Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 10:58 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 203 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
99prelim wrote:
verbs wrote:
Seriously, what 99prelim wants and what cj69 wants ain't gonna impact whether we win a premiership or not and what's posted here isn't going to make us St Kilda or Richmond. Stupid stupid thinking. :screwy:


You're right verbs, it is stupid stupid thinking. I forgot to mention Richmond. (Would your average Rich supporter have thought in October 82 that they would have gone 27 years without playing on the last sat in sept). carlton (and rich once) were successful because they were ruthless and their supporters didn't believe in honorable losses. set the bar low and that's what you'll get. The MC needs a kick in the pants for this and the ess game. If you can't see that, you are going to have a much less stressful year watching the game with your Bono inspired raybans than a few of us. I'll keep setting the bar higher internally (both the off field and on field) and will obviously endure more anxious moments than you. Opportunities need to be seized, and if they're not we look at why. A few of us here are just giving our opinions as to "the why".


I did think Richmond supporters seriously thought they influenced their teams performance. Looks like Carlton supporters are no different. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
99prelim wrote:
The MC needs a kick in the pants for this and the ess game.


If you think those two matches have anything in common other than the fact that a team called "Carlton" were playing in them both, then you need to see someone.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
verbs wrote:
Seriously, what 99prelim wants and what cj69 wants ain't gonna impact whether we win a premiership or not and what's posted here isn't going to make us St Kilda or Richmond. Stupid stupid thinking. :screwy:


I had the exact same thought Verbs :eek: Are you Robert Walls?

But seriously, agree with you here.

This idea that if we fans congratulate the team for a gallant loss we're dooming the team to continued mediocrity is silly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
aramari wrote:
verbs wrote:
Seriously, what 99prelim wants and what cj69 wants ain't gonna impact whether we win a premiership or not and what's posted here isn't going to make us St Kilda or Richmond. Stupid stupid thinking. :screwy:


I had the exact same thought Verbs :eek: Are you Robert Walls?

But seriously, agree with you here.

This idea that if we fans congratulate the team for a gallant loss we're dooming the team to continued mediocrity is silly.


Of course it's silly. We don't make any difference one way or the other. It's not going to make us St Kilda, Richmond, Geelong or the Souths Sharks Superules. :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
verbs wrote:
99prelim wrote:
verbs wrote:
Seriously, what 99prelim wants and what cj69 wants ain't gonna impact whether we win a premiership or not and what's posted here isn't going to make us St Kilda or Richmond. Stupid stupid thinking. :screwy:


You're right verbs, it is stupid stupid thinking. I forgot to mention Richmond. (Would your average Rich supporter have thought in October 82 that they would have gone 27 years without playing on the last sat in sept). carlton (and rich once) were successful because they were ruthless and their supporters didn't believe in honorable losses. set the bar low and that's what you'll get. The MC needs a kick in the pants for this and the ess game. If you can't see that, you are going to have a much less stressful year watching the game with your Bono inspired raybans than a few of us. I'll keep setting the bar higher internally (both the off field and on field) and will obviously endure more anxious moments than you. Opportunities need to be seized, and if they're not we look at why. A few of us here are just giving our opinions as to "the why".


I did think Richmond supporters seriously thought they influenced their teams performance. Looks like Carlton supporters are no different. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.



Am I missing something. Last time I checked, this website was a forum for "supporters sharing opinions". Had I known this website was for "influencing teams performances", I would've really cranked it up.

VERBS-any large class of words in language that serve to indicate the occurrence or performance of an action
I figure that if you can't understand the difference between supporters sharing opinions and supporters influencing team performances, you might need some didactic support with the definition of your own username.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
99prelim wrote:
Agree with all the positives about the game........but if we focus on them too much, we'll become a StK or Fre....


So this "we", and "we'll become a StK or Fre" is who exactly?

The faires?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:20 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Disappointing loss, but after cooling off and looking back at what transpired we were always playing catch up, rolling the dice footy all the way through. The come back in the last 5 minutes was more about hawthorn being knackered than us lifting. When we needed to lift (at the start of the last) we didn't and therefore deserved to lose in the end.

The team is definitely more competitive than last year IMO but the lineup still needs some major fine tuning and change in personnel. Cloke should now make way for Hampson long term and lets see what this kid has to offer. I feel he and kruezer would be much more mobile and both would be a plus across HF. Seeing Cloke outmarked by Lewis on the wing in the last when the game was in the balance was very Collingwood-like and pretty much sums up Clokeys future for me.

Bentley was tried and the trial failed miserably...fair enough but no repeats thanks. Wiggins??? Yeah we all love him...great heart....blah blah blah but the guy just is not in the same league as top flight teams like Hawthorn or our top ten players for that matter. Those on this forum who continue to pump this guy up as being in our top six, I say to you... :screwy: you have no idea.

Re the defence I thought they played well with the exception of the Thornton/Roughhead matchup. I've never been a big fan of Thornton and have advocated for his trade for a couple of years now...nothing personal..just IMO I do not think he has what it takes...not in defence anyway and I mean that as regards ANY position in defence. I'd like to see Ratten play him at the other end of the ground as a trial. Maybe up foward he can get some confidence after all the beatings he keeps taking down back.

Austin should be trialed down back in the coming weeks to see how far has come. It is important to lock in this 3rd tall defender by years end as together with the first ruck position IMO are the two distinct holes in the side at the moment. Once rectified we will improve markedly. Some will say CHF is a problem also but this will be resolved automatically if the other two are taken care of, i.e. Waite (joker to be used at both ends) & Kruezer/Carlos at CHF.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:26 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
verbs wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Agree with all the positives about the game........but if we focus on them too much, we'll become a StK or Fre....


So this "we", and "we'll become a StK or Fre" is who exactly?

The faires?


Rephrase...."Agree with all the positives about the game..........but if we focus on them too much, It is my opinion, and my opinion only and an opinion that does not reflect that of other supporters or the inner sanctum of the club, we will become a StK or Freo"

Is that OK?

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Sun May 03, 2009 11:52 am, edited 2 times in total.
Excessive captialisation removed as per Guideline 4 regarding SHOUTING.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:27 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
I am surprised that some posters are surprised that other posters think the sky has fallen in. If ever there has been a place for negativity it is TC after a loss!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
99prelim wrote:
verbs wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Agree with all the positives about the game........but if we focus on them too much, we'll become a StK or Fre....


So this "we", and "we'll become a StK or Fre" is who exactly?

The faires?


Rephrase...."Agree with all the positives about the game..........but if we focus on them too much, It is my opinion, and my opinion only and an opinion that does not reflect that of other supporters or the inner sanctum of the club, we will become a StK or Freo"

Is that OK?


The "we" being you or us devoted Carlton supporters?

Either or, how will that turn Carlton into St Kilda or Fremantle? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:29 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
99prelim wrote:
The MC needs a kick in the pants for this and the ess game.


If you think those two matches have anything in common other than the fact that a team called "Carlton" were playing in them both, then you need to see someone.

It’s called Carpe Diem And now I'm off to see someone, my old Latin teacher.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:32 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
verbs wrote:
99prelim wrote:
verbs wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Agree with all the positives about the game........but if we focus on them too much, we'll become a StK or Fre....


So this "we", and "we'll become a StK or Fre" is who exactly?

The faires?


Rephrase...."Agree with all the positives about the game..........but if we focus on them too much,It is my opinion, and my opinion only and an opinion that does not rflect that of other supporters or the inner sanctum of the club, we will become a StK or Freo"

Is that OK?


The "we" being you or us devoted Carlton supporters?

Either or, how will that turn Carlton into St Kilda or Fremantle? :?


At this point, I wish to exercise my right to disengage from this discussion. An old Denis Paganism comes to mind.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Sun May 03, 2009 11:57 am, edited 2 times in total.
personal attack removed, also excessive capitalisation removed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Good move.

If you can prove how "we" will turn Carlton into St Kilda or Fremantle, you could end up very rich indeed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:42 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:10 am
Posts: 463
Location: WA
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Re the defence I thought they played well with the exception of the Thornton/Roughhead matchup. I've never been a big fan of Thornton and have advocated for his trade for a couple of years now...nothing personal..just IMO I do not think he has what it takes...not in defence anyway and I mean that as regards ANY position in defence. I'd like to see Ratten play him at the other end of the ground as a trial. Maybe up foward he can get some confidence after all the beatings he keeps taking down back.


Thornton CHF or close to goal for a few games would be interesting. Agree all above - but somehow have always felt that he might be a better player in attack.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:55 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4607
Location: lygon street
he meant nothing more than applauding "honourable" losses leaves us (the supporters) akin to St.Kilda and Freo supporters. I reckon its a fair comment.

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Sun May 03, 2009 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
personal attack removed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
Mark J wrote:
Anyone who blames Fev for today should be banned from TC forever!



still should have kicked it

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 10:03 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
The_Cranium wrote:
he meant nothing more than applauding "honourable" losses leaves us (the supporters) akin to St.Kilda and Freo supporters. I reckon its a fair comment.


Thanks for your support cranium but I'm a big boy, I'll be Ok....really

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 10:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
I can mostly see positives from today, we're getting there, it'll take time and we'll have ups and downs but we WILL get there.

With each week we can work out what our best team line up is.

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 10:21 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
verbs and prelim - please ease up.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 10:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
The_Cranium wrote:
Today is without doubt the most devestating loss loss I have ever been at in 25 years of going to the footy.

So you didn't go to the 1993 Grand Final?

We've had more devastating losses than this since 2002.

We nearly snatched victory from the jaws of defeat against the reigning Premier who were up by 25 points IIRC.

No one accepts or enjoyed the loss, yet this game was miles ahead of where we were two years ago.

Hawthorn supporters reacted like it was a draw and they got out of jail.

Plenty of upside with Hadley, Walker, Warnock, Grigg, Browne, Robinson, Austin, Hampson and Yarran on the sidelines.

I'd take this result ahead of having our pants pulled down by St Kilda at the G in front of 39,000 in 2006.

Carlton scored just four goals that day.

Fevola kicked them all. :yikes:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 203 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group