budzy wrote:
So has anyone actually called for Rattens head? I must've missed the posts wanting him sacked..
Why is it such a crime here to have an opinion away from the 'company line'?
I don't think that there has been a post asking him to be sack, but there are quite a few who believe quite strongly that he should never been appointed, which you can take a little as wanting them sacked.
I have my reservations about Ratts, but I like that he is working on the most important issues first with the view of development rather than following the whims of posters on this site.
My question to the detractors of Ratts is how do you know that the players are following his instructions? How do you know how Ratts wants to develop the players? What merits does a player need to fulfill in order to get a call up to seniors?
So far most of the bagging of Ratts is peoples opinion that he's not developing the players the way that they would do it. Pagan had a saying that 90% of football is played above the shoulders, well I would say that the players state of mind is 3000% better than when Ratts took over.
Well you might think that he's doing well developing our list but it's a mixed bag from where I sit.
) to the destination while others are made to take the detour on the dirt track full of potholes..
..and another thing..
..juddy said in the paper today the club has a policy that all recruits must be able to potentially play 100 games ..and Ratts is looking at Jeff White??