Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:24 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 176 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Like i said Jamo needs a rest... he is struggling ....

We have T Bird Bower Setanta Austin and Jamo all in the side... but wont rest him for another runner...

Thats a con...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:44 pm 
Online
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8176
Pros:

I thought the intensity was good last night. Particularly liked the willingness of Simmo and Stevo to make body contact when needed.
Good to see Judd out in a bit more space.
Our rucks again.
Bower, Murphy.
Despite his weaknesses, we need Houlihan's class and play better when he's in the team. I don't think it's any convenience that we've looked much more dangerous up forward when Robinson, Houla and Garlett have all been in the team.
AJ. Nice for once seeing us nullifying an opposition weapon, rather than the other way round.

Cons:

Judd still hasn't got a free since his comments about a month back on the channel 10 footy show. (It shouldn't need to happen, but) I reckon the club has to bite the bullet and get Fev and Judd to go and apologise to the umps.
Fev's set shot kicking for goal (and a few others).
I picked a 40 point loss in my tipping competition (out by 1!). :smile:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:45 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:33 pm
Posts: 965
Cazzesman wrote:
I suggest we are getting better simply because of the following. Aside from playing the Cats and the Saints.....If we were playing any one of the other 13 teams this weekend and someone could gaurantee that the Blues play with the same intensity they showed in Rounds 1 and 2 this year, for the full 4 quarters would you think that we were a fair chance of a win?

I'd say yes. What about you?

Regards Cazzesman


That argument isn't valid.
It's akin to saying that if the player who takes a set off Nadal or Federer could play like that for 5 sets then he could win Wimbledon.
The fact is that we haven't played anywhere near as well as we did in the early rounds.
Now you can put that down to any number of things, but to gloss over it and say "could have", "would have", "should have", "might have" "will some day", is a cop out and to say that we've improved on the basis of two games against mediocre opposition is delusional.
We have a way to go, any Carlton supporter with a grip on reality knows that, but believing it will happen won't make it so.
There's as much chance that it won't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:45 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
livolover wrote:
cazzesman,

....I hope someone, somehwere at the club are addressing the obvious deficiencies that exist !


:roll: :roll: :roll: Nah they're all taking the week off thinking they have done a great job thus far.

I don't have rose coloured glasses I have realistic glasses. Synbad and Keogh will tell you the reality is that CFC is crap because of Ratts and the MC. I simply tell you that we are a team that is coming from a long way back and we are slowly getting better.

I suggest we are getting better simply because of the following. Aside from playing the Cats and the Saints.....If we were playing any one of the other 13 teams this weekend and someone could gaurantee that the Blues play with the same intensity they showed in Rounds 1 and 2 this year, for the full 4 quarters would you think that we were a fair chance of a win?

I'd say yes. What about you?

Regards Cazzesman



If you keep your rose coloured glasses on and watch bue .. you get Freo..

You started this pros and cons thread and then pre empted any attack on any cons.. :lol:

Look ... your case is we shouldnt have a gameplan... but its coming.... its coming... we dont know when but its going to come.

i just want a gameplaN... and i dont see it coming...

Didnt go but i did check out the Bullants thread played today... andi did ask a couple of weeks ago how is Teague coaching?
I got blasted for asking it....
But what i see is confusion and over possession in the AFL and same in the VFL.
See i dont care about 4 points just patterns or styles of play...

Now i always will come back to the same thing...

How were the coaches chosen and what are their qualifications?

Now i ask this cos there is something wrong going on around the club and its onfield performances...
Yet youre telling us everything is going according to plan..
BUT Ratts told us we had to make the finals this year and our promo was "They know were coming".
BUT... today he said we should all be more realistic with ourexpectations...

What im seeing is NO OVERALL IMPROVEMENT.. except whats organic improvement.. but not educated improvement...
And im seeing us riding the coat tails of Juddy alot...
And i see we need Fev to kick big bags...

Or we struggle...

Sure you can tell me i dont know what im talking about.. cos i dont see a gameplan... but can you EXPLAIN to us right now what were attempting to do so i can look for it???

Please??

Cos you know.... and noone else on this board does..

So can yu just begin with what were doing defensively... through the midfield and up forward??
When is it man on man and when is it a zone.. and why were breaking down in execution...

Thanks in advance...

Cos you know and we dont..


I reckon Ratts is back peddling cuz his original statement pre-season of where we are at was absurd and he really put himself under the pump...he needs to live up to his original call IMO otherwise he risks being seen as another Wallace which I doubt he is. It would have all been so much easier if his appointment was more transparent.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:49 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
livolover wrote:
cazzesman,

I am not offended by your sentiments...but deeply concerned at your attitudes given the fact that you work at the club.

if everyone else working at the club continues to look through the same rose coloured glasses that you use, no wonder we are struggling to drag our club out of the mire !

this thread is pros and cons.....to acknowledge the good but more importantly identify the ugly which needs to be addressed in our pursuit to improve !

if the cons disturb you so much....avoid this thread !

in my opinion, many of the questions raised by posters of B Ratten re our gameplan and structures are well worth consideration....I hope someone, somehwere at the club are addressing the obvious deficiencies that exist !


+1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:50 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20246
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
PROs
- Bower
- Fev at full forward, and signs at least that we can move the ball to him well when we're decisive
- AJ, a similar game to Walker's on Aker a few years ago v Brisbane. Both players and opponents found a bit but you could see the respect at the handshake that the senior player (Aker/Kerr) had for the younger player (Walker/AJ). AJ is a great find.
- Rucks. Make no mistake Kruze and Hammer were up against the best tonight and they did fantastically well for mine.
- Fisher's kicking. A typical Brad Fisher game, but with decent kicking. He is to key forwards what T-bird is to key backs. But both can have a place.
- Judd. It's no crime him being our best every week. He's awesome.
- Murphy. Has to be knocking on the door of the top tier now. Knocked around and just gets on with it.

CONs
- JR. Was only playing on Ebert for the bulk of the game, but made a lot of dumb mistakes. Clearly he's doing some sort of role every week but it's never clear what it is. Must be doing it well enough...
- no listed players sound like they played well enough in the bullants today
- opponents. We won by 41 points but WC were absolutely awful. Very hard to guage how well we played, but from Judd speaking afterwards I doubt we'll be getting to carried away this week.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:54 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Con:

I know this forum seems divided re JR but one common theme (from those who love JR and those that dont) is that not many seem to know what his role is in any game.

This has got to be the biggest con of all time...

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16975
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
livolover wrote:
cazzesman,

....I hope someone, somehwere at the club are addressing the obvious deficiencies that exist !


:roll: :roll: :roll: Nah they're all taking the week off thinking they have done a great job thus far.

I don't have rose coloured glasses I have realistic glasses. Synbad and Keogh will tell you the reality is that CFC is crap because of Ratts and the MC. I simply tell you that we are a team that is coming from a long way back and we are slowly getting better.

I suggest we are getting better simply because of the following. Aside from playing the Cats and the Saints.....If we were playing any one of the other 13 teams this weekend and someone could gaurantee that the Blues play with the same intensity they showed in Rounds 1 and 2 this year, for the full 4 quarters would you think that we were a fair chance of a win?

I'd say yes. What about you?

Regards Cazzesman



If you keep your rose coloured glasses on and watch bue .. you get Freo..

You started this pros and cons thread and then pre empted any attack on any cons.. :lol:

Look ... your case is we shouldnt have a gameplan... but its coming.... its coming... we dont know when but its going to come.

i just want a gameplaN... and i dont see it coming...

Didnt go but i did check out the Bullants thread played today... andi did ask a couple of weeks ago how is Teague coaching?
I got blasted for asking it....
But what i see is confusion and over possession in the AFL and same in the VFL.
See i dont care about 4 points just patterns or styles of play...

Now i always will come back to the same thing...

How were the coaches chosen and what are their qualifications?

Now i ask this cos there is something wrong going on around the club and its onfield performances...
Yet youre telling us everything is going according to plan..
BUT Ratts told us we had to make the finals this year and our promo was "They know were coming".
BUT... today he said we should all be more realistic with ourexpectations...

What im seeing is NO OVERALL IMPROVEMENT.. except whats organic improvement.. but not educated improvement...
And im seeing us riding the coat tails of Juddy alot...
And i see we need Fev to kick big bags...

Or we struggle...

Sure you can tell me i dont know what im talking about.. cos i dont see a gameplan... but can you EXPLAIN to us right now what were attempting to do so i can look for it???

Please??

Cos you know.... and noone else on this board does..

So can yu just begin with what were doing defensively... through the midfield and up forward??
When is it man on man and when is it a zone.. and why were breaking down in execution...

Thanks in advance...

Cos you know and we dont..


I can't be bothered Badman because I know you are simply in your yearly...'pick a topic and beat up on it' mode. You know exactly what I think because I have posted it many times. Stay on your soap box until you get bored and move on to another topic.

Don't bother throwing out the .....'Cos you know and we dont'.. line because I have no interest. We can discuss it over coffee next time I'm passing. :thumbsup:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16975
Location: Melbourne
Budsyblues wrote:
Now you can put that down to any number of things, but to gloss over it and say "could have", "would have", "should have", "might have" "will some day", is a cop out and to say that we've improved on the basis of two games against mediocre opposition is delusional.
We have a way to go, any Carlton supporter with a grip on reality knows that, but believing it will happen won't make it so.
There's as much chance that it won't.


Was the intensity and desire in those two games delusional? Doesn't matter whether you are playinhg a good team or a bad team, if the intensity of effort isn't there then we have no hope. The 1 half vs the 2nd half of the Crows game shows that fact.

Of course we have a way to go. We have plenty to go. My argument is that because I believe we are improving, if we have the required intensity and desire at the footy for 4 quarters then I believe we can run any team close to the wire.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:04 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Cazzesman wrote:
keogh wrote:
Hope I am proved wrong


I strongly doubt that Keogh. I mean I really, really strong doubt that.

Regards Cazzesman


:screwy:

It's one thing to have a go at posters for being "excessively negative" but if you think Keogh or any other "negative poster" will be barracking for Brisbane you have lost it.

It's funny, for someone who avoids the negatives (which is ok BTW, different strokes) your attitude on this forum of late is very negative, towards your fellow Carlton fans.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:07 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Budsyblues wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
I suggest we are getting better simply because of the following. Aside from playing the Cats and the Saints.....If we were playing any one of the other 13 teams this weekend and someone could gaurantee that the Blues play with the same intensity they showed in Rounds 1 and 2 this year, for the full 4 quarters would you think that we were a fair chance of a win?

I'd say yes. What about you?

Regards Cazzesman


That argument isn't valid.
It's akin to saying that if the player who takes a set off Nadal or Federer could play like that for 5 sets then he could win Wimbledon.
The fact is that we haven't played anywhere near as well as we did in the early rounds.
Now you can put that down to any number of things, but to gloss over it and say "could have", "would have", "should have", "might have" "will some day", is a cop out and to say that we've improved on the basis of two games against mediocre opposition is delusional.
We have a way to go, any Carlton supporter with a grip on reality knows that, but believing it will happen won't make it so.
There's as much chance that it won't.


More if you think that every other team is in the same boat. The AFL is not static and it kind of seems as if our preparation for each season is based on the one gone before instead of factoring in the future development of the competition as a whole. I have hope for the future but I think we seriously need a revision of where we are at and how best to move forward.

Having said all that, I think we are quickly forgetting that we just lost Waite for the season and having him in the side may have added to the scoreboard Friday night.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Last edited by Pafloyul on Sat May 30, 2009 8:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Well Cazz.. youre always welcome. You know that.

But you cant blame me for being concerned.
I bet they all are concerned right now.... i really do. As a matter of fact i know of an inside 'suit' who is extremely concerned.
In my opinion.. we have a few problems....

They stem from outside of the playing group and at the top.


In my opinion alot of whats going on stems from the 95 group.

One is a president.. and i cant see anyone puting his hand up t lead this club in the post Pratt era (Hopefully its Anthony Pratt if he can find time.. cs fair dinkum Kernahan will be harder to dislodge than herpes)
... then there are the appointments of coaches that are a direct result of Sticks and friends.. Braddles Williams Brown etc....of which a very underqualified Ratten is head coach..

Then we have a couple of token outsiders as assitants.. being outsiders in a real boys club they would have less courage to dfo anything than tow the line...

Even worse.. say we did wanna go after a Hardwick as an asst coach or anyone else... would ANYBODY be that stupid to apply for a job as a coach for us???

He wouldnt get a look in long term and he would always be an outsider...
So why would any up and coming coach even want to come to us???
Is that why Richardson didnt come to us???
Surely we are after the best footy heads right???


Ad then we have ther problem of when does anyone know when its gone past loyalty to a mate enough that a tap on the shoulder is in order???

Massive probems.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:14 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:33 pm
Posts: 965
Cazzesman wrote:
Budsyblues wrote:
Now you can put that down to any number of things, but to gloss over it and say "could have", "would have", "should have", "might have" "will some day", is a cop out and to say that we've improved on the basis of two games against mediocre opposition is delusional.
We have a way to go, any Carlton supporter with a grip on reality knows that, but believing it will happen won't make it so.
There's as much chance that it won't.


Was the intensity and desire in those two games delusional? Doesn't matter whether you are playinhg a good team or a bad team, if the intensity of effort isn't there then we have no hope. The 1 half vs the 2nd half of the Crows game shows that fact.

Of course we have a way to go. We have plenty to go. My argument is that because I believe we are improving, if we have the required intensity and desire at the footy for 4 quarters then I believe we can run any team close to the wire.

Regards Cazzesman


I don't always but in this case I agree with Synbad, in that our improvement this year has been
organic rather than educated.
Natural improvement is to be expected when three or more of your best players are in their early years and that's the case at Carlton, but has there been improvement elsewhere, in terms of older players, match day tactics and structure, on and off field discipline and all the other things that go towards making a successful football team?
Based purely on results any improvement has been marginal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6428
I think with all the talk about game plans coffee and jobs for the boys talk one basic thing does get lost.

The quality of the opposition

Last night it was shit

2 weeks ago it was shit
Thats why the first half against Adelaide was no surise to a negative poster such as myself.

Brisbane buy 5 goals if we play like last night


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:23 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9108
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Pro:- we are seven goals better than westcoast.
- Better Roll Down.
- Garlett made some good space.
- Fev putting a good fight and really looking back in form (long kicking aside).
- Murphy and Judd playing well.
- Its been a fun season so far.

Con:- Still unclean hands in close
- Not prepared to take risky kicks that open up play. That will come with time and experience.
- not getting our dominance on the board when all is going our way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:24 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:33 pm
Posts: 965
Pafloyul wrote:
Budsyblues wrote:
That argument isn't valid.
It's akin to saying that if the player who takes a set off Nadal or Federer could play like that for 5 sets then he could win Wimbledon.
The fact is that we haven't played anywhere near as well as we did in the early rounds.
Now you can put that down to any number of things, but to gloss over it and say "could have", "would have", "should have", "might have" "will some day", is a cop out and to say that we've improved on the basis of two games against mediocre opposition is delusional.
We have a way to go, any Carlton supporter with a grip on reality knows that, but believing it will happen won't make it so.
There's as much chance that it won't.


More if you think that every other team is in the same boat. The AFL is not static and it kind of seems as if our preparation for each season is based on the one gone before instead of factoring in the future development of the competition as a whole. I have hope for the future but I think we seriously need a revision of were we are at and how best to move forward.

Having said all that, I think we are quickly forgetting that we just lost Waite for the season and having him in the side may have added to the scoreboard Friday night.


For starters, every club loses players to injury so it's no good hanging a hat on it.
Waite, and to a lesser extent Walker, are the only two serious injuries we've suffered since '07, and we played last year virtually with a full list, no club can bet on such a charmed run.
The main point you make is critical.
Every club goes to the same well in the draft, and although we have 3 number one's other clubs have their share of high picks as well.
Other clubs may also have had the benefit of years of stable and competent administration with the attendant recruiting, list management, player welfare strategies, disciplinary structures and the like, so it's reasonable to assume that we are no further along the road to success than other clubs, and possibly not as far.
The only answer is sheer hard work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:35 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Budsyblues wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
Budsyblues wrote:
That argument isn't valid.
It's akin to saying that if the player who takes a set off Nadal or Federer could play like that for 5 sets then he could win Wimbledon.
The fact is that we haven't played anywhere near as well as we did in the early rounds.
Now you can put that down to any number of things, but to gloss over it and say "could have", "would have", "should have", "might have" "will some day", is a cop out and to say that we've improved on the basis of two games against mediocre opposition is delusional.
We have a way to go, any Carlton supporter with a grip on reality knows that, but believing it will happen won't make it so.
There's as much chance that it won't.


More if you think that every other team is in the same boat. The AFL is not static and it kind of seems as if our preparation for each season is based on the one gone before instead of factoring in the future development of the competition as a whole. I have hope for the future but I think we seriously need a revision of were we are at and how best to move forward.

Having said all that, I think we are quickly forgetting that we just lost Waite for the season and having him in the side may have added to the scoreboard Friday night.


For starters, every club loses players to injury so it's no good hanging a hat on it.
Waite, and to a lesser extent Walker, are the only two serious injuries we've suffered since '07, and we played last year virtually with a full list, no club can bet on such a charmed run.
The main point you make is critical.
Every club goes to the same well in the draft, and although we have 3 number one's other clubs have their share of high picks as well.
Other clubs may also have had the benefit of years of stable and competent administration with the attendant recruiting, list management, player welfare strategies, disciplinary structures and the like, so it's reasonable to assume that we are no further along the road to success than other clubs, and possibly not as far.
The only answer is sheer hard work.


Your point re; injuries occurred to me when I was writing but sometimes you learn to temper your posts a bit around here, especially if you have a thin skin like mine. Therefore, I decided to keep the comment in. :wink:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 10:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Quote:
except whats organic improvement.. but not educated improvement...

Typical Faculty of Education bs

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 10:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16975
Location: Melbourne
keogh wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
keogh wrote:
Hope I am proved wrong


I strongly doubt that Keogh. I mean I really, really strong doubt that.

Regards Cazzesman



Once again Cazzeman You cant judge someone by what buttons they push on a keyboard.

But let me tell ya about meeting my second wife.

After going out with her for about 6 months I asked her what she really liked about me besides my great personality and hairy chest. She said that I didnt hate my ex and I took responsibility for how I flower up my first go at wedding bliss. All the blokes my current wife went out with between her divorce and meeting me hated their exs and thought they were 100% right .

So there goes your theory. Anyway if you think you can judge a person by what they write on TC good luck to you :wink:


I'm sure your current wife is very happy regardless of any thoughts I may have regarding your personality & hirsute appearance.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R10: Pros and Cons
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 11:14 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
livolover wrote:
..

What im seeing is NO OVERALL IMPROVEMENT.. except whats organic improvement.. but not educated improvement...
And im seeing us riding the coat tails of Juddy alot...
And i see we need Fev to kick big bags...

Or we struggle...

.


About as perfect summation of where we are at as you can get!!!!!!! A+

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 176 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: diesel95, Mickstar, Stefchook and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group