Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 3:08 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:52 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Synbad wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Effes wrote:
Egan hasn't played for a long time, Gilham is a dud who is helped enormously by the Hawks all ground pressure, Morris isn't genuine KP size, Tom Harley isn't very good man on man either...he's good when he can play loose, read the play and cut off inside 50s but one on one he can be exposed. Jamison has the ability to hold the full forward, unfortunately injury meant Bradshaw cut loose and then he missed this week so couldn't play on Lloyd. I still believe if Bower can put on some more size he has the closing speed to be able to play CHB, as he has shown against someone like Travis Cloke.

I think Austin is more suited to reading the ball coming in rather than playing on a quick leading forward or hard leading CHF.


Gilham dud?


Maybe not a dud... just would be really crap if he had to play for us.......


And imagine how good Darren Pfeiffer would be if he played for the Hawks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:27 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
Effes wrote:
Egan hasn't played for a long time, Gilham is a dud who is helped enormously by the Hawks all ground pressure, Morris isn't genuine KP size, Tom Harley isn't very good man on man either...he's good when he can play loose, read the play and cut off inside 50s but one on one he can be exposed. Jamison has the ability to hold the full forward, unfortunately injury meant Bradshaw cut loose and then he missed this week so couldn't play on Lloyd. I still believe if Bower can put on some more size he has the closing speed to be able to play CHB, as he has shown against someone like Travis Cloke.

I think Austin is more suited to reading the ball coming in rather than playing on a quick leading forward or hard leading CHF.


You went to a alot of trouble and rationalisation to try to refute what was a perfectly good point. Sometimes the more things change the more they stay the same. You have good KP players it puts the icing on a great midfield. Tough to win flags without them. Ask the Bulldogs.

Bower's been thin for years, always will be. Setanta is easily the best option at CHB, especially as it frees up so many others to play their natural role. Has most of what's needed to play there.

Gilham a dud?....You're kidding. Fit nicely here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:48 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Melvey wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Effes wrote:
Egan hasn't played for a long time, Gilham is a dud who is helped enormously by the Hawks all ground pressure, Morris isn't genuine KP size, Tom Harley isn't very good man on man either...he's good when he can play loose, read the play and cut off inside 50s but one on one he can be exposed. Jamison has the ability to hold the full forward, unfortunately injury meant Bradshaw cut loose and then he missed this week so couldn't play on Lloyd. I still believe if Bower can put on some more size he has the closing speed to be able to play CHB, as he has shown against someone like Travis Cloke.

I think Austin is more suited to reading the ball coming in rather than playing on a quick leading forward or hard leading CHF.


Gilham dud?


Maybe not a dud... just would be really crap if he had to play for us.......


And imagine how good Darren Pfeiffer would be if he played for the Hawks


Yeah twice axed Guerra and axed Gillham do... so why couldnt Pfeiffer Melvey??? :wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:01 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 505
Location: Melbourne
Melvey wrote:
I say our issue is that the current 4 down back are similar type's players. T-bird, Jammo, Bower and Waite are all same height and at best half back flankers and not genuine FB or CHB's. None of them other than Waite create any drive off half back which adds to what i see as our biggest issue the lack of any run off half back.

Now those who argue Setanta is no good, well i didn't see T-bird, Jammo, Waite and Bower hold down Bradshaw and Brown two weeks ago. Bradshaw kicked 6 and brown 4, Llyody bagged himself 5 and Lucas 2. Setanta has amazing closing speed, is able to get a fist in and does not hold back. HE IS A MONSTER who can fill a role freeing up a T-bird to become a more rebounding defender (more on that later)

We need to settle on two talls down back. For mine those two are Jammo and Setanta to fill those two key posts and surround them with 6 who can rotate through the backline and create run off half back. The likes of Armfield, Johnson, Browne, Scottland and Joseph. Unfortunately we have programed Thornton into this lethargic type player who skips around. T-bird needs to get on his bike and use his best asset (his kicking) to our advantage splitting the game open and hitting the likes of Armfield and Brown who should be busting there arses out of defense ala Chance Bateman.

The Dogs have Lake and Morris, Cats had Scarlett and Egan, Hawks have Croad and Gilham. Two talls and then are surrounded by mid to smalls with plenty of drive.

Waitey should be played on a wing kind of a Richo role who can pinch hit up forward or plug a hole down back.



That's one of the big things that disappointed me about them not picking Carlos last weekend. Waite looks so much better on the wing than the backup tall defender and part-time loose man.

_________________
Gaga and The Hoff party hard in London


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:20 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
If you are relying on Stevens and Johnston to stop the mid size/smaller forwards, then you're in trouble in my view.

Surely defenders need to be able to defend, first and foremost.

Waite is another one, his first instinct is attack.

Not saying you can't have him down back, because clearly right now we need his extra cover and he is an excellent rebounder, but my point is you can't have too many players down back who aren't natural defenders.

It's a mind set.

The ball aint going past me, I'm going to be a tight arse.

Other than Jamo, we don't have players with that mindset, in my view.

Our backline still leaks like a sieve.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:29 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
I'd setup with Jammo and Setanta as FB and CHB.

We need to make room for the Browne and Armfield. I think Browne, Armfield, Grigg and Joseph could be handy players off half back with there pace and tenacity. Jarrad Waite on a wing pinch hitting up forward or plugging a hole down back and Johnson and T-bird as quarterbacks setting up play with there good foot skills.

I think T-bird needs to take the game on like we see Scarlett do through the middle. Then we can have Scotto, Stevens and Simpson rotating through to the back as well giving us plenty of drive

Friday night we looked like Carlton 2008. The static style of game play chipping it around and no one breaking the lines or carrying the ball


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
jim wrote:
Effes wrote:
Egan hasn't played for a long time, Gilham is a dud who is helped enormously by the Hawks all ground pressure, Morris isn't genuine KP size, Tom Harley isn't very good man on man either...he's good when he can play loose, read the play and cut off inside 50s but one on one he can be exposed. Jamison has the ability to hold the full forward, unfortunately injury meant Bradshaw cut loose and then he missed this week so couldn't play on Lloyd. I still believe if Bower can put on some more size he has the closing speed to be able to play CHB, as he has shown against someone like Travis Cloke.

I think Austin is more suited to reading the ball coming in rather than playing on a quick leading forward or hard leading CHF.


You went to a alot of trouble and rationalisation to try to refute what was a perfectly good point. Sometimes the more things change the more they stay the same. You have good KP players it puts the icing on a great midfield. Tough to win flags without them. Ask the Bulldogs.

Bower's been thin for years, always will be. Setanta is easily the best option at CHB, especially as it frees up so many others to play their natural role. Has most of what's needed to play there.

Gilham a dud?....You're kidding. Fit nicely here.



yeah just what we need a lightweight defender .......

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
You attack from defence
and defend from attack


The game has changed a little bit recently if you hadn't quite noticed

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:52 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Sydney Blue wrote:
You attack from defence
and defend from attack

The game has changed a little bit recently if you hadn't quite noticed


Well said.

W have to many of the same type players in defense. We need two tall's and the rest needs to be mixed up to create the perfect blend


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:38 pm
Posts: 183
Jammo & Bower are going to be our '11 Premiership FB & CHB.
Joey Anderson could go alright also.

Most forward lines have 2 smalls, 2 bigs and an inbetween - 1 up the gound.
At the moment Setanta and Jammo should be taking the 2 bigs.
Bower on the inbetween.
Armie and Joseph on their smalls, Joseph on the more dangerous one so Armie can run off.
Grigg to take the player who pushes up ground.
Johnson & Steves to play "quaterback" roll, The players with the last kick coming out of defense (Luke Hodge).

_________________
Better late than Cerra


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:00 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Sydney Blue wrote:
You attack from defence
and defend from attack


The game has changed a little bit recently if you hadn't quite noticed


That's a pretty simplistic comment.

Do you care to elaborate?

Are you saying there's no need for good defenders down back?

Pfft.

Yes, the game has changed to the extent you need run from defense, but you also need to stop the goals when it gets down there.

Terribly simplistic comment by SB.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:15 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 505
Location: Melbourne
Virgin Blue wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
You attack from defence
and defend from attack


The game has changed a little bit recently if you hadn't quite noticed


That's a pretty simplistic comment.

Do you care to elaborate?

Are you saying there's no need for good defenders down back?

Pfft.

Yes, the game has changed to the extent you need run from defense, but you also need to stop the goals when it gets down there.

Terribly simplistic comment by SB.


Sounds like he's saying you have to have equal capacity to defend or attack from any position on the ground these days, that's all: ideally everyone is both suffocating without the ball and ferocious with it.

_________________
Gaga and The Hoff party hard in London


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:17 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
OK VB how is this

Teams with the best offensive defence and the best defensive attack win most games

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Sydney Blue wrote:
You attack from defence
and defend from attack


The game has changed a little bit recently if you hadn't quite noticed


:clap:

You're already a better coach than Terry Wallace with one sentence.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19526
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Gilham is a dud.

He was delisted by Port Adelaide after showing little there.

Jamison can actually perform even when his midfield isn't being accountable. Gilham is very lucky his midfield his accountable most of the time, otherwise he'd be exposed for the dud that he is.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:39 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
I think VB is on to something. He’s not saying we won’t win games or have a decent percentage with our current defensive line-up. He’s saying we won’t win a premiership. I tend to agree.


Totally agree. Making the eight is one thing but winning a flag just won't happen without a settled effective back six which doesn't contain any pissweak sweeper types...ala Stevens, Scotland etc...these are not defenders and never will be. Use Waite as our sweeper and develop tough nuts down there who play close and give nothing away.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:55 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
Your best users of the footy have to set up play from the back line at the moment the better user of the footy are Johnson - stevens and Scotland - they may be soft but you want them with the ball in their hands - that is why even DP shifted Houla to defence

Sorry the tough nut back flanker left the game some time ago with maybe the exception of Hodge but he is rare .

So this is why blokes like Wiggens and Russell get selected forward they are the back flankers of years gone by their job now is to shut down these soft ball users - the game has been turned around .

It is quite a simple game when you sit back and watch what is happening

there are defensive defenders
there are attacking defenders
there are defensive forwards
there are attacking forwards
the rest are midfielders who sould be doing both but even some of them have defensive roles and attacking roles


and it the bench ever gets extended to 6 which will happen sooner rather than later you will see the introducton of offensive and defensive bench players

but thats for some years in the future

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:05 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:38 pm
Posts: 183
Sydney Blue wrote:
Your best users of the footy have to set up play from the back line at the moment the better user of the footy are Johnson - stevens and Scotland - they may be soft but you want them with the ball in their hands - that is why even DP shifted Houla to defence

Sorry the tough nut back flanker left the game some time ago with maybe the exception of Hodge but he is rare .

So this is why blokes like Wiggens and Russell get selected forward they are the back flankers of years gone by their job now is to shut down these soft ball users - the game has been turned around .

It is quite a simple game when you sit back and watch what is happening

there are defensive defenders
there are attacking defenders
there are defensive forwards
there are attacking forwards
the rest are midfielders who sould be doing both but even some of them have defensive roles and attacking roles


and it the bench ever gets extended to 6 which will happen sooner rather than later you will see the introducton of offensive and defensive bench players

but thats for some years in the future


there are defensive defenders
there are attacking defenders
there are defensive forwards
there are attacking forwards

Can anybody tell me what Wiggins and Russel fall into... And they arent midfielders. Dont know what Thornton or Scotland are either.
Its not as simple as being an attacker or a defender.. you need to find a good mix. Luke Hodge defends as well as creaitng a handfull of goals from Half Back, he gets across and chops off & tackles hard.

_________________
Better late than Cerra


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
Dont look at Hodge he is rare

Wiggens and Russell are defensive forwards

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Sydney Blue wrote:
Your best users of the footy have to set up play from the back line at the moment the better user of the footy are Johnson - stevens and Scotland - they may be soft but you want them with the ball in their hands - that is why even DP shifted Houla to defence

Sorry the tough nut back flanker left the game some time ago with maybe the exception of Hodge but he is rare .

So this is why blokes like Wiggens and Russell get selected forward they are the back flankers of years gone by their job now is to shut down these soft ball users - the game has been turned around .

It is quite a simple game when you sit back and watch what is happening

there are defensive defenders
there are attacking defenders
there are defensive forwards
there are attacking forwards
the rest are midfielders who sould be doing both but even some of them have defensive roles and attacking roles


and it the bench ever gets extended to 6 which will happen sooner rather than later you will see the introducton of offensive and defensive bench players

but thats for some years in the future


Good post SB.

Its surprising the number of people who don't realise the game has changed and backmen aren't just there to stop forwards.

They say Houla isn't suited to the backline because he's not defensive enough. In truth, he's not defensive enough to play as a forward.

DP moved Houla and Lappin from the half-forward line to the half-back line.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group