Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 3:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 489 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 25  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:22 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:48 am
Posts: 230
I think people should take a step back and hold judgement on Chris, he hasnt had the impact that his fellow draftees have had but he reminds me of Leon Davis.

Remember how patient “the filth” were with him. I think he will be a top flight player in 6 years but in saying that if given the choice again would TC’ers have preferred we drafted Rich or happy we went with Yarran?

Rich
Gibbs
Murphy
Judd
Walker
Kreuze

Is pretty enticing in hindsight

_________________
WE ARE CARLTON @#$%&! THE REST


Last edited by Benji on Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:30 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
The only thing I've gleaned from the short time he's had a senior level is that he's a naturally gifted and highly skilled footballer.
The question mark hangs over his application and that will be answered over the next couple of years.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:36 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
I wouldn't have been happy with Rich. Vanilla and his Head aint suited to Carlton....much much much prefer Yarran.

I would have liked McKernan...he was my pick of the talls...apart from Nick Nat of course and I'll be pleased to see him turn into a gun.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:49 pm 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
I've got some Yarran Estate at home....

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:32 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7674
Location: Bendigo
TheBluesMuse wrote:
I wouldn't have been happy with Rich. Vanilla....much much much prefer Yarran.

+1

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:13 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
TheBluesMuse wrote:
I wouldn't have been happy with Rich. Vanilla and his Head aint suited to Carlton....much much much prefer Yarran.

I would have liked McKernan...he was my pick of the talls...apart from Nick Nat of course and I'll be pleased to see him turn into a gun.



..yer joking right..??!!.. ..and i'm asking in all seriousness.. ..Rich is exactly the sort of player we want on our list, 'head-wise'.. ..he's tough, gutsy, tenacious, with a strong work ethic.. ..it's an indictment against our midfield to say that if we picked him, he'd be our most physical presence in the guts.. ..Yarran has supposedly sublime skills.. ..i've seen him do a few nice things, granted.. ..but i've also seen a few nice things done by most of the new kids playing this year.. .... ..i've also seen many a time Rich's great skills on show.. ..if it takes Yarran as long as Leon to start playing good consistent footy, we got robbed..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21570
Location: North of the border
Whats this he is a drunk

Yarren likes fine wine :lol:

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:39 am
Posts: 209
I'm more impatient than most....yet even I would admit it is too early to tell.

big preseason coming up for yarran....needs to clearly build his tank to allow him to show off his undoubted skill.

no doubt was a ballsy call by the recruiters given the "mature/ready made" talent that was around....only time will tell if his selection was pure genius or sheer naivete !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:50 pm
Posts: 1122
dont forget we're judging these kids after a handful of games. . . Yarran was picked for the TYPE of player he is, he'll come on, give him time. Yeh daniel rich will be a star, but meh are melbourne crying about taking jack watts? No. Because they know that he's the Position they needed most, and they can build a team around him hopefully. Daniel rich would have been great to get, can never have too many midfielders, and gun midfielders at it. .

_________________
Cuck Follingwood


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:00 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
There are Daniel Rich's in every draft, every year. Vanilla mids who will be great out of the box.
But their upside is limited. Daniel Rich will be playing the same footy in 5-7 years.

Yarran is a risk, granted, but if he turns out like a McCleod or a Burgoyne.... we'l they dont come along every draft.
Worth the risk.

No problem with the clubs selection here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:46 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
TheBluesMuse wrote:
I wouldn't have been happy with Rich. Vanilla and his Head aint suited to Carlton....much much much prefer Yarran.

I would have liked McKernan...he was my pick of the talls...apart from Nick Nat of course and I'll be pleased to see him turn into a gun.



..yer joking right..??!!.. .... ..



Nope.

As SnickerS says there is a Daniel Rich in every draft and yeah he'll be a 200 games player but look I'm personally happy that our recruiters took a risk...something they haven't been known to do in the past.....I am just not a fan of the "ready mades" it scares me to think of how much improvement is really there....I've been influenced a bit from the 'upside' king in Paf but that's where I stand at the moment.

I'm not a recruiter.....so the weight of the CFC doesn't stand on my shoulders so I can come and say from my view of players...the types i like and dislike I would rather Yarran on our list than Rich, anyday.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:59 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
SnickerS wrote:
There are Daniel Rich's in every draft, every year. Vanilla mids who will be great out of the box.
But their upside is limited. Daniel Rich will be playing the same footy in 5-7 years.

Yarran is a risk, granted, but if he turns out like a McCleod or a Burgoyne.... we'l they dont come along every draft.
Worth the risk.

No problem with the clubs selection here.


..i don't prescribe to all this baloney about limited upside cos they're a ready-made player.. ..that's like saying that geelong didn't hit the lottery with selwood cos he doesnt have huge upside.. ..and thats bollocks.. ..basically, both selwood and now rich are good enough to play well in good established midfields..

.. ..look at the other 'late' developers.. ..what do you expect of them..?.. ..another pre-season, more endurance, footy experience etc etc etc.. ..well, selwood and rich types are getting that too, and are also improving because of it, and if they're good they'll continue to push themselves and improve, as does any star player..

..and bloody hell, fancy calling a mid of Rich's ilk 'vanilla'.. ..that's crazy.. ..mids like him and selwood are similar in ways to mids like voss and roo [crow variety].. ..they dont come every year, and calling them vanilla is way off the mark..

..Rich may play the same style of footy in 5-7 years granted, but it will be better footy than he's already playing now.. ..and that's v.impressive.. ..he is also the exact kind of mid we need and do not have on our list.. ..it is the one missing ingredient to our midfield, and until we address this our midfield will be good, but not great.. ..in turn, Judd will need to play that role in the guts and the roll-on effect continues..

..for where our list is at, we could not afford to take a 'risk' as you call it, with our first pick.. ..especially when a HFF wasn't our biggest weakness.. ..inside mid and chf/chb were by far our more pressing concerns in regards to building our list.. ..flashy silky flankers that pose a possible risk, that also have 'lazy' hype and which may take a few years to come good can just as easily be picked up later in the draft.. ..or rookie'd or psd..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:01 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
TheBluesMuse wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
TheBluesMuse wrote:
I wouldn't have been happy with Rich. Vanilla and his Head aint suited to Carlton....much much much prefer Yarran.

I would have liked McKernan...he was my pick of the talls...apart from Nick Nat of course and I'll be pleased to see him turn into a gun.



..yer joking right..??!!.. .... ..



Nope.

As SnickerS says there is a Daniel Rich in every draft and yeah he'll be a 200 games player but look I'm personally happy that our recruiters took a risk...something they haven't been known to do in the past.....I am just not a fan of the "ready mades" it scares me to think of how much improvement is really there....I've been influenced a bit from the 'upside' king in Paf but that's where I stand at the moment.

I'm not a recruiter.....so the weight of the CFC doesn't stand on my shoulders so I can come and say from my view of players...the types i like and dislike I would rather Yarran on our list than Rich, anyday.


..you do realise that good ol' Murphos was ready made.. ..and not only has he improved heaps, but i reckon he's got more left in him too.. ..it's nutty to think that just because a player is ready made, that they have less upside..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
TheBluesMuse wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
TheBluesMuse wrote:
I wouldn't have been happy with Rich. Vanilla and his Head aint suited to Carlton....much much much prefer Yarran.

I would have liked McKernan...he was my pick of the talls...apart from Nick Nat of course and I'll be pleased to see him turn into a gun.



..yer joking right..??!!.. .... ..



Nope.

As SnickerS says there is a Daniel Rich in every draft and yeah he'll be a 200 games player but look I'm personally happy that our recruiters took a risk...something they haven't been known to do in the past.....I am just not a fan of the "ready mades" it scares me to think of how much improvement is really there....I've been influenced a bit from the 'upside' king in Paf but that's where I stand at the moment.

I'm not a recruiter.....so the weight of the CFC doesn't stand on my shoulders so I can come and say from my view of players...the types i like and dislike I would rather Yarran on our list than Rich, anyday.


You make more sense than your brother ;) :razz:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:03 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
Spewing we didnt take Rich.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Not looking to argue against Yarran but Rich isn't your traditional vanilla mid; not much physical upside sure, but his kicking skills are elite, unbelievably so, in fact.

His issues are that he doesn't look as though he will be a good inside mid (given his lack of pace), and of course...

Image

... foetus hands.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:08 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
jimmae wrote:
Not looking to argue against Yarran but Rich isn't your traditional vanilla mid; not much physical upside sure, but his kicking skills are elite, unbelievably so, in fact.

His issues are that he doesn't look as though he will be a good inside mid (given his lack of pace), and of course...

Image

... foetus hands.


..ppl said similar of diesel, west, kirk, mitchel.. ..when you're that good, you just get your hands on the ball.. ..quick reflexes, lightning fast correct decision making are [in my opinion] more inborn than learned traits..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Yes, but the more you ask of his hands, the more likely they will succumb to their foetus nature and fail him.

Those other blokes didn't have tiny hands. He can't do a West, Diesel or Mitchell and collect and dish off in the same motion consistently, especially as he gets more and more finger injuries by playing this great game. Dunno about Kirk in the trenches personally.

Tiny arms and tiny hands lower his chances of being a successful footballer, it's that simple.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:35 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
Only time will tell guys.
No use giving yrselves headaches trying to predict the future.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:40 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:52 pm
Posts: 295
Quote:
.i don't prescribe to all this baloney about limited upside cos they're a ready-made player.. ..that's like saying that geelong didn't hit the lottery with selwood cos he doesnt have huge upside.. ..and thats bollocks.. ..basically, both selwood and now rich are good enough to play well in good established midfields..

.. ..look at the other 'late' developers.. ..what do you expect of them..?.. ..another pre-season, more endurance, footy experience etc etc etc.. ..well, selwood and rich types are getting that too, and are also improving because of it, and if they're good they'll continue to push themselves and improve, as does any star player..

..and bloody hell, fancy calling a mid of Rich's ilk 'vanilla'.. ..that's crazy.. ..mids like him and selwood are similar in ways to mids like voss and roo [crow variety].. ..they dont come every year, and calling them vanilla is way off the mark..

..Rich may play the same style of footy in 5-7 years granted, but it will be better footy than he's already playing now.. ..and that's v.impressive.. ..he is also the exact kind of mid we need and do not have on our list.. ..it is the one missing ingredient to our midfield, and until we address this our midfield will be good, but not great.. ..in turn, Judd will need to play that role in the guts and the roll-on effect continues..

..for where our list is at, we could not afford to take a 'risk' as you call it, with our first pick.. ..especially when a HFF wasn't our biggest weakness.. ..inside mid and chf/chb were by far our more pressing concerns in regards to building our list.. ..flashy silky flankers that pose a possible risk, that also have 'lazy' hype and which may take a few years to come good can just as easily be picked up later in the draft.. ..or rookie'd or psd..


Spot On !!! :thumbsup:

Rich is NOT vanilla.....and if you can't see that then you have no reason to be discussing football.

Big gamble by the recruiters in getting Yarran......at the moment.....not looking too good. But I am prepared to give it some time.

Haven't we already got a silky skilled, flashy HFF who's a bit lazy :yikes:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 489 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 25  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group