camelboy wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
...Driving a car whilst being suspended is stupid, but I'm sure we all know someone who's done it and/or probably worse...
While I may not disagree with your basic premise, the "yeah but plenty of others have done it" defence is the lamest response going around. Fair dinkum!
I think you missed my point Camel
It's not a "defence" at all. All I was intending to do with that statement was to encourage people to think about any indescretions that they (or people close to them) have made in the past which they have accepted, before taking the moral high ground on the issue.
I, for instance know a guy who lost his licence for 28 days for too many demerit points (mostly speed cameras). He is a tradesman and needs his licence at work. After 2 weeks of getting rides to and from work with an apprentice and his wife, his boss tells him that unless he can come to work and drive while he is there, then he doesn't have a job. So he drives for 2 weeks while suspended, and never gets pulled over in that time.
Now, what he did was stupid. But I understand why he did it, and I accepted it. Now, wouldn't that make me a hypocrite if I was to say AW was a flowering moron who was risking the lives of others on the road by continuing to drive? Most likely. All I'm saying is that we should have a look in our own back yards before jumping on our high horses and passing judgements on AW's actions.
I haven't missed the point at all. I understand exactly what you're saying. For example, you're saying your mate is unable to accept responsibility for his own actions.
I'm not taking the moral high ground--I can't because I have had plenty of speeding fines in my time--but whenever I have got one I've never sooked about it, because, ultimately I was in control of whether I was speeding or not. If I choose to keep nudging past the limit and I get caught, well, sorry, but I have to wear the consequences, no matter how big or small.
Driving without a licence would have to be one of the most uneducated risks anyone can take on the road. If it goes pear shaped the consequences are much, much worse than getting your photo taken for a minor speed limit infringement.
Firstly Camel, let me get this straight: I wasn't targeting my previous post at you in particular, I was putting it out there for everyone to read before they commented on AW's case. In your case, that's fine, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it.
In my opinion, I think these cases can be blown out of all proportion. All I was trying to say was that people should consider things that they (or those close to them) have done in the past - which they consider harmless or insignificant, despite the fact they are illegal and/or risky - before flying off the handle at AW.
Quote:
Driving without a licence would have to be one of the most uneducated risks anyone can take on the road. If it goes pear shaped the consequences are much, much worse than getting your photo taken for a minor speed limit infringement
I don't necessarily agree with that statement. The risk is to the individual more than anyone when driving unlicenced. eg voiding insurance, lawsuits, jail terms, fines. etc. Taking risks by drink driving, dangerous driving, excessive speeding etc. are far more serious in that you can threaten the lives and safety of other road users as well as your own.
It is impossible to prove that just because someone has had their licence suspended that they are more of a risk on the road than anyone else, however actions like those I have mentioned above can and have been proven before.
He has made the mistake, and he has been punished for it. Done and dusted. It's really not worth hauling him over hot coals for it.......
I have already forgiven him.
