Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:21 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:58 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:35 pm
Posts: 167
baz_baz wrote:
walkers a gun wrote:

your observation is wrong.

If a coach had indentified thing like taht and then the team comes out and does the opposite, what does that tell u? it tell me he either doesnt have a plan to stop those trends or he cant get the guys to do what he wants, either way he is failing as a coach either tactically or in his team management skills.


Thats the recruiting (right type of player interms of attitiude), development (development of the player and the list), inexpoerience (old heads on young shoulders), morale (the winnning belief) disciplne (see recruiting) type arguements.

If we win this week, lets reassess then Ok?


I believe we will win this week but i still think that we're not moving forward as a developing team. like i said the only difference is NOW we have Judd who makes us a 5 goal better team then 2 years ago so we're bound to win games here and there.


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please keep quoting to a minimum...makes it easier for evryone to read.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
[/quote]I believe we will win this week but i still think that we're not moving forward as a developing team. like i said the only difference is NOW we have Judd who makes us a 5 goal better team then 2 years ago so we're bound to win games here and there.[/quote]

I agree and I'm not sold on us winning this week.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Quote:
Stll waiting Synbad for your list of experience as questioned by Spider......


Fortunately my qualifications dont count match day... the problem is the guy who should be qualified isnt.. and it reflects on the way we go about the game on match day....yes???

Cos by shining the spotlight on my observations is deflecting from what is happening out on the field of play.... dogs brekky yes???

yes???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:11 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
Synbad wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
="walkers a gun"]You're saying that we have set plays for all parts of the game but yet we still havent got a game plan or set play for our kickouts. :banghead: tell me why this is??? Ratts has had 2 years to at least work out a way where we can kick the ball out without having to boot it to a contest

There are certianly plans in place for kick outs. Plans are dependent on people Plans are dependent on players being in the right position in their zone, other players dumming runing to draw out opposition, decisions by the kicker to determine the best option, the correct kicker (depending on who is manning who and then skill disposal

Just to say plans are not in place is quite ridiculous frankly and is typical of the tripe served up on this site constantly.


People are dependant on plans.....

Sure there are plans.. but theyre yearrrrrrrs behind.....cos Ratts isnt an AFL standard coach...what makes it worse... Sticks is in the box... as if he has anything to add.... go pay for a brainiac to be in the box Sticks!!!
They are not effective.....
The players reflect this.
Unless you strongly believe our players are the dumbest.. most unskilled... deaf... blind... dumb.... not able bodied... and have the memory of a goldfish.....

The correct way to put that is...People depend on plans....but it isnt quite correct anyway.

see previuous discussion

Stll waiting Synbad for your list of experience as questioned by Spider......

Fortunately my qualifications dont count match day... the problem is the guy who should be qualified isnt.. and it reflects on the way we go about the game on match day....yes???

Cos by shining the spotlight on my observations is deflecting from what is happening out on the field of play.... dogs brekky yes???

yes???


Your qualifications infact dount count at all, match day or not because Im forming the opinion that you dont have any at all...yes???

Ratten is qualified in all aspects I can identify although there may be some I dont know about....

Thats why he is coaching the football club and your sitting on a PC as an anonymous bagger,,,theres the diference in qulification right there

_________________
Go BLues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:03 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:36 pm
Posts: 557
Location: In the coach's box
Think Baz may be onto something on the execution/implementation. That's why someone like Scotland has been dropped due to:

* not sacrificing for teammates (blocks, shepherds etc)
* no impact (take him out of the team = no impact)
* doesn't hurt with disposal often enough (spoons ball in the air with kicks = no penetration, oversue of left foot)
* tackle count = plays with his nads > tackling opposition

Also this is a guy that often leads younger players astray. And we have finally made a stand and said enough's a enough.

Playing for each other and sacrificing goes a long way to success.... yes tactics and game plans play a part and the game has come on in leaps and bounds in terms of structures, plays and set ups. But it is still a continuous game that can be so unstructured at times, the bounce of the ball, a little slip because you didn't wear stops and in particular that instangibe called momentum. I think sometimes we can overplay the structures and santise the game too much.

Same goes with the process for choosing the coach. With Greg Swann at the helm (and he is really running the club in my book), I have complete confidence in the process they undertook (not to mention Dick was president at the time). There is still room for gut feel amid a process..... Brisbane Lions didn;t have an exhaustive process from where I sit. So many say our club is stuffed becasue we only bring in Carlton people, yet we have brought in Greg Swann, Chris Judd, Robert Harvey, Mark Riley and Brett Montogmery. So maybe we just might be on the righ path..... but it's a long journey. Think about we were as a club only 2 years ago.

_________________
17 4 10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:14 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
I remember McGuire flying over to Perth to wine and dine Mick Malthouse when he was coaching the Eagles......from what I was told.....there was no process.....they wanted Mick to coach the Pies.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
baz_baz wrote:
[q]
baz_baz wrote:
="walkers a gun"]You're saying that we have set plays for all parts of the game but yet we still havent got a game plan or set play for our kickouts. :banghead: tell me why this is??? Ratts has had 2 years to at least work out a way where we can kick the ball out without having to boot it to a contest

There are certianly plans in place for kick outs. Plans are dependent on people Plans are dependent on players being in the right position in their zone, other players dumming runing to draw out opposition, decisions by the kicker to determine the best option, the correct kicker (depending on who is manning who and then skill disposal

Just to say plans are not in place is quite ridiculous frankly and is typical of the tripe served up on this site constantly.


People are dependant on plans.....

Sure there are plans.. but theyre yearrrrrrrs behind.....cos Ratts isnt an AFL standard coach...what makes it worse... Sticks is in the box... as if he has anything to add.... go pay for a brainiac to be in the box Sticks!!!
They are not effective.....
The players reflect this.
Unless you strongly believe our players are the dumbest.. most unskilled... deaf... blind... dumb.... not able bodied... and have the memory of a goldfish.....

The correct way to put that is...People depend on plans....but it isnt quite correct anyway.

see previuous discussion

Stll waiting Synbad for your list of experience as questioned by Spider......

Fortunately my qualifications dont count match day... the problem is the guy who should be qualified isnt.. and it reflects on the way we go about the game on match day....yes???

Cos by shining the spotlight on my observations is deflecting from what is happening out on the field of play.... dogs brekky yes???

yes???

Your qualifications infact dount count at all, match day or not because Im forming the opinion that you dont have any at all...yes???

Ratten is qualified in all aspects I can identify although there may be some I dont know about....

Thats why he is coaching the football club and your sitting on a PC as an anonymous bagger,,,theres the diference in qulification right there


What you dont get is its not me that doesnt have them kicking out.. finding space into their forward line... being fluid with thew ball.. blocking shepherding.

Again youre deflecting .. the spotlight is not on me.. its on the underqualifued Ratten... thats who has that particular job.. thats who is being paid to do that particular job...
Thats who is failing to do that job.,..
Thats what you dont get...

Yes???

Or do you think im responsible for that job????

Yes???

No????

Wanna fifty fifty on it???

OR would you like to call a friend???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
Synbad accusing someone else of deflecting. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Image

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Lurker Blue wrote:
Synbad accusing someone else of deflecting. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Image



How am i deflecting when Ratts is underperforming and im calling it? :thumbsup:


By the way im white....choofing is bad for you...


Warby... Malthouse has a history of success.
Ratten was coaching out in the eastern suburbs league...

You cannot compare what Malthouse had in the bank as a VFL AFL coach to what Ratts had...

Apples and oranges...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:03 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9108
Location: Nth Fitzroy
barass wrote:
Think Baz may be onto something on the execution/implementation. That's why someone like Scotland has been dropped due to:

* not sacrificing for teammates (blocks, shepherds etc)
* no impact (take him out of the team = no impact)
* doesn't hurt with disposal often enough (spoons ball in the air with kicks = no penetration, oversue of left foot)
* tackle count = plays with his nads > tackling opposition

Also this is a guy that often leads younger players astray. And we have finally made a stand and said enough's a enough.

Playing for each other and sacrificing goes a long way to success.... yes tactics and game plans play a part and the game has come on in leaps and bounds in terms of structures, plays and set ups. But it is still a continuous game that can be so unstructured at times, the bounce of the ball, a little slip because you didn't wear stops and in particular that instangibe called momentum. I think sometimes we can overplay the structures and santise the game too much.

Same goes with the process for choosing the coach. With Greg Swann at the helm (and he is really running the club in my book), I have complete confidence in the process they undertook (not to mention Dick was president at the time). There is still room for gut feel amid a process..... Brisbane Lions didn;t have an exhaustive process from where I sit. So many say our club is stuffed becasue we only bring in Carlton people, yet we have brought in Greg Swann, Chris Judd, Robert Harvey, Mark Riley and Brett Montogmery. So maybe we just might be on the righ path..... but it's a long journey. Think about we were as a club only 2 years ago.


Thats a top post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:07 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
You're the king of deflection Synbad, and you know it.

I know you'll neither admit it, nor change though.

I just find it extremely funny that you're accusing someone of doing something you're the master of. :lol:

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
Back to the topic please!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:10 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Mrs Caz wrote:
Back to the topic please!


Thank you. Things were really getting out of hand there... :razz:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Lurker Blue wrote:
You're the king of deflection Synbad, and you know it.

I know you'll neither admit it, nor change though.

I just find it extremely funny that you're accusing someone of doing something you're the master of. :lol:



Ok, you go back to what you do best....

But according to you im a deflector... cos Ratten cant get us to do the basics yes??? :clap:

But thats where youre at....

anyway you leave the analysis to me......

Carlton needs to win this one.. and the next one... or the chatter gets louder..

And yes im the one deflecting.. cos this is about Rattens and our performance.. and bb and youre lurking self have a spotlight on me..

Love the attention when a couple of you have turned me responsible for whats going on out there... :screwy:

But typical 'Ids'

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:17 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
Synbad wrote:
according to you im a deflector

Yep. That part I said.

Please show me where I said any of the other things you've attributed to me.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
lets not hey ?

please keep it on topic which is ratten not being the man

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:56 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:04 pm
Posts: 308
Location: Regent
Synbad wrote:
Lurker Blue wrote:
Synbad accusing someone else of deflecting. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Image



How am i deflecting when Ratts is underperforming and im calling it? :thumbsup:


By the way im white....choofing is bad for you...


Warby... Malthouse has a history of success.
Ratten was coaching out in the eastern suburbs league...

You cannot compare what Malthouse had in the bank as a VFL AFL coach to what Ratts had...

Apples and oranges...


Didn't we do that with Pagan?

_________________
WE ARE CARLTON, WE ARE ARROGANT AND WE LOVE IT!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Yes we did...and we all know how that went..which should have taught us that knee jerk decison making is not what its all about in this day and age...and Ratts's appointment seemed to have been knee jerk given no-one else other than Voss had been seriously considered.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:17 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Lurker Blue wrote:
Synbad accusing someone else of deflecting. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Image


Bloody kettles are all plastic these days. The pot isn't black, it's blind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
If you were a thinker youd realise Malthouse was pached a decade ago... as a very succesful coah at the Doggies and then won a flag at WC..
So he proved he had the appetite and the accumen to coach succesfuly.
In the last decade footy has changed immensely... and Malthouse has done pretty well keeping up with the game changes... and in my opinion has extracted the most out of a very basic Collingwood club for a long time.
They are usually playing in the finals.. and have been a pretty succesful club under his tenure...without ultimate success.

How do you begin to compare what happened TEN YEARS AGO with Malthouse... and what he has done with that side that was where we were at when he took over.. to us going out and not having to poach Ratten at any club cos he was AFL unemployable... and then extend by 2 years a contract without having achieved anything...
Raatten should have been judged at around this time for any extention.....
..... sure he may have threatened to go coach at another club if he was unsecured ........................... but what are the chances another club would have hopped on Ratts today??

The guy hs never proven anything...

.... hee might still.. but its not looking good for him.
He is making statements on selection round 14.....thats how good hes going....

Plus right now hiss personal changes...without a gameplan he is re organising the deckchairs of the SS Ratten....

What he doesnt get is we look shit with an inspid Stevo ot Fevola...but in this MODERN GAME... its not about running through walls to win... thats all nice for us in the terraces cos we hate seeing inspidness... but the games are won on preparedness... and we are very unprepared for this game...

I harp back to the closed training sessions.. which kind of suggests Ratts thought he was onto something... and was tweaking...

Surely you wouldnt close intra club sessions when you cant zone.. cant play man on man.. cant kick... cant tackle.. cant find inside 50s.. cant kick out from defence.... as a matter of fact just on kicking out from points... its better if they just kick a goal... so we can start again from the centre.. instead of conceding a point.. then turning over the subsequent kick out and having 7 points kicked against us.. (Ratts should look at that tactic for the close games)

Cos really the closed sessions suggest either he thought he was a genius and we were goingt to tweak an unbelievable gameplan to be unleashed on the competition this year... OR..... he was really worried and embarassed...about where we were at...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MPH78, Scotty12000 and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group