Harlett was recruited the same year as Russell. What about Bentick? Bannister? They've all played over 50 games. So have Fisher and Hadley.

He just picked 6 players from the last game without giving it a lot of thought really. He's a constant cracked record these days.

All Walls did was pick six players with over 40 games who played in Round 6, which is now history making his article largely irrelevant. The 22 who played in Round 6 may very well never play in the same 22 ever again. He's neglected a stack of players on our list just because they didn't play in Round 6. He probably can't even remember who else is on our list.

All Walls did was pick six players with over 40 games who played in Round 6, which is now history making his article largely irrelevant. The 22 who played in Round 6 may very well never play in the same 22 ever again. He's neglected a stack of players on our list just because they didn't play in Round 6. He probably can't even remember who else is on our list.

Read the article.

He is basing it on players that are being picked on a REGULAR basis.

How can you rate or include Bannister, Hartlett, Fisher and Bentick if they aren't PLAYING

He is NOT worried YET about the first or second year guys who are playing because they will be up and down as it is very early in there careers.

You must watch a different game if YOU think Hadley is in our bottom six.

The article is spot on. I can't remember who it was but someone once said your only as good as your bottom 5 or 6 players.

No he's not. He's basing it on the 22 who played Round 6.

As I said, that 22 may never play together again. It's a pretty good chance indeed. All he did was pick 6 players from Round 6 without any thought to other players on our list at all.

So if he is basing it on Round 6 then how did Hunt and Lonergan from Geelong, Ladson, Young and Ellis from the Hawks play last week

Like i said just READ THE ARTICLE

Haven't got the link but Walls writes today about our last 6 and how they don't measure up against the better sides.

His six I think were Wiggins, Houlihan, Cloke, Russell, Thornton, and one other...??

Wiggins might surprise some but I agree to the extent his kicking for goal lets him and the team down. It's inexcusable really, given the amount of experience Chief now has. I'm sure the man himself would agree he should be getting the sort of shots he misses.

Thornton is the other surprise, but again I can see some merit in what Wallsy is saying. Thornton is not a gun, we all know that now, and he does have a temperament issue sometimes, see the 'double goals' to Essendon*.

The only thing I think Wallsy missed in his article, was he should have talked about the players with talent we have missing right now or who were out last week, ie: Grigg, Walker, Warnock, Hampson, Yarran, Hadley etc, as these types will almost surely replace the Worst Six in the next 1-2 years.

I've read it, and I had to endure it last Saturday. He also includes Zac Dawson. How do you explain that? I can't.

So it's just pure coincidence that our "worst six" just so happened to play Round 6, and Walls was a commentator at the game?

Deluded.

Finally somebody has the balls to say what we've all been thinking. And say what has been shot down by so many people on this forum.

..he's full of it, certainly Hoops isn't in our bottom 6.. ..not sure he's ever been in our bottom 6 (aside from first coming to PP)..

Remember we have Grigg, Walks, Johnson, Yarran, Browne, Warnock and Robbo who will make there way into the team. These guys will have an impact and hopefully change the way we play

All 7 are far more are far more promising than the deadwood we are carrying in Cloke, Houla, Wiggins, O'Hailpin, Carrazzo, Stevo and Hadley.

In 2010 you will see a very different Carlton line up. I doubt the players mentioned above will play a part (especially when choco comes in and sweeps teh place clean)

Johnson? Because he's a good kick?