Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 7:49 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 172  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:44 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8131
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:17 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
Oh .. this is so tough ...

B: Browne Jamison Bower
HB: Scotland Waite Thornton
C: Simpson Stevens Robinson
HF: Gibbs Kreuzer Houlihan
F: Walker Fevola Betts

R: Warnock Judd Murphy

I: Carazzo Yarran Grigg Hadley

Appologies: Fisher Johnson Russell Austin Cloke Hampson Armfield Anderson

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16816
Location: Melbourne
FB: Bret Thornton - Michael Jamison - Shaun Grigg
CHB: Heath Scotland - Paul Bower - Kade Simpson
C: Jordan Russell - Bryce Gibbs - Nick Stevens
CHF: Ryan Houlihan - Jarrad Waite - Andrew Walker
FF: Eddie Betts - Brendan Fevola - Matthew Kreuzer

FOL: Robert Warnock - Chris Judd - Marc Murphy

INT: Andrew Carrazzo - Richard Hadley - Chris Yarran - Shaun Hampson

EM: - Setanta - Browny


Back on Dec 2nd I had the above team.

On current form and considering injury, solid preseason and brain fades I have some minor changes.

I'm leaning more towards this for Rd1.........I don't believe it is our best 22 if all players were up and going but it's solid. There should be some good run and carry out of defense. Skill in the middle and some tough match-ups up forward. There's also abit of versatility to be had if required (i.e forwards who can go back) but little in the way of quality onballers coming off the bench. Maybe Hadley onto the bench for either Yarran, Robinson or Wiggo might fix that problem.

FB: Bret Thornton - Michael Jamison - Shaun Grigg

CHB: Chris Johnson- Paul Bower - Kade Simpson

C: Jordan Russell - Bryce Gibbs - Nick Stevens

CHF: Ryan Houlihan - Jarrad Waite - Andrew Walker

FF: Eddie Betts - Brendan Fevola - Matthew Kreuzer

FOL: Shaun Hampson - Chris Judd - Marc Murphy

INT: Chris Yarran - Cam Cloke - Mitch Robinson - Simon Wiggins

EM: - Richard Hadley - Dennis Armfield

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:50 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:45 pm
Posts: 818
Location: Still in the shadows.
Not the best 22 but possibly the best 22 for round 1.

FB: Thornton - Jamison - Armfield

CHB: Bower - Waite - Simpson

C: Russell - Gibbs - Stevens

CHF: Houlihan - Walker - Yarran (or Fisher)

FF: Betts - Fevola - Robinson

FOL: Kreuzer - Judd - Murphy

INT: Hampson (or Cloke) - Hadley - Grigg - Bannister
(interchange selected mainly for midfield rotation)

Scotland to be considered if available

_________________
Hey Rocky; there are too many rabbits ... in China.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:25 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 589
Isn't Steven out Round 1 due to suspension?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16816
Location: Melbourne
septembergurl wrote:
Isn't Stevens out Round 1 due to suspension?


Stop confusing the issue with facts :banghead:

You'll never last on TC relying on fact SG. :wink:

If that's the case then Robinson to the wing and Hadley to the bench. All fixed :thumbsup:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:05 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:32 am
Posts: 1077
Location: east coast
@cazzesman

That team will be pretty close .
Given Stevens won't be there , I would replace him , Johnson and Russell with Armfield , Bannister and Fisher .
Bannister to take Nathan Brown .
Maybe Hadley for Wiggo .

Still a few weeks to go yet though . Probably be changes after the NAB cup is over .
Scotland have to be considered if he is fit .

_________________
Get the facts first.
Then you can distort them at your leisure.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:36 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24735
Location: Bondi Beach
Grigg showed a lot in 2008, and from training reports has really stepped up.

I thought he looked fantastic on a wing last year...has pace and can sneak forward.

Whilst developing I would like to have him in defense because he is a tough nut and sticks to his defensive task very well.

He was good playing on the small forward too, and whilst I'd like to have him playing on a small forward on the last line because of his height advantage (say over a Medhurst, Stokes...) my concern is that he is one sided, and on the last line, the better opposition FP's would try and force him to his right side when they can. That spells danger to me.

I might be wrong, but does Grigg have a right side?

If not, does this raise any concerns for any posters in playing him in the last line?

Cazz obviously is very comfortable with the option of Grigg on the last line, and he's seen a hell of a lot more of him than most, let alone me.

Cazz?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:57 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24735
Location: Bondi Beach
It's great to see Russell is on the radar for some of the track watchers.

Admitedly, the training reports do influence ones perception, and I'm surprised to see his name on a wing.

I can see the positives, which include his strength, fitness, defensive pressure, pace and games under his belt, but there's a lot players vying for his spot too: Robinson, Hadley, Bannster, Armfield, Johnson, Grigg, Wiggins, Anderson.

Yeah I know you can't have them all in the 22, but my perception is that Hadley is a class above him, Robinson has already shown all we desire to include him, and Bannister is similar but a better kick. Then there's Yarran as a HF to consider. Whilst we can take our time with him, and he hasn't proven anything for a first year player, nor should he have to, I can't help but think he's another one who will overtake Russell in the pecking order sooner rather than later...yeah I know they're different players.

I may be wrong, but those training reports are not painting a great picture of Russell in comparion to many others.

I'd like to hear some more positives about Russell from those who have selected him in their 22, because I think he's a good prospect, who just needs some polish with his kicking before he's a given in the first 22. We can apply the same criticism with Carrots, but I wouldn't call Russell a ball magnet, whereas Carrots can at least find the pill, and is a great link up player.

The more vying for a spot the better...bring it on!

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:11 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8131
bondiblue wrote:
It's great to see Russell is on the radar for some of the track watchers.

... but my perception is that Bannister is similar but a better kick.


I like Bannister, and think he's got a role to play. But whatever Russell's deficiencies might be, I don't think they lie with his disposal by foot. Despite a recent training report, and his kicking for goal, I would argue he's got very good foot skills (on both sides). Certainly better than Bannister's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:32 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24735
Location: Bondi Beach
Stefchook wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
It's great to see Russell is on the radar for some of the track watchers.

... but my perception is that Bannister is similar but a better kick.


I like Bannister, and think he's got a role to play. But whatever Russell's deficiencies might be, I don't think they lie with his disposal by foot. Despite a recent training report, and his kicking for goal, I would argue he's got very good foot skills (on both sides). Certainly better than Bannister's.


Thanks stefchook.

I think Jordie is a very good pass by hand and foot, but I think the evidence from games and from recent training reports is that Russell does have a serious problem when kicking for goal. There's not much evidence I've seen, heard or read to suggest otherwise. Has this changed recently?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:54 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
JR worries me. Watched him closely at training and he gives his all but he is not 'clean' with his disposal and it always takes him that extra second to dispose of it.

He trains hard and is as fit as anyone. Last year Ratts gave him every opportunity to get his confidence up and apart from a few good cameo's here and there he didn't do much. He will not get those opportunities this season. He also spent most of the time playing as a lead up forward which says to me they have given up on him as a midfielder. He is also not a natural goalkicker which makes it even harder.

As the side improves I find it hard to find a space for him. I really like his attack on the ball and his attitude BUT he needs to do more to cement a spot in our best 22.

IMO there are a number of players they may push past him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:14 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:45 pm
Posts: 818
Location: Still in the shadows.
Stefchook wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
It's great to see Russell is on the radar for some of the track watchers.

... but my perception is that Bannister is similar but a better kick.


I like Bannister, and think he's got a role to play. But whatever Russell's deficiencies might be, I don't think they lie with his disposal by foot. Despite a recent training report, and his kicking for goal, I would argue he's got very good foot skills (on both sides). Certainly better than Bannister's.


Feint praise.

_________________
Hey Rocky; there are too many rabbits ... in China.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:17 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:45 pm
Posts: 818
Location: Still in the shadows.
bondiblue wrote:
It's great to see Russell is on the radar for some of the track watchers.

Admitedly, the training reports do influence ones perception, and I'm surprised to see his name on a wing.

I can see the positives, which include his strength, fitness, defensive pressure, pace and games under his belt, but there's a lot players vying for his spot too: Robinson, Hadley, Bannster, Armfield, Johnson, Grigg, Wiggins, Anderson.

Yeah I know you can't have them all in the 22, but my perception is that Hadley is a class above him, Robinson has already shown all we desire to include him, and Bannister is similar but a better kick. Then there's Yarran as a HF to consider. Whilst we can take our time with him, and he hasn't proven anything for a first year player, nor should he have to, I can't help but think he's another one who will overtake Russell in the pecking order sooner rather than later...yeah I know they're different players.

I may be wrong, but those training reports are not painting a great picture of Russell in comparion to many others.

I'd like to hear some more positives about Russell from those who have selected him in their 22, because I think he's a good prospect, who just needs some polish with his kicking before he's a given in the first 22. We can apply the same criticism with Carrots, but I wouldn't call Russell a ball magnet, whereas Carrots can at least find the pill, and is a great link up player.

The more vying for a spot the better...bring it on!


JR has made slow and steady progress over the years but my biggest concern has been his tendency to go missing for lengthy periods of a game. In the two intra-club games so far he has been consistently prominent, which gives me hope that he now has the experience to keep his head in the game.

_________________
Hey Rocky; there are too many rabbits ... in China.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16816
Location: Melbourne
bondiblue wrote:
Cazz obviously is very comfortable with the option of Grigg on the last line, and he's seen a hell of a lot more of him than most, let alone me.

Cazz?


He went from strength to strength with each game last year and by all accounts his work ethic, attitude and maturity have been excellent in this preseason. He continues to show more and more mongrel as he gains confidence and experience. He did some great jobs down back last year and I think it's a good place for him to do his apprenticeship until he can progress to the midfield.

I would be happy to see any of Armfield, Anderson or Browney in the BP but I'm also happy to give Grigga the 1st crack at it.

He is the tallest of the 4 and is just as quick as them. His left foot is solid and he can take a good mark.

Maybe a run up on the wing would also suit if they put 1 of the other 3 in the BP.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
grigg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the world

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24735
Location: Bondi Beach
Cazzesman wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Cazz obviously is very comfortable with the option of Grigg on the last line, and he's seen a hell of a lot more of him than most, let alone me.

Cazz?


He went from strength to strength with each game last year and by all accounts his work ethic, attitude and maturity have been excellent in this preseason. He continues to show more and more mongrel as he gains confidence and experience. He did some great jobs down back last year and I think it's a good place for him to do his apprenticeship until he can progress to the midfield.

I would be happy to see any of Armfield, Anderson or Browney in the BP but I'm also happy to give Grigga the 1st crack at it.

He is the tallest of the 4 and is just as quick as them. His left foot is solid and he can take a good mark.

Maybe a run up on the wing would also suit if they put 1 of the other 3 in the BP.

Regards Cazzesman


Thanks Cazz

I knew Grigg had pace when we recruited him, but didn't know he's as fast as Armfield; that's fantastic pace.

I love the mongrel he displays.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
bondiblue wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Cazz obviously is very comfortable with the option of Grigg on the last line, and he's seen a hell of a lot more of him than most, let alone me.

Cazz?


He went from strength to strength with each game last year and by all accounts his work ethic, attitude and maturity have been excellent in this preseason. He continues to show more and more mongrel as he gains confidence and experience. He did some great jobs down back last year and I think it's a good place for him to do his apprenticeship until he can progress to the midfield.

I would be happy to see any of Armfield, Anderson or Browney in the BP but I'm also happy to give Grigga the 1st crack at it.

He is the tallest of the 4 and is just as quick as them. His left foot is solid and he can take a good mark.

Maybe a run up on the wing would also suit if they put 1 of the other 3 in the BP.

Regards Cazzesman


Thanks Cazz

I knew Grigg had pace when we recruited him, but didn't know he's as fast as Armfield; that's fantastic pace.

I love the mongrel he displays.


I expect Grigg to be one of those players that takes us to the next level this year. His pre season has been excellent. I see him as almost a third tall in defence ala Campbell Brown. He is tough and works hard and his kicking is improving. He gives us tremendous flexibilty and can do a number of roles.

In our best 22 he could be part of a defence such as:

Browne Jamison Grigg
Anderson Bower Johnson

That is a very quick defence, a couple of left footers that attack and can match up to anyone. Add Waite or Walker dropping back we can confidently keep sides under 10-12 goals.

Against Hawthorn it could easily be:

Jamo on Roughead
Bower on Buddy
Grigg on Williams
Anderson on Rioli
Browne on Stokes

I back us in especially with our midfield!!! :thanks:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:13 pm
Posts: 1138
Location: Narre Warren VIC
Grigg is one guy who should push in the midfield....


He is one player who is ready to push beyond 20+ Disposals a game this year


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:53 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:11 pm
Posts: 1226
Dodo27 wrote:
Grigg is one guy who should push in the midfield....


He is one player who is ready to push beyond 20+ Disposals a game this year



We have enough players running through the midfield IMO. Il'd prefer him to settle in the backline, bring the ball out of defence.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 172  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kem and 107 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group