Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 11:20 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:53 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
COULD IT HAVE BEEN WORSE We have a bufoon former president disgrace us off the field - with disgraceful allegations innuendo - pathetic

Our leaders President Board or CEO are paralysed by fear about the subject about responding to Bloody Elliott so remain mute whilst everyone else in authority denounces the dinosaur AND because no one at Carlton has the courage to speak up the void is filled by anti- Carlton sentiment - PATHETIC

We get to the MCG TONIGHT in a game defining match are were absolutely PATHETIC

The last week the Carlton Football Club has let us all down from the President to the 22nd player this week - PATHETIC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:57 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:00 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:56 pm
Posts: 723
Location: Melbourne
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...

_________________
... an eagle flew out of the night. he was something to observe, came in close i heard a voice, bending stretching every nerve, had to listen had no choice ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:05 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:10 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
Melvey wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences



Melvey, the coach didn't lose the game for us tonight - the players did.

They were weak, lazy and insipid once the scum got their tails up, and no one stood up to them. No coach would have won it for us tonight with that mentally fragile bunch.

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:20 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences



Melvey, the coach didn't lose the game for us tonight - the players did.

They were weak, lazy and insipid once the scum got their tails up, and no one stood up to them. No coach would have won it for us tonight with that mentally fragile bunch.


Really?

The game was done and dusted at the selection table. The Bomber were always going to run over us with the team ratten selected to play tonight

Seriously Brett Ratten has no idea. He said pst match that he thought that we could slow them down. What by playing slow sluggish hacks

Get rid of this guy while he has some credibility as a good carlton man


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:34 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences



Melvey, the coach didn't lose the game for us tonight - the players did.

They were weak, lazy and insipid once the scum got their tails up, and no one stood up to them. No coach would have won it for us tonight with that mentally fragile bunch.


Really?

The game was done and dusted at the selection table. The Bomber were always going to run over us with the team ratten selected to play tonight

Seriously Brett Ratten has no idea. He said pst match that he thought that we could slow them down. What by playing slow sluggish hacks

Get rid of this guy while he has some credibility as a good carlton man



OK then - tell me who you would have selected instead that would have won us the game?

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:51 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences



Melvey, the coach didn't lose the game for us tonight - the players did.

They were weak, lazy and insipid once the scum got their tails up, and no one stood up to them. No coach would have won it for us tonight with that mentally fragile bunch.


Really?

The game was done and dusted at the selection table. The Bomber were always going to run over us with the team ratten selected to play tonight

Seriously Brett Ratten has no idea. He said pst match that he thought that we could slow them down. What by playing slow sluggish hacks

Get rid of this guy while he has some credibility as a good carlton man


OK then - tell me who you would have selected instead that would have won us the game?


Would have played Garlett before Banno. Garlett could have allowed Betts to play stints in the middle

To go into a game against the Bombers with a top heavy forward line with one small forward was a major blunder. Fev, O'Hailpin, Fisher and Banno playing along side slow movers in Houlihan and and an underdone Scottland.

We are playing a hard running super quick side and we go in with all our tall timber in O'Hailpin, Krooze, Hampson, Austin, Fisher, Fev and Bannister. Would have never played Fisher, Hampson and Bannister and would have brought in Chris Johnson/Russell, Robinson and Garlett. O'Hailpin and Krooze sharing Ruck duties with O'Hailpin running with Ryder around the ground and Krooze playing CHF

HF: Robinson Krooze Stevens
FF: Betts Fevola Garlett


Last edited by Melvey on Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:54 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 296
Location: Outside Demetriou's Office - shhh!
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences



Melvey, the coach didn't lose the game for us tonight - the players did.

They were weak, lazy and insipid once the scum got their tails up, and no one stood up to them. No coach would have won it for us tonight with that mentally fragile bunch.


Really?

The game was done and dusted at the selection table. The Bomber were always going to run over us with the team ratten selected to play tonight

Seriously Brett Ratten has no idea. He said pst match that he thought that we could slow them down. What by playing slow sluggish hacks

Get rid of this guy while he has some credibility as a good carlton man


OK then - tell me who you would have selected instead that would have won us the game?


Well i would have played Garlett before Banno. Garlett could have allowed Betts to play stints in the middle

To go into a game against the Bombers with a top heavy forward line with one small forward was a major blunder. Fev, O'Hailpin, Fisher and Banno along side slow movers in Houlihan and and underdone Scottland.

We are playing a hard running super quick side and we play all our tall timber in O'Hailpin, Hampson, Austin, Fisher and Bannister. Would have never played Fisher, Hampson and Bannister and would have brought in Chris Johnson/Russell, Robinson and Garlett. O'Hailpin and Krooze sharing Ruck duties with O'Hailpin running with Ryder and Krooze playing CHF

Set up the forward line
HF: Robinson Krooze Stevens
FF: Betts Fev Garlett



Spot on


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:59 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Laguna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences



Melvey, the coach didn't lose the game for us tonight - the players did.

They were weak, lazy and insipid once the scum got their tails up, and no one stood up to them. No coach would have won it for us tonight with that mentally fragile bunch.


Really?

The game was done and dusted at the selection table. The Bomber were always going to run over us with the team ratten selected to play tonight

Seriously Brett Ratten has no idea. He said pst match that he thought that we could slow them down. What by playing slow sluggish hacks

Get rid of this guy while he has some credibility as a good carlton man


OK then - tell me who you would have selected instead that would have won us the game?


Well i would have played Garlett before Banno. Garlett could have allowed Betts to play stints in the middle

To go into a game against the Bombers with a top heavy forward line with one small forward was a major blunder. Fev, O'Hailpin, Fisher and Banno along side slow movers in Houlihan and and underdone Scottland.

We are playing a hard running super quick side and we play all our tall timber in O'Hailpin, Hampson, Austin, Fisher and Bannister. Would have never played Fisher, Hampson and Bannister and would have brought in Chris Johnson/Russell, Robinson and Garlett. O'Hailpin and Krooze sharing Ruck duties with O'Hailpin running with Ryder and Krooze playing CHF

Set up the forward line
HF: Robinson Krooze Stevens
FF: Betts Fev Garlett


Spot on


Ratten can't identify something as simple as this is worrying


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:59 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 5:16 pm
Posts: 276
Look I am hopeful that Ratt's will be a coach capable of delivering the rightfully expected success (#17), and I say expected because our list has half a dozen first rounders including 4 x top 3 picks. I do have concerns though.

Comparisons with Knights are I think reasonable, and with a list that most would consider well below ours, he has done exceptionally well. They are organised, aggressive and playing far superior footy to what we are. They look like they are very well drilled, and I don't think we do alot of the time.

He (Knights) has made tough calls in relation to his players (Lovett last year, Lucas this year) and they have responded well, not to mention the development of players that should not be comparable with the talent on our list.

Guys like Grigg, Armfield, Browne are developing, but not as fast as other teams, and their disposal at times is unacceptable at this level. They are examples and certainly not alone.

Consider all the needless fumbles resulting in turnovers we have had this year...tonight obviously a number of them. When a player receives a handball under no pressure right at chest height as Banno did in Q2 and fumbles, it to me is possibly an indication of him thanking "what do I do with this now?"...rather than it being an ingrained response (as it seemed to be when they had the ball).

Consider also the kicks to contests on half back/the wing after a point is conceded. To me this has had little positive impact. There's no Wayne Carey under that ball....and it's resulted in innumerable turnovers. Why do we do it? Where is the science and philosophy in that?

Are we a possesion style team, or free running? I don't know.

Who are our line breakers? Bower and Kade Simpson (and Jarrad Waite). This is a list deficiency. Judd is also but is often the one having to win the hard ball inside whilst dragging a ouple of opponents as others watch and wait and run by for a cheapy. Murph, Gibbs...it's time to earn your own ball a bit.

As Jack Dyer would have said, we are a good ORDINARY side. Unfortunately with our picks, our resources, and our return to a sound financial position, this is nowhere near good enough.

It needs to be addressed. Not sure what happened with Alan Richardson but his reputation is sound as is his track record. We don't have him, they do. My understanding is that we tried and failed a while ago. Fair enough, but why did Essendon* succeed? I interested to know as surely our list would have offered greater appeal (on paper).

Ratt's may be a nice bloke and probably a legend of the club, as is Sticks, but they need to get results plain and simple, or they need to make way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:59 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
I believe Robinson was suspended in the VFL.

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:17 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
Laguna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences



Melvey, the coach didn't lose the game for us tonight - the players did.

They were weak, lazy and insipid once the scum got their tails up, and no one stood up to them. No coach would have won it for us tonight with that mentally fragile bunch.


Really?

The game was done and dusted at the selection table. The Bomber were always going to run over us with the team ratten selected to play tonight

Seriously Brett Ratten has no idea. He said pst match that he thought that we could slow them down. What by playing slow sluggish hacks

Get rid of this guy while he has some credibility as a good carlton man


OK then - tell me who you would have selected instead that would have won us the game?


Well i would have played Garlett before Banno. Garlett could have allowed Betts to play stints in the middle

To go into a game against the Bombers with a top heavy forward line with one small forward was a major blunder. Fev, O'Hailpin, Fisher and Banno along side slow movers in Houlihan and and underdone Scottland.

We are playing a hard running super quick side and we play all our tall timber in O'Hailpin, Hampson, Austin, Fisher and Bannister. Would have never played Fisher, Hampson and Bannister and would have brought in Chris Johnson/Russell, Robinson and Garlett. O'Hailpin and Krooze sharing Ruck duties with O'Hailpin running with Ryder and Krooze playing CHF

Set up the forward line
HF: Robinson Krooze Stevens
FF: Betts Fev Garlett



Spot on



Well, I'm convinced then!

IN: Melvey
OUT: Ratten

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:24 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
and it could get worse next week. If the Bombers have a win against the Pies (and i think they will) they will be two games a head of us

going by Rattens form i really look forward to seeing Warnock, Bentick, Jacobs and Cloke matching up it against a running machine called Freo at Subiaco.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:30 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Mil Hanna wrote:
Laguna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences


Melvey, the coach didn't lose the game for us tonight - the players did.

They were weak, lazy and insipid once the scum got their tails up, and no one stood up to them. No coach would have won it for us tonight with that mentally fragile bunch.


Really?

The game was done and dusted at the selection table. The Bomber were always going to run over us with the team ratten selected to play tonight

Seriously Brett Ratten has no idea. He said pst match that he thought that we could slow them down. What by playing slow sluggish hacks

Get rid of this guy while he has some credibility as a good carlton man


OK then - tell me who you would have selected instead that would have won us the game?


Well i would have played Garlett before Banno. Garlett could have allowed Betts to play stints in the middle

To go into a game against the Bombers with a top heavy forward line with one small forward was a major blunder. Fev, O'Hailpin, Fisher and Banno along side slow movers in Houlihan and and underdone Scottland.

We are playing a hard running super quick side and we play all our tall timber in O'Hailpin, Hampson, Austin, Fisher and Bannister. Would have never played Fisher, Hampson and Bannister and would have brought in Chris Johnson/Russell, Robinson and Garlett. O'Hailpin and Krooze sharing Ruck duties with O'Hailpin running with Ryder and Krooze playing CHF

Set up the forward line
HF: Robinson Krooze Stevens
FF: Betts Fev Garlett


Spot on


Well, I'm convinced then!

IN: Melvey
OUT: Ratten


Spare me the sarcasm. Least i gave it a crack!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:37 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
I don't always agree with you Melvey, but I often do, and I really like your attitude.

Give em heaps :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:10 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Mil Hanna wrote:
Melvey wrote:
maxyblue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
And John Worsfold and Mark Williams re-signing


can you please, please, please stop hi-jacking every thread with your broken record items ...

we get it ... really we do ...


Well obviously some senior figures at our club don't.

More stupid decisions will set us back further and further until someone grows some balls and makes the big calls no matter consequences


Melvey, the coach didn't lose the game for us tonight - the players did.

They were weak, lazy and insipid once the scum got their tails up, and no one stood up to them. No coach would have won it for us tonight with that mentally fragile bunch.


Yeah sorry...coach must take most if not all of the blame...nice try but no cigar mate.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:10 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 296
Location: Outside Demetriou's Office - shhh!
Blue Steel wrote:
Look I am hopeful that Ratt's will be a coach capable of delivering the rightfully expected success (#17), and I say expected because our list has half a dozen first rounders including 4 x top 3 picks. I do have concerns though.

Comparisons with Knights are I think reasonable, and with a list that most would consider well below ours, he has done exceptionally well. They are organised, aggressive and playing far superior footy to what we are. They look like they are very well drilled, and I don't think we do alot of the time.

He (Knights) has made tough calls in relation to his players (Lovett last year, Lucas this year) and they have responded well, not to mention the development of players that should not be comparable with the talent on our list.

Guys like Grigg, Armfield, Browne are developing, but not as fast as other teams, and their disposal at times is unacceptable at this level. They are examples and certainly not alone.
Consider all the needless fumbles resulting in turnovers we have had this year...tonight obviously a number of them. When a player receives a handball under no pressure right at chest height as Banno did in Q2 and fumbles, it to me is possibly an indication of him thanking "what do I do with this now?"...rather than it being an ingrained response (as it seemed to be when they had the ball).

Consider also the kicks to contests on half back/the wing after a point is conceded. To me this has had little positive impact. There's no Wayne Carey under that ball....and it's [color=#FFFF00]resulted in innumerable turnovers. Why do we do it? Where is the science and philosophy in that?

Are we a possesion style team, or free running? I don't know.

Who are our line breakers? Bower and Kade Simpson (and Jarrad Waite). This is a list deficiency. Judd is also but is often the one having to win the hard ball inside whilst dragging a ouple of opponents as others watch and wait and run by for a cheapy. Murph, Gibbs...it's time to earn
your own ball a bit[/color].

As Jack Dyer would have said, we are a good ORDINARY side. Unfortunately with our picks, our resources, and our return to a sound financial position, this is nowhere near good enough.

It needs to be addressed. Not sure what happened with Alan Richardson but his reputation is sound as is his track record. We don't have him, they do. My understanding is that we tried and failed a while ago. Fair enough, but why did Essendon* succeed? I interested to know as surely our list would have offered greater appeal (on paper).

Ratt's may be a nice bloke and probably a legend of the club, as is Sticks, but they need to get results plain and simple, or they need to make way.



POW


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:08 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:43 pm
Posts: 94
I read how quick Essendon* are, and I must say I'm a little bemused.

Are they actually quick? or are they playing a one dimension game plan over and over?

Each Essendon* game I've watched the common theme is how each player looks forward and runs forward instinctively, when they take possession of the ball. I concede they have a few quick players, but no more than other sides, they are simply instructed to carry it forward at all costs!! Its simple and effective when your game is not on! They too have lost and looked very slow when they have played teams that play a better tempo controlled game.

It looks great, but I do not believe it will get you too far, as I wrote before. Ratts and Co. would do well to review how Neil Craig has changed his focus whilst still maintaing a defensive tempo controlling game.

We should look at last nights game as one to forget, but be sure to keep the focus on the defensive structure and persist in controlling the tempo whilst knowing when to pull the trigger. With confidence we should start using the easiest route to goal, through the middle.

Go Blues !!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:08 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Michael Jackson and Farrah Fawcett died too.. shocking week...

Back on the important stuff... youd think Essendon* is a class side that is competing for the flag if you looked out how we tackled the game ...

Massive respect to Essendon*...

Hold on a minute wernt these Bozos lower than us in the ladder??

But then who is the Bozo is a perspective thing...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group