Think about it

The season is over, so a challenge will mean he will either get off (0 points) or he will be found guilty, attracting 125 point (1 game suspension + 25 points carry over)

Would it be better to take the 1 game suspension now and have 25 points carry over for next year or take the early guilty plea and have 93.75 points hanging over his head for the majority of next year ???

I say appeal !!!!!!!!!!

Or does the suspension mean he gets more loading on upcoming suspensions ???

If so disregard the thread .............. lol

If he has attracted 125 points for the incident, he would get that downgraded by 25% for having a good record. Has he ever been suspended? He'd also get a deduction for an early plea, so he'd end up with under 100 points and not miss a week.

He may be given a 225 point rating though. Was it reckless or negligent?

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/ ... 42,00.html



Sounds like its only a rough conduct charge, which carry 125 iirc ..........

I think he should have at least punched the ball or attempted to.

Take it and be thankful.

_________________
Supporting the Blues No Matter What

Always been a supporter but very lucky to get only a reprimand -fortunate kangaroo wasnt seriously injured given he was completely unprotected

Just watched the replay of that last 5 mins of Q2 ... Wiggins jumped in the air to crunch him rather than making a legit attempt to spoil ... lucky not to get a week.

You guys are missing my point .............. I dont care if he was guilty or not ............ My question is should he appeal knowing he will probably take a week ban in a season that is over, and carry over 25 points into next year when we could be playing finals or should he take the reprimand, play next week and carry 93 points into next year meaning he will get a suspension for looking at the umpire the wrong way ...........

Does this mean he is out of the running for the Brownlow?

_________________
dane's trolling again

I know, and I had $500 on him at 1,000:1 ............... lmfao ..................

Shit! I got him at 2000:1

_________________
dane's trolling again

Yeah, I saw those odds @ SportsBet, but didn't have the min bet of 2k at the time ................... I WAS SPEWING !!!!!!!!!!!

Did he take the early plea ???

I'm not Guilty

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)

A bit of payback from the AFL due to the after the siren debacle against Geelong in 2002

Is that where WIGGINS touched Ricardi's kick that was supposedly a goal and that won them the game and we haven't recovered since that incident?

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.

Yes and it was touched just like SOS in the 1993 Grand Final

Actually this would be a ripper idea for a Blueseum special article - games won or lost with a bit of controversy...

Round 11, 2002 - The WIGGINS FINGER GAME:

http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php? ... s%20finger

Round 5, 1996 - The DIESEL GOAL FROM TONY EVANS GAME:

http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php? ... +5%2C+1996

Any others?

From the Blueseum

_________________
Check out www.blueseum.org for all of your Carlton information needs.

Ahhhh Mr History - wasn't their a granny win that was won by the ball being out of bounds versus being in and then the tap on to another player and then goal for a 5pt win?????

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.

I reckon that'll qualify, but 3 games doth not an article make!

The Ryan Houlihan out on the full game


against North in 2004...

_________________
#DonTheStash