Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:05 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 2:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Melvey wrote:
Who cares. The fact is we are shit. i don't need them to tell me that!!!!!!

The fact is we were shit last night. Let's look at that, and work out why instead of pointing at other people's opinions.

Otherwise, what the hell are we doing on a discussion forum?? Don't shift the argument.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 2:50 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
MPH78 wrote:
This post from the Doc in another thread pretty much sums it up for me

"Yep - I left early and I almost never do that.. disgraceful, insipid performance from the whole team - coaches included. Not only did the players lack intensity, they broke team rules and played unaccountable football. Would have thought playing a game for the Richard Pratt Cup that would further enhance our finals chances would mean more. Too many passengers...too many getting lost...too many making basic mistakes...and obviously there's something wrong somewhere - either the message isn't getting through - or the message isn't very good.

I'm normally 'Glass Half Full' too - - but they lost me tonight...can't defend that crap. The better drilled team won."

Two epic fails on the big stage with plenty at stake.....something is seriously wrong and needs to be acted upon, now.


I thought we actually gave it a crack and thats the saddest part of all.

Something isn't right........... TRUST ME!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 2:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Not that long ago.....Bomber Thompson was facing the sack.....as was Clarkson....they've both since won Flags.

I'm hoping for third time lucky.....Ratts may yet surprise us................................................hope so.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 2:55 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
jimmae wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Who cares. The fact is we are shit. i don't need them to tell me that!!!!!!

The fact is we were shit last night. Let's look at that, and work out why instead of pointing at other people's opinions.

Otherwise, what the hell are we doing on a discussion forum?? Don't shift the argument.


Didn't i give you reasons why.

We've been ordinary most of the year. Take away Chris Judd and we'd most definitely be out of finals contention and thats not good enough.

Imagine if Judd had chosen the Pies as his preferred club of choice that probably be premiership favorites. Essendon* could be top 4 with Juddy in there midfield.

Brett Ratten must thank good for Chris Judd


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 2:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Warby wrote:
Not that long ago.....Bomber Thompson was facing the sack.....as was Clarkson....they've both since won Flags.

I'm hoping for third time lucky.....Ratts may yet surprise us................................................hope so.



Thats the only thing Ratten supporters can use.... :roll: ... its so shockingly laughable...that that is his defence... one and only defence...

Both of those blokes had done a sizeable apprentiship somewhere and gone into coaching.

Ratten had not.

The question is...

Apart from 'hope'....what has Ratts DONE to make you believe???

Anything???

Whats he shown so far??

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:03 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Warby wrote:
Not that long ago.....Bomber Thompson was facing the sack.....as was Clarkson....they've both since won Flags.

I'm hoping for third time lucky.....Ratts may yet surprise us................................................hope so.


Clarkson was never facing the sack.

Both coaches had a vision. Both had a plan. Even though at the time it wasn't paying off you could see some sort plan being implemented and the development of players............ I CANT SEE ANYTHING TO SUGGEST RATTENS GOT ANY IDEA and thats why im being so harsh. I never expected us to finish top 4 this year. I wanted to see our players improve all over the board, see us play more consistent football, play with a particular style or brand, and see a plan coming together thats going to take us to our 17th.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:06 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Melvey wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Who cares. The fact is we are shit. i don't need them to tell me that!!!!!!

The fact is we were shit last night. Let's look at that, and work out why instead of pointing at other people's opinions.

Otherwise, what the hell are we doing on a discussion forum?? Don't shift the argument.


Didn't i give you reasons why.

We've been ordinary most of the year. Take away Chris Judd and we'd most definitely be out of finals contention and thats not good enough.

Imagine if Judd had chosen the Pies as his preferred club of choice that probably be premiership favorites. Essendon* could be top 4 with Juddy in there midfield.

Brett Ratten must thank good for Chris Judd

And you honestly think that's the primary issue?

Explain to me why you think the team cannot perform without Judd. I think we overuse him to our detriment. I think we regularly see some of the lesser lights handball to him because they think he will turn water into wine and do better with three blokes bearing down on him than they will in space.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Ratts will be rapt that it's now all Judd's fault and not his.......... :lol:

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18673
Location: threeohfivethree
I've kept out of the coaching debate this year because last night was the first time I've managed to get to see a game live and you can't tell a whole lot from watching it on TV and listening to McAveney bang on about the various players "assets".

As with Pagan I've been willing to give Ratts the benefit of the doubt for his first 2 - 3 years to show what he can do but if last night's indicative of where we're at then we're going to be [REDACTED] for a fair time to come.

That was the most stunningly inept showing I've seen from a Carlton side probably since the "2003 Round 22 Kangaroos Beaumont speaks" game.

The argument that it's the coach or it's the players seems beside the point. It's the coach's job to make the players play in an effective manner. That didn't happen last night.

Which isn't to say that we've been like that all year. We've had enough good quarters of football to show what we can do when we click. We attack fast and and take risks and we defend man on man. Tellingly both of those things come more down to natural ability than any drilling or system. We need to be able to do both those things when we can and we need to develop other modes of playing when we can't.

There's no sign that we've developed beyond natural ability at the moment. That's got to be a big X against Ratten and he'd want to work out a workable gameplan pretty quickly if he doesn't want the fans booting him out (because we all know Sticks isn't going to do it).

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:12 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
jimmae wrote:
And you honestly think that's the primary issue?

Explain to me why you think the team cannot perform without Judd. I think we overuse him to our detriment. I think we regularly see some of the lesser lights handball to him because they think he will turn water into wine and do better with three blokes bearing down on him than they will in space.


How many times has his efforts got us over the line? More than Brett Rattens effort from the coaches box i tell ya.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Melvey wrote:
jimmae wrote:
And you honestly think that's the primary issue?

Explain to me why you think the team cannot perform without Judd. I think we overuse him to our detriment. I think we regularly see some of the lesser lights handball to him because they think he will turn water into wine and do better with three blokes bearing down on him than they will in space.


How many times has his efforts got us over the line? More than Brett Rattens effort from the coaches box i tell ya.

I'd say Ratten's efforts last week had a big say.

Look I have no doubt that Judd pulls out some massive efforts to give us some of the close ones, and definitely will bridge the gap between us and genuine finals contention, but he's just one bloke on the field. Just like Fev is one bloke.

Our game plan was choked last night by player indecision and unwillingness to take on roles in the decision making, and our tempo and execution suffered as a result. I'm as angry as anyone with Ratts because I feel he contributed, but to say he has no tactics whatsoever is an inept and under-developed analysis.

Some of you wanted Krezuer forward, Hartlett forward, Austin forward. He's done all of those and all of them failed because the players weren't responding to the tactic under pressure. That takes time to develop, and probably wasn't the focus in the pre-season because we had blokes like Wiggins, Walker and Waite up and running, guys who understand the forward line play and had roles to play.

You can see guys like Austin or Krezuer are learning but they are very raw with the tactics, and that's fine at 20/21.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
Melvey wrote:
.......... TRUST ME!


:lol: Yeah, good luck with that one.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:12 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Synbad wrote:
Quote:
And you're missing the point again Juddy. Pretty sure I have stated I don't oppose the thread or those expressing their views. I'm laughing as much at myself as you guys, as both sides are sounding like broken records as we continually cover the same ground.

At least you blokes grabbed a win tonight. Congratulations :thumbsup:


Ahhhh ive worked it out.. youre mrs ratten right???

you earliuer said you dont mind people having a go at rarts coaching mrs ratten.. as long as its within reason or something?

Well mrs ratten...youve had your fun lately...having a go at us are you mrs ratten???... protecting the hubby are you????.... ..but here are my reasons again...

my reasons..
1)we know how hard it is this coaching caper to find one that can coach.. % are pretty low to have a good one..
2)hasnt coached anywhere
3)had the job handed to him on a plate by mates.
4)side undrilled after 2 years,.,
5) cant kick.... players have genuine skill flaws .. even judd and gibbs..
6) not enough kids have improved - its just been organic improvement... our lesser players struggle even our good ones struggle.
7) confusion on the part
8) too static
9) mrs ratten.... im getting onto nine... how many bad starts have we had... suggests whatever he says to them before they go out onto the park is having a nagative effect... (probably cos his tactics and mindset is one of negativity) mrs ratten....and the tactics and preparation which has been laid in place during the week.. mrs.. ratten... are usually that negative and flawed ...

dadadadada said.. it .. we went in too top heavy FOR STARTERS against collingwood..)... anyway our preparation often leaves us behind the eight ball.

10) Collingwood played with more FIRST YEAR players who played a solid role....in their more disciplined.. more drilled win...

Im assuming you are mrs ratten..... or a cousin???

and if you think im having a go.. you should read what you write up...

Now that was TEN REASONS WHY I THINK HE IS THE WRONG COACH... and until this club admits it was a horrendous mistake appointing Ratten as coach and moves to change things we will be hitting a glass ceiling...

... and no matter how many number 1 picks we have or Champion footballers... (he cant get the best out of anyone mind you)..., we will be banging our heads against the glass ceiling

Now what i want from you.... are three reasons as to WHY RATTEN IS THE RIGHT MAN....

Just THREE...

the floor is yours.... and whoever wants to take a crack...

Not ... so so wasnt liked and look at him now argument....

BUT WHY RATTS IS THE RIGHT MAN on what he HAS SHOWN SO FAR!!!

Ok????


At least Mrs Ratten is something different :razz:

You seem to be working yourself up into a frenzy again. Just settle yourself down, it can't be good for the blood pressure.

Horrible result. Can't deny it Coach and players were poor. Now you can either wallow in the misery of a rubbish result or move on. Myself I'll move on. Forward set up was awful and our nervousness in the first quarter especially, was as bad as Richmond was against us in the first round.

Now I realise that your escape from your escape is bagging so you have the floor...enjoy your week, probably two :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:22 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Synbad wrote:
ScottSaunders wrote:
:thumbsup:

some of yo blokes must of had smiles on your faces heading home tonight after that performance :)


"The old clutching at straws trick"... :thumbsup:


So you aren't enjoying yourself :razz:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:26 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Hey why hasn't anyone who DOES think Ratts is the man answered Synner's question about 7 pages ago?

Please - give THREE reasons why Ratts is the man. Instead of smugly chuckling and making condescending remarks about 'Not having an idea".

I'll even add a degree of difficulty. TRY not to use the following two lines;

Ratts is young
The Team is young
The Coach can't teach skills

Collingwood's first year players last night played significant, constructive roles in their win last night.

Age is not a factor here. Teaching strategy and having your players know their role, and executing it, is.

Please give us three reasons or clear examples where Ratts has displayed he is strategically taking this team forward.

I think the idea of a thorough, Geelong-esque, football department review sounds better by the week. NOT a "We have a review every year" review, but a legitimate, no-holds-barred review where no one is safe.


Last edited by Punter22 on Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:27 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
club29 wrote:
That 3 - 2 Ratts way over Malthouse. One of malhouses was a gift in 2007 also.

So if we lose we are out coached and if we win Ratts out coached the opposition.

Last week he out coached Roos. A couple before that he outcoached Worsfold and Harvey ( who was a highly rated assistant coach with great credentials). A few months back he outcoached Eade, matched it with Lyon. This all too confusing.

I think a few of you are slightly overrating our list.

Tonight was a bad night for all involved with Carlton. Lets dust ourselves off and give it another crack next week. Players, coaches and supporters alike. The finals are still a chance and if we get in them then its been a great turn around for the club.


Sensible post :smile: Although I do agree with the discontented that not making the finals will be a setback.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21579
Location: North of the border
There is nothing wrong with Rattens plan playing the zone defence and using the switch coming out of defence is basically what all clubs are doing
Our problem has been the execution of the plan
you can't play this type of footy if your not prepared to run and you can't play this type of footy if your skills are not up to scratch
If Ratten has done anything wrong it was to persist with a game style that his players are not capable of doing
Craig realized his game plan wasn't working and changed it earlier in the year Ratts should have done the same
Pagan persisted to long with a plan not suited to his cattle
Ratten cannot keep playing this style of game with a team that has 52% kicking efficiency

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:42 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
There have been times when we have played exhilarating football under Ratts - St Kilda and Hawthorn games spring to mind. So he can get them doing the right things but I think he is too negative in the starting setups.

I have liked our defensive unit's development this year - much stronger than it has been for years and I wonder if his main focus has been this.

Ratts has shown an understanding that we need speed and we need to be more accountable - the problem is some of our most accountable footballers are either shocking kicks or in an out of the side (lack of goal kicking hurt factor?).

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18673
Location: threeohfivethree
Sydney Blue wrote:
There is nothing wrong with Rattens plan playing the zone defence and using the switch coming out of defence is basically what all clubs are doing
Our problem has been the execution of the plan
you can't play this type of footy if your not prepared to run and you can't play this type of footy if your skills are not up to scratch
If Ratten has done anything wrong it was to persist with a game style that his players are not capable of doing
Craig realized his game plan wasn't working and changed it earlier in the year Ratts should have done the same
Pagan persisted to long with a plan not suited to his cattle
Ratten cannot keep playing this style of game with a team that has 52% kicking efficiency


I agree.

But defence is the least of our worries based on what I watched last night (in the company of four Pies supporters :? )

Can you fill me in on what the plan is coming into the forward line?

And what we're meant to do if it's not working (whatever 'it' is)?

Couldn't work it out at all.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
yep this is the area that's killing us (is still killing us more accurately)

No Setanta No Waite No Walker No Warnock have not helped

Cloke form dropping off Wiggo's form dropping off

We need to get some structure and some players into that forward line.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group