Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:30 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 147 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 1:55 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
BlueIce wrote:
Blueboy_Dan wrote:
aramari wrote:
Blueboy_Dan wrote:
Hampson. Some of his disposal was just shocking, dropping marks, kicking wayward. Did some nice things at the end but overall very disappointing, Im not a big fan of his and dont see him at the club for very long


I'm not surprised he stuffed up - he does it in the 2s. He is a fair way off, but he is improving, and he needs the exposure to the big guns after playing against midgets in the VFL. Like Setanta, he follows something eye-catching with something awful. I reckon if he plays 10 games straight, we might lose a game or two, but we might gain a star. He's not keeping any superstars out of the side, give him time. This team is obviously not the finished article yet, not too much to lose.


I understand your points, but I see Hampson as an act of desperation at a time when we were down and out. Like O'Hailpin, we recruited a very high risk prospect and it hasnt worked out much so far, if at all. I dont see how a few games in the seniors when he aint setting the world on fire in the 2s is going to somehow develop his talent.

O Hailpin showed a lot more at the same stage of his career and Hampson has showed very little. O Hailpin must come in this week against the Pies for Hampson.

You know little about footy if you think Hampson was poor and Hughes recruited Shaun out of desperation like O'hAilpin.

Sandilands beat him, but who doesn't the Docker beat?

Hampson is raw, but was very impressive around the ground with his agility and with his second efforts for a big man.

Stick to posting on that garbage team and code in your avatar.

I will be furious if we drop Hampson for that spud O'hAilpin.


Nah I reckon a majority of people who watched the game would think Hampson was poor, and Id bet a lot on that event occuring.

Oh and at least that garbage team wins things :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 2:29 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
grrofunger wrote:
SparkyBlue wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
PROS

and

CONS

please



...yes sir.

:|




...so, no discussing the pros and cons then?


we do have a post match discussion thread yeah?


kinda pointless (when it comes to my reply anyway) responding to a post in a different thread.

_________________
Cheap Bike Insurance
Selling Baseball Cards


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 2:58 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 762
grrofunger wrote:
PROS

and

CONS

please


It only makes sense that people can discuss what they agree and/or disagree with from somebody's pros and cons. A bit of argument over what was a pro and what was a con is the whole point of it, I thought.

_________________
They will know that they've been playing against the famous old dark blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 7:17 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Melvey wrote:
yibbida wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Con: Brett Ratten (NFI)

Pro: Choco Williams.

Dear Jeannie and Anthony Pratt, if you wanna fulfill your husband and fathers hard work and money and see his beloved Carlton win a premiership then demand who ever is in charge of the Blues to sign up Mark Williams immediately. If you're listening, anyone please im begging get this man over to the mighty blue baggers.


You mean the bloke who coaches Port? The team that lost to the Kangaroos? :confused: :donk:


Well couldn't be any worse than Ratts who coaches Carlton who lost to Freo.



Great logic that. "Couldn't be worse". Let's sign him up. While we're at it, let's trade for Richmond's 10th best player. Couldn't be worse than some of ours.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 8:01 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
yibbida wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Con: Brett Ratten (NFI)

Pro: Choco Williams.

Dear Jeannie and Anthony Pratt, if you wanna fulfill your husband and fathers hard work and money and see his beloved Carlton win a premiership then demand who ever is in charge of the Blues to sign up Mark Williams immediately. If you're listening, anyone please im begging get this man over to the mighty blue baggers.


You mean the bloke who coaches Port? The team that lost to the Kangaroos? :confused: :donk:



Williams is a coach that understands the modern game.

Hes probably been at Port for abit too long... but his players do underdtand how to play footy though.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 8:03 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
Pros:

The biggest pro (and one people seem to be missing) is that instead of losing with Houlihan, O'Hailpin, Carrazzo, and Bentley in the team, we lost with Yarran, Austin, and Hampson in the team. Those 3 guys offer us a hell of a lot going forward, and the former four players offer us very little. We therefore took a small step toward improving the bottom in our side.... not a quick process, but one we have at least began working on immediately after the Hawthorn game. I hope the MC keeps working toward it.

Sitting near Warwick Capper who was wearing leopard-print jeans!

Cons:

I don't know which of our players will really, really work their backsides off to avoid a loss? Judd is one. Murphy is one. Kreuzer is one. And I think that Waite is probably one too. But the rest of them at the moment... forget about it.

I see why people who get to see the games live get frustrated. Our use of the wings and pockets is low percentage, takes too long, and is too easy to cut out. On the rare occasions we went through the guts we did ok... but almost every time we get the ball we look short and wide. It's extremely frustrating to watch live.

Stevens... a finished footballer in my opinion. Runs backwards 5 metres for a receive every time the ball goes near him.

Cloke, Wiggins, and Hadley - 'nuff said.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 8:31 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
The most disappointing day since Ratten took over from Pagan in my view.

PROS:
Yarran's first quarter was fantastic to see - glides across the ground
The normal ones - Murphy, Kruezer, Judd
Waite was good too

CONS:
Skills out of defence
Nothing type possessions at half back in a terrible effort to 'set up'. I remember laughing at Richmond doing this in Round 1. You have 3 Blues within 20 metres of each other and they HAVE to handball to each other for no advantage. Scotland, Stevens, Im looking at you.
Scotland was very jittery
Lack of hard running
Lack of skills
Do we really have to lose to every team that clogs up our F50?
Fevola
Cloke and Wiggins not being able to have an impact again (Cloke's 5th goal from within 10 metres after HBR)
Losing another close one.
Start of the third quarter - failing to land one, failing to get to someone who could land one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 8:50 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Con

3 or 4 links in the chain not giving a sh*t which is an insult to the late Dick Pratt.


Pro

Armfield. Yeah so he fluffed a few kicks, but he busted a gut running and breaking through the corridor trying do DO SOMETHING.

Judd and Kreuzer ALWAYS 100% committed.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 8:53 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
and another con

People using the weak blame game re playing at the Gold Coast. That's such a pathetic copout.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 9:15 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Worse loss in post Pagan era - sloppy lacked intensity -dont understand why after all these years of beltings we are not hungry for success

Lost a third game under 7 points -NEVER TAKE OUR CHANCES - Kicking for goal we are more wasteful than any other team

50 ENTRIES -CONTINUALLY DONT SCORE FROM THEM

No sense of urgency

Overhyped - too many passengers

Absolutely no consistency of performance-one week up the next down - no excuses its a young team -leaders should be able to stand up and I dont mean Judd

Not a top 8 team at the moment and will miss the finals because of performances against Freo and Essendon*


Abysmal away record continues - we know in two weeks time Adelaide will choke the life out of us at AAMI -we will have plenty of shots and forward entries -but have another dishonourable loss - everyone is running out of excuses


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 9:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
GAVROMAN wrote:
Ive only read the first 3 pages but from what ive read, the biggest CON are most of the posters in here!!!

Ive lost count of the number of posters who have said 'we arent a top 4 team'. We havent flower played finals since 2001 yet for some reason we should be a top 4 team???

Lets concentrate on being a top 8 team and the top 4 component will follow!!!


Hooray. Someone that knows where we are at.

And whoever it was that said Yarran was soft, hang your head in shame. I thought he sensational in the 1qrt. He tapered of after that, but that's understandable having really just turned 18 and playing in your 1st game. From what I saw, the kids got it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 9:43 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 1620
Location: Deep Blue Sea
Molly wrote:
.....................................................................

I don't know which of our players will really, really work their backsides off to avoid a loss? Judd is one. Murphy is one. Kreuzer is one. And I think that Waite is probably one too. But the rest of them at the moment... forget about it.

.....................................................................


"That's what I'm Talking About"

..... with another 3 or 4 who work their backsides we'd be on our way. Add another half dozen or more to that and you'd be top 4. Week in week out it's always Judd, Murphy, Kruz then we get the odd cameo.

_________________
"IF YOU FAIL TO PREPARE, YOU'RE PREPARED TO FAIL" - Mark Spitz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 10:12 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17514
Location: Left Cuckistan
Con: We lost so Synbad will be all over this place like shit on a blanket for the next week with his de-stabilisation campaign.

Pro: Enough people are on to him and his methods now that he won't be the pied piper like in years gone by.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 10:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Heavs wrote:
Con: We lost so Synbad will be all over this place like shit on a blanket for the next week with his de-stabilisation campaign.

Pro: Enough people are on to him and his methods now that he won't be the pied piper like in years gone by.



How do i destabilise a football team thats promised us "They know were coming " and is falling in a disorganised mess Heavsy???

Im not in charge... im an observer... :screwy:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 10:48 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
Please post your Pros & Cons only people.

Discussion can be found in the after game discussion thread.

And please stop needling each other.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:00 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2761
What was different about this match was we lost despite the fact that many of us DID go in hard, the intensity was up. Tackles were around 70, contested possessions were higher than Freo, forward entries higher, shots at goal more etc, etc...
As distinct from the Ess & Syd games, we did not whimp out. We caused turnovers & goals from good tackling, including Yarran & Hampson.
But this just more clearly reveals the other problems (CONS) we have been worried about: EVERYONE needs to contribute and we have not yet improved our strategies for bringing the ball in to our forward line, since last year.

CONS
Contribution: Wallsy's bottom six problem refers to the bottom 6 on any given day, not just specific 6 players he mentioned. Yesterday, I would say most of our players put in. Some did not. Some did but not for the whole game: I thought Fev, Stevens, Wiggins, Cloke, Simpson, Hadley were our weakest, as regards effort. SImmo put in in bursts.

Strategy: I don't think the problem is Fev. It wouldn't matter who we had in there if we keep bringing it in like we are now, we will struggle to kick high scores. I think we do/did have a plan but it is not robust enough or not drilled well enough. Early on in the season, we had Fev & Cloke/Kruezer bringing the ball to ground where Betts, Garlett, Robinson, Houlihan were crumbing & with Murphy, Judd, Gibbs streaming through 50 and kick a goal or 2 each.
Now, we bring the ball slowly up the wings & then look for a pinpoint pass to a leading (or stationary) Fev. No speed into F50, no multi-directional leads, no crumbers, (Murphy, Judd, Gibbs still holding up their end of the bargain).

My wife, who just waltzed in & out during the telecast (very annoying..), says to me: "why is our forward line so busy and theirs is so clear?? Every time they get the ball, they kick a goal!" :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:03 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
PROS

Juddy, where oh where would we be without him?
Murph, Krooz, Waite, Gibbs.
Yarran gets a taste, another game into Aussie and Hammer.

CONS

Fev's I've-got-a-broken-finger-nail and I don't want-to-play-in-front-of-only-10,000-people routine :screwy:
Cloke and his mates let us down again.
Really missing Wiggo's input during the past couple of weeks.
Losing to Flower Freo :mad:

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:06 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
17th Premiership wrote:
What was different about this match was we lost despite the fact that many of us DID go in hard, the intensity was up. Tackles were around 70, contested possessions were higher than Freo, forward entries higher, shots at goal more etc, etc...
As distinct from the Ess & Syd games, we did not whimp out. We caused turnovers & goals from good tackling, including Yarran & Hampson.
But this just more clearly reveals the other problems (CONS) we have been worried about: EVERYONE needs to contribute and we have not yet improved our strategies for bringing the ball in to our forward line, since last year.

CONS
Contribution: Wallsy's bottom six problem refers to the bottom 6 on any given day, not just specific 6 players he mentioned. Yesterday, I would say most of our players put in. Some did not. Some did but not for the whole game: I thought Fev, Stevens, Wiggins, Cloke, Simpson, Hadley were our weakest, as regards effort. SImmo put in in bursts.

Strategy: I don't think the problem is Fev. It wouldn't matter who we had in there if we keep bringing it in like we are now, we will struggle to kick high scores. I think we do/did have a plan but it is not robust enough or not drilled well enough. Early on in the season, we had Fev & Cloke/Kruezer bringing the ball to ground where Betts, Garlett, Robinson, Houlihan were crumbing & with Murphy, Judd, Gibbs streaming through 50 and kick a goal or 2 each.
Now, we bring the ball slowly up the wings & then look for a pinpoint pass to a leading (or stationary) Fev. No speed into F50, no multi-directional leads, no crumbers, (Murphy, Judd, Gibbs still holding up their end of the bargain).

My wife, who just waltzed in & out during the telecast (very annoying..), says to me: "why is our forward line so busy and theirs is so clear?? Every time they get the ball, they kick a goal!" :banghead:


What forward line?

Tarrant getting big raps FFS

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:13 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21576
Location: North of the border
we are all looking at the bottom 6 but there were two in the top 6 that were very ordinary last night

one should have stayed in melbourne we would have been better off

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:47 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 505
Location: Melbourne
Pro:
We got $400k that

Con:
Was more than we deserved.
The only door getting knocked on at the moment is for Walls' Bottom 6.


Image

_________________
Gaga and The Hoff party hard in London


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 147 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mickstar, Stefchook and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group