Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:37 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:45 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
Everyone is a lot smarter after facts or when some measurement is available. Look at recruiting for example :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: Rich is better than Yarran. :grin:

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
SurreyBlue wrote:
Blame the coach, blame the game plan, blame what ever you like, the simple fact is it's about the past 6 years and what they have done to us mentally that is the problem.
Next time you advocate "tanking for picks" ....... well you finish the sentence.


Surrey, I've always been of the opinion that a 'winning mentality' plays a very, very important part of it - but you cannot simply say that the game plan and experience are not the problem.

The game plan is fine, but needs tweaking - and Ratts has to have a Plan B to execute if needs be... something that wasn't done today.

Experience, look at our squad today. More kids than men. All capable of course, but with experience comes better decision making - and this also ties in with mentality as this also grows as the player gets more game time...

The mentality is an issue, but it isn't the ONLY issue.

_________________
Cheap Bike Insurance
Selling Baseball Cards


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:51 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14731
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Pretty sure it was the membership slogan that cost us today

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:54 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Everyone is a lot smarter after facts or when some measurement is available. Look at recruiting for example :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: Rich is better than Yarran. :grin:


Yeah but according to all the spin doctors on here, yarran will be a future star whilst rich is just an average onballer :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
SurreyBlue wrote:
The problem is above the shoulders. This group can't perform when they are expected too. They are mentally weak.
Don't be suprised if they win next week as no-one will be expecting anything from us. Time and time again this group has faulted when expectation rises.
The last 6 years have taken a toll on this playing group.
Blame the coach, blame the game plan, blame what ever you like, the simple fact is it's about the past 6 years and what they have done to us mentally that is the problem.
Next time you advocate "tanking for picks" ....... well you finish the sentence.


The players wont change...the coach has to change them and that means being strong and tough....getting harder, demanding more.....swapping peripheral players for more peripheral players wont do anything.
The game plan is the same game plan that keeps failing.....kick it to Fev, if Fev doesnt get it then lets hope Eddie can crumb a couple....hardly rocket science to coach against.
The picks are fine....Murphy, Gibbs, Kruezer, Robbo, Bower etc, they can all play ...tanking made sense......leaving Rhys Shaw to run loose unchecked for 3/4 didnt...not using Waite more forward didnt, not using Eddie in the middle didnt.....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:21 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
This is more directed at those on this forum as opposed to the club itself, but we have collingwooditis, what is collingwooditis I hear you ask?

It's when you overrate your list to the detriment of reality. In other words we think some of our players are good when the rest of the competition knows that they are just average. Collingwood have done this for years and continue to do so - that is why they barely cut players when they should (Tarrant the exception).

I don't need to name names but in todays team there was at least 5 players that most on here rate as being good or worthy of a spot in our team that are simply just triers or 'b' graders. If you think back to round 1 you will notice that our skills weren't there, that was my concern after that game (amongst the joy of a big win), but early on then we couldn't hit targets.

So what's the solution? We need a gameplan that is executable by the players on our list.

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:29 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Blueboy_Dan wrote:
Yeah but according to all the spin doctors on here, yarran will be a future star whilst rich is just an average onballer :roll:


:garthp:

can see the future can you?

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:28 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Blueboy_Dan wrote:
Yeah but according to all the spin doctors on here, yarran will be a future star whilst rich is just an average onballer :roll:

Patience is a virtue.

Stick to the roundball game with the toilet lid for a trophy.

Port stuffed up.

Hartlett had a better game against Hawthorn in his debut than Rich has played all year. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:54 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:43 pm
Posts: 94
Not sure a selection change would make much of a difference, from where I see it. There are good arguments for setanta, scotland, maybe even browne to be included. But I just get that strange feeling we are overcorrecting. When the team feels the pressure starting to mount, we unexpectedly swing into a negative game plan (hold position, kick it wide style of play). We understand its importance when the momentum shifts during a game, but we seem to be employing it a little too early. Once we start playing in this mode, sides seem to surge and place greater pressure. Today was deplorable, we did not seem to run and carry, create opportunities by pushing into space or even look remotely interested in hitting up running targets when they presented through the middle, we were far to intent in holding position, chipping it sideways and finally coughing it up due to either a poor disposal or worse a three to one option!!.

I don't believe players of the skill of hadley, murphy, grigg, gibbs, stevens, wiggins (only to mention a few) would instinctively look back or sidewards when they receive the ball. Today they did, and for this reason they looked very slow and completely out of position when they finally received the ball.

As for individual players, I don't think its fair to nominate who should stay or play, but for my mind, we were far too interested in corralling the player with the ball, rather than placing a firm tackle or bump (exclude wiggins Great courage). A few players come to mind, those of you who watched the game know who!!

Again: The quote I have heard twice from oppostion players post game, is a little unsettling. paraphrase "we were keen to prove that a team effort would beat individual champions"

Call it now, Ratts, forget who we have on our list or what potential they have as players, they must be ready to get in and get their hands dirty for each other!!!! We should be regarded as the team that most teams fear, not because of who we have in the side, but how we are prepared to irradicate the bad years by pushing their way back to the front. Our Arrogance is something to be proud of, and when we play with it as a team, success will come quicker than expected!!

It is this very reason, that changing one or two players, wont make that difference your looking for. We must be able to play a brand of game that employs the basic carlton trait winning!!!

Go Blues.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:27 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm
Posts: 2471
Location: Princess Park
Rome wasn't built in one day BUT we have some serious work to do.

It was obvious during the third quarter that we were not going to win, why doesn't Rat's try a different formula?

May be Waite up forward,
Kruizer up forward,
Stevens in the middle rather than playing back (I'd rather see Stevens in the middle all the time)

We played the game on their terms - good teams dictate the play.

Some of our players have got ahead of themselves and watching the Cats tonight shows that a good team is capable of playing good football over a long period of time - we are not at this point yet.

I hope Setanta comes in soon as well as Browne & Scotland, Robbo needs a full game in the 2nd's.

People callong for Carazzo should take note of his turnovers last week in the VFL.

Onec again I will go watch the Bullants with the hope someone puts their hand up especially Yarran, makes me sick watching Rich and Beams showing so much and please don't tell me we don't need any more midfielders :mad:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:34 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Blue Vain wrote:
If this thread appeared before the game, it would have some credibility.
Bagging selection after the event....meh, poor form.

At one stage we had 3.12. We dominated the first 40 minutes of the game and but for reasonable goalkicking, the game should have been over.
Footy is about taking your opportunities and we didn't. Bringing in Scotland and Carrazzo wouldn't have changed that a bit.

Some of the crap that gets posted here after a loss is disappointing. There's little logic. Just supporters venting their spleens.


So a good forty minutes is whats required to be successful. FFS so what if we kicked 3.12There is still another half of footy...we lack commitment....the players at the moment have not acquired the heart to win games where a 4 qtr effort is required against reasonable oppostion.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:39 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
If this thread appeared before the game, it would have some credibility.
Bagging selection after the event....meh, poor form.

At one stage we had 3.12. We dominated the first 40 minutes of the game and but for reasonable goalkicking, the game should have been over.
Footy is about taking your opportunities and we didn't. Bringing in Scotland and Carrazzo wouldn't have changed that a bit.

Some of the crap that gets posted here after a loss is disappointing. There's little logic. Just supporters venting their spleens.


So a good forty minutes is whats required to be successful. FFS so what if we kicked 3.12There is still another half of footy...we lack commitment....the players at the moment have not acquired the heart to win games where a 4 qtr effort is required against reasonable oppostion.


Maybe you don't understand that even the best teams like Geelong can't play 4 quarters. They kill teams with a couple of patches of brilliance then hold when it's the oppositions turn.

If Carlton kicked straight, we dictate the play for the rest of the game, Sydney are forced to attack to get back into the game resulting in a contest played on our terms. Two weeks in a row we have lost because of poor finishing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:02 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
Couldn't have put it better myself. :thumbsup:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:37 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Rafalution wrote:
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
If this thread appeared before the game, it would have some credibility.
Bagging selection after the event....meh, poor form.

At one stage we had 3.12. We dominated the first 40 minutes of the game and but for reasonable goalkicking, the game should have been over.
Footy is about taking your opportunities and we didn't. Bringing in Scotland and Carrazzo wouldn't have changed that a bit.

Some of the crap that gets posted here after a loss is disappointing. There's little logic. Just supporters venting their spleens.


So a good forty minutes is whats required to be successful. FFS so what if we kicked 3.12There is still another half of footy...we lack commitment....the players at the moment have not acquired the heart to win games where a 4 qtr effort is required against reasonable oppostion.


Maybe you don't understand that even the best teams like Geelong can't play 4 quarters. They kill teams with a couple of patches of brilliance then hold when it's the oppositions turn.

If Carlton kicked straight, we dictate the play for the rest of the game, Sydney are forced to attack to get back into the game resulting in a contest played on our terms. Two weeks in a row we have lost because of poor finishing.




Rubbish!!!

Were expected to play a 1/4 of footy and if we kick straight we win and if we dont we lose????

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:29 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4949
Melvey wrote:
Our second tier players look average.

Our depth is overrated.


I don't necessarily disagree with you Melvey however look at Geelong's team last night.

Mumford, Blake, Lonergan, Taylor, Rooke and Byrnes are all footsoldiers at best. Wojinski and Stokes are nothing special whilst there are big ???'s about Hawkins.
However saying that there doesn't appear to be many "passengers" in their side.

We should have beaten Sydney yesterday with all their injuries and Hall a late withdrawal.....especially considering Goodes and O'Keefe were quiet.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:53 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Humpers wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Our second tier players look average.

Our depth is overrated.


I don't necessarily disagree with you Melvey however look at Geelong's team last night.

Mumford, Blake, Lonergan, Taylor, Rooke and Byrnes are all footsoldiers at best. Wojinski and Stokes are nothing special whilst there are big ???'s about Hawkins.
However saying that there doesn't appear to be many "passengers" in their side.

We should have beaten Sydney yesterday with all their injuries and Hall a late withdrawal.....especially considering Goodes and O'Keefe were quiet.


Should of but we didn't two games in a row now.

You are right no matter the pecking order amongst the Cats list there are no passengers.

I think Ratts faces some tough decisions come years end but what makes it more difficult is i don't think our depth runs deep at all. We have NO key positional prospects for the future to build around. We've tried to inject some youthfulness into the team which worked for two weeks but not much else to come back in other than the hopes that Yarran will be a Peter Matera like player.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:08 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4949
Melvey wrote:
We have NO key positional prospects for the future to build around. We've tried to inject some youthfulness into the team which worked for two weeks but not much else to come back in other than the hopes that Yarran will be a Peter Matera like player.

Kreuzer should be at least a very fine player, Bower was good yesterday whilst both Austin and Hampson have shown promise......still have a fair way to go however.
I like Steven Browne and think he will be a good player.
Robinson and Garlett have shown a fair bit but just need a bit of a rest and they should eventually come back as better players.
Grigg has been down since returning to the side but he has shown enough to suggest he will be a good player as well.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:31 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Humpers wrote:
Melvey wrote:
We have NO key positional prospects for the future to build around. We've tried to inject some youthfulness into the team which worked for two weeks but not much else to come back in other than the hopes that Yarran will be a Peter Matera like player.


Kreuzer should be at least a very fine player, Bower was good yesterday whilst both Austin and Hampson have shown promise......still have a fair way to go however.
I like Steven Browne and think he will be a good player.
Robinson and Garlett have shown a fair bit but just need a bit of a rest and they should eventually come back as better players.
Grigg has been down since returning to the side but he has shown enough to suggest he will be a good player as well.


What have Austin and Hampson shown??? do you have any footage of this cause i've seemed to have missed it.

Out of all these players you have mentioned i can easily say Krooze and Grigg will be ten year players for the blues.

I to like Stephen Browne and think he and Armfield have something different to offer our side and would like to see them get a go ahead of Carrazzo.

We really really need to find a KP forward and a mid size (medhurst type) in the next draft.

As for Hampson i'd say we should get some games into him and then trade him off to GC17 for a first rounder.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:34 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14731
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Melvey wrote:
As for Hampson i'd say we should get some games into him and then trade him off to GC17 for a first rounder.


GC will trade away a first rounder for a player whos apparently shown nothing?

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:48 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
I think the biggest selection mistake made by this club was missing out on bringing Alan Richardson as a development coach to our club.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 17th Premiership, Google Adsense [Bot], Mickstar and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group