Blue Sombrero wrote:
Hey, Bondi, you know that would NEVER happen.
Imagine these options:
Houla takes possession and accepts full body contact and causes a ballup or gets caught holding it. OR,
Houla goes for a one handed pickpocket, it comes off and he runs into an open goal. OR
He misses it and cops plenty on TC from certain quarters.
He'll never be good enough for Keogh until he gets re-incarnated as a player with more grunt and less skill. Risk-takers win games but little praise when the risks don't come off.
This Houla thread used to be on talking players with a different name. Talking players has been closed but the circular argument goes on forever.
Houlihan isnt good enough for AFL BS
Plain and simple
I dont have this blinkered tunnel vision view of RYAN HOULIHAN
Its the way he plays in respect to the modern game.
He isnt quick
He isnt as great a kick as anyone says
When the pressure is on he shits himself
He doesnt carry the ball quickly enough with speed
His kicking over long distances isnt good enough
He hasnt raised his game to the next level
and he is 27 years of age with over 160 games experience yet provides @#$%&! all leadership to our youngsters on and off the field
Ratten plays him as a defensive forward
What value is he to the team when he keeps Sam Fisher to 16 possessions
The game has passed the likes of Ryan Houlihan because the game has become so intense and he isnt intense enough
The sooner th MC realise this the better