* Trade Fev: Fev is an immature, arrogant and self centered individual, who only cares for himself and making himself look like a hero. He doesn't give a crap about his teammates or the team, due to his continual telling teammates off and refusing to do the 2nd and 3rd efforts (like chasing and tackling), for the benefit of the team. His body language is bad more times than it is good. He should be dropped and even traded, but unfortunately our coach and power brokers (e.g management) at the club, don't have the guts to make a statement. By continually letting Fev get away with this attitude and performances, he is getting the message that it is O.k to do what he is doing, as he is guaranteed a game and career at Carlton. He should have been traded 3 years ago after that pathetic display of attitude at Subiaco against Fremantle where he gave a 100 metre penalty away. I was there that day and there was talk after the game in the media after a statement from Greg Swann, that Carlton were disgusted and considering trading Fev at years end, due to his attitude and ransom at contract negotiations. Well we all know it was a big bluff. He has made it really hard for the club when dealing new contracts, and then the club give in and Fev puts in performances like Friday night. He is not worth the money he is reportedly on. He will never be as good as say a Riewoldt or Brown, as he doesn't do the work off the ball, as these 2 guys. Even if Riewoldt and Brown aren't scoring goals their 2nd and 3rd efforts and body language are still 100%.
* Trade Stevens: Until this year, I have been a supporter of Stevens, therefore not really seeing his weaknesses. But this year his weaknesses like not; chasing, tackling, putting his body on the line and continually turning the ball over, have become so evident, that it is hard for even his supporters to not notice. I say trade.
* Stop letting Ex-Carlton players influence decisions at Carlton I believe that there is also a favoritism problem at Carlton. This is the reason why I believe Ratten got the coaching position. Yes Carlton were after Voss, but once Voss pulled out of the Carlton coaching postion, Ratten got the job without Carlton going through the process of interviewing and seeking the best coach for the job. I believe Ratten got the job due to Kernahan having an influence. They were old teammates, and even though Carlton might argue that they interviewed other candidates for the coaching position, I believe Ratten's name was already listed. For any other potential candidate, I believe they were trying to show Carlton why they were better than Ratten for the coaching job, rather than they were the best candidate for Carlton. In other words it was like Ratten vs Candidate B, rather than Candidate A vs Candidate B and so on.
For Carlton to move forward, I think the Carlton influences like Kernahan and Ratten etc need to go, and outside sources need to be brought in to the club. This would eliminate any conflict of interest or favoritism at the club. This is the only way the Carlton organization can be successful. Outside sources would be able to make decisions that best suit Carlton in an unbiased manner, rather than make decisions based on friendships or favoritism. We need someone to make decisions on behalf of the club using their head, rather than their heart.
* Sack Ratten as coach because; He is too soft. E.g he refuses to drop or drag players like Fevola and Stevens. Even against Essendon* on Friday, at 3 quarter time he didn't seem to be giving the players a good old fashion spray. He seems to say the same things after match press conferences, whether we lose buy 20 points or 70 points. He doesn't show enough anger or disappointment at the result, instead trying too make excuses or talk about positives. He only has a Game Plan A rather than a Plan B or C. This is why we continually lose to the same teams every year whilst Ratten has been in charge. Ratten's bogey coaches are; Craig, Knights, Clarkson, Roos and Lyon.
* Leadership group should only consist of 4 players Leadership group should only consist of 4 players who try 100% week after week, even if they are having a bad day. Players like Judd, Murphy, Simpson and Waite would be ideal. Gibbs has been a bit inconsistent this year and Kreuzer is still too young, but in time will be in leadership. Having a large leadership group means POTENTIALLY having a higher chance of players with big ego's or complacency in it, due to their status as leadership group members.
* Get a new Recruitment team We need an overhaul of the Recruitment team. They have been good at selecting the No 1's, but apart from that there have been more fails than passes. Since 2004 when Hughes took over he has not picked many players with good foot skills, hardness at the ball, or good decision making skills. Time for a new Recruitment manager and support team.
|