only side to score more than 100 points against them.

also conviently forgot all about the doggies game?

whilst i dont think we are impressive as many think we are, i also dont think we, or ratts is as bad as what many make him out to be on here.

but i also find your post somewhat amusing. a simple question ... do you rate collingwood? becase many of those "champions" of the game you refer to. but who has collingwood beaten? no one. they fell over the line against the dogs, beat brisbane, duriong that period that they had half of their side out, us and the bombers. the rest is all against bottom 8 sides.

but they are flying?

give me a spell.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:57 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
what has Ratts shown in 2 seasons that gives you the confidence that he is in fact the man??? This can cover a broad spectrum of attributes...i.e. pre season preparation, fast track player development, match day tactics, changes in our structures this year as opposed to last year...etc....

There's a difference between defending Ratts and trying to balance out some of the absurdity in this thread. If you can point me towards a post that provides some asute and balanced criticism of the coaching staff I'll be happy to debate the point. The onus is on those who want him sacked to provide something of substance to back up their point of view. The majority of arguments in this thread are childish and simplistic and honestly aren't worth my time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:59 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
at the end of the day.

if carlton makes the eight - then Ratten and the Team have achieved his/their goals. making the eight is what its about this year. not winning a grand final, not playing like super stars every week. our best is as good as anyones in the comp, our worst still makes us look rubbish.

if carlton doesnt make the eight, then Ratten and the Team havent achieved their goals and then we have to look at it.

until then .... close this thread, its now become a joke. we win three games in a row and it probably got 15 replies, we lost one game and it gets 15 pages.

before round 1, if we where told at the start of the year, we would be 9w8L after 17 rounds with a percentage of 108

there isnt a single person who supports this club who wouldnt be happy with it.

ffs, we havent played finals for 7 flower years, its almost like some of yo blokes think we are going to go from 15 to 10 to top 4 in the space of two seasons. give me a spell!! and we are still so incredibly young is amazing we are as good as we are already!!

all along, in any debate i have had with anyone about carlton this yeah, its always been

2009 - top 8
2010 - top 4
2011 - our window opens

i have seen nothing to suggest that has changed.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:06 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
ScottSaunders wrote:
at the end of the day.

if carlton makes the eight - then Ratten and the Team have achieved his/their goals. making the eight is what its about this year. not winning a grand final, not playing like super stars every week. our best is as good as anyones in the comp, our worst still makes us look rubbish.

if carlton doesnt make the eight, then Ratten and the Team havent achieved their goals and then we have to look at it.

until then .... close this thread, its now become a joke. we win three games in a row and it probably got 15 replies, we lost one game and it gets 15 pages.

before round 1, if we where told at the start of the year, we would be 9w8L after 17 rounds with a percentage of 108

there isnt a single person who supports this club who wouldnt be happy with it.

ffs, we havent played finals for 7 !@#$%& years, its almost like some of yo blokes think we are going to go from 15 to 10 to top 4 in the space of two seasons. give me a spell!! and we are still so incredibly young is amazing we are as good as we are already!!

all along, in any debate i have had with anyone about carlton this yeah, its always been

2009 - top 8
2010 - top 4
2011 - our window opens

i have seen nothing to suggest that has changed.


4 teams tanking ... so if u win 6 games of those u only need to win 5 games to make the eight....

i predicted a weak season prior to the season beginning....

a succesful season should be one where you have sorted a pattern a style of play into the future that suits what you have.
as well as finding the key to unlocking consistant performances from key veteran players.
to be capable of kicking the ball out and moving it forward .
to have found options and effectiveness in inside 50 entries.
etc etc etc

we have done none of that... and yet its going to be a succesful season???

well you can bet there are other teams looking at coming up and improving next year also....and were falling behind a few we would have thought we were ahead of prior to the season beginning.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 6:32 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
ScottSaunders wrote:
at the end of the day.

if carlton makes the eight - then Ratten and the Team have achieved his/their goals. making the eight is what its about this year. not winning a grand final, not playing like super stars every week. our best is as good as anyones in the comp, our worst still makes us look rubbish.

if carlton doesnt make the eight, then Ratten and the Team havent achieved their goals and then we have to look at it.

until then .... close this thread, its now become a joke. we win three games in a row and it probably got 15 replies, we lost one game and it gets 15 pages.

before round 1, if we where told at the start of the year, we would be 9w8L after 17 rounds with a percentage of 108

there isnt a single person who supports this club who wouldnt be happy with it.

ffs, we havent played finals for 7 !@#$%& years, its almost like some of yo blokes think we are going to go from 15 to 10 to top 4 in the space of two seasons. give me a spell!! and we are still so incredibly young is amazing we are as good as we are already!!

all along, in any debate i have had with anyone about carlton this yeah, its always been

2009 - top 8
2010 - top 4
2011 - our window opens

i have seen nothing to suggest that has changed.


And

In8 wrote:
There's a difference between defending Ratts and trying to balance out some of the absurdity in this thread. If you can point me towards a post that provides some asute and balanced criticism of the coaching staff I'll be happy to debate the point. The onus is on those who want him sacked to provide something of substance to back up their point of view.


Hear, hear!

Well said.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:10 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
Synbad wrote:
a succesful season should be one where you have sorted a pattern a style of play into the future that suits what you have.

dont disagree, but problem for us, is at times our skill level is horrible. i dont know if anyone could be bothered but we seem to play alot better at telstra dome than the mcg, and we certainly seem to struggle at night at the mcg for some reason or another.

Synbad wrote:
as well as finding the key to unlocking consistant performances from key veteran players.

doesnt fly with me, we probably have three or four "veteran players"
Stevens - who it appears "doesnt like the coach" so isnt putting the effort in. if i was ratts, stevens wouldnt play again.
Scotland - as per stevens, if the rumours are true, and again, if i was ratts wouldnt get a game
Fevola - is a true full forward, he can only impact on the game if we give him a chance. unless we change his role, which is something the club should consider, he is useless to us, if the delievery to him is useless (this isnt potting fevola)

Synbad wrote:
to be capable of kicking the ball out and moving it forward .

we have a plan, and whilst im not a fan, we do the same thing every time, it needs to be changed, but to suggest we dont is rubbish, but again, you can have all the best plans in the world, but if your execution isnt up to it, it wouldnt matter a jot if it was best coach to ever played the game.

Synbad wrote:
to have found options and effectiveness in inside 50 entries.

something ver much under development. you look at would be are prefeered starting forward line, and for me it would consist of fevola, kreuzer, waite, betts, yarren/garlett/robinson. nopw of that, two are playing, kreuzer cant remain forward until warnock comes good, waite is out for the season, and then it leaves yarren/garlett/robinson all in the first year and all of them wouldnt have more than 20 games experience combined.

our forward line, like most of our side is still very much under development .. how can you possibly think they are going to be as good as say a collingwood forward line that probably has close to 900 games experience?

some times, some of yo blokes just need to look at it subjectively and then speak, becase all yo do is post with emotion and make your self look like you havent got a clue.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:10 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
ScottSaunders wrote:
99prelim wrote:
An interesting observation
When the nay sayers on this forum talk about Ratts (and I will reveal my hand and say that he is a poor coach), they use a combination of observation, perception, discussion, trends, what they read, what they hear, what they're gut feeling is etc etc
Just as night follows day, all the positive posters refute all this because they have no hard data, no facts, they're not part of the inner circle, they have hidden agendas, the stats rebut the argument etc
In other words, the nay sayers were just too emotional, too simplistic.
BUT
When Carlton wins and they played shithouse, and really just won because Fev kicked 8 or Judd carried everyone or the opposition was deplorable or the opposition had a quarter of their best players out etc, facts, stats and more complex arguments are thrown out the window by the positive posters, ripping into the naysayers with, "Just enjoy the win, we've won more than last year, can't believe we won and you're still not happy....etc...etc". you can't have it both ways

We beat Bris with half their defence missing-Fev got us over the line
We beat Coll with a VFL side
We beat Syd because Ratten threw his gameplan????? out and said, "see ball, run with ball make space" and then did the sign of the cross and prayed that it would work out
We beat Freo........just....Adelaide restricted them to 1 goal the following week
We beat Richmond. Thank god Riewolt didn't kick straight. would've been interesting
Carlton are becoming a joke. I don't really give a flying toss that some people don't value the opinion of Walls, Buckley, Sheahan, Cometti, Shaw and co. they have infinitely more credibility that the sum total of this site, certainly in terms of experience. i just hope that those people who play the credibility card when people like Synbad, Melvey or whoever articulate their opinions don't then just as simply dismiss the opinions of people who've played the game successfully at the highest level
Carlton are on the verge of going backwards. thank god Hawthorn had their year from hell.....everyone beat them...except us.
Ratten IS NOT THE ANSWER. He is not value-adding to that squad one iota.



conviently left out the fact that we took the game to the siaints, and very nearly could have won it. are we still teh only side to score more than 100 points against them.

also conviently forgot all about the doggies game?

whilst i dont think we are impressive as many think we are, i also dont think we, or ratts is as bad as what many make him out to be on here.

but i also find your post somewhat amusing. a simple question ... do you rate collingwood? becase many of those "champions" of the game you refer to. but who has collingwood beaten? no one. they fell over the line against the dogs, beat brisbane, duriong that period that they had half of their side out, us and the bombers. the rest is all against bottom 8 sides.

but they are flying?

give me a spell.


What they all say about collingwood is that the coaches get the best out of their talents. We don't. Now take your own advice and give yourself a spell,

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:19 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Synbad wrote:
ScottSaunders wrote:
at the end of the day.

if carlton makes the eight - then Ratten and the Team have achieved his/their goals. making the eight is what its about this year. not winning a grand final, not playing like super stars every week. our best is as good as anyones in the comp, our worst still makes us look rubbish.

if carlton doesnt make the eight, then Ratten and the Team havent achieved their goals and then we have to look at it.

until then .... close this thread, its now become a joke. we win three games in a row and it probably got 15 replies, we lost one game and it gets 15 pages.

before round 1, if we where told at the start of the year, we would be 9w8L after 17 rounds with a percentage of 108

there isnt a single person who supports this club who wouldnt be happy with it.

ffs, we havent played finals for 7 !@#$%& years, its almost like some of yo blokes think we are going to go from 15 to 10 to top 4 in the space of two seasons. give me a spell!! and we are still so incredibly young is amazing we are as good as we are already!!

all along, in any debate i have had with anyone about carlton this yeah, its always been

2009 - top 8
2010 - top 4
2011 - our window opens

i have seen nothing to suggest that has changed.


4 teams tanking ... so if u win 6 games of those u only need to win 5 games to make the eight....

i predicted a weak season prior to the season beginning....

a succesful season should be one where you have sorted a pattern a style of play into the future that suits what you have.
as well as finding the key to unlocking consistant performances from key veteran players.
to be capable of kicking the ball out and moving it forward .
to have found options and effectiveness in inside 50 entries.
etc etc etc

we have done none of that... and yet its going to be a succesful season???

well you can bet there are other teams looking at coming up and improving next year also....and were falling behind a few we would have thought we were ahead of prior to the season beginning.


you can add Hawthorn's shocker of a season to help us out. But against that, the Bombers have had a surprising season.....oops, can't use that line of argument because we couldn't beat them.....twice.
Too simplistic to say what you would or would not have taken at the beginning of the year. I agree with you Synbad. It' s not about personnel or experience (Hawthorn put paid to that last year). The coaching staff are not adding any value to the expected improvement that comes from having the best player in the AFL come our way, the best ff and 3 #1 draft picks.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:25 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
in8 wrote:
99prelim wrote:
What I don't struggle with is reality. We are potentially a better side being poorly coached/developed

Potentially a better side? Based on what exactly.

I think you underestimate your struggles with reality.


If you think this side is playing anywhere near its potential, you continue to believe that. It's an opinion forum. You're entitled to one. Watch Collingwood and Essendon* play. Whether you like them or not, I'll back my opinion against yours that if we took a poll of 1000 footy supporters from other clubs and asked them the question, "Which team is getting the most out of its playing list" Carlton would be ranked third

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:25 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
It really is all about what the coaching staff can extract out of the players and the team .
Are our boys playing to the maximum of their abilities most weeks?
Collectively and individually???

Thats what you pay coaches for .
Thats what theyre employed to do.

And there has to be marked improvement inside 2 years ... in both of those sectors.

Alot of our guys have not improved the required amount.
The gameplan is a dogs breakfast....
Were too focussed on defence... and tagging.. and a heap of tall defenders... and the players do not seem to have the confidence to be adventurous.
Were too predictable in what we do .
We are training an army of talls or medium talls to play in the backline.

It really baflles me when we have so many tall or tallish defenders why Hartlett and Edwards are played there too...

Youd think we would spend the money to bring in people who can work with these two and Setanta as well as Kreuzer to improve what we have at our disposal up forward.

Seriously.... if you have TBird Waite Jameson Bower and Austin... why do you need Hartlett and Edwards doing exactly the same thing???

Yes i know theyre thinking get them to learn to be defensive... but not at the expense of stripping them of any forwrd mindset....

We do not need more tall or hird tall defenders....

We need more forward options...

So teach them to create space.. run into space... drag defenders..lead... kick goals.. work with Fev...

Its just the most small minded ludicrous planning ever.....

Every tream has talls up forward who are not household names.. and each one of those has his good defensive days and bad defensive days in the forward line...

We are training ours just to be defenders...

And Lappin really gets an F for his work with the forwards this year...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:28 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
99prelim wrote:
Synbad wrote:
ScottSaunders wrote:
at the end of the day.

if carlton makes the eight - then Ratten and the Team have achieved his/their goals. making the eight is what its about this year. not winning a grand final, not playing like super stars every week. our best is as good as anyones in the comp, our worst still makes us look rubbish.

if carlton doesnt make the eight, then Ratten and the Team havent achieved their goals and then we have to look at it.

until then .... close this thread, its now become a joke. we win three games in a row and it probably got 15 replies, we lost one game and it gets 15 pages.

before round 1, if we where told at the start of the year, we would be 9w8L after 17 rounds with a percentage of 108

there isnt a single person who supports this club who wouldnt be happy with it.

ffs, we havent played finals for 7 !@#$%& years, its almost like some of yo blokes think we are going to go from 15 to 10 to top 4 in the space of two seasons. give me a spell!! and we are still so incredibly young is amazing we are as good as we are already!!

all along, in any debate i have had with anyone about carlton this yeah, its always been

2009 - top 8
2010 - top 4
2011 - our window opens

i have seen nothing to suggest that has changed.


4 teams tanking ... so if u win 6 games of those u only need to win 5 games to make the eight....

i predicted a weak season prior to the season beginning....

a succesful season should be one where you have sorted a pattern a style of play into the future that suits what you have.
as well as finding the key to unlocking consistant performances from key veteran players.
to be capable of kicking the ball out and moving it forward .
to have found options and effectiveness in inside 50 entries.
etc etc etc

we have done none of that... and yet its going to be a succesful season???

well you can bet there are other teams looking at coming up and improving next year also....and were falling behind a few we would have thought we were ahead of prior to the season beginning.


you can add Hawthorn's shocker of a season to help us out. But against that, the Bombers have had a surprising season.....oops, can't use that line of argument because we couldn't beat them.....twice.
Too simplistic to say what you would or would not have taken at the beginning of the year. I agree with you Synbad. It' s not about personnel or experience (Hawthorn put paid to that last year). The coaching staff are not adding any value to the expected improvement that comes from having the best player in the AFL come our way, the best ff and 3 #1 draft picks.


The concept of value adding is very relevant here - good point. There will be natural improvement but the mark of good structures is how much is added outside the natural improvement. Like with most teams it is the middle and third tier players that really make a consistent difference. That is where the real value adding comes from. How much value adding is being done at our club? Harris and his development team have only been in the club for a short time (AFAIK) so will be interesting to see what happens next year as a result of the work done so far.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:29 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Does in8 trully believe were playing to the best of our abilities???? :lol: :screwy:

Get real!!!!

We are massively underperforming...

As long as youre not WC -Freo- MElb -or Richmond.. you should be guaranteed seven wins just playing those teams..

Its the most pathetic group of straggler teams in the history of this sport...

Then you dont have to play Hawthorn Geelong or StKilda 2 times...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:02 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
they way you blokes talk, its as if we are sitting 2nd last on the ladder.

we are sitting 7th, and its about right, for where we are at as a side.

9 wins 8 losses - 4 losses under 10 points, as someone said somewhere before.

if we improve our game, by two goals, just two goals, a game next year, we are sitting 13 wins and 4 losses.

currently, using todays ladder, we would be sitting clear in third spot.

we must and more importantly ratten must be doing something right, if we are in that position already, considering we finished 10th last year, and 15th the year before.

we arent playing great football all the time, but we have improved gradually, and as a side we will continue to improve, improve by 2 goals a game next year, and we start to look a top 4 side.

all this without fielding our best 22 all year ..... yep, ratten, he has no flower idea :roll:

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:08 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9108
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Rafalution wrote:
Can someone explain to me why Grigg started on Heath Shaw? and why they persist trying to use him as a run with player?


This continues to baffle me week in week out. Ratts seems to have this deep down belief that we need to tag half the team we are playing. FFS why did we need to tag anyone other than Didak last night...I cannot believe the filth have anyone of real class who is damaging other than this guy. So you tag Didak with a designated tagger i.e. Joseph and tell all of your creative players to run and create NOT negate CREATE....FFS CREATE...Ratts is to reactive and defensive in his tactics...it just seems he is trying to complicate as much as possible what is in reality much simpler...


Surely you put someone on the other teams chief play maker out of defence. Tactic has worked well for us and other clubs for years and very well for us over the last couple. Grigg has done the job on shaw before and it has worked a treat.

I agree with you that we shouldnt play too many taggers. For me id go with joseph on oppositions most dangerous player and one of Houla/grigg/carrazzo on thier creative dashing half back. I dont think that is very complicated.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cazzesman, Google [Bot] and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group