Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:25 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:48 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9108
Location: Nth Fitzroy
99prelim wrote:
God help this once great club if we are clinging onto a 2012-2013 window. The number of permutations of what will happen both internally and externally between now and then are in the billions. I said it after all our losses and I'll say it again........SEIZE THE flower DAY. I will be over the moon if we can play one final this year. Right now, IMHO, we don't have a snowflakes chance in hades.
PS. Gibbs is going backwards in 2009. He is a minor worry for me. murphy is that far ahead of him it's laughable


If you want a miracle or our team to be a freak superteam where a bunch of kids with 20 -50 games somehow give the flag a shake this year or next then i agree Ratts isnt your man.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:51 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 1756
I think we got it wrong all week.

What summed it up for me was after the match they interviewed monfrees and he mentioned that all week Carlton was talking about getting us back and redemtion from round 3. He then mentioned that there focus was just on winning the game and how they weren't WORRIED about carlton and just worked on what they could do to win.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:03 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Laguna wrote:
budzy wrote:
IMO, whilst there are issues within the FD that need fixing , I think it's too early to be making definitive calls on Ratts future worth as Senior Coach.

If we keeping boning Senior Coaches every 2 years we will end up like the tigers.

I'll make a call on him later next year.


If we have to wait that long our so-called premiership window could be shattered.

Melbourne, Freo and West Coast will have overtaken us


Our young key premiership hopefuls are still very mentally immature as far as consistent performance is concerned.
The likes of Jamo Aussie Bower Kreuzer Hampson Gibbs Murphy Yarran have the natural ability to guide the rest to the top of the mountain but they are not there yet. They have 10 years ahead of them.
To say our window will be shattered if things aren't going to plan this time next year is a bit dramatic.

IMO Stevo Houla Banno and the like have no hope of playing in a premiership side. They're only in the side now because of their physical maturity.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 1620
Location: Deep Blue Sea
deano35 wrote:
I think we got it wrong all week.

What summed it up for me was after the match they interviewed monfrees and he mentioned that all week Carlton was talking about getting us back and redemtion from round 3. He then mentioned that there focus was just on winning the game and how they weren't WORRIED about carlton and just worked on what they could do to win.


Agree with you Deano ....... Heard Fev during the week saying exactly that. Bit like him last night showing the ball after he got a mark (then failed to kick the distance). As if to say "job done". Utter crap. Absolutely no focus last night .... all reactive football (if you want to call it that).

_________________
"IF YOU FAIL TO PREPARE, YOU'RE PREPARED TO FAIL" - Mark Spitz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:09 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Effes wrote:
Club29 my problem with Ratten is comments like this

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Quote:
“Sometimes if you don’t move the ball quickly in the back 50 then you play into their hands and they manned up very quickly and we played such slow footy.”


We have seen this happen ever since Ratten took over yet we have seen no improvement in this area.

So is he saying that if we don't move the ball quickly that we're !@#$%&?

I'm sure there are plenty of teams that when they don't move it quickly out of defence still have the structures/player movement to be able to move it out of defence.

In this situation we bomb it down the line and hope to win the crumb...that's Pagan stuff.

Surely there should be some tactics in place to create space...you see the players standing still.

Why is there no movement? Where is the plan to make space for players to run in to?

Then you see how we defend when the opposition have it in defence.

We zone very poorly...but it doesn't even get to that because they do move the ball quickly out of defence.

However when they have a kickout and we have a chance to lock them down we don't. Why?

He's basically saying if we don't move it quickly out of defence first go then we're !@#$%&! How can we possibly be so one dimensional?


I think confidence in disposal is a big part of moving the ball quickly.

Time and again I see a player leading into space, albeit not big space but enough space, only to see the player kicking it hesitate when seeing him and prefer to take the easy way out and bomb it to a contest.

That's a mental barrier our young blokes MUST overcome.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:10 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
Lets ask ourselves this question that was plaguing me all night last night, and it is a hypothetical..
If Ratts was on the free market, how many OTHER clubs looking for a new coach would seriously entertain him? I think that answer says a lot of things...
We dont have the best available coach at the moment, and we need to get the best available coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19471
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
So did we go in with too negative a mindset?

Besides Judd, Gibbs and Murphy, did we have any other midfielders who were playing to attack or playing to defend?

Bannister tagging Winderlich
Grigg tagging Watson
Carrazzo tagging Stanton
Joseph tagging Lovett
Houlihan tagging Dempsey

That's five players who are more focussed on their opponents than getting the ball themselves. You'd definitely tag Lovett but with the others did it go too far?

Did this then restrict the amount of run we had?

Their main tags appeared to be Welsh on Judd and possibly Lonergan on Simpson/Scotland.

You'd think they would be keen to lock down on our midfield but it wasn't the case.

To probably early in the third qtr we had held Lovett, Stanton and Winderlich fairly well yet we didn't counterpunch...were our taggers so negatively focussed that we couldn't hurt them the other way...so that we just relied on Judd/Gibbs/Murphy, with Judd not really having an impact because he was getting crunched at the stoppages.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19471
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
budzy wrote:
Effes wrote:
Club29 my problem with Ratten is comments like this

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Quote:
“Sometimes if you don’t move the ball quickly in the back 50 then you play into their hands and they manned up very quickly and we played such slow footy.”


We have seen this happen ever since Ratten took over yet we have seen no improvement in this area.

So is he saying that if we don't move the ball quickly that we're !@#$%&?

I'm sure there are plenty of teams that when they don't move it quickly out of defence still have the structures/player movement to be able to move it out of defence.

In this situation we bomb it down the line and hope to win the crumb...that's Pagan stuff.

Surely there should be some tactics in place to create space...you see the players standing still.

Why is there no movement? Where is the plan to make space for players to run in to?

Then you see how we defend when the opposition have it in defence.

We zone very poorly...but it doesn't even get to that because they do move the ball quickly out of defence.

However when they have a kickout and we have a chance to lock them down we don't. Why?

He's basically saying if we don't move it quickly out of defence first go then we're !@#$%&! How can we possibly be so one dimensional?


I think confidence in disposal is a big part of moving the ball quickly.

Time and again I see a player leading into space, albeit not big space but enough space, only to see the player kicking it hesitate when seeing him and prefer to take the easy way out and bomb it to a contest.

That's a mental barrier our young blokes MUST overcome.


That's a fair point Budzy but when we do have the options are you confident that they can hit the target? Armfield most likely won't have the accuracy. We saw Hampson have Fisher clear in space but turn it over. Jamison your right won't take the harder option but I don't think his disposal is good enough. Austin's disposal isn't shit but I don't think he'd chop the opposition up with it. Bower is the one who can run off half back but he couldn't get off the leash. Browne will take the safe option.

So we probably need more players off half back who when that slight option is there they can deliver it. Gilbee/Drummond/Hodge/McLeod/Guerra/Gram/Goddard.

Chris Johnson was recruited for this role but he has been disappointing even before injury.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:18 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
You can't have too many pure stoppers in the side at once. One, maybe two.

Some of those matchups, our blokes don't hurt them the other way. Not good enough.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:20 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Effes wrote:
budzy wrote:
Effes wrote:
Club29 my problem with Ratten is comments like this

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Quote:
“Sometimes if you don’t move the ball quickly in the back 50 then you play into their hands and they manned up very quickly and we played such slow footy.”


We have seen this happen ever since Ratten took over yet we have seen no improvement in this area.

So is he saying that if we don't move the ball quickly that we're !@#$%&?

I'm sure there are plenty of teams that when they don't move it quickly out of defence still have the structures/player movement to be able to move it out of defence.

In this situation we bomb it down the line and hope to win the crumb...that's Pagan stuff.

Surely there should be some tactics in place to create space...you see the players standing still.

Why is there no movement? Where is the plan to make space for players to run in to?

Then you see how we defend when the opposition have it in defence.

We zone very poorly...but it doesn't even get to that because they do move the ball quickly out of defence.

However when they have a kickout and we have a chance to lock them down we don't. Why?

He's basically saying if we don't move it quickly out of defence first go then we're !@#$%&! How can we possibly be so one dimensional?


I think confidence in disposal is a big part of moving the ball quickly.

Time and again I see a player leading into space, albeit not big space but enough space, only to see the player kicking it hesitate when seeing him and prefer to take the easy way out and bomb it to a contest.

That's a mental barrier our young blokes MUST overcome.


That's a fair point Budzy but when we do have the options are you confident that they can hit the target? Armfield most likely won't have the accuracy. We saw Hampson have Fisher clear in space but turn it over. Jamison your right won't take the harder option but I don't think his disposal is good enough. Austin's disposal isn't shit but I don't think he'd chop the opposition up with it. Bower is the one who can run off half back but he couldn't get off the leash. Browne will take the safe option.

So we probably need more players off half back who when that slight option is there they can deliver it. Gilbee/Drummond/Hodge/McLeod/Guerra/Gram/Goddard.

Chris Johnson was recruited for this role but he has been disappointing even before injury.


They'll never improve if they don't try, try and try some more. Practice practice practice.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Josh K wrote:
Lets ask ourselves this question that was plaguing me all night last night, and it is a hypothetical..
If Ratts was on the free market, how many OTHER clubs looking for a new coach would seriously entertain him? I think that answer says a lot of things...
We dont have the best available coach at the moment, and we need to get the best available coach.


Agree. I am not sure how good a coach Ratts is but a measurement between Carlton and Essendon* in recruiting, development, coach and team seems fair. We appeared to be ahead of them in all those areas and we have Judd. After last night we are clearly behind them in all areas. Our drafting has been comparable, but we have had better picks and their highest draft pick Gumbo has barely got on the park. Their players appear to have developed quicker. Clearly their coach has had the better of Ratts every time. They have beaten sides they are not expected to beat. When have we won a game this year we weren't expected to win?

On what basis I wonder did Ratts get a 2 year extension after one year in the job, was that the 'my mate's president" clause? He should not have been considered for extension until towards the end of this season, and if it was to be extended - one year only. We had no serious process. We went after Voss and then got Ratts without any serious searching. Did we talk to Bailey or Knights or anyone? I am not saying they are the answer but surely you need to have a serious process if you want the best in Australia, not just the best ex team mate who happens to be working at the club - that process seems to be applied to the assistants as well. Does experience count for anything? The only experience we have brought in is Riley. He might be great but because of Ratts inexperience as a coach and at other clubs he has brought in people he knows which is basically (apart from Riley) old team mates.

I just find it galling that Knights can get the level of effort he gets from his team and Ratts gets the level of effort we got last night in our most important and most telling game of the year - against a side that we are utterly comparable with.

Ratts should be coach next year because we have made a decision and need to stick with it for 3 years, but i am not sure he would have got the job if we had conducted the process correctly, and I doubt he will ever be a premiership coach.

Great coaches get the most from all players the most of the time. Ratt's needs to do that, and he is not at the moment. If Judd had stayed at WCE we'd be eyeing off a #3 or 4 draft pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:40 am
Posts: 448
Where do i start with last night .... just pathetic ... still have not slept ,,, tried to but was soooooo angry.

We are a one trick pony that everyone has worked out. If Ratten had some balls he would drop Fev for at least a couple of weeks and hand stevens his pink slip now. If we start winning without fev ... well then ... its a different kettle of fish. i know who do we play? all i can say is that sometimes I feel fev is more a distraction than anything else ... the team just looks for him alone. He is incredibly selfish, look at the two knocks he gave IRISH, who i thought was playing well until that happened.

You cannot blame a good first quarter then a quite game when everyone is kicking to fev with a dozen players hanging off him.

If fev is being tripple teamed does it not stand to reason that there should be other free forwards? But no the team just looks for the one trick pony.

what really drives me barking mad is seeing the scum get back down once they lose possession and then seeing our lot be so flowering lazy. I do not think we care about winning or losing (we do but ya get the drift) we just want 110% from everyone who pulls on the navy blue jumper ... god know we would all give up a kidney for the chance!

I have never seen so many fumbles in 4 quarters of footy ... it was almost hypnotic watching all the flower ups.

It really cheeses me off that we seem to have the same problems week in and week out. Everyone knows what they are so why are we not improving in these areas? Ratten has to take responsibility.

In the end we all love Ratts for who he was in his playing days but geez how long do we have to accept the same mistakes over and over again?

I mean FFS as someone else put it ... we are the scum's bitch.

Really thought we had the right motivation to come out firing and we came out flat again ... just happens too often ... and the blame lays squarly on Ratt's feet.

I really want to see him succeed but in the end you cannot be everyones mate and a good coach ... it does not work ... u have to be a ruthless SOB ... don't see Ratts with that attribute ... too busy tryiny to be touchy feely with all the players.

Well i will reserve proper judgement until the Freo game ... the axe better fall hard after that bit of rubbish last night. But just cant see too much happenning, yeah we will win next week but the same problems will surface again and again and again ... if Ratts cannot fix them then he is not that man for the job ....

Nuff said


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
Molly wrote:
On another topic... it is time Ratten showed some real guts at the selection table. Until Stevens and Fev are dropped to show them they aren't dispensable (and to demonstrate the team is bigger than the individual), then Ratts looks weak to me.


This to me is the major problem and it is glaringly apparent in performances like last night. When we are down on confidence/energy/spirit, whatever you want to call it, we lack discipline, we lack structure, we lack composure, we lack determination. We lack these qualities, but primarily in a TEAM sense.

From start to finish Essendon* were willing to run hard to get more numbers to the contest, because they were disciplined as a team whereas we were not.

From start to finish Essendon* were willing to run hard and spread to provide options in attack, because they were disciplined in their structure/gameplan, whereas we were not.

From start to finish Essendon* were prepared to, as a team, shepard the guy with the ball so that in most cases he had the composure dispose of it skillfully. To be honest I don't know if we do this half the time when we do actually win.

From start to finish Essendon* were determined to put their body on the line and go in and get the ball first. They did this as a team and with their players having the discipline to get numbers to a contest, they won the ball and took it away. It appeared as though were just waiting for them to get it first so that we could tackle them.

These four things should be TEAM rules that if you fail to do, you fail to get a game, regardless of how skillful a player you are or what role you are playing on the day. The bombing it long to a contest down the line is a direct consequence of players not spreading to provide options in the middle and being afraid to take it into the corridor because we are not going to get the required protection from their teammates to do it successfully. Moving the ball quickly through the corridor should not be a question of confidence, we should know that if we do these team things, as a team down to every last man, that it will work. Sadly we don't have this faith, because these team rules are broken and there are no consequences to players who break them. This perpetuates a mindset that we need good players in our team to win, rather than good team players.

Carlton didn't play as a team last night, they played as a collective of individuals wearing the same jumper. I'm sick of it.

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:02 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Quote:
Carlton didn't play as a team last night, they played as a collective of individuals wearing the same jumper. I'm sick of it.


I think that is a very astute observation and has been happening since 2001. When the going gets tough it can bring people together or drive them apart. CFC gives every indication that it is the latter. Courageous leadership is required - now!

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:21 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6427
Exactly right which is why the MC take a stand and give a broom to
Stevens
Houlihan
Scotland
Banno
this week and regardless of how they play but so long as they give 100% tomorrow
Anderson
Robinson
Gartlett
Yarran


A no brainer because with the 1st 4 players we will go down the dunny.


And Fev as well
Not good enough
Hartlett or Edwards are not the answere but that aint the point
I am sick of Fevola and his dummy spits.


Line in the Sand
Simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:40 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:36 pm
Posts: 557
Location: In the coach's box
Agree..... a line in the sand MUST BE DRAWN NOW if Ratts and the MC/Coaching staff have any chance of regaining credibility. Ross Lyon did it last year with Dal Santo and Milne, and Kinights to a degree with Lucas.

One bit of play disturbed me last night, when Hayden Skipworth was able to win a contested ball against 2 Carlton players (just can't recall right now think one was Fisher) was able to get to his feet an run away from them and hit a target in the forward 50 - think it was Q3 from memory. Hayden Skipworth???

_________________
17 4 10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:01 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
keogh wrote:
Exactly right which is why the MC take a stand and give a broom to
Stevens
Houlihan
Scotland
Banno
this week and regardless of how they play but so long as they give 100% tomorrow
Anderson
Robinson
Gartlett
Yarran


A no brainer because with the 1st 4 players we will go down the dunny.


And Fev as well
Not good enough
Hartlett or Edwards are not the answere but that aint the point
I am sick of Fevola and his dummy spits.


Line in the Sand
Simple as that


I thought we had drawn our line in the sand in the Aints game. Nearly everything we say they should have done last night, they did that game. It just keeps getting back to the coaching staff........headed by you know who. Failure in tactics, failure to motivate a group of (presumably) good young men. No top 8 this year and Ratts will be on his way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:58 am
Posts: 30
Location: Melbourne
Refer Livolover's post at pg 1 of this thread - it says it all

Last night was a nightmare and when I checked the scores in today's paper that hadn't changed. I contacted the editor who unfortunately confirmed the scores. I will wake up soon and Juddy will be holding up No. 17.

Getting Paul Roos isn't a silly idea. He gets the most out of an average list. Imagine what he could do with ours. We may not play the prettiest footy but he at least he would have a game plan.

The hardest part is having to sack a favourite son.

Posting here is cathartic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:28 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Rafalution wrote:
I'm really starting to become annoyed at the language Ratten uses:

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/ ... 42,00.html

Maybe
I suppose
Some blokes

I have us losing to Freo, season over then IMO, not sure we are good enough to pickup that extra win for 12.

If we miss finals it's a failure for Ratts as coach, I think come half-way mark next year and we still haven't improved enough he will be gone.


Nah mate sorry if we don't make finals this year Ratts goes immediately...by his own words. He set finals as the bar this year so I'm alsmost hoping we don't fall into the 8 cuz I just don't see him being capable of taking us all the way.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:44 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
gerry atric wrote:
Josh K wrote:
Lets ask ourselves this question that was plaguing me all night last night, and it is a hypothetical..
If Ratts was on the free market, how many OTHER clubs looking for a new coach would seriously entertain him? I think that answer says a lot of things...
We dont have the best available coach at the moment, and we need to get the best available coach.


Agree. I am not sure how good a coach Ratts is but a measurement between Carlton and Essendon* in recruiting, development, coach and team seems fair. We appeared to be ahead of them in all those areas and we have Judd. After last night we are clearly behind them in all areas. Our drafting has been comparable, but we have had better picks and their highest draft pick Gumbo has barely got on the park. Their players appear to have developed quicker. Clearly their coach has had the better of Ratts every time. They have beaten sides they are not expected to beat. When have we won a game this year we weren't expected to win?

On what basis I wonder did Ratts get a 2 year extension after one year in the job, was that the 'my mate's president" clause? He should not have been considered for extension until towards the end of this season, and if it was to be extended - one year only. We had no serious process. We went after Voss and then got Ratts without any serious searching. Did we talk to Bailey or Knights or anyone? I am not saying they are the answer but surely you need to have a serious process if you want the best in Australia, not just the best ex team mate who happens to be working at the club - that process seems to be applied to the assistants as well. Does experience count for anything? The only experience we have brought in is Riley. He might be great but because of Ratts inexperience as a coach and at other clubs he has brought in people he knows which is basically (apart from Riley) old team mates.

I just find it galling that Knights can get the level of effort he gets from his team and Ratts gets the level of effort we got last night in our most important and most telling game of the year - against a side that we are utterly comparable with.

Ratts should be coach next year because we have made a decision and need to stick with it for 3 years, but i am not sure he would have got the job if we had conducted the process correctly, and I doubt he will ever be a premiership coach.

Great coaches get the most from all players the most of the time. Ratt's needs to do that, and he is not at the moment. If Judd had stayed at WCE we'd be eyeing off a #3 or 4 draft pick.


We are IMO the most unprofessional team in the AFL. That should answer all of your concerns.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group